Eric Miller August 3rd, 2010 Dr. Camberato & Dr. Nielsen

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Duane Friend Extension Educator.  Funding for the study was through the Illinois Department of Agriculture Sustainable Ag Grant program  Additional.
Advertisements

Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.
Determine seeding rate and hybrid effects on: Phenotypical and physiological plant measurements Canopy and leaf sensor measurements A goal in precision.
Morteza Mozaffari Soil Testing and Research Laboratory, Marianna Efforts to Improve N Use Efficiency of Corn in Arkansas Highlights of Research in Progress.
FIELD-SCALE N APPLICATION USING CROP REFLECTANCE SENSORS Ken Sudduth and Newell Kitchen USDA-ARS Translating Missouri USDA-ARS Research and Technology.
EVALUATION OF GREENSEEKER FOR NITROGEN FETILIZATION IN COTTON ALABAMA REPORT 1 Evaluation of Green Seeker for Nitrogen Fertilization in Cotton – Preliminary.
An integrated study of nutrient leaching and greenhouse gas emissions Tyson Ochsner and Rodney Venterea Soil and Water Management Research Unit Agricultural.
Jacob P. Vossenkemper Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Oklahoma State University.
Optimizing Crop Management Practices with DSSAT. Our Goal With increasing population and climate change, the ability to maximize crop production is essential.
Sensor Orientation to maize canopy row and estimating biomass and Nitrogen Status Paul Hodgen, Fernando Solari, Jim Schepers, John Shanahan, Dennis Francis.
Sparse Versus Dense Spatial Data R.L. (Bob) Nielsen Professor of Agronomy Purdue University West Lafayette, IN Web:
Agronomic Implications of Soybean Rust Shawn P. Conley Ellsworth Christmas Purdue University Soybean Production Systems.
Comparison of Active Optical Sensors
Comparison of Commercial Crop Canopy Sensors Ken Sudduth Newell Kitchen Scott Drummond USDA-ARS, Columbia, Missouri.
Nitrogen Use Efficiency Workshop Canopy Reflectance Signatures: Developing a Crop Need-Based Indicator for Sidedress Application of N Fertilizer to Canola.
WP2. Adaptability and Productivity Field Trials Results from the fourth growing period and comparison of the results recorded from the years 2003, 2004.
Corn Plot Overview Jared Shippey Ben Logan. General Information  Planted 5/30/08  Hybrid – Pioneer 38B87 – 94 days  Planted population 35,000  Manure.
Determining the Most Effective Growth Stage in Corn Production for Spectral Prediction of Grain Yield and Nitrogen Response Department of Plant and Soil.
Eric C. Miller Jeremiah L. Mullock, Jacob T. Bushong, and William R. Raun NUE Conference Sioux Falls, SD August 5 th, 2014.
Remote sensing of canopy reflectance on a field scale has been proposed as a useful tool for diagnosing nitrogen (N) deficiency of corn plants. Differences.
Optimizing Nitrogen and Irrigation Timing for Corn Fertigation Applications Using Remote Sensing Ray Asebedo, David Mengel, and Randall Nelson Kansas State.
2013 NUE Conference Des Moines, Iowa August 5-7 Jacob T. Bushong.
Active-Crop Sensor Calibration Using the Virtual-Reference Concept K. H. Holland (Holland Scientific) J. S. Schepers (USDA-ARS, retired) 8 th ECPA Conference.
Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Wade Thomason,
Automated Calibration Stamp Technology for Improved In-Season Nitrogen Fertilization K. Freeman, R. Teal, C. Mack, K. Martin, B. Arnall, K. Desta, J. Solie,
Delineating Zones for Variable rate Seeding a Fertility Mgt. Chad Godsey Godsey Precision Ag.
Single plant yields: The NE experience. Why talk about individual plants when farmers are shelling up to 40ft swaths?
Refinement of the Missouri Corn Nitrogen Algorithm Using Canopy Reflectance Newell Kitchen, Ken Sudduth, and Scott Drummond USDA-Agricultural Research.
Introduction Efficient use of nitrogen is becoming important due to increasing N fertilizer prices and the growing concerns about NO 3 - contamination.
Demonstration of In-Season Nitrogen Management Strategies for Corn Production John Sawyer John Lundvall Jennifer Hawkins Department of Agronomy Iowa State.
On-farm Evaluation of Optical Sensor Technology for Variable Rate N Application to Corn in Ontario and Quebec Bao-Luo Ma, and Nicolas Tremblay Eastern.
Locations Efaw Lake Carl Blackwell Haskell Years2005, 2006 Objectives: 1)To determine the minimum preplant N fertilizer needed to achieve maximum yield.
REAL-TIME CALIBRATION OF ACTIVE CROP SENSOR SYSTEM FOR MAKING IN-SEASON N APPLICATIONS K.H. Holland and J.S. Schepers Holland Scientific and USDA-ARS,
Categorizing Nitrogen Availability for Corn Fields Using Field History and Cornstalk Nitrate Test Haiying Tao 1, Thomas Morris 1, Suzy Friedman 2, Richard.
Phosphorus Fertilization Reduced Hessian Fly Infestation of Spring Wheat S. E. Petrie and K. E. Rhinhart Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon.
VI. Acknowledgements I. Introduction Background: The optimum plant population for maximum grain yield in corn (Zea mays L.) has continually increased over.
The impacts of information and biotechnologies on corn nutrient management Jae-hoon Sung and John A. Miranowski Department of Economics Iowa State University.
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Laboratory for Agriculture and Environmental Studies Sensor Based Variable Rate N Management in Mid-Atlantic.
Regional Project Objectives  To evaluate the performance of sensor-based N recommendation algorithms across a wide range of soil and climate conditions.
Exploratory Research in Corn
Variable Rate Nitrogen
Developing Sidedress N Recommendations for Corn in Central PA
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
Nutrient Management: Ways to Save Money, From Simple to High Tech
In-season Nitrogen Applications: How Late is Too Late?
Topsoil Depth at the Centralia Site
Sensor Algorithms.
Crop-based Approach for In-season N Application
In-season Nitrogen Applications: How Late is Too Late?
Evaluation of Pre-Side Dress Nitrate Test for Corn in Minnesota
EVOLUTION OF NITROGEN REFERENCE STRIPS
EFFECT OF DELAYED EMERGENCE ON CORN GRAIN YIELDS
Evaluation of Midseason UAN Application Depth in Winter Wheat
Redball NUE Conference August 9, 2007
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Irrigated Corn VT VT Irrigated Corn
Dave Franzen – North Dakota State University
Relationships between SPADs, Aerial Images, and Yield
Utilizing Indicator crop N-rich strips for anticipating pre plant and side dress Nitrogen rates for maize. Rationale Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) in cereal.
REVIEW.
Landscape Position Zones and Reference Strips
What Is Up with Soybean Yields?
Precision Agriculture
Objective: To discuss the current regional project and identify improvements needed for conducting future collaborative sensor-based research.
Gyles Randall and Jeff Vetsch University of Minnesota
María I. Travasso (INTA)
Variability in Corn Response to N Fertilizer along a 1000-ft Hillslope
Evaluating “Ultra-Early” Corn Hybrids
Jeff Vetsch and Gyles Randall University of Minnesota
Purdue-Indiana Seed Industry Forum: Crop Production Shawn P. Conley
Presentation transcript:

Eric Miller August 3rd, 2010 Dr. Camberato & Dr. Nielsen Variability of Maize Canopy Reflectance within Field-Length Strips Fertilized With Low to High Rates of Nitrogen Eric Miller August 3rd, 2010 Dr. Camberato & Dr. Nielsen http://www.agry.purdue.edu/intranet/images/logos/Grey-logo.jpg http://www.agry.purdue.edu/intranet/images/logos/Purdue-logo.jpg

Research objective Do “Virtual Reference Strips” occur in under-fertilized corn?

Virtual Reference Strip OptRx calibration process 1/3 – 1/2 estimated total N consumed Suggested pre-plant N rates: 67 - 90 kg N ha-1 Corn following Soybean 90 - 112 kg N ha-1 Corn following Corn

Virtual Reference scan consists of driving for five minutes over the tallest, greenest plants in the field Vegetative Index Reference Value

Project Description 2006 - 2009 6 Purdue Agricultural Centers 32 site years 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009: 19 CS and 13 CC Plots range in size from 120 m – 550 m in length Starter + sidedress with 28% UAN at six rates from 0 – 286 kg N ha-1 Crop Circle ACS-210 were run 14 – 25 days after N application Single hybrid/near-isoline was planted 2006 - 2008

Relative CI well correlated with rel. yield over 23 site-years 2006: ACRE, DPAC, NEPAC, PPAC, SEPAC (all C/S) 2007: ACRE, DPAC, NEPAC (C/S and C/C) 2008: ACRE, DPAC, NEPAC, PPAC, SEPAC, TPAC (C/S and C/C) * Normalized to values of highest N rate in each rep

Sensor Measurements 2 ACS-210 sensors 4 mph, 40,000 hz, 38,400 baud rate Recording data every 18 cm Partitioned data into 30 and 60 sec runs Approx. 3,500 30-sec runs/305 m

Few 30 sec. runs of CI equal to RefCI C/S rotation, sidedressed with 90 kg N/ha, V9-V10 sensor readings Optimum N rate, kg/ha 167 169 190 204 225 232

Throckmorton Purdue Ag Center 305 m long plots, 12 rows, 76 cm wide V-stage: V10 Sensor Data Collected: July 8th Hybrid: Pioneer Brand ‘33F88’ Population Density: 81,500 plants ha-1 Dominant Soil: Throckmorton- Fine-silty, mixed, superactive, mesic Mollic Oxyaquic Hapludalfs Precipitation during growing season: 25 cm Planted: May 24th Previous Crop: Soybean Fertilized: June 24th

Yield Response

30 second runs = 53 meters of row Avg. CI = 4.77 Frequency, % Avg. CI = 4.77 30 second runs = 53 meters of row With 114 kg N ha-1 (68% of optimum N rate) 17% ≥ CI 4.77 Starter only (14% of optimum N rate) 2% ≥ CI 4.77

Location of CI = RefCI 114 kg N ha-1 24 kg N ha-1 77 131 130 77 84 67

Davis Purdue Ag Center 365 m long plots, 12 rows, 76 cm wide V-stage: V10 Sensor Data Collected: July 9th Hybrid: Pioneer Brand ‘33F88’ Population Density: 81,500 plants/ha Dominant Soils: Blount- Fine, illitic, mesic Aeric Epiaqualfs Pewamo- Fine, mixed, active, mesic Typic Argiaquolls Precipitation during growing season: 37 cm Planted: May 26th Previous Crop: Soybean Fertilized: June 15th

Yield Response

30 second runs = 53 meters of row Avg. CI = 4.00 54% of optimum N rate Frequency, % 54% of optimum N rate 38% ≥ CI 4.00 34 % of optimum N rate 16% ≥ CI 4.00

Conclusions Few areas of a field fertilized with 50-70% of the optimum N requirement had CI equal to or greater than the reference CI. Areas with CI ≥ ref. CI were small, generally less than 200 m and 2 minutes in length. Could we have found these areas without previously running the sensors? Would these areas identified in 2009 continue to be ≥ ref. CI?

Questions?