Acog@fivo.org Valencia, España SESION CONTROVERSIAS ¿Es necesario modificar el desarrollo clínico de los nuevos fármacos? COMENTARIOS Y DISCUSION Andres.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Synopsis of FDA Colorectal Cancer Endpoints Workshop Michael J. O’Connell, MD Director, Allegheny Cancer Center Associate Chairman, NSABP Pittsburgh, PA.
Advertisements

GCIG Prague 2010 On behalf of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) 4 th Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference Co-Chairs Gavin CE Stuart & Henry C Kitchener,
Advanced NSCLC Objective response rate -Well defined & widely accepted -Does not correlate well with OS -May be more useful if SD included -Higher RR correlates.
Clinical Trial Design Considerations for Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines Richard Simon, D.Sc. Chief, Biometric Research Branch, NCI
Clinical Perspective. Screening/Prevention Who is at risk for what type Decision to Intervene: Risk Assessment normal Evidence of Disease Disability Death.
HIGHLIGHTS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF BREAST CANCER
Re-Examination of the Design of Early Clinical Trials for Molecularly Targeted Drugs Richard Simon, D.Sc. National Cancer Institute linus.nci.nih.gov/brb.
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer Key issues in trial design.
Drug Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer
Phase III Trial of Bevacizumab in the Primary Treatment of Advanced Epithelial Ovarian, Primary Peritoneal, or Fallopian Tube Cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology.
EN.8 - A PHASE III STUDY OF STANDARD THERAPY VERSUS RIDAFOROLIMUS IN WOMEN WITH RECURRENT OR METASTATIC ENDOMETRIAL CANCER WHO HAVE PREVIOUS HAD CHEMOTHERAPY.
CTEP IND LOI Review and Approval Process. Study Proposals Letter of Intent May be sent in response to solicitation May be sent by investigator with interesting.
Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer A Regulatory Perspective of End Points to Measure Safety and Efficacy of Drugs Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer Bhupinder.
Investigational Drugs in the hospital. + What is Investigational Drug? Investigational or experimental drugs are new drugs that have not yet been approved.
ESMO 2011 Lung Cancer AVAPERL Study Authors: Dr. Sunil Verma Date posted: September 28 th, 2011.
Result of Interim Analysis of Overall Survival in the GCIG ICON7 Phase III Randomized Trial of Bevacizumab in Women with Newly Diagnosed Ovarian Cancer.
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
SARC: Participation and Protocol / Concept Review Robert Maki, MD PhD Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.
BASED ON PROTOCOL VERSION 1 SEPTEMBER 2012 A new study evaluating an investigational drug to treat patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastroesophageal.
WHAT WILL THE KEY ISSUES IN END- POINT ASSESSMENT BE, IN FUTURE OVARIAN CANCER TRIALS INVOLVING NOVEL TARGETED AGENTS? first line treatment maintenance/consolidation.
Final Efficacy Results from OAM4558g, a Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating MetMAb or Placebo in Combination with Erlotinib in Advanced NSCLC Spigel DR.
ESMO 2011 Breast Cancer BOLERO-2 Authors: CARE Faculty (Drs. Anil Joy and Sunil Verma) Date posted: October 12, 2011.
S1207: Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Use of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy +/- One Year of Everolimus in Patients.
A Multi-Center Phase I/II Trial of Carfilzomib and Pomalidomide with Dexamethasone (Car-Pom-d) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Shah.
Clinical Trials - PHASE II. Introduction  Important part of drug discovery process  Why important??  Therapeutic exploratory trial  First time in.
Response, PFS or OS – what is the best endpoint in advanced colorectal cancer? Marc Buyse IDDI, Louvain-la-Neuve & Hasselt University
Lancet Oncol 2013; 14: 749–59 R2 김민제 / Prof. 백선경. Journal conference.
Erlotinib plus Gemcitabine Compared with Gemcitabine Alone in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute.
HE-4 TRIAL Prospective phase II trial on the prognostic and predictive value of HE-4 regression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian, Fallopian.
Results Increased median PFS 2.8 months No apparent increased survival. HR=0.985 CR+PR=46% Gemzar vs 36% control Independently Assessed Increased toxicity,
종양혈액내과 R4 고원진 / pf. 김시영 Rectal cancer : state of the art in 2012 Curr Opin Oncol 2012, 24:441–447.
Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib as first-line therapy : A Korean multicenter.
Belani CP et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract CRA8000. (Oral Presentation)
Patient Focused Drug Development An FDA Perspective
Claudia Marchetti Pierluigi Benedetti Panici
Shah N et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 206.
A Single-Arm Phase IIIb Study of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab with a Taxane as First-Line Therapy for Patients with HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer.
PHASE I/II STUDY OF PEGYLATED LIPOSOMAL DOXORUCIN (PLD) AND GEMCITABINE (GEM) IN RECURRENT PLATIN RESISTANT OVARIAN CANCER (OC). A Study of the VWOG.
Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 310.
Farletuzumab in platinum sensitive ovarian cancer with low CA125
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Nivolumab in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R cHL): Clinical Outcomes from Extended Follow-up of a Phase 1 Study.
IFM/DFCI 2009 Trial: Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) for Multiple Myeloma (MM) in the Era of New Drugs Phase III study of lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone.
Presented By Luca Malorni at 2017 ASCO Annual Meeting
Broadening Eligibility Criteria to Make Clinical Trials More Representative Joint Recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and Friends.
S1207: Phase III randomized, placebo-controlled trial adding 1 year of everolimus to adjuvant endocrine therapy for patients with high-risk, HR+, HER2-
S1400 Revision #8 & 9/10 Training Slides
Metastatic HER2+ Breast Cancer: Resistance
A New Path Forward: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Bladder Cancer
Dr Nicky Lawrence Medial Oncologist, PhD Candidate
Barrios C et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 46.
PARP and Other DNA Damage Repair Inhibitors in Solid Tumors: An Update
CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Breast Cancer:
Reviewer: Dr. Sunil Verma Date posted: December 12th, 2011
Comments on design and sequence of biomarker studies
Baselga J et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 45.
Controversias de Temas de Actualidad: ¿Sería Necesario Modificar el Desarrollo Clínico de los Nuevos Fármacos? a Favor Manuel Hidalgo, M.D., Ph.D.
Martin M et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-7.
Clinical Trials Oct. 6, Lyon France
CoPrincipal Investigators
PROSTATE CANCER CIRCULATING BIOMARKER CONSENSUS STATEMENT QUESTIONS
MITO 26 PHASE II TRIAL ON TRABECTEDIN IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED UTERINE AND OVARIAN CARCINOSARCOMA (CS)
Phase III study of irinotecan/5FU/LV (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5FU/LV (FOLFOX) +/- cetuximab for patients with untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the.
Efficacy of BSI-201, a PARP Inhibitor, in Combination with Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (GC) in Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer (mTNBC): Results.
Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 265.
Biomarkers as Endpoints
Aimery de Gramont Association between 3 year Disease Free Survival and Overall Survival delayed with improved survival after recurrence in patients receiving.
CORE: A randomised trial of COnventional care versus Radioablation (stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)) in Extracranial oligometastases (CRUK/14/038)
Statistics for Clinical Trials in Cancer Research
Presentation transcript:

acog@fivo.org Valencia, España SESION CONTROVERSIAS ¿Es necesario modificar el desarrollo clínico de los nuevos fármacos? COMENTARIOS Y DISCUSION Andres Poveda, Fundacion IVO. Valencia acog@fivo.org Valencia, España

acog@fivo.org Valencia, España 4th Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference June 25 – 27, 2010 UBC Life Sciences Institute, Vancouver, BC acog@fivo.org Valencia, España

B-3 Do We have Appropriate Methods for Evaluating Targeted Therapies? 4th Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference June 25 – 27, 2010 UBC Life Sciences Institute, Vancouver, BC B-3 Do We have Appropriate Methods for Evaluating Targeted Therapies? Currently there is no other validated method than the standard methods for evaluating targeted therapies. In order to evaluate targeted therapies, it is important to demonstrate an appropriate effect on the target in early phase studies. Patient selection for clinical trials should be based on the known biology of target action and appropriately validated. Criteria other than response (RECIST) are relevant and assessment of patient reported outcomes, quality of life, and measurement of the duration of stable disease may provide valuable information about efficacy. New trial designs such as randomised feasibility studies, or trials using a patient as their own control should be used to evaluate novel agents. Ca-125 and functional imaging should be validated for use with targeted agents

4th Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference June 25 – 27, 2010 UBC Life Sciences Institute, Vancouver, BC A1-1: What are the appropriate endpoints for different trials: (maintenance, upfront chemotherapy trials including molecular drugs) Appropriate endpoints for clinical trials should reflect the achievement of clinical benefit which is defined as improvement of one or more of the following subjective and objective endpoints: toxicity time without symptoms patient reported outcomes (PRO) PFS OS In addition, cost effectiveness should be evaluated when feasible. Scans unmet needs-arguably needs to be defined at beginning of trials-perhaps comment on in paper-address re PFS (?). PFS discussion: term in terms of hazard or months? For manuscript-no specification now for concensus statements. Dependent on trial-histology, primary or recurrent

4th Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference June 25 – 27, 2010 UBC Life Sciences Institute, Vancouver, BC A1-2: What are the appropriate endpoints for different trials: (maintenance, upfront chemotherapy trials including molecular drugs) The recommended primary endpoints for future front line/maintenance clinical trials in ovarian cancer are: Phase II Screening for activity PFS, PFS at defined time point, or Response Phase III Early ovarian cancer - Recurrence free survival (note: recurrence = recurrent disease + deaths from any cause) Advanced ovarian cancer - Both PFS and OS are important endpoints to understand the full impact of any new treatment. Although overall survival is an important endpoint, progression free survival is most often the preferred primary endpoint for trials because of the confounding effect of the post- recurrence/progression therapy on overall survival. Each protocol should specify if PFS or OS is the preferred endpoint. Regardless of which is selected, the study should be designed and powered for both PFS and OS when feasible. Maintenance trials: These criteria should be applied to trials that include maintenance therapy.

B-2 What are the promising targets for future therapeutic approaches? 4th Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference June 25 – 27, 2010 UBC Life Sciences Institute, Vancouver, BC B-2 What are the promising targets for future therapeutic approaches? The most promising targets in clinical trials are angiogenesis and homologous recombination deficiency. To select patients for trials investigating these targets, predictive biomarkers are required. Understanding mechanisms of resistance is a priority. Other promising targets currently being studied based on ovarian cancer biology include: PI3-Kinase and Ras/Raf pathways Folate receptor Immune targets/cytokines, Notch/hedgehog, IGF merit further investigation. Targeted agents should be studied both as single agents and in combination based on appropriate preclinical data.

GRACIAS acog@fivo.org