Climate Change Legislation & Agriculture

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EPA’s Clean Power Plan Proposed Rules for Reducing GHG Emissions from Power Plants Presentation to ACPAC June 16,
Advertisements

4 good reasons why Energy Efficiency is Important.
1 ACT AND ADAPT: CLIMATE CHANGE IN SCOTLAND Climate Change Division.
Carbon Sequestration in U.S. Agriculture: The Policy Context Linda M. Young Montana State University.
© Mark Godfrey What’s in it for agriculture and forests? Bill Stanley, The Nature Conservancy.
Carbon Credit Trading: Boom or Bust for Farmers & Ranchers? Soil & Water Conservation Society Fall Forum September 17, 2009 MISSOURI FARM BUREAU.
1. What Do We Know About Our Energy and Climate Policy? John W. Rowe Chairman and CEO, Exelon Corporation Grand Challenges of the 21 st Century Conference.
National Energy/Climate Bills How does the legislative process work? What bills are currently being considered? What are the pros and cons of each? Who.
EU Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050
Policy Matters Ohio To create clean energy jobs, achieve energy independence, reduce global warming pollution and transition.
Trade and Climate Change: International Perspective Mac Callaway, Ph.D UNEP-RISØ Center Technical University of Denmark CPA International.
Agriculture Industry Views on Climate Legislation and Markets David Miller Chief Science Officer AgraGate Climate Credits Corp & Director of Research Iowa.
The UK’s policies on reducing GHG emissions By Arjun and Jonny.
Manitoba Hydro’s Emission Management Perspectives Bill Hamlin.
Federal Policy Update Presented to Max Williamson June 17, 2010 M-AGG Policy Conference Washington, D.C. 1.
Overview of Carbon Markets and US Federal Proposals to Regulate GHGs American College of Construction Lawyers and Princeton University Joint Symposium.
Department of Economics Climate Change Legislation & Livestock.
LONG TERM ELECTRICAL SUPPLY PLAN STAFF RESPONSE TO QUESTIONS, ISSUES, AND RECOMMENDATIONS MADE IN NOVEMBER 2004 Presentation to the Gainesville City Commission.
Point of Regulation, Permit Allocation, Uses of Revenue, and Offsets in S (Lieberman-Warner) Presentation to the Kansas Energy Council Greenhouse.
Cap & Trade. Cap & Trade (Cap) A cap commits a region or country to limits on greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and then reduces those limits over time.
FEDERAL CLIMATE CHANGE LEGISLATION Overview of Key Provisions of House and Senate Bills for Industrial Energy Users John Clancy Godfrey & Kahn, S.C. 780.
December 6, 2013 USDA Climate Change Program Office.
Offsets and Climate Policy: EPA Perspectives Dina Kruger Director, Climate Change Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency May 30, 2008.
Latest on Bioenergy in the EU Emissions Trading System and in the CDM Latest on Bioenergy in the EU Emissions Trading System and in the CDM B. Schlamadinger.
Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol: what does it mean for bioenergy and C sequestration? Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol: what does it mean for.
Andy Engel and Andy Cook The Hamilton Consulting Group Hamilton-consulting.com.
What do you think best characterizes Dr. Curry’s opinion on what has caused the majority of planetary warming in the late 20th century? a) CO 2 b) solar.
Clean Air Act Section 111(d) Indiana State Bar Association Utility Law Section September 4, 2014 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE Commissioner IN Department.
Department of Economics Trends & Issues in Agriculture 2009 Nationwide Agribusiness Annual Commercial Policyholder Conference Des Moines, Iowa August 20,
The Role of Biofuels in the Transformation of Agriculture Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte and Chad M. Hellwinckel The Economics of Alternative Energy Sources.
Presented at: Saskatchewan Agriculture and Food Agriculture and Greenhouse Gas/Climate Change Workshop Saskatoon December 11, 2000 Llewellyn Matthews and.
Delivering commercial insight to the global energy industry Wood MackenzieEnergy Natural Gas Markets Enter an Era of Unprecedented Uncertainty.
Reid Harvey U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chief, Climate Economics Branch Climate Change Division 6 th Forestry and Agriculture GHG Modeling Forum.
Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative RGGI John Marschilok, P.E. Environmental Engineer Department New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.
Washington State: Climate Initiative
A Brave New World Cathy Woollums, SVP, Environmental and Chief Environmental Counsel NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting – June 2, 2014.
Chicago Climate Exchange ®, Inc. © 2008 Murali Kanakasabai, Ph.D Vice President & Senior Economist Carbon Expo Cologne May, 2008.
1. Sustainable Development. International commitment. COORDINATION. A LONG-TERM VISSION. Policies Enhance the economic growth. Certainty and Economic.
Department of Economics Crops and Climate Change Northwest Iowa Agronomy Group Holstein, Iowa December 15, 2009 Chad Hart Assistant Professor/Grain Markets.
Department of Economics Cap & Trade Legislation: What’s Proposed and What Does It Mean Iowa Meeting of ASFMRA and RLI Ames, Iowa March 23, 2010 Chad Hart.
Agricultural Economics An Introduction to Markets for Ecosystem Services (Carbon Offsets) Jack Schieffer.
Climate Action Meeting the EU’s Kyoto commitments & Avoiding a gap after 2012 Doha, 27 November 2012 Paolo CARIDI Policy Coordinator DG Climate Action.
Department of Economics Climate Change Legislation & Agriculture 2009 Ag Outlook and Management Seminars.
2/27/ % below 2005 by 2020 cap and trade 11/15/2007 set emissions targets by 11/15/08 ~60-80% cuts by ???? (2040?) cap and trade; C inventory, reporting.
Woody Biomass Energy Federal Issues & Legislation Environmental Quality Council September 10-11, 2009 Angela Farr Biomass Utilization Julia Altemus Forest.
The Economics of Alternative Energy Sources and Globalization: The Road Ahead Views from the U.S. Senate November 16, 2009 Hayden Milberg Senior Economist.
Charlotte Chamber U. S. CLIMATE CHANGE LEGISLATION Mike Stroben November 11, 2009.
11 AB 32 Climate Change Scoping Plan Progress Report October 21, 2010 California Air Resources Board.
Department of Economics Crop Situation and Outlook Tri County Ag Marketing Club 2009 Grain Marketing Outlook Workshop Grundy Center, Iowa July 23, 2009.
 Cap and Trade Application: Global Warming 6. 2.
Department of Economics Policy Implications for Biofuels and Commodities Midwestern Legislative Conference Overland Park, Kansas August 9, 2009 Chad Hart.
The U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard Melissa Powers Assistant Professor, Lewis & Clark Law School Portland, OR USA.
1 UK Progress reducing emissions and preparing for climate change PPA Sustainability Summit, 8 October 2015 Adrian Gault, Chief Economist Committee on.
U.S. Mitigation Presentation Jonathan Pershing UNFCCC Pre-sessional Workshop Bangkok, Thailand April 2011.
State and Regional GHG Initiatives What are the individual states doing to mitigate GHG emissions? What are the common elements? and regional differences?
Department of Economics Climate Change Legislation & Agriculture 2010 Iowa Turkey Federation Meetings.
Advancing US Gas Turbine Technology
Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Targets
U. S. CLIMATE CHANGE LEGISLATION
Kenya’s REDD+ Readiness Activities
IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES FOR THE CREATION OF OFFSETS IN THE AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY SECTORS FOR USE IN A POTENTIAL CANADIAN DOMESTIC EMISSION TRADING.
Jean-Mari Peltier Counselor to the Administrator on Agriculture Policy
Development of a Solar Water Heater NAMA Concept Belize
Current Status of Carbon Market in Thailand
Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050
DOE 1605(b) Voluntary Greenhouse Gas Registry and
Regional Climate Alliances Spring 2008
Carbon Offset Markets and Utah’s Opportunity
Oregon State Bar Sustainable Future
Enhanced transparency as a vehicle for ambition: European Union experience Martin Kaspar European Commission DG CLIMA A.2.
Presentation transcript:

Climate Change Legislation & Agriculture 2010 Nebraska Beef Feedlot Roundtables 1

Climate Change Source: www.conservationreport.com

Climate Change Source: Congressional Budget Office

GHG Emission Rules Greenhouse gas rules are coming Whether through legislation or regulation EPA has the authority to regulate GHGs Via Clean Air Act However, Congress would like to set the rules H.R. 2454, American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009, Passed in U.S. House of Rep. on 6/26/09, 219-212 S. 1733, Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act Introduced 9/30/09, In committee (actually, six committees)

U.S. GHG Emissions Source: EPA, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2007

CO2 Emissions Source: EPA, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2007

CH4 Emissions Source: EPA, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2007

N2O Emissions Source: EPA, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2007

GHG Emissions by Sector Source: EPA, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2007

Agricultural GHG Emissions Source: EPA, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2007

Climate Change Legislation American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (H.R. 2454) Requires utilities to supply an increasing percentage of their demand from a combination of energy efficiency savings and renewable energy (6% in 2012, 9.5% in 2014, 13% in 2016, 16.5% in 2018, and 20% in 2021-2039). Provides for issuing, trading, banking, retiring, and verifying renewable electricity credits. Establishes targets to cap and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, annually, so that GHG emissions from capped sources are reduced to 97% of 2005 levels by 2012, 83% by 2020, 58% by 2030, and 17% by 2050; and establish a federal GHG registry. Provides for trading, banking and borrowing, auctioning, selling, exchanging, transferring, holding, or retiring emission allowances. Source: Congressional Research Service

Climate Change Legislation Agriculture provisions in H.R. 2454 Provides some exemptions from the GHG emission reduction requirements for agriculture and forestry Provides incentive-based approach to GHG emission reduction/capture Allows USDA to help establish eligible GHG offset practices and review of those practices Shifts question on indirect-land-use to an independent panel for study with EPA and USDA to review in the future Allows for a specific exemption for livestock (enteric fermentation from ruminant animals) from uncapped emissions guidelines Source: Craig Raysor, Gillon & Associates, PLLC

Lots of Analysis The EPA has funded the development of several models that are capable of examining the impact of this bill and other similar bills The environmental economists who worked on these models are very well respected and the work is sound However, the only certainty in the bill is the limit on carbon, everything else is assumption driven Source: ISU, Dermot Hayes presentation, Oct. 2009

Key Assumptions The US economy was already on a slow growth path for energy consumption, the analysis assumes that this continues Coal fired plants largely shut down and are replaced by nuclear Enormous reliance on international and domestic offsets If we cannot build the large number of nuclear plants or find the international offsets, then the price of carbon will increase at about twice the reported rate Source: ISU, Dermot Hayes presentation, Oct. 2009

Energy Sources Source: EPA Analysis of H.R. 2454, June 23, 2009

GHG Emissions & Abatements Source: EPA Analysis of H.R. 2454, June 23, 2009

Domestic Offsets Implementing regulations not yet written Uncertainty about how the offsets would work in agriculture, particularly for conservation tillage, but the intention is clearly to use these offsets as a way to stimulate agricultural incomes Consideration of leakage is prohibited pending a study Heavy reliance on the growth of trees on pasture and crop land Source: ISU, Dermot Hayes presentation, Oct. 2009

Domestic Offsets Source: EPA Analysis of Waxman-Markey, April 20, 2009

Domestic Offsets Source: ISU, Dermot Hayes presentation, Oct. 2009

Shifting Land Patterns Source: EPA, “Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potential in U.S. Forestry and Agriculture”, Nov. 2005

International Offsets Must be a developing country that is a member of a unilateral or multilateral emissions reduction agreement with the United States Must have the technical capacity to monitor, measure, report and verify forest carbon fluxes resulting from deforestation Must have the capacity to reduce emissions from deforestation, including strong forest governance The international offset project itself must be shown to result in permanent verifiable reductions that are net of any leakage measures Source: ISU, Dermot Hayes presentation, Oct. 2009

Allowances 2030 2016 Source: Congressional Research Service, June 2009

Carbon Prices Increase Over Time Source: EPA Analysis of H.R. 2454, June 23, 2009

Prices Are Sensitive to Offsets Source: EPA Analysis of H.R. 2454, June 23, 2009

Energy Price Paths Source: EPA Analysis of H.R. 2454, June 23, 2009

Impacts on an Average Household Source: EPA Analysis of H.R. 2454, June 23, 2009

Comparison of Results Allowance Price Source: ISU, Dermot Hayes presentation, Oct. 2009

Climate Change Legislation Analysis Source: USDA, Office of Chief Economist, “The Impacts of the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 On U.S. Agriculture”

Climate Change Legislation Analysis Source: USDA, Office of Chief Economist, “The Impacts of the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 On U.S. Agriculture”

Climate Change Legislation Analysis Source: USDA, Office of Chief Economist, “The Impacts of the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 On U.S. Agriculture”

Climate Change Legislation Analysis Source: USDA, Office of Chief Economist, “The Impacts of the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 On U.S. Agriculture”

Concluding Thoughts The potential for cropland conversion points to higher crop prices and feed costs Crop prices and feed costs will likely track carbon prices Cropland and pasture conversion will benefit landowners through higher rents Agriculture will experience the benefits and the costs of climate change legislation

Thank you for your time! Any questions?