Strathclyde gun bead-pull results

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Simple Machines and Mechanical Advantage
Advertisements

The Front End Test Stand Collaboration ELECTROMAGNETIC DESIGN OF A RFQ FOR THE FRONT END TEST STAND AT RAL A. Kurup, A. Letchford The RAL front end test.
Breakdown Rate Dependence on Gradient and Pulse Heating in Single Cell Cavities and TD18 Faya Wang, Chris Nantista and Chris Adolphsen May 1, 2010.
Optimum Round Pool Instructions. Prepare the pool site Remove all the grass on a surface 2’ wider than the size of the pool Level the ground.
30 th September 2004 High Power RF Couplers James Rogers High Power RF Couplers ELSRF Daresbury Laboratory.
EMMA Cavity Update Emma Wooldridge 27/02/07. Requirements Initial Design Cavity Options & Optimisation Available Designs Future Work.
MICE RF Cavity Design and Fabrication Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 27, 2004.
SCU Magnet Modelling: Tolerances and Beam Trajectories Ben Shepherd Superconducting Undulator Workshop RAL, April 2014.
MICE RF Cavity Measurements Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory March 26, 2010 University of California, Riverside,
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
Cell-Coupled Drift Tube Linac M. Pasini, CERN AB-RF LINAC4 Machine Advisory Committee 1 st meeting CERN January 29-30, 2008.
Manufacturing Assembly Plan P Mechanical Spine Test Platform.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Reconfigurable Inspection Machine (RIM). NFS Engineering Research Center for Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems College of engineering, University of.
DELTA Quadrant Tuning Y. Levashov, E. Reese. 2 Tolerances for prototype quadrant tuning Magnet center deviations from a nominal center line < ± 50  m.
S Temple CLRC1 End-cap Mechanics FDR Cooling Structures Steve Temple, RAL 1 November 2001.
Objective To study the effect of sub surface defects in surface roughness monitoring through ultrasonic flaw detector. To study the sizing of defects.
Chapter 5: Work and Machines.  Describe the six types of simple machines.  Explain how the different types of simple machines make work easier.  Calculate.
GWADW 2010 in Kyoto, May 19, Development for Observation and Reduction of Radiation Pressure Noise T. Mori, S. Ballmer, K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata,
Status of RFCC-Module Development Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting at INFN-LNF, Frascati,
LASER AND ADVANCES IN METROLOGY
Progress on Window thickness measurement We have so far received two sets of data; one from LBNL and one from Mississippi; 1. The LBNL results LBNL used.
Stat 1301 Chapter 6 MEASUREMENT ERROR. National Bureau of Standards l NB 10 –supposed to be 10 grams –weighed weekly under the “same conditions”  same.
Analysis of Metrology Data from First Two Small Disks Stephen Pate 5/11/111.
Mechanical Designs of The Central Detector Jinyu Fu
PASI OsC meeting 12th July 2012
14FEB2005/KWCAE2-UsersGroup Astro-E2 X-Ray Telescopes XRT Setup & Structure Performance Characteristics –Effective Area –Angular Resolution –Optical Axes.
10/2007 M.Taborelli, TS-MME M.Taborelli Structure fabrication: dimensional tolerances Contributions of : G.Arnau-Izquierdo, A.Cherif, D.Glaude, R.Leuxe,
Main features of PETS tank J. Calero, D. Carrillo, J.L. Gutiérrez, E. Rodríguez, F. Toral CERN, 17/10/2007 (I will review the present status of the PETS.
EBC dial indicators The next slides are the graphic representation of the dial indicator measurements The values shown are the values as read from the.
1. You have drilled two ice holes in a frozen lake on a frosty winter day. One ice hole is close to the shore, while the other ice hole is far from the.
Valencia Report 5 Pre-qualification (2 mechanical + 3 electrical) All inside mechanical specification in XY after assembled. However, Pre3-Pre5 bad planarity.
MBA Magnets MultiBend Achromat Magnets 8/14/2015 Review By Mark Jaski.
What is an STL file To get your model printed you will need to send us an stl file. This is a file format created to take the complexity out of a CAD model.
MICE RFCC Module Update Steve Virostek Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CM27 at RAL, UK July 8, 2010.
Detuning of T18 after high power test Jiaru Shi
CHAPTER 11 Mean and Standard Deviation. BOX AND WHISKER PLOTS  Worksheet on Interpreting and making a box and whisker plot in the calculator.
MAP Assembly Investigation A project summary for discussion during 4/11/2014 meeting.
Let’s Design a Box John Cobb
RFQ coupler S. Kazakov 07/28/2015. Requirements: Coupler requirements Expected problems: Heating (loop, ceramic window, etc.) Multipactor Solutions: Appropriate.
Grid Pix Field Simulations and precision needed for a module Peter Kluit, Jan Timmermans Prepared 16 May 2016.
TE-MSC. 07/04/2016 Jose Ferradas TE-MSC-MDT Alejandro Carlon TE-MSC-MDT Juan Carlos Perez TE-MSC-MDT On behalf to MSC-MDT section and Coil working group.
24 September 2012 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) SVD Status of Mechanics PXD-SVD Meeting Göttingen.
SPS High Energy LSS5 Thermal contact & cooling aspects
1.Dimension measurement for calibration duties.
HCAL preliminary analysis and results
Overview of the RFCC Module and 201-MHz Cavity Design
Grid Pix Field Simulations and precision needed for a module
by P. Musumeci and F.Tazzioli
R. Kersevan, TE-VSC-VSM 30/06/2016
Physics design on Injector-1 RFQ
Checks of TOF Fiducial Cuts
Analysis Test Beam Pixel TPC
The COMET Experiment Ajit Kurup, Imperial College London, on behalf of the COMET Collaboration. ABSTRACT The COherent Muon to Electron Transition (COMET)
USFD.
Pressure vs height (solid CPA plane)
ATF2 Recent Wakefield (Beam size Intensity dependence) Studies
Optimisation of the FETS RFQ
TPC Paul Colas Technical meeting, Lyon.
Name: Ansari Kaushar Ali
These drawings for designs show how it will be constructed both graphically and through annotation. How they will adjust, rotate or fix to surfaces. During.
Feed horn array sub-system for QUBIC
200 kV gun CST microwave studio simulations Shield modifications
Test RF gun cavity Takuya Natsui.
200 kV gun CST microwave studio simulations Shield modifications
Roof design Bunker Project CDR
Computed Tomography (C.T)
Minimized emittance for high charge with multi cell superconducting guns and solenoidal focusing D. Lipka, BESSY.
A series of vessels of uniform cross section look like letters when viewed face-on. They are 1cm thick, and the corners of the vessels have either whole.
Tutorial 1 Learning Topology Optimization Through Examples and Case Studies August 18, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Strathclyde gun bead-pull results

Cathode construction

Cathode frequencies Cathode 0 is the old cathode that was used for the most recent VELA run Cathode 1 is the first of the new cathodes All frequencies are converted to operating conditions

Cathode frequencies (2) I measured all of the new cathodes’ frequencies. The frequency of the gun with each cathode varies. All measurements were taken under the same conditions and with the same torque. This is consistent with reports of frequency varying when the cathode was changed before.

Bead-pull results with cathode 1 The field flatness is 0.59 with a standard deviation of 0.027 Simulation shows the hole in the cathode gives a negligible change in frequency and field flatness This would give an beam momentum of ~5 MeV/c at 7.5 MW compared to a flat cavity giving ~5.7 MeV/c. If this were the flatness of the cavity it would explain the missing momentum However…

Flatness error caused by frequency variation I modelled the frequency change from cathode 0 to cathode 1 as due to the full cathode face penetrating less into the cavity. The frequency change of 220 kHz can be caused by 77 μm movement of the cathode face – very sensitive! This corresponded to a field flatness of 0.62

Flatness error caused by frequency variation (2) This could explain almost the full field flatness deviation to within the error on the measurement. The question is now what is causing the frequency difference between the cathodes and can it be modelled as I have done here? Top choices so far are Thicker cathodes bow out more due to flange gap – Mechanical modelling to estimate magnitude Cathode flatness is poor – metrology to determine

Metrology- step height Cathode Nominal Manufacturer On site with touch probe 7.3 - 1 7.8 7.704? 7.644 2 7.802? 3 7.746 7.724 Based on the frequencies would expect 1 to be longest and 3 to be shortest – not the case.

Metrology- surface flatness Cathode 0

Metrology- surface flatness Cathode 1 Mark was unable to do interferometer measurement as there appears to be a high slope bump in the middle third – due to drilling?

Metrology- surface flatness Cathode 2

Metrology- surface flatness Cathode 3

Design with larger gap and 4.5mm thick copper VELA Cathode FEA Design with larger gap and 4.5mm thick copper 2500N applied to each screw location Current design 16.7µm in Z Deformation of copper 15.1µm in Z Deformation of copper Outer 3mm of copper fixed to represent face to face contact with gun.

Further work CMM/ stylus probe measurements at RAL to confirm measurements and answer concave/convex question Consider options for hole-less bead-pull? Design apparatus to deform cathode known amounts and re-measure frequency.