Volume 71, Issue 5, Pages 750-759 (May 2017) Application of a Prognostic Gleason Grade Grouping System to Assess Distant Prostate Cancer Outcomes Michael S. Leapman, Janet E. Cowan, Jeffry Simko, Gray Roberge, Bradley A. Stohr, Peter R. Carroll, Matthew R. Cooperberg European Urology Volume 71, Issue 5, Pages 750-759 (May 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.11.032 Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions
Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier survival plots and tables with numbers of events and numbers of patients still at risk at each time point for (A) prostate cancer–specific survival and (B) bone metastasis–free survival stratified by prognostic Gleason score category at biopsy. CE=cumulative events. European Urology 2017 71, 750-759DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2016.11.032) Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions
Fig. 2 Kaplan-Meier survival plots and tables with numbers of events and numbers of patients still at risk at each time point for (A) prostate cancer–specific survival and (B) bone metastasis–free survival stratified by traditional extended Gleason categories. CE=cumulative events. European Urology 2017 71, 750-759DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2016.11.032) Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions