K. Alzyoud, P. Hogg, B. Snaith, K. Flintham, A. England  Radiography 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date of download: 7/1/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Water thickness equivalence of the lateral (LAT) (black) and anterior-posterior.
Advertisements

Date of download: 7/9/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Experimental configuration of the PAT setup coregistered with the DOT system. The.
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (May 2013)
Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(8): doi: /M Figure Legend:
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
Effects of One-Legged Exercise Training of Patients With COPD
Simple method to measure gamma camera energy resolution
Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication
From: Additive Manufacturing of Glass
Reducing radiation dose and enhancing imaging quality of 4DCT for radiation therapy using iterative reconstruction algorithms  George Noid, PhD, An Tai,
Date of download: 11/5/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Attitudes of oncology healthcare practitioners towards smoking cessation: A systematic review of the facilitators, barriers and recommendations for delivery.
Valve Drainage of the Pleural Cavity
Journal of Vision. 2014;14(14):2. doi: / Figure Legend:
Hayley Milne & Andrew England
J.G. Couto, S. McFadden, P. Bezzina, P. McClure, C. Hughes  Radiography 
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (November 2017)
Weight-adapted iodinated contrast media administration in abdomino-pelvic CT: Can image quality be maintained?  E. Perrin, M. Jackson, R. Grant, C. Lloyd,
The “humble” bubble: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound
Thomas Warlow, Peter Walker-Birch, Philip Cosson  Radiography 
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (August 2018)
Volume 153, Issue 2, Pages e33-e36 (February 2018)
Incidental finding of congenital pericardial and mediastinal pleural defect by pneumothorax in an adult  Y. Sugiura, Y. Matsusaka, E. Nemoto, T. Hashizume,
Collaboration between radiological technologists (radiographers) and junior doctors during image interpretation improves the accuracy of diagnostic decisions 
A comparison of radiographers and radiologists in CT based measurements of abdominal aortic aneurysms  Andrew England, Abigail Best, Charlotte Friend 
Dose-Length Product to Effective Dose Conversion Factors for Common Computed Tomography Examinations Based on Canadian Clinical Experience  Idris A. Elbakri,
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (May 2014)
Moving back: The radiation dose received from lumbar spine quantitative fluoroscopy compared to lumbar spine radiographs with suggestions for dose reduction 
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages e1-e10 (February 2019)
Radiography of the acutely injured shoulder
Simultaneous measurement of patient dose and distribution of indoor scattered radiation during digital breast tomosynthesis  T. Nakamura, S. Suzuki, Y.
Wire Basket Removal of a Large Endobronchial Foreign Body
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Managing discomfort and developing participation in non-emergency MRI: Children's coping strategies during their first procedure  S. Kada, M. Satinovic,
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages e18-e25 (February 2019)
Woman With Hip Pain Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (February 2019)
Children, but Not Chimpanzees, Prefer to Collaborate
Target Detection Is Enhanced by Polarization Vision in a Fiddler Crab
Blurring the lines for better visualisation
Radiofrequency (RF) coil impacts the value and reproducibility of cartilage spin–spin (T2) relaxation time measurements  B.J. Dardzinski, E. Schneider 
The effect of vertical centering and scout direction on automatic tube voltage selection in chest CT: a preliminary phantom study on two different CT.
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 24, Pages S3-S6 (October 2018)
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (February 2019)
Support Your Specialty
A qualitative study to determine Kuwaiti Women's knowledge of breast cancer and barriers deterring attendance at mammography screening  A. Marzouq Muhanna,
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (February 2010)
Sarah Clark, Pauline J. Reeves  Radiography 
The use of 80 kV versus 100 kV in pulmonary CT angiography: An evaluation of the impact on radiation dose and image quality on two CT scanners  A. Rusandu,
Research Techniques Made Simple: Itch Measurement in Clinical Trials
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (February 1950)
Erratum to “Reconstructed three-dimensional MR images: application to simulated tibial plateau depression fractures” [Radiography 10 (2) (2004) 95–101] 
C.W.E. Younger, M.J. Wagner, C. Douglas, H. Warren-Forward  Radiography 
A Man in His 70s Presenting With Chest Pain and Hematuria
Sensing Very Weak Strains at the Single-Molecule Scale
Roshan S Livingstone and Benedicta R Department of Radiology
Evaluating the fundamental qualities of a nuclear medicine radiographer for the provision of an optimal clinical service  Marc Griffiths, Simon King,
Electronic Clinical Challenges and Images in GI
Public Versus Personal Information for Mate Copying in an Invertebrate
Craig Fryman, MD, Sahar Ahmad, MD  CHEST 
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (May 2019)
Cervical Injury Causing Widening of the Mediastinum
Radiography - 25 years in the making
Development of an Easy-to-Use Visual Aid for the Prediction of Body Fat Based on Waist Circumference and Height in Asian Chinese Adults  Christiani Jeyakumar.
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 2-3 (February 2006)
Analytical Method for the Fast Time-Domain Reconstruction of Fluorescent Inclusions In Vitro and In Vivo  Sung-Ho Han, Salman Farshchi-Heydari, David.
J.M. Harvey-Lloyd, J. Morris, G. Stew  Radiography 
Presentation transcript:

Impact of body part thickness on AP pelvis radiographic image quality and effective dose  K. Alzyoud, P. Hogg, B. Snaith, K. Flintham, A. England  Radiography  Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages e11-e17 (February 2019) DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2018.09.001 Copyright © 2018 The College of Radiographers Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Experimental setup of the pelvis phantom and additional fat container (scaled 1 cm increments in a plastic box). Radiography 2019 25, e11-e17DOI: (10.1016/j.radi.2018.09.001) Copyright © 2018 The College of Radiographers Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Illustrates the four different ROIs (circles) used for the SNR and CNR calculations together with the two background ROIs used to indicate image noise. Radiography 2019 25, e11-e17DOI: (10.1016/j.radi.2018.09.001) Copyright © 2018 The College of Radiographers Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Percentage change of E relative to the reference image (80 kVp) for all body part thicknesses. Values in the figure legend correspond to the respective tube potentials. Radiography 2019 25, e11-e17DOI: (10.1016/j.radi.2018.09.001) Copyright © 2018 The College of Radiographers Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Percentage change of SNR relative to the reference image (80 kVp) for all body part thicknesses. Values in the figure legend correspond to the respective tube potentials. Radiography 2019 25, e11-e17DOI: (10.1016/j.radi.2018.09.001) Copyright © 2018 The College of Radiographers Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Percentage change of CNR relative to the reference image (80 kVp) for all body part thicknesses. Values in the figure legend correspond to the respective tube potentials. Radiography 2019 25, e11-e17DOI: (10.1016/j.radi.2018.09.001) Copyright © 2018 The College of Radiographers Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Percentage change of visual IQ relative to the reference image (80 kVp) for all thicknesses. Values in the figure legend correspond to the respective tube potentials. Radiography 2019 25, e11-e17DOI: (10.1016/j.radi.2018.09.001) Copyright © 2018 The College of Radiographers Terms and Conditions