Deubiquitination and Activation of AMPK by USP10

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (April 2015)
Advertisements

Takashi Tanaka, Michelle A. Soriano, Michael J. Grusby  Immunity 
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 134, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Parameswaran Ramakrishnan, David Baltimore  Molecular Cell 
Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
DBC1 Functions as a Tumor Suppressor by Regulating p53 Stability
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (April 2005)
p53 Stabilization and Transactivation by a von Hippel-Lindau Protein
The Histone Variant MacroH2A1 Is a BRCA1 Ubiquitin Ligase Substrate
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Yongli Bai, Chun Yang, Kathrin Hu, Chris Elly, Yun-Cai Liu 
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages e6 (October 2017)
TopBP1 Controls BLM Protein Level to Maintain Genome Stability
Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages (October 2014)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages (February 2008)
Parkin Regulates Mitosis and Genomic Stability through Cdc20/Cdh1
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (January 2017)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 136, Issue 6, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
Ligand-Independent Recruitment of SRC-1 to Estrogen Receptor β through Phosphorylation of Activation Function AF-1  André Tremblay, Gilles B Tremblay,
Volume 69, Issue 3, Pages e5 (February 2018)
Volume 45, Issue 6, Pages (March 2012)
Shijiao Huang, Danming Tang, Yanzhuang Wang  Developmental Cell 
Per Stehmeier, Stefan Muller  Molecular Cell 
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages (December 2014)
Lysine 63 Polyubiquitination of the Nerve Growth Factor Receptor TrkA Directs Internalization and Signaling  Thangiah Geetha, Jianxiong Jiang, Marie W.
The Actin-Bundling Protein Palladin Is an Akt1-Specific Substrate that Regulates Breast Cancer Cell Migration  Y. Rebecca Chin, Alex Toker  Molecular.
A Critical Role for Noncoding 5S rRNA in Regulating Mdmx Stability
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages (April 2013)
GRM7 Regulates Embryonic Neurogenesis via CREB and YAP
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (December 2007)
Regulation of the Hippo-YAP Pathway by Glucose Sensor O-GlcNAcylation
Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages (October 2013)
Mst1 Is an Interacting Protein that Mediates PHLPPs' Induced Apoptosis
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Fan Yang, Huafeng Zhang, Yide Mei, Mian Wu  Molecular Cell 
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
USP15 Negatively Regulates Nrf2 through Deubiquitination of Keap1
Regulation of Yeast mRNA 3′ End Processing by Phosphorylation
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Phosphorylation of CBP by IKKα Promotes Cell Growth by Switching the Binding Preference of CBP from p53 to NF-κB  Wei-Chien Huang, Tsai-Kai Ju, Mien-Chie.
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
A Direct HDAC4-MAP Kinase Crosstalk Activates Muscle Atrophy Program
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
c-IAP1 Cooperates with Myc by Acting as a Ubiquitin Ligase for Mad1
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (October 2014)
Presentation transcript:

Deubiquitination and Activation of AMPK by USP10 Min Deng, Xu Yang, Bo Qin, Tongzheng Liu, Haoxing Zhang, Wei Guo, Seung Baek Lee, Jung Jin Kim, Jian Yuan, Huadong Pei, Liewei Wang, Zhenkun Lou  Molecular Cell  Volume 61, Issue 4, Pages 614-624 (February 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.01.010 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2016 61, 614-624DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.01.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 USP10 Regulates AMPK Activation and Cellular Metabolism (A) Knockdown of USP10 inhibits AMPK activation. HCT116 cells were infected with lentivirus encoding the indicated shRNAs. Cell lysates were immunoblotted as indicated. (B and C) Knockdown of USP10 increases lipid droplet formation. Control or USP10 knockdown HCT116 cells were incubated in medium supplemented with 200 μM sodium oleate overnight (20 hr) and fixed with formalin. The intracellular lipid droplet abundance was assessed by oil red O staining. The results represent the means (±SEM) of three independent experiments. ∗∗p < 0.01. (D) Knockdown USP10 of increases lactate production. The lactate production was measured after incubation of control and USP10 knockdown HCT116 cells in medium for 48 hr. The results represent the means (±SEM) of three independent experiments. ∗∗p < 0.01. (E) Knockdown of USP10 increases glycolytic gene expression. Relative expression of aldoa, ldha, and pdk1 mRNA in control or USP10 knockdown HCT116 cells was determined by qPCR. Transcript levels were determined relative to actin mRNA levels and normalized relative to control cells. The results represent the means (±SEM) of three independent experiments. ∗∗p < 0.01. (F) USP10 deubiquitinase activity is required for AMPK activation. Cells were transfected with indicated constructs. Cells were placed in medium without glucose for 4 hr. Cell lysates were immunoblotted with indicated antibodies. (G) USP10 deubiquitinase activity regulates lipid droplet formation. Cells as in (F) were incubated in medium supplemented with 200 μM sodium oleate overnight (20 hr) and placed in medium without glucose for 4 hr. The intracellular lipid droplet abundance was assessed by oil red O staining. The results represent the means (±SEM) of three independent experiments.∗∗p < 0.01. (H) USP10 deubiquitinase activity regulates glycolytic gene expression. Cells as in (F) were placed in medium without glucose for 4 hr. Relative expression of aldoa, ldha, and pdk1 mRNA in indicated cells were determined by qPCR. Transcript levels were determined relative to actin mRNA levels, and normalized relative to control cells. The results represent the means (±SEM) of three independent experiments. ∗∗p < 0.01. (I) Spautin-1 treatment inhibits AMPK activation. HCT116 cells were treated with indicated concentration of Spautin-1 and cell lysates were immunoblotted as indicated. See also Figure S1 and Table S1. Molecular Cell 2016 61, 614-624DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.01.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 USP10 Interacts with AMPKα and Deubiquitinates AMPKα (A) USP10 directly interacts with AMPKα in vitro. Purified His6-USP10 was incubated with indicated GST tagged AMPK subunits coupled to GSH-Sepharose. Proteins retained on Sepharose were then blotted with the indicated antibodies. (B–D) USP10 interacts with AMPKα in cells. HCT116 cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) with control IgG, anti-USP10 (B), anti-AMPKα1(C), anti-AMPKα2 (D) antibodies. The immunoprecipitates were then blotted with the indicated antibodies. (E) USP10 interacts with AMPKα through the N-terminal 1–100 aa. 293T cells transfected with the indicated constructs were lysed and lysates were incubated with anti-FLAG beads. Proteins retained on beads were blotted with the indicated antibodies. (F) Knockdown of USP10 increases AMPKα ubiquitination. HCT116 cells infected with lentivirus encoding the indicated shRNAs were transfected with the indicated constructs. Cell lysates and Ni-NTA pulldowns were immunoblotted as indicated. -Glu, glucose starvation. (G) USP10 deubiquitinase activity is required for AMPK deubiquitination. Indicated constructs were transfected into USP10 knockdown cell lines. Cells were placed in medium without glucose for 4 hr. Cell lysates were incubated with anti-HA beads and immunoblotted with indicated antibodies. −Glu, glucose starvation. (H) Deubiquitination of AMPKα2 in vitro by USP10. Ubiquitinated AMPKα2 was incubated with purified USP10 or USP10CA in vitro, and then blotted with indicated antibodies. See also Figure S2. Molecular Cell 2016 61, 614-624DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.01.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Ubiquitination of AMPKα Inhibits Its Activation (A) Ubiquitin chain type on AMPKα2. AMPKα2 expression vectors and indicated HA tag ubiquitin were transfected into USP10 knockdown cells. Cell lysates were boiled and immunoprecipitated with anti-HA beads and immunoblotted as indicated. (B) Knockdown of USP10 increases AMPKα2 K63 ubiquitination. HCT116 cells infected with lentivirus encoding the indicated shRNAs were transfected with the indicated constructs. Cell lysates were boiled and immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG beads and immunoblotted as indicated. (C) Candidate ubiquitin sites on AMPKα. (D) Identify the ubiquitination sites on AMPKα2. AMPKα2 expression vectors and HA-Ub K63 plasmid were transfected into USP10 knockdown cells. Cell lysates were boiled and immunoprecipitated with FLAG beads and immunoblotted as indicated. (E) Regulation of AMPKα2 ubiquitination by USP10. AMPKα2 expression vectors were transfected into control and USP10 knockdown cells. Cell lysates were boiled and immunoprecipitated with FLAG beads and immunoblotted as indicated. (F and G) Ubiquitination of AMPKα affects LKB1 binding and T172 phosphorylation. AMPKα2 expression vectors were transfected into HCT116 cells. Lysates were immunoprecipitated with FLAG beads and immunoblotted as indicated. (H) USP10 regulates AMPK activation through deubiquitination of AMPKα. AMPKα2 expression vectors were transfected into control or USP10 knockdown cells. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with FLAG beads and immunoblotted as indicated. (I) Ubiquitination of AMPKα inhibits AMPK activation. Wild-type (WT) or AMPK α1/α2 double knockout (DKO) MEFs were infected with retrovirus expression AMPKα or the 4KR mutant, and placed in media containing vehicle or 2 mM AICAR for 1 hr. Cell lysates were immunoblotted as indicated. (J) Ubiquitination of AMPKα affects lipid droplet formation. AMPK α1/α2 double knockout (DKO) MEFs were infected with retrovirus expression AMPKα or the 4KR mutant. Cells were incubated in medium supplemented with 200 μM sodium oleate overnight (20 hr) and placed in medium without glucose for 4 hr. The intracellular lipid droplet abundance was assessed by oil red O staining. The results represent the means (±SEM) of three independent experiments. ∗∗p < 0.01. (K) Ubiquitination of AMPKα inhibits affects glycolytic gene expression. AMPK α1/α2 double knockout (DKO) MEFs were infected with retrovirus expression AMPKα or the KR mutant. Cells were placed in medium without glucose for 4 hr. Relative expression of aldoa, ldha, and pdk1 mRNA in indicated cells were determined by qPCR. Transcript levels were determined relative to actin mRNA levels, and normalized relative to control cells. The results represent the means (±SEM) of three independent experiments.∗∗p < 0.01. See also Figure S3. Molecular Cell 2016 61, 614-624DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.01.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 AMPK Phosphorylates USP10 at Ser76 (A) Clustal alignment of a conserved sites in USP10 matching the optimal AMPK substrate motif. (B) USP10 is phosphorylated under energy stress. USP10 expression vectors were transfected into HCT116 cells. Cells were placed in medium with or without glucose for 4 hr. FLAG-USP10 was immunoprecipitated and treated with or without λ PPase, then blotted with indicated antibodies. -Glu, glucose starvation. (C) AMPK phosphorylates USP10 in vitro. Bacterial expressed GST and USP10 were incubated with purified AMPK in the presence of [γ-32P]ATP with or without AMP. Proteins were resolved by SDS–PAGE; phosphorylated proteins were visualized with autoradiography. (D) Phosphorylation of the USP10 S76 peptide and SAMS peptide by AMPK in vitro. Initial rates of 32P-incorporation by AMPK into the USP10 peptide and SAMS peptide were 155 ± 36 and 95 ± 18 pmol/min/reaction mix, respectively. The results represent the means (±SEM) of three independent experiments. (E) Maximal stoichiometry of phosphorylation of the USP10 S76 peptide and SAMS peptide by AMPK. Stoichiometries of 32P-incorporation after 30 min of incubation were calculated from the data shown in Figure 4D. The results represent the means (±SEM) of three independent experiments. (F) AMPK phosphorylates USP10 at Ser76 in vitro. Bacterial expressed WT USP10 and the S76A mutant were incubated with purified AMPK in the presence of [γ-32P]ATP and AMP. Proteins were resolved by SDS–PAGE; Phosphorylated proteins were visualized with autoradiography. (G) AMPK phosphorylates USP10 at Ser76 in cells. USP10 expression vectors were transfected into HCT116 cells. Cells were placed in medium with or without glucose for 4 hr. FLAG-USP10 was immunoprecipitated and immunoblotted with indicated antibodies. See also Figure S4. Molecular Cell 2016 61, 614-624DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.01.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Phosphorylation of USP10 Promotes Its Activation (A) Phosphorylation of USP10 by AMPK regulates USP10 deubiquitinase activity in vitro. Purified WT USP10 or the S76A mutant was incubated with or without active AMPK. The activities of USP10 were assayed using Ub-AMC as a substrate. (B) Phosphorylation of USP10 regulates USP10 deubiquitinase activity in cells. Cells expressing WT or S76A USP10 were cultured in medium with or without glucose for 4 hr. Cells were lysed in lysis buffer and total proteins were labeled with Ub-VS probe and then subjected to immunoblotting with indicated antibodies. (C) Phosphorylation of USP10 regulates AMPKα ubiquitination. Indicated constructs were transfected into USP10 knockdown cell lines. Cells were placed in medium without glucose for 4 hr. Cell lysates were IPed with anti-HA beads and immunoblotted with indicated antibodies. -Glu, glucose starvation. (D) Phosphorylation of USP10 regulates AMPKα activation. WT USP10 or the S76A mutant constructs were transfected into indicated cells. Cells were placed in medium without glucose for 4 hr. Cell lysates were immunoblotted with indicated antibodies. (E) Phosphorylation of USP10 regulates lipid droplet formation. WT USP10 or the S76A mutant constructs were transfected into indicated cells. Cells were incubated in medium supplemented with 200 μM sodium oleate overnight (20 hr) and placed in medium without glucose for 4 hr. The intracellular lipid droplet abundance was assessed by oil red O staining. The results represent the means (±SEM) of three independent experiments. ∗∗p < 0.01. (F) Phosphorylation of USP10 regulates glycolytic gene expression. WT USP10 or the S76A mutant constructs were transfected into indicated cells. Cells were placed in medium without glucose for 4 hr. Relative expression of aldoa, ldha, and pdk1 mRNA in indicated cells were determined by qPCR. Transcript levels were determined relative to actin mRNA levels and normalized relative to control cells. The results represent the means (±SEM) of three independent experiments. ∗∗p < 0.01. Molecular Cell 2016 61, 614-624DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.01.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Knockout of Hepatic Usp10 Leads to Multiple Metabolic Defects (A) AMPK and ACC1 phosphorylation levels in liver from the indicated mice were examined by western blot. (B) The H&E staining of the liver tissue from the indicated mice. (C and D) Liver lipids were extracted, and hepatic triglyceride and cholesterol levels were assayed using a commercial kit. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM n = 6. ∗∗p < 0.01. (E) Blood glucose levels were measured in tail vein blood samples using a glucometer. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). ∗∗p < 0.01. (F) Blood glucose levels were measured in tail vein blood samples using a glucometer. Values are expressed as ± SEM. n = 6. ∗∗p<0.01. (G) Model for the AMPK-USP10 positive feedback loop. See also Figure S5. Molecular Cell 2016 61, 614-624DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.01.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions