Large Scale Structure of the Universe

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Seeing Dark Energy (or the cosmological constant which is the simplest form of DE) Professor Bob Nichol (ICG, Portsmouth)
Advertisements

PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 3: The Growth of Structure Growth of structure in an expanding universe The Jeans length Dark matter Large scale structure simulations.
If the universe were perfectly uniform, then how come the microwave background isn’t uniform? Where did all the structure(galaxies, clusters, etc.) come.
Simulating the joint evolution of quasars, galaxies and their large-scale distribution Springel et al., 2005 Presented by Eve LoCastro October 1, 2009.
CMB: Sound Waves in the Early Universe Before recombination: Universe is ionized. Photons provide enormous pressure and restoring force. Photon-baryon.
Astro-2: History of the Universe Lecture 4; April
Cosmological Structure Formation A Short Course
Dark Matter-Baryon segregation in the non-linear evolution of coupled Dark Energy models Roberto Mainini Università di Milano Bicocca Mainini 2005, Phys.Rev.
Lecture 2: Observational constraints on dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Nikolaos Nikoloudakis Friday lunch talk 12/6/09 Supported by a Marie Curie Early Stage Training Fellowship.
PRE-SUSY Karlsruhe July 2007 Rocky Kolb The University of Chicago Cosmology 101 Rocky I : The Universe Observed Rocky II :Dark Matter Rocky III :Dark Energy.
WMAP CMB Conclusions A flat universe with a scale-invariant spectrum of adiabatic Gaussian fluctuations, with re-ionization, is an acceptable fit to the.
CMB as a physics laboratory
The Galaxy Formation Paradigm Paradigm R. Giovanelli Astro620/Spring ‘07 Remember to mention.pdf file.
Program 1.The standard cosmological model 2.The observed universe 3.Inflation. Neutrinos in cosmology.
Large Scale Structure of the Universe. Evolution of the LSS – a brief history Picture credit: A. Kravtsov,
Universe: Space-time, Matter, Energy Very little matter-energy is observable Critical matter-energy density balances expansion and gravitational collapse.
Cosmology I & II Expanding universe Hot early universe Nucleosynthesis Baryogenesis Cosmic microwave background (CMB) Structure formation Dark matter,
CMB acoustic peaks.
The Theory/Observation connection lecture 3 the (non-linear) growth of structure Will Percival The University of Portsmouth.
Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) Peter Holrick and Roman Werpachowski.
Cosmic Inflation Tomislav Prokopec (ITP, UU) Utrecht Summer School, 28 Aug 2009 ˚ 1˚ WMAP 3y 2006.
Cosmological Tests using Redshift Space Clustering in BOSS DR11 (Y. -S. Song, C. G. Sabiu, T. Okumura, M. Oh, E. V. Linder) following Cosmological Constraints.
Polarization-assisted WMAP-NVSS Cross Correlation Collaborators: K-W Ng(IoP, AS) Ue-Li Pen (CITA) Guo Chin Liu (ASIAA)
Different physical properties contribute to the density and temperature perturbation growth. In addition to the mutual gravity of the dark matter and baryons,
Black hole production in preheating Teruaki Suyama (Kyoto University) Takahiro Tanaka (Kyoto University) Bruce Bassett (ICG, University of Portsmouth)
Lecture 3 - Formation of Galaxies What processes lead from the tiny fluctuations which we see on the surface of last scattering, to the diverse galaxies.
Early times CMB.
Academic Training Lectures Rocky Kolb Fermilab, University of Chicago, & CERN Cosmology and the origin of structure Rocky I : The universe observed Rocky.
Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations Jérôme Martin Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris (IAP) 1 [In collaboration with K. Jedamzik & M. Lemoine,
Dark energy I : Observational constraints Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
The Theory/Observation connection lecture 2 perturbations Will Percival The University of Portsmouth.
University of Durham Institute for Computational Cosmology Carlos S. Frenk Institute for Computational Cosmology, Durham Galaxy clusters.
Michael Doran Institute for Theoretical Physics Universität Heidelberg Time Evolution of Dark Energy (if any …)
the National Radio Astronomy Observatory – Socorro, NM
Using Baryon Acoustic Oscillations to test Dark Energy Will Percival The University of Portsmouth (including work as part of 2dFGRS and SDSS collaborations)
General Relativity Physics Honours 2008 A/Prof. Geraint F. Lewis Rm 560, A29 Lecture Notes 10.
Latest Results from LSS & BAO Observations Will Percival University of Portsmouth StSci Spring Symposium: A Decade of Dark Energy, May 7 th 2008.
Cosmology and Dark Matter III: The Formation of Galaxies Jerry Sellwood.
Dark Energy and baryon oscillations Domenico Sapone Université de Genève, Département de Physique théorique In collaboration with: Luca Amendola (INAF,
1 1 Dark Energy with SNAP and other Next Generation Probes Eric Linder Berkeley Lab.
Feasibility of detecting dark energy using bispectrum Yipeng Jing Shanghai Astronomical Observatory Hong Guo and YPJ, in preparation.
Large Scale Structure of the Universe. Evolution of the LSS – a brief history Picture credit: A. Kravtsov,
Lecture 27: The Shape of Space Astronomy Spring 2014.
Carlos Hernández-Monteagudo CE F CA 1 CENTRO DE ESTUDIOS DE FÍSICA DEL COSMOS DE ARAGÓN (CE F CA) J-PAS 10th Collaboration Meeting March 11th 2015 Cosmology.
Study of Proto-clusters by Cosmological Simulation Tamon SUWA, Asao HABE (Hokkaido Univ.) Kohji YOSHIKAWA (Tokyo Univ.)
Cheng Zhao Supervisor: Charling Tao
Inh Jee University of Texas at Austin Eiichiro Komatsu & Karl Gebhardt
BAO Damping and Reconstruction Cheng Zhao
Smoke This! The CMB, the Big Bang, Inflation, and WMAP's latest results Spergel et al, 2006, Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Three Year results:
Collapse of Small Scales Density Perturbations
2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey ¼ M galaxies 2003
The Observational Basis of Modern Cosmology
WEIGHING THE UNIVERSE Neta A. Bahcall Princeton University.
Outline Part II. Structure Formation: Dark Matter
The influence of Dark Energy on the Large Scale Structure Formation
Princeton University & APC
Recent status of dark energy and beyond
dark matter and the Fate of the Universe
STRUCTURE FORMATION MATTEO VIEL INAF and INFN Trieste
Cosmology from Large Scale Structure Surveys
Shintaro Nakamura (Tokyo University of Science)
Detection of integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect by cross-correlation of the
Outline Part II. Structure Formation: Dark Matter
宇宙磁场的起源 郭宗宽 中山大学宇宙学研讨班
Measurements of Cosmological Parameters
CMB Anisotropy 이준호 류주영 박시헌.
Self-similar Bumps and Wiggles: Isolating the Evolution of
6-band Survey: ugrizy 320–1050 nm
Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations
Presentation transcript:

Large Scale Structure of the Universe

Evolution of the LSS – a brief history Somewhat after recombination -- density perturbations are small on nearly all spatial scales. Dark Ages, prior to z=10 -- density perturbations in dark matter and baryons grow; on smaller scales perturbations have gone non-linear, d>>1; small (low mass) dark matter halos form; massive stars form in their potential wells and reionize the Universe. z=2 -- Most galaxies have formed; they are bright with stars; this is also the epoch of highest quasar activity; galaxy clusters are forming. In LCDM growth of structure on large (linear) scales has nearly stopped, but smaller non-linear scales continue to evolve. z=0 -- Small galaxies continue to get merged to form larger ones; in an open and lambda universes large scale (>10-100Mpc) potential wells/hill are decaying, giving rise to late ISW. Picture credit: A. Kravtsov, http://cosmicweb.uchicago.edu/filaments.html

Matter Density Fluctuation Power Spectrum P(k)~kn Harrison-Zel’dovich n=1 A different convention: plot P(k)k3

Evolution of density fluctuations: the set-up z=1200 z=4 x 103 z=1 z>>1010 log(t) log(rcomov) lambda-matter equality recombination; production of CMB matter-radiation equality end of inflation Planck time domination matter radiation lambda infla- tion sub-horizon super-horizon P(k) k P(k) k Growth rate of a density perturbation depends on epoch (i.e. what component dominates global expansion dynamics at that time), and whether a perturbation k-mode is super- or sub-horizon.

Linear growth of density perturbations: Super-horizon, w comp Linear growth of density perturbations: Super-horizon, w comp. dominated, pre & post recomb. fluid pressure is not important on super-horizon scales, so it makes no difference whether recombination has taken place or not. Friedmann eq: different patches of the Universe will have slightly different average densities and curvatures – at a fixed H: CMB MRE inflation log(t) log(rcomov) MD CMB MRE inflation log(t) log(rcomov) RD

Linear growth of density perturbations: Sub-horizon, radiation dominated, pre recombination dark matter has no pressure of its own; it is not coupled to photons, so there is no restoring pressure force. Jeans linear perturbation analysis applies: log(t) zero CMB radiation dominates, and because radiation does not cluster  all dk=0… MRE inflation log(rcomov) …but the rate of change of dk’s can be non-zero growing “decaying” mode mode

Linear growth of density perturbations: Sub-horizon, matter dominated, pre & post recomb. dark matter has no pressure of its own; it is not coupled to photons, so there is no restoring pressure force. Jeans linear perturbation analysis applies: log(t) zero also, can assume that total density is the critical density at that epoch: CMB MRE inflation log(rcomov) Two linearly indep. solutions: growing mode always comes to dominate; ignore decaying mode soln. growing decaying mode mode

Linear growth of density perturbations: Sub-horizon, lambda dominated, pre & post recomb. dark matter has no pressure of its own; it is not coupled to photons, so there is no restoring pressure force. Jeans linear perturbation analysis applies: log(t) can assume the amplitude of perturbations is zero, because lambda, which dominates, does not cluster: zero CMB MRE inflation log(rcomov) Two linearly indep. solutions: growing mode always comes to dominate; ignore decaying mode soln. “growing” decaying mode mode

Linear growth of density perturbations: Sub-horizon, curvature dominated, pre & post recomb. dark matter has no pressure of its own; it is not coupled to photons, so there no restoring pressure force. Jeans linear perturbation analysis applies: log(t) can assume the amplitude of perturbations is zero, because curvature, which dominates, does not cluster: zero CMB MRE inflation log(rcomov) Two linearly indep. solutions: growing mode always comes to dominate; ignore decaying mode soln. “growing” decaying mode mode

Linear growth of density perturbations: dark matter, baryons, and photons log(t) CMB MRE inflation log(rcomov)

Evolution of matter power spectrum log(t) Now z=1 On sub-horizon scales growth of structure begins and ends with matter domination CMB Evolution of matter power spectrum MRE EoIn log(rcomov) log(k)

Evolution of matter power spectrum log(t) P(k) high-k small scale perturbations grow fast, non-linearly Now z=1 k P(k) k baryonic oscillations appear – the P(k) equivalent of CMB T power spectrum CMB P(k) Evolution of matter power spectrum MRE k sub-horizon perturb. do not grow during radiation dominated epoch P(k) k P(k) k Harrison-Zeldovich spectrum P(k)~k from inflation P(k) EoIn k log(rcomov) log(k)

Transfer Functions Peacock; astro-ph/0309240 Transfer function is defined by this relation: Peacock; astro-ph/0309240

Growth of large scale structure Dark Matter density maps from N-body simulations Lambda (DE) spatially flat Wmatter=0.3 fractional overdensity ~const Standard spatially flat Wmatter=1.0 fractional overdensity ~1/(1+z) 350 Mpc the Virgo Collaboration (1996)

Growth of large scale structure In linear theory gravitational potential decays if DE or negative curvature dominate late time expansion Lambda (DE) spatially flat Wmatter=0.3 gravitational potential ~(1+z) Standard spatially flat Wmatter=1.0 gravitational potential ~const 350 Mpc the Virgo Collaboration (1996)

Late Integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) Effect If a potential well evolves as a photon transverses it, the photon’s energy will change Sachs & Wolfe (1967) ApJ 147, 73 Crittenden & Turok (1996) PRL 76, 575 Energy Energy Energy Energy photon gains energy after crossing a potential well potential well Look for correlation between CMB temperature fluctuations and nearby structure. Detection of late ISW effect in a flat universe is direct evidence of Dark Energy

Detecting late ISW Late ISW is detected as a cross-correlation, CCF on the sky between nearby large scale structure and temperature fluctuations in the CMB. HEAO1 hard X-rays full sky median z~0.9 NVSS 1.4 GHz nearly full sky radio galaxies; median z~0.8 Lines are LCDM predictions, not fits to data Note: points are highly correlated Boughn & Crittenden (2005) NewAR 49, 75, astro-ph/0404470

Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations One wave around one center: Wave starts propagating at Big Bang; end at recombination. The final length is the sound crossing horizon at recomb. (Change of color means recombination.) Many waves superimposed

Matter power spectrum - observations Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) SDSS and 2dF galaxy surveys from k-space to real space BAO bump gal. corr. fcn. Narrow feature: standard ruler (sound crossing horizon at recombination) comoving r (Mpc/h) Eisenstein et al. astro-ph/0501171 Percival et al. astro-ph/0705.3323

Recombination affects the matter power spectrum too sound horizon size at recombination Luminous SDSS red galaxies, z ~ 0.35 Wmh2=0.12, 0.13, 0.14 galaxy correlation function Wmh2=0.130+/-0.011 Eisenstein et al. astro-ph/0501171

Quantifying LSS on linear and non-linear scales The power spectrum quantifies clustering on spatial scales larger than the sizes of individual collapsed halos The 2pt correlation fcn is another way to quantify clustering of a continuous fluctuating density field, or a distribution of discrete objects, like collapsed DM halos. these are Fourier transforms of each other The mass function of discrete objects is the number density of collapsed dark matter halos as a function of mass - n(M)dM. This was evaluated analytically by Press & Schechter (1974) Internal structure of individual collapsed halos: one can use an analytical description for mildly non- linear regimes, but numerical N-body simulations are needed to deal with fully non-linear regimes. Picture credit: A. Kravtsov, http://cosmicweb.uchicago.edu/filaments.html

Correlation functions Two-point correlation function is a measure of the degree of clustering. It is a function of distance r only, . Suppose we are told that . What does that mean? If you are sitting on a galaxy, the probability dP that you will find another galaxy in a volume dV a distance r away from you is given by where n = average number density of galaxies. dP is the number of galaxies you expect to find in a volume dV. best fit line Alternative definition: take two small volumes distance r apart; the joint probability that you will find a galaxy in either one of the two dV volumes a distance r apart is given by. r dV r dV1 dV2

Estimating 2pt correlation function How does one calculate the 2pt correlation function given a distribution of galaxies is space? – Count the number of pairs of galaxies for every value of separation r. Then divide this histogram by the number of pairs expected if the spatial distribution of galaxies were random, and subtract 1. clustered # pairs separation r clustered random random 1 -1 Correlation functions measure the fractional excess of pairs compared to a random distrib. separation r

Correlation fcn and correlation length linear vertical scale Correlation length is defined as the scale where so expect twice the number of galaxies compared to random. For galaxies, correlation length is ~5 Mpc, for rich galaxy clusters it is ~25 Mpc.

2pt correlation function and power spectrum linear vertical scale Power spectrum is a Fourier transform of the correlation function:

Mass function of collapsed halos: Press-Schechter Smoothly fluctuating density field; randomly scattered equal volume spheres, each has some overdensity d. Some of these volumes will have a large enough overdensity (dc>1.69) that they will eventually collapse and form gravitationally bound objects. What is the mass function of these objects at any given cosmic epoch? rms dispersion in mass, or, equivalently, overdensity d, in spheres of radius R large R medium R small R 0 1.69 d fraction of volumes Press-Schechter (1974) main assumption: the fraction of spheres with volume V having overdensity d is Gaussian distributed these spheres collapse

Mass function of collapsed halos: Press-Schechter The fraction of spheres that will eventually collapse is The fraction of spheres that have just collapsed ( of all possible M, but same dc) How much mass in every unit of volume is contained in these objects? How many of the collapsed objects are there? power exponential law

Press-Schechter halo mass function large R medium R small R 0 1.69 d fraction of volumes power law exponential cut-off Press-Schechter vs. numerical simulations: solid red lines: simulations blue dotted: Press-Schechter green dashed: extended Press-Schechter (takes into account non-sphericity of proto halos.) small R medium R large R

Collapse of individual DM halos Hubble expansion In comoving coordinates a sphere, centered on a local overdensity shrinks in time; Hubble expansion is getting retarded by the overdensity. At some point, the sphere’s expansion stops (turn-around), and the sphere starts to collapse. local overdensity time rm constant time rm Halos collapse from inside out.

Collapse of individual DM halos at smaller radii (larger overdensities) halo is virialized turn-around; overdensity decouples from the Hubble flow radius shell-crossing turn-around radius moves out with time; halos collapse and virialize from inside out. reaches asymptotic radius time parametric equations apply non-linear evolution, shell-crossing, relaxation KE+0.5PE=0 at turn- around internal density increase external density decrease

Collapse of individual halos: the algebra leading to d=4 Collapse of individual halos: the algebra leading to d=4.5 at turn-around

Why are there no galaxies with M>1013Msun ? So far we have been mostly concerned with dark matter halos. The distribution DM halos in mass is continuous from ~109 to ~1015 Msun. But, DM halos with M>few x 1012Msun are not observed to host galaxies, only clusters of galaxies. Why? about 1/10 of virial radius, r200 for both Cooling curve diagram galaxies tcool < tdyn gas has cooled gas has not cooled galaxy clusters tcool > tdyn Whether a galaxy forms in a given halo is determined by the rate of gas cooling.

Cosmological Parameters From the number density of galaxy clusters can obtain: Measurements of global geometry: std candles – Supernova Type Ia std rulers – Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations: CMB – a test of flatness a test for Lambda – late ISW effect