Volume 107, Issue 7, Pages (October 2014)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lever-Arm Mechanics of Processive Myosins Yujie Sun, Yale E. Goldman Biophysical Journal Volume 101, Issue 1, Pages 1-11 (July 2011) DOI: /j.bpj
Advertisements

Cell Traction Forces Direct Fibronectin Matrix Assembly Christopher A. Lemmon, Christopher S. Chen, Lewis H. Romer Biophysical Journal Volume 96, Issue.
Nonlinear Poisson Equation for Heterogeneous Media Langhua Hu, Guo-Wei Wei Biophysical Journal Volume 103, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012) DOI: /j.bpj
Date of download: 9/18/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: The Effects of Elastic Fiber Protein Insufficiency and Treatment on the Modulus.
Date of download: 12/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Stiffening of Human Skin Fibroblasts with Age
Clamping Down on Tumor Proliferation
Myosin II Activity Softens Cells in Suspension
Mark F. Coughlin, David D. Sohn, Geert W. Schmid-Schönbein 
Volume 111, Issue 7, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 107, Issue 2, Pages (July 2014)
Goran Žagar, Patrick R. Onck, Erik van der Giessen  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Actomyosin Tension Exerted on the Nucleus through Nesprin-1 Connections Influences Endothelial Cell Adhesion, Migration, and Cyclic Strain-Induced Reorientation 
Mechanical Properties of Actin Stress Fibers in Living Cells
Stephen R. Norris, Marcos F. Núñez, Kristen J. Verhey 
Volume 111, Issue 7, Pages (October 2016)
Cell Mechanics: FilaminA Leads the Way
Jeffrey G. Jacot, Andrew D. McCulloch, Jeffrey H. Omens 
Shijie He, Chenglin Liu, Xiaojun Li, Shaopeng Ma, Bo Huo, Baohua Ji 
Volume 107, Issue 11, Pages (December 2014)
Susanne Karsch, Deqing Kong, Jörg Großhans, Andreas Janshoff 
Volume 103, Issue 6, Pages (September 2012)
Tianhui Maria Ma, J. Scott VanEpps, Michael J. Solomon 
Volume 108, Issue 12, Pages (June 2015)
Dietmar B. Oelz, Boris Y. Rubinstein, Alex Mogilner 
Volume 108, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Viscoplasticity Enables Mechanical Remodeling of Matrix by Cells
Cellular Contraction Can Drive Rapid Epithelial Flows
Volume 114, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 109, Issue 5, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 96, Issue 7, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 114, Issue 4, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 110, Issue 8, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 110, Issue 11, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 103, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 91, Issue 9, Pages (November 2006)
Matthias D. Koch, Alexander Rohrbach  Biophysical Journal 
Inês Mendes Pinto, Boris Rubinstein, Rong Li  Biophysical Journal 
A Dynamic Biochemomechanical Model of Geometry-Confined Cell Spreading
Bart Smeets, Maxim Cuvelier, Jiri Pešek, Herman Ramon 
S. Majid Hosseini, James J. Feng  Biophysical Journal 
Substrate Deformation Predicts Neuronal Growth Cone Advance
Guidance of Cell Migration by Substrate Dimension
K. Venkatesan Iyer, S. Pulford, A. Mogilner, G.V. Shivashankar 
Volume 114, Issue 4, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 107, Issue 11, Pages (December 2014)
Focal Adhesion Kinase Stabilizes the Cytoskeleton
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 99, Issue 8, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 114, Issue 2, Pages (January 2018)
Quantitative Analysis of the Viscoelastic Properties of Thin Regions of Fibroblasts Using Atomic Force Microscopy  R.E. Mahaffy, S. Park, E. Gerde, J.
Philip J. Robinson, Teresa J.T. Pinheiro  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 108, Issue 10, Pages (May 2015)
Igor Titushkin, Michael Cho  Biophysical Journal 
A Computational Model of YAP/TAZ Mechanosensing
Volume 112, Issue 8, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
Drug-Induced Changes of Cytoskeletal Structure and Mechanics in Fibroblasts: An Atomic Force Microscopy Study  Christian Rotsch, Manfred Radmacher  Biophysical.
Volume 97, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Mechanotransduction Dynamics at the Cell-Matrix Interface
Systems Biophysics: Multiscale Biophysical Modeling of Organ Systems
Gidon Ofek, Dena C. Wiltz, Kyriacos A. Athanasiou  Biophysical Journal 
René B. Svensson, Tue Hassenkam, Colin A. Grant, S. Peter Magnusson 
Jeffrey G. Jacot, Andrew D. McCulloch, Jeffrey H. Omens 
Jarett Michaelson, Venkatesh Hariharan, Hayden Huang 
Volume 110, Issue 11, Pages (June 2016)
Sandeep Kumar, Alakesh Das, Amlan Barai, Shamik Sen 
Viscoplasticity Enables Mechanical Remodeling of Matrix by Cells
Presentation transcript:

Volume 107, Issue 7, Pages 1502-1512 (October 2014) Combining AFM and Acoustic Probes to Reveal Changes in the Elastic Stiffness Tensor of Living Cells  Nadja Nijenhuis, Xuegen Zhao, Alex Carisey, Christoph Ballestrem, Brian Derby  Biophysical Journal  Volume 107, Issue 7, Pages 1502-1512 (October 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.07.073 Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Schematic diagram, after Riveline et al. (21), showing the effect of Rho on cell mechanical properties through the activation of the ROCK-dependent and mDia1-dependent pathways. The ROCK-dependent pathway tensions the actin fibers through myosin-II-driven cell contractility either directly or indirectly via myosin light-chain phosphatase (MLCP). The mDia1-dependent pathway activates actin polymerization or, possibly, influences the organization of the actin network and microtubules. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 107, 1502-1512DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.07.073) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 SAM and AFM experiments on populations of cells treated with Y-27632 and a control population. (a) Filamentous actin structure in a control NIH3T3 cell showing regular straight, tensioned filaments called stress fibers. (b) Highly disorganized actin filamentary structure was observed after treatment with Y-27632. (c) SAM image showing characteristic interference rings from a typical control NIH3T3 cell. (d) NIH32T3 cell after treatment with Y-27632, showing a larger number of interference rings and a more raised profile. Scale bars in a–d, 10 μm. (e) Mean (± SE) acoustic wave velocity (control, n = 27; Y-27632, n = 51) and contact elastic modulus (control, n = 92; Y-27632, n = 27). (f) Computed bulk modulus (K) and shear modulus (G). In all cases, the asterisk indicates a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) between treated and control populations. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 107, 1502-1512DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.07.073) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 SAM and AFM experiments on cells transfected with mDia1ΔN3 and a control population of cells. (a) NIH3T3 cell transfected with mDia1ΔN3 packed with a dense network of actin stress fibers; scale bar, 10 μm. (b) SAM image showing interference rings from transfected NIH3T3 cells; scale bar, 20 μm. (c) Mean (± SE) acoustic wave velocity (control, n = 38; mDia1ΔN3, n = 45) and contact elastic modulus (control, n = 30; mDia1ΔN3, n = 55). (d) Computed mean ± SE bulk modulus (K) and shear modulus (G). In all cases, the asterisk indicates a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) between treated and control populations. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 107, 1502-1512DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.07.073) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 SAM and AFM experiments on NIH3T3 cells treated with nocodazole and a control population. (a) NIH3T3 cell in control conditions stained to reveal microtubules. (b) After treatment with nocodazole, the microtubule structure is no longer revealed by the stain, indicating severe disruption. (c) NIH3T3 cell in the control condition stained to reveal actin. (d) After treatment with nocodazole, actin filaments are clearly present in an amount similar to that observed in the control population and are well aligned. Scale bars in a–d, 10 μm. (e) SAM image of the cells after treatment with nocodazole. The presence of several interference rings indicates that the cells have maintained a 3D shape; scale bar, 20 μm. (f) Mean (± SE) acoustic wave velocity (control, n = 34; nocodazole, n = 47) and contact elastic modulus (control, n = 39; nocodazole, n = 40). (g) Computed mean (± SE) bulk modulus (K) and shear modulus (G). In all cases, asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) between treated and control populations. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 107, 1502-1512DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.07.073) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Deviation of the value of the Poisson ratio from the incompressible limit (ν = 0.5) for cell populations studied after a number of treatments. Biophysical Journal 2014 107, 1502-1512DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.07.073) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions