CEPC-SPPC Beihang Symposium

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SuperB Damping Rings M. Biagini, LNF-INFN P. Raimondi, SLAC/INFN A. Wolski, Cockroft Institute, UK SuperB III Workshop, SLAC, June 2006.
Advertisements

Lattice calculations: Lattices Tune Calculations Dispersion Momentum Compaction Chromaticity Sextupoles Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 17 January 2012 Rende.
March A. Chancé, J. Payet DAPNIA/SACM / Beta-beam ECFA/BENE Workshop The Decay Ring -First Design- A. Chancé, J.Payet CEA/DSM/DAPNIA/SACM.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
Flat-beam IR optics José L. Abelleira, PhD candidate EPFL, CERN BE-ABP Supervised by F. Zimmermann, CERN Beams dep. Thanks to: O.Domínguez. S Russenchuck,
ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design ( Modified FODO ) ** Yi-Peng Sun *,1,2, Jie Gao 1, Zhi-Yu Guo 2 Wei-Shi Wan 3 1 Institute of High Energy Physics,
LER Workshop, October 11, 2006LER & Transfer Line Lattice Design - J.A. Johnstone1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Introduction The.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Lattice design for CEPC main ring H. Geng, G. Xu, W. Chou, Y. Guo, N. Wang, Y. Peng, X. Cui, Y. Zhang, T. Yue, Z. Duan, Y. Wang, D. Wang, S. Bai, Q. Qin,
FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
CEPC Booster Zhang Chuang, Cui Xiaohao September 11,2015.
Hybrid Synchrotron Arc: 2 Dipoles per Half Cell J. Scott Berg Advanced Accelerator Group Meeting 28 July 2011.
Accumulator & Compressor Rings with Flexible Momentum Compaction arccells MAP 2014 Spring Meeting, Fermilab, May 27-31, 2014 Y. Alexahin (FNAL APC)
Optics considerations for PS2 October 4 th, 2007 CARE-HHH-APD BEAM’07 W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, C. Carli, B. Goddard, S. Hancock, J.M. Jowett, A. Koschik,
Optics solutions for the PS2 ring February 11 th, 2008 LIS Section Meeting Y. Papaphilippou.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
Optics considerations for PS2
Optimization of the Collider rings’ optics
Off-axis injection lattice design studies of HEPS storage ring
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
A.Lachaize CNRS/IN2P3 IPN Orsay
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
CEPC parameter optimization and lattice design
Cui Xiaohao, Zhang Chuang,Bian Tianjian January 12,2016
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Summary of CEPC pretzel scheme design
Issues in CEPC pretzel and partial double ring scheme design
CEPC pretzel scheme study
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Pretzel scheme of CEPC H. Geng, G. Xu, Y. Zhang, Q. Qin, J. Gao, W. Chou, Y. Guo, N. Wang, Y. Peng, X. Cui, T. Yue, Z. Duan, Y. Wang, D. Wang, S. Bai,
Summary on SPPC Accelerators
Summary on SPPC Accelerators
Injector Chain General and more about p-RCS
Optimization of CEPC Dynamic Aperture
Status of CEPC lattice design
CEPC-SppC Accelerator CDR Copmpletion at the end of 2017
CEPC Booster Design Progress (Low field)
The new 7BA design of BAPS
Injector Chain General and more about p-RCS/i-RCS
DA study for CEPC Main Ring
Progress of SPPC lattice design
CEPC partial double ring scheme and crab-waist parameters
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Optic design and performance evaluation for SPPC collimation systems
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Preliminary design result of SS ring
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Optics Design of the CEPC Interaction Region
Optics solutions for the PS2 ring
CEPC parameter optimization and lattice design
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
PEPX-type BAPS Lattice Design and Beam Dynamics Optimization
Overall Considerations, Main Challenges and Goals
Update of lattice design for CEPC main ring
Update on CEPC pretzel scheme design
Lattice design for CEPC
Towards an NMC Ring: Dispersion suppressor & long straight section
Optics considerations for PS2
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

CEPC-SPPC Beihang Symposium SS Conceptual design USTC Group: Xiangqi WANG, Yang HONG, Ershuai KONG, Linbo LIANG, Jiawen LI, Zhiliang REN, Bin SUN, Kai XIE, Hongliang XU, Jiayang YAN, Penghui YANG, Yuangji PEI IHEP Group: Feng SU, Jiangping DAI, Jingyu TANG, Qingjin XU , Linhao ZHANG CEPC-SPPC Beihang Symposium Sep. 02-03, 2016, IHEP, Beijing 2019/2/22

Content Introduction Consideration of injection and extraction Preliminary lattice design result Conclusion 2019/2/22

Introduction 2019/2/22

SS is the last booster in the injection chain 2019/2/22

SS Layout Total length is 7200 m. Two super period structure Four long straight sections: 2 for injection or extraction; 2 for RF cavities and other equipments 2019/2/22

New parameters for SPPC by late 2015 Collision energy is 35.3 TeV and injection energy is 2.1 TeV. Circumference of each ring is 57.36 km for the SPPC. Beam current is 1 A. A peak luminosity is 1.2×1035 cm-2·s-1. Momentum rigidity is 7008.0 T·m. Maximum strength of dipole magnetic field is 20T. RF frequency is about 200.02817 MHz used for injection. 质子静止能量:938.2720813(58)MeV。299792428.1. 5.22650677 kHz,38272 Bunch。 2019/2/22

Beam parameters of SS The injection energy of SPPC is 2100 GeV and the extraction energy of MSS is 180 GeV. Harmonic number of SS is chosen to be 4804, and the circumference is 7200 m. The cyclotron frequency is from 41.6373 to 41.6378 kHz. So the RF frequency is from 200.0255 to 200.0282 MHz. The adjust- ment amount can be calculated as 2.7 kHz. Beam current is 1 A, which is a challenge for SS design. The proton number per bunch (3828* bunches) is 3.9159×1010, and the total number of proton is 1.4928×1014 . * Assuming the injection filling factor from MSS to SS is 80% 2019/2/22

injection and extraction Considerations of injection and extraction 2019/2/22

Requirement of SS extraction To obtain a continuous bunch string in SPPC, the bump orbit injection scheme to SPPC is needed. If the repetition period of the injection process to SPPC is about 30 s, then multi partial injection by bunch to bunch to the two rings of SPPC would take 8-10 min. Fast extraction scheme is taken according to SS lattice. The proton cyclotron time is 24.0166 micro seconds in SS ring, and 1/8 of which in SPPC is 23.9165 micro seconds. If the length of a filled bunch string in SS is less than 21 micro seconds (or 21.5 micro seconds), according to the leading edge of kicker field waveform, the limit of bunch string length is 22 micro seconds in SS. This partially filled long bunch string pattern assures the safe process of rapid extraction. 4804/2=2402, 注入质子速度299788427.2,200.02550 MHz,根据1月25日下午视频会议讨论调整为5ps。 C/299788427.2=T=f-1, 2019/2/22

Kicker magnetic field wave form of LHC The leading edge (from 10% to 90%) of kicker magnetic field wave is about 2-2.5 micro seconds. 2019/2/22

Requirement for injection Bump orbit injection scheme is considered for SS injection operation. For a 180 GeV beam, proton cyclotron time in SS is 24.0169 micro seconds while in MSS it is11.6749 micro seconds. Twice injection from MSS to SS is needed to fill the whole SS ring. the length for each beam bunch string in MSS is at least 11 micro seconds. In order to reduce the difficulty of kicker design, large beam envelop in the injection as well as extraction long straight section is required. 2019/2/22

Operation process of SS To set the working parameters of the injected magnetic field, about 3 s Two partial injection, bunch to bunch from the MSS, time piece is about 2 s Ramping Up, about 8 s up to 2.1 TeV. Extraction from the SS ring into the SPPC, about 50 micro seconds Ramping Down, about 8 s Once again to set working parameters of the injected magnetic field, and so on. Tc,ss=24.01662 micro second, and 23.91655 micro second. Tc,sppc=191.33238409 micro second. 引出不需要长时间,微秒级;引出时间必须长于23.917 micro second。 注入磁铁不需要长时间,1微秒左右;注入时间必须长于0.5倍的23.917 micro second,等于11.9959 micro second。 SS周期的主要时间是RampingUp时间,其次是RampingDown时间,再其次是注入。 Repetition period of operation process of SS is 30 s! 2019/2/22

Preliminary lattice design result 2019/2/22

Dipole magnet Maximum magnetic field strength is 9.0319 T Minimum magnetic field strength is 0.7778 T Effective curvature radius of arc is 775.9122 m Number of dipole magnets is 352 Effective length of dipole magnets is 13.85 m Magnet gap is 50 mm 2019/2/22

Quadrupole and sextupole magnet Effective length is 4.0 m. Effective aperture is 50 mm. Maximum magnetic field 10 T, so maximum gradient magnetic field is 400 T·m-1. Maximum focus intensity is equal to 0.0057 m-2 (the gradient magnetic field is less than 400 T·m-1). The integration of other high order fields is less than 10-4 times of quadrupole field. The parameters of sextupole magnet is under research. 2019/2/22

Structure of the bare lattice The length of a single super periodic structure is 3600.0 meters Structure of a superperiod: half of LSS1 + DSPL + ARC + DSPR + LSS2+DSPL + ARC + DSPR + half of LSS1 LSS1: long straight section for injection or extraction DSPL: dispersion suppressor at the upstream of arc DSPR: dispersion suppressor at the downstream of arc LSS2: long straight section for RF cavities and other equipment ARC: consisting of 9 ARC FODOs 2019/2/22

Focusing strength [m-2] ARC FODO Parameters of quadrupole magnets Length [m] Focusing strength [m-2] QF 4 0.00463 QD -0.00435 ARC FODO structure: ½ QF + 4*DM + QD + 4*DM + ½ QF The length of drifts between magnets is 0.5 m There are nine ARC FODOs in the ARC section of half of a superperiod L=123.8 m 2019/2/22

Dispersion suppressor DSPL DSPR Length of DSPL or DSPR is 244.8 m DSPL and DSPR use the same dipole magnets with the ARC Nearly the same focusing strength of quadrupole magnets with the ARC Sextupole magnets for chromaticity correction are installed by the side of quadrupole magnets 2019/2/22

LSS1 for injection or extraction The length of LSS1 for injection is 248 m. The length of short drift in LSS1 is 15 m, and the length of longer drift is 84 m.. The triplet structure of quadrupole magnets is installed at the end of both sides of LSS1 to get large envelop The two short drift in LSS1 is used for installing kicker magnets and the long drift in the center is used for installing spetrum magnets. 2019/2/22

LSS2 for RF cavity The total length of a LSS2 for RF cavity is 128.4 m, and the length of a long drift without magnets in LSS2 is 60.2 m. As the research for RF cavity is not finished yet, the length and structure of LSS2 are not determined. 2019/2/22

Full superperiod Is it appropriate? Momentum compaction factor is 0.0100422 The horizontal tune for a superperiod is 5.58744 The vertical tune for a superperiod is 4.83483 The maximum horizontal beta function is 685.345 m The maximum vertical beta function is 629.219 m The maximum absolute horizontal dispersion is 18.465 m Is it appropriate? * This version of lattice is named SS V1.1 2019/2/22

Closed orbit deviation The maximum momentum deviation of SS V1.1 lattice is The maximum absolute horizontal closed orbit deviation is 0.3246 mm. The r.m.s horizontal closed orbit deviation is 0.2020 mm It is acceptable in this preliminary analysis! * The closed orbit deviation is calculated by the MAD-X V5.02.08 2019/2/22

dynamic aperture of SS ring First calculation of dynamic aperture of SS ring * 2019/2/22

X: 1.612913 mm Y: 5.058169 mm * 2019/2/22

Preliminary calculation of dynamic aperture * The closed orbit deviation is calculated by the MAD-X V5.02.08 2019/2/22

Preliminary calculation of dynamic aperture * 2019/2/22

Preliminary calculation of dynamic aperture * 2019/2/22

Preliminary calculation of dynamic aperture It is * 2019/2/22

Preliminary calculation of dynamic aperture * 2019/2/22

Preliminary calculation of dynamic aperture * 2019/2/22

Preliminary calculation of dynamic aperture * 2019/2/22

X: 14.516136 mm Y: 45.523273 mm * 2019/2/22

Preliminary calculation of dynamic aperture * 2019/2/22

Preliminary calculation of dynamic aperture * 2019/2/22

Preliminary calculation of dynamic aperture * 2019/2/22

Preliminary calculation of dynamic aperture * 2019/2/22

Preliminary calculation of dynamic aperture * 2019/2/22

Preliminary calculation of dynamic aperture * 2019/2/22

Preliminary calculation of dynamic aperture * 2019/2/22

X: 29.032262 mm Y: 91.046514 mm * 2019/2/22

Preliminary calculation of dynamic aperture * 2019/2/22

Preliminary calculation of dynamic aperture * 2019/2/22

Preliminary calculation of dynamic aperture * 2019/2/22

Preliminary calculation of dynamic aperture * 2019/2/22

Preliminary calculation of dynamic aperture * 2019/2/22

Base data of first calculation of dynamic aperture Lattice version: V1.0.0, June 5, 2016 Energy of 2100 MeV Ring circumference of 7200 m Cycle frequancy of 41.63(8) kHz Tracking numbers of 400,000: about 10 second Dynamic aperture: 29 mm × 91 mm Suitable for injection or extraction, in the vertical direction The lattice of cell’s period is not optimized The tracking has not been done: injection and Ramping Up processes * 2019/2/22

Check calculation of Lattice Twiss function is used to injection and extraction * The closed orbit deviation is calculated by the MAD-X V5.02.08 2019/2/22

Check calculation of Lattice It is acceptable in this preliminary analysis * The closed orbit deviation is calculated by the MAD-X V5.02.08 The phase advance of A super period 2019/2/22

Check calculation of Lattice Twiss function of A super period of SS ring * The closed orbit deviation is calculated by the MAD-X V5.02.08 2019/2/22

Check calculation of Lattice Twiss function of SS ring * The closed orbit deviation is calculated by the MAD-X V5.02.08 2019/2/22

Conclusion 2019/2/22

The high intensity proton beam of 1 A gives challenge to injection and extraction system. SS should adopt fast extraction scheme and bump orbit injection scheme. It is proved that the machine operates safely particularly during the injection (180 GeV, 11 microseconds) and extraction (2.1 TeV, 22 microseconds) process. A lattice with large envelop in the LSS for injection and extraction is proposed which is named SS V1.1. This lattice also reduces the difficulties of kicker magnets design. The closed orbit deviation is less than 0.3246 mm, corresponding to the maximum momentum deviation of . It comes to a preliminary conclusion that the beam can operate stably with this lattice scheme. The r.m.s horizontal closed orbit deviation is 0.2020 mm . 2019/2/22

To optimize the layout of the Lattice calculation, for all the cell’s periods The dynamic aperture tracking, with the high frequency system under injected energy in the process of ramping up  The large beta function and dispersion function, in arc section still need To be optimize to a reasonable value, in the future work. 2019/2/22

Thanks for your attention ! Thanks to the help of the collaborator ! 2019/2/22