MAP Kinase-Interacting Kinases—Emerging Targets against Cancer

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pratistha Ranjitkar, Amanda M. Brock, Dustin J. Maly 
Advertisements

AMPK—Sensing Energy while Talking to Other Signaling Pathways
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Mechanism and Substrate Recognition of Human Holo ACP Synthase
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Arvin C. Dar, Michael S. Lopez, Kevan M. Shokat  Chemistry & Biology 
Crystal Structures of Sirt3 Complexes with 4′-Bromo-Resveratrol Reveal Binding Sites and Inhibition Mechanism  Giang Thi Tuyet Nguyen, Melanie Gertz,
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (November 2014)
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
UPF1 Learns to Relax and Unwind
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
Peter Chien, Robert A. Grant, Robert T. Sauer, Tania A. Baker 
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Structure of the Endonuclease Domain of MutL: Unlicensed to Cut
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Multiplying Messages LRRK beneath Parkinson Disease
AMPK—Sensing Energy while Talking to Other Signaling Pathways
Developing Irreversible Inhibitors of the Protein Kinase Cysteinome
Substrate Recognition Mechanism of Atypical Protein Kinase Cs Revealed by the Structure of PKCι in Complex with a Substrate Peptide from Par-3  Chihao.
Crystal Structure of an Inactive Akt2 Kinase Domain
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e5 (January 2019)
UPF1 Learns to Relax and Unwind
Regulation of protein phosphatase-1
Steven G. Smith, Roberto Sanchez, Ming-Ming Zhou  Chemistry & Biology 
A General Strategy for Creating “Inactive-Conformation” Abl Inhibitors
Sanjay B. Hari, Ethan A. Merritt, Dustin J. Maly  Chemistry & Biology 
André Schiefner, Michaela Gebauer, Antonia Richter, Arne Skerra 
Sachin Surade, Tom L. Blundell  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Biochemical Implications of a Three-Dimensional Model of Monomeric Actin Bound to Magnesium-Chelated ATP  Keiji Takamoto, J.K. Amisha Kamal, Mark R. Chance 
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2013)
A Drug-Drug Interaction Crystallizes a New Entry Point into the UPR
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 1999)
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Mark Del Campo, Alan M. Lambowitz  Molecular Cell 
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Gene-Specific Regulation by General Translation Factors
Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Tianjun Zhou, Liguang Sun, John Humphreys, Elizabeth J. Goldsmith 
Crystal Structure of Saccharopine Reductase from Magnaporthe grisea, an Enzyme of the α-Aminoadipate Pathway of Lysine Biosynthesis  Eva Johansson, James.
Conformation-Selective ATP-Competitive Inhibitors Control Regulatory Interactions and Noncatalytic Functions of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases  Sanjay B.
Crystal Structure of 4-Amino-5-Hydroxymethyl-2- Methylpyrimidine Phosphate Kinase from Salmonella typhimurium at 2.3 Å Resolution  Gong Cheng, Eric M.
Volume 121, Issue 5, Pages (June 2005)
Huiying Li, Michael R. Sawaya, F. Robert Tabita, David Eisenberg 
Pratistha Ranjitkar, Amanda M. Brock, Dustin J. Maly 
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Arvin C. Dar, Michael S. Lopez, Kevan M. Shokat  Chemistry & Biology 
Molecular Similarity Analysis Uncovers Heterogeneous Structure-Activity Relationships and Variable Activity Landscapes  Lisa Peltason, Jürgen Bajorath 
The Structure of JNK3 in Complex with Small Molecule Inhibitors
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Guilty as charged Cancer Cell
Structural Basis for Kinase-Mediated Macrolide Antibiotic Resistance
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
A General Strategy for Creating “Inactive-Conformation” Abl Inhibitors
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Morgan Huse, Ye-Guang Chen, Joan Massagué, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Presentation transcript:

MAP Kinase-Interacting Kinases—Emerging Targets against Cancer Sarah Diab, Malika Kumarasiri, Mingfeng Yu, Theodosia Teo, Christopher Proud, Robert Milne, Shudong Wang  Chemistry & Biology  Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 441-452 (April 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.01.011 Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Roles of eIF4E in Initiating Translation and Exporting mRNAs from the Nucleus to the Cytoplasm (A) Overview of cap-dependent translation initiation: (i) recruitment of the eIF4F complex to the 5′-UTR of the mRNA via an interaction between eIF4E and m7G cap structure, (ii) binding of eIF4B enhances the unwinding of the secondary structures within the 5′-UTR, (iii) recruitment of the 43S preinitiation complex, and (iv) localization of the initiator codon, joining of the large ribosomal unit, and initiation of translation. (B) eIF4E may enhance export to the cytoplasm of certain mRNAs that contain the 4E-SE structure. Chemistry & Biology 2014 21, 441-452DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.01.011) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Translational Control by Mnks (A) eIF4E and mRNA discrimination. Translation of strong (efficient) mRNAs (blue curve) is independent of eIF4E, whereas translation of “weak” mRNAs (purple curve) requires an increased availability of eIF4E. Strong mRNAs code for vital proteins for normal growth and weak mRNAs for malignancy-related proteins as in metastasis. (B) Regulatory features of Mnk isoforms. A solid line represents a good affinity for the upstream kinase, whereas a dashed line refers to a poor affinity. Green and blue represent the N terminus and the C terminus, respectively. The following abbreviations were used: KD, kinase domain; MAPK, MAPK binding site. Mnk1b and Mnk2b are poor substrates for the MAPKs since they lack the MAPK binding site. Mnk1a is a good substrate for both while Mnk2a is good substrate only for Erks. Chemistry & Biology 2014 21, 441-452DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.01.011) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 eIF4E Is Mainly Regulated by the MAPK Pathways and the PI3K/Akt/mTOR Pathway In response to extracellular stimuli, Mnks (especially Mnk1a) are phosphorylated by Erks or p38 MAPKs. Mnks activate eIF4E by phosphorylating it on Ser209, which appears to promote translation initiation. Furthermore, the availability of eIF4E is regulated by the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. Triggering PI3K activates mTORC1, which in turn phosphorylates 4E-BPs and S6Ks. Hyperphosphorylated 4E-BPs bind weakly to eIF4E, releasing eIF4E to bind eIF4G and thus initiate translation. S6Ks activate eIF4B, which enhances the helicase activity of eIF4A. The Mnk-eIF4E axis may be targeted at different stages: (1) rapalogues inhibit the mTOR pathway, (2) 4EGI-1 impairs the binding of eIF4E to eIF4G, (3) ribavirin reportedly blocks the interaction of eIF4E with the m7G cap structure of mRNAs, and (4) Mnk inhibitors prevent the phosphorylation of eIF4E. Chemistry & Biology 2014 21, 441-452DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.01.011) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Structure of Mnks (A) Stereoview of the structure of Mnk2 in the DFD-out conformation based on a homology model that uses the X-ray crystallographic structure (PDB ID 2AC3) as the template (Hou et al., 2013). The hinge region backbone is shown in yellow, the three insertions in red. The DFD motif and the Phe gatekeeper are in capped sticks. (B) Sequence alignment of kinase domains of Mnks, FLT3, and c-KIT. The DFG/D motif is shown in red, the phosphorylation sites in green, and the three insertions in line-edged boxes. The light blue background highlights conserved residues among all four kinases, and light orange the residues conserved only between Mnk1/2. (C) Stereoview of the superposition of the DFD-in (light blue) and -out (green) conformations of Mnk2. The homology model is built to include the missing activation loop and insertion 3 (I3) in the X-ray crystal structure (PDB ID 2HW7). Phe227-in represents Phe227 in the DFD-in conformation of Mnk2. The hinge region is shown in yellow. All figures are generated using Pymol v.1.5.0.4. Chemistry & Biology 2014 21, 441-452DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.01.011) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Known and Proposed Mnk Inhibitors (A) Stereoview of X-ray structure of the binding mode of staurosporine to Mnk2 in the DFG-in conformation (PDB ID 2HW7). Mnk2 is shown as light-brown ribbons. Staurosporine is shown in capped sticks. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines. (B) The chemical structures of known Mnk inhibitors and proposed Mnk2 inhibitors (PI-1 and PI-2). Chemistry & Biology 2014 21, 441-452DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.01.011) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Hydrogen Bond Donor/Acceptor and Hydrophobic Area Mapping of the Binding Site of Mnk2 The Mnk2 DFD-in conformation is shown in (A), and the DFD-out homology model in (B). Phe227 of the DFD motif is shown in black and the protein backbone is in ribbons. The yellow solid surface depicts hydrophobic areas where hydrophobic moieties of ligands could be positioned. The red and blue mesh indicates areas where hydrogen bond acceptor and donor functionalities can be placed. The figures were generated using Site Map and Maestro (Schrödinger Suite 2012). Chemistry & Biology 2014 21, 441-452DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.01.011) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Binding Modes of CGP57380, PI-1, and PI-2 to Mnk2 (A) Binding mode of CGP57380 to ATP-binding site and the schematic of protein-inhibitor interactions. (B) Binding mode of the designed inhibitor PI-1. PI-1 interacts with Ser231, a partially conserved residue among kinases. (C) Binding mode of PI-2. PI-2 interacts with Ser166 and 231, both partially conserved residues. Mnk2 is shown in light blue ribbons with the bound inhibitors in capped sticks. Dashed lines are hydrogen bonds. The binding modes were generated computationally using the IFD protocol (Schrödinger Suite 2012). A homology model of the DFD-in conformation based on an X-ray structure (PDB ID 2HW7) provided the protein atom coordinates. The ligand-interaction-diagram tool (Schrödinger Suite 2012) was used to produce the interaction schematics. Chemistry & Biology 2014 21, 441-452DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.01.011) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions