Descartes -- Meditations Two

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© Michael Lacewing The concept of a person Michael Lacewing.
Advertisements

The value of certainty. Foundationalists suppose that true beliefs held with certainty (indubitable) together with logical and linguistic analysis offer.
What is it like to be me? Trying to understand consciousness.
The Cogito. The Story So Far! Descartes’ search for certainty has him using extreme sceptical arguments in order to finally arrive at knowledge. He has.
Cartesian Dualism. Real Distinction Argument P1.Whatever can be clearly and distinctly conceived apart can exist apart. P2.Whatever can exist apart are.
Descartes’ rationalism
René Descartes ( ) Father of modern rationalism. Reason is the source of knowledge, not experience. All our ideas are innate. God fashioned us.
Concept innatism II: the case of substance Michael Lacewing
Descartes on Certainty (and Doubt)
The Rationalists: Descartes Certainty: Self and God
Substance dualism: do Descartes’ arguments work? Michael Lacewing
DESCARTES Meditation 2 Getting Re-established. Biopsychology – Meditation VI.
Descartes’ Epistemology
Philosophy of Mind Week 3: Objections to Dualism Logical Behaviorism
Descartes I am essentially rational, only accidentally an animal ‘essentially’ = logically necessarily ‘essentially’ = logically necessarily Strictly speaking,
Finding our way back  The initial result of Descartes’ use of hyperbolic doubt is the recognition that at least one thing cannot be doubted, at least.
Philosophy 1050: Introduction to Philosophy Week 10: Descartes and the Subject: The way of Ideas.
PHL105Y November 1, 2004 For Wednesday, read Descartes’s Third Meditation. Brace yourself: it is very hard. The final version of your first essay is due.
© Michael Lacewing Doubt in Descartes’ Meditations Michael Lacewing
René Descartes ( AD) Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) (Text, pp )
René Descartes ( ) Father of modern rationalism.
René Descartes ( AD) Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) (Text, pp ) Revised, 8/20/15.
© Michael Lacewing Substance and Property Dualism Michael Lacewing
L ECTURE 6: D ESCARTES. L ECTURE O UTLINE In today’s lecture we will: 1.Become introduced to Rene Descartes 2.Begin our investigation into Descartes’
Substance dualism Michael Lacewing co.uk.
1 The Rationalists: Descartes The Material World Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana Jack Nichols, Living in the material world.
11/26/2015 Modern Philosophy PHIL320 1 Kant III Charles Manekin.
René Descartes, Meditations Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
Substance dualism Michael Lacewing
Descartes on the mind Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Descates Meditations II A starting point for reconstructing the world.
 The value of certainty.  Foundationalists suppose that true beliefs held with certainty (indubitable) together with logical and linguistic analysis.
1/9/2016 Modern Philosophy PHIL320 1 Kant II Charles Manekin.
Descartes’ divisibility argument
The argument for the existence of bodies (Meditation 6) 1.Nature provided me with a strong propensity to believe there are bodies. 2.The only way I could.
Meditation 2. The Cogito Like a drowning man – head sinks below water and yet cannot put feet on river bed. Panic! Needs an Archimedean Point – a sure.
René Descartes (1596–1650) Cartesian Substance Dualism.
A posteriori Knowledge A priori knowledge A posteriori knowledge is based on experience. A posteriori knowledge is based on experience. A priori knowledge.
An Outline of Descartes's Meditations on First Philosophy
WEEK 4: EPISTEMOLOGY Introduction to Rationalism.
1. I exist, because I think. 2. I am a thinking thing 3
Meditation Three Of God: That He Exists.
Substance and Property Dualism
Intuition and deduction thesis (rationalism)
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
The Trademark Argument and Cogito Criticisms
Descartes’ Meditations
Meditation Two Cogito Ergo Sum.
O.A. so far.. Anselm – from faith, the fool, 2 part argument
Descartes’ ontological argument
1st wave: Illusion Descartes begins his method of doubt by considering that in the past he has been deceived by his senses: Things in the distance looked.
Descartes’ conceivability argument for substance dualism
Descartes, Meditations 1 and 2
Michael Lacewing Descartes on the mind Michael Lacewing
On your whiteboard: What is empiricism? Arguments/evidence for it?
Get Yourself Thinking…
Descartes -- Meditations Four
Descartes -- Meditations One
Descartes -- Meditations Three
Is the concept of substance innate?
Philosophy Sept 28th Objective Opener 10 minutes
Dualism.
Meditation 2: The Nature of the Mind, which is Better Known than the Body Descartes Meditation I.
Meditation Two Cogito Ergo Sum.
Michael Lacewing Descartes on the mind Michael Lacewing
Neo’s Escape: Plato’s Cave, Descartes’ Evil Genius, Berkeley & The Matrix
Meditation Three Of God: That He Exists.
Quiz 1 At the beginning of the Second Meditation, what statement is it that Descartes knows to be necessarily true (or at least necessarily true whenever.
Descartes The Cogito.
Descartes and Hume on knowledge of the external world
Presentation transcript:

Descartes -- Meditations Two Charles Manekin 2/21/2019 Modern Philosophy PHIL320

Modern Philosophy PHIL320 Topics of Discussion The Search for the “Archimedean Point” “one thing…that is certain and unshakable” The Argument of the Cogito From “Cogito Sum” to “Sum Res Cogitans” The Self is Known Better than Material Objects 2/21/2019 Modern Philosophy PHIL320

The Search for the Archimedean Point What is Descartes trying to do? To establish the existence of the self To establish the nature of the self, i.e., Thought/Soul. To claim that this is indubitable. What is Descartes not trying to do? He is not yet arguing that the soul is immortal, or even that it persists at times when we are unconscious. 2/21/2019 Modern Philosophy PHIL320

How Does the Argument for the Existence of the Self Work? From the inability to doubt that I exist, I infer that I exist. “So after considering everything very thoroughly, I must conclude that this proposition, I am, I exist is necessarily true whenever it is put forward by me or conceived in my mind.” What does Descartes mean by “necessarily true.” How does he see the inference from “I think (doubt, etc.)” to I am? 2/21/2019 Modern Philosophy PHIL320

Modern Philosophy PHIL320 Notes on the Cogito “Necessarily true” Not logical necessity Something closer to psychological necessity, to indubitability What sort of inference is the Cogito? Reply to the Second objections; the inference is not syllogistic but by a simple intuition of the mind. Objections Why can’t you infer your existence from any activity? Why must it be thinking? How can you know that you exist without first knowing what existence is? 2/21/2019 Modern Philosophy PHIL320

Modern Philosophy PHIL320 Sum res cogitans How does Descartes get to this conclusion? Begins with what “philosophy” then with what “common experience” teaches what he is. I know what I am through introspection Introspection of the unity of the self and its attributes “The fact that it is I who is doubting and understanding and willing is so evident that I see no way of making it clearer.” 2/21/2019 Modern Philosophy PHIL320

Modern Philosophy PHIL320 The Subtle Inference I think (doubt, will, etc.) Thought is a property essential to me. Thought is the only property essential to me. Hence, I am essentially a thinking thing and not essentially material. 2/21/2019 Modern Philosophy PHIL320

Modern Philosophy PHIL320 The Subtle Inference I think (doubt, will, etc.) Thought is a property essential to me. Thought is the only property I know essential to me. Hence, I do not know thought to be identical with any corporeal property. 2/21/2019 Modern Philosophy PHIL320

Modern Philosophy PHIL320 Arnauld’s Objection Surely there are things in our mind of which the mind is not aware. The baby in the mother’s womb Response: If it is in the mind, then it has to be mental. 2/21/2019 Modern Philosophy PHIL320

Modern Philosophy PHIL320 The Piece of Wax What is more distinctly known – the nature of the mind, or nature of the external world? 2/21/2019 Modern Philosophy PHIL320

Modern Philosophy PHIL320 The Piece of Wax How does one go about determining the essential properties of the wax? Why is “essential” important? What of the wax is preserved over time, after the incidental properties are subtracted? Answer: the property of extension 2/21/2019 Modern Philosophy PHIL320

Modern Philosophy PHIL320 The Piece of Wax How does Descartes show that wax is known better by the mind than by the senses/imagination. Objection: if I didn’t have my senses, then how would I know that it is wax? Answer on next slide 2/21/2019 Modern Philosophy PHIL320

Modern Philosophy PHIL320 The Piece of Wax What Descartes is interested in is the essential nature of the wax, i.e., the wax qua material object, and that nature is one of extension. 2/21/2019 Modern Philosophy PHIL320

Last Claim of Meditation Two “Surely my awareness of my own self is not merely much truer and more certain than my awareness of the wax, but also much more distinct and evident.” “I know x” implies that “I know myself” 2/21/2019 Modern Philosophy PHIL320