Zhuren Wang, J. Christian Hesketh, David Fedida  Biophysical Journal 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fig. 1 (A) Average current voltage relations of peak INa in Con (n=10), nAF (n=7) and cAF (n=9) cells using protocol shown on left. (B) Average.
Advertisements

M. Martini, M.L. Rossi, G. Rubbini, G. Rispoli  Biophysical Journal 
Teresa K. Aman, Indira M. Raman  Biophysical Journal 
by Xianming Lin, Mark Crye, and Richard D. Veenstra
Activity-Dependent Regulation of HCN Pacemaker Channels by Cyclic AMP
Takeshi Sakaba, Erwin Neher  Neuron 
Volume 99, Issue 9, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 80, Issue 2, Pages (February 2001)
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Rundown of the Hyperpolarization-Activated KAT1 Channel Involves Slowing of the Opening Transitions Regulated by Phosphorylation  Xiang D. Tang, Toshinori.
Xianming Lin, Richard D. Veenstra  Biophysical Journal 
Differential Modulation of Cardiac Ca2+ Channel Gating by β-Subunits
Altered Subthreshold Sodium Currents and Disrupted Firing Patterns in Purkinje Neurons of Scn8a Mutant Mice  Indira M Raman, Leslie K Sprunger, Miriam.
FPL Modification of CaV1
Feng Qiu, Santiago Rebolledo, Carlos Gonzalez, H. Peter Larsson  Neuron 
Kenton J. Swartz, Roderick MacKinnon  Neuron 
The Transfer Functions of Cardiac Tissue during Stochastic Pacing
Volume 96, Issue 1, Pages e4 (September 2017)
Victor G. Romanenko, George H. Rothblat, Irena Levitan 
Preferential Closed-State Inactivation of Neuronal Calcium Channels
Volume 77, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Thomas Voets, Erwin Neher, Tobias Moser  Neuron 
Unitary Conductance Variation in Kir2
Volume 74, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Kristian Wadel, Erwin Neher, Takeshi Sakaba  Neuron 
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 106, Issue 12, Pages (June 2014)
The Reduced Release Probability of Releasable Vesicles during Recovery from Short- Term Synaptic Depression  Ling-Gang Wu, J.Gerard G Borst  Neuron  Volume.
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (November 2017)
Dirk Beutner, Thomas Voets, Erwin Neher, Tobias Moser  Neuron 
Modulation of the Gating of Unitary Cardiac L-Type Ca2+ Channels by Conditioning Voltage and Divalent Ions  Ira R. Josephson, Antonio Guia, Edward G.
External Ba2+ Block of Human Kv1
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Kinetic and Energetic Analysis of Thermally Activated TRPV1 Channels
A Computational Model of the Human Left-Ventricular Epicardial Myocyte
Alexander Sobolevsky, Sergey Koshelev  Biophysical Journal 
K. Purtell, K.J. Gingrich, W. Ouyang, K.F. Herold, Hemmings H.C.  
Teresa K. Aman, Indira M. Raman  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 1998)
Carlos A. Obejero-Paz, Stephen W. Jones, Antonio Scarpa 
Katie C. Bittner, Dorothy A. Hanck  Biophysical Journal 
Timothy Mickus, Hae-yoon Jung, Nelson Spruston  Biophysical Journal 
A Large-Conductance Anion Channel of the Golgi Complex
Rapid and Slow Voltage-Dependent Conformational Changes in Segment IVS6 of Voltage-Gated Na+ Channels  Vasanth Vedantham, Stephen C. Cannon  Biophysical.
Volume 93, Issue 12, Pages (December 2007)
The Binding of κ-Conotoxin PVIIA and Fast C-Type Inactivation of Shaker K+ Channels are Mutually Exclusive  E. Dietlind Koch, Baldomero M. Olivera, Heinrich.
Samuel J. Goodchild, Logan C. Macdonald, David Fedida 
Volume 88, Issue 3, Pages (March 2005)
Excitability of the Soma in Central Nervous System Neurons
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Daniel Krofchick, Mel Silverman  Biophysical Journal 
Effects of Temperature on Heteromeric Kv11.1a/1b and Kv11.3 Channels
Anna Boccaccio, Oscar Moran, Keiji Imoto, Franco Conti 
Inhibition of αβ Epithelial Sodium Channels by External Protons Indicates That the Second Hydrophobic Domain Contains Structural Elements for Closing.
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Vladimir Avdonin, Toshinori Hoshi  Biophysical Journal 
Phospholemman Modulates the Gating of Cardiac L-Type Calcium Channels
A Point Mutation in Domain 4-Segment 6 of the Skeletal Muscle Sodium Channel Produces an Atypical Inactivation State  John P. O’Reilly, Sho-Ya Wang, Ging.
Don E. Burgess, Oscar Crawford, Brian P. Delisle, Jonathan Satin 
Electroporation of DC-3F Cells Is a Dual Process
Kinetics of P2X7 Receptor-Operated Single Channels Currents
Kwoon Y. Wong, Felice A. Dunn, David M. Berson  Neuron 
Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
R.P. Schuhmeier, B. Dietze, D. Ursu, F. Lehmann-Horn, W. Melzer 
Use Dependence of Heat Sensitivity of Vanilloid Receptor TRPV2
Voltage-Dependent Blockade of Connexin40 Gap Junctions by Spermine
Synapse-Specific Contribution of the Variation of Transmitter Concentration to the Decay of Inhibitory Postsynaptic Currents  Zoltan Nusser, David Naylor,
David Naranjo, Hua Wen, Paul Brehm  Biophysical Journal 
Stimulatory Action of Internal Protons on Slo1 BK Channels
Kenton J. Swartz, Roderick MacKinnon  Neuron 
Presentation transcript:

A High-Na+ Conduction State during Recovery from Inactivation in the K+ Channel Kv1.5  Zhuren Wang, J. Christian Hesketh, David Fedida  Biophysical Journal  Volume 79, Issue 5, Pages 2416-2433 (November 2000) DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76486-1 Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Rapid C-type inactivation in Na+-conducting Kv1.5 channels. (A) 135mM Ki+/5mM Ko+. The current was recorded at +60mV for 500ms from −80mV. (B) 135mM Nai+/5mM Nao+. As in A, but for 400ms. (C) Symmetrical 135mM Na1+/Nao+. The pulse protocol is shown at the top. An initial 20-ms depolarization was given from −80 to +80mV and incremented by 20ms for each subsequent pulse, given every 20s. Note that with increasing test pulse duration, the initial fast tail was progressively reduced, as the rising phase became apparent. Enlarged tail currents are shown in the inset. (D) Normalized outward currents at the end of depolarizing pulses (●) and instantaneous tail currents (○) as functions of pulse duration from data as in C. Data represent mean±SE (n=5). In this figure, as in all others, dotted lines represent zero current. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2416-2433DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76486-1) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Increase in Kv1.5 Na+ conductance in symmetrical Na+ during the recovery from C-type inactivation. (A) Supernormal currents at short repolarization intervals in 135mM Nai+/135mM Nao+. A 400-ms prepulse to +60mV from −80mV conditioned the channels. After repolarization for 200ms at −80mV, a 1-s test pulse to +60mV was given. The protocol was repeated every 20s, with an increment of the interpulse interval of 400ms each time. (B) Data from another cell. As for A, except that the interpulse interval was incremented by 2s each time. (C) Time course for the recovery of the outward Na+ currents. The test pulse peak outward current (Itest) was normalized to the corresponding prepulse current amplitude (Icont), and the ratio Itest/Icont was plotted as a function of the interpulse interval. The double-exponential fit had time constants of 0.9±0.2s (τ1) and 3.7±1.8s (τ2) (n=4–9 cells). The dotted line represents recovery from inactivation in 5mM Nao+ (redrawn from Fig. 3 D). Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2416-2433DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76486-1) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Increase of Kv1.5 Na+ conductance in asymmetrical Na+ during the recovery from C-type inactivation. (A) Appearance of slow inward Na+ tail current in 135mM NMGi+/5mM Nao+. The pulse was from −80 to +60mV for 400ms. (B) Supernormal currents at short repolarization intervals in 135mM Nai+/5Nao+. A 400-ms prepulse to +60mV from −80mV conditioned the channels. After repolarization for 50ms at −80mV, a 200-ms test pulse to +60mV was given. The protocol was repeated every 20s, and the interpulse interval was incremented by 50ms each time. (C) As for B, from another cell, except that the interpulse interval was incremented by 400ms each time. (D) Mean peak test pulse data were normalized to preceding control peak current amplitudes and plotted as a function of the interpulse interval. Note the break in the abscissa after 1s and the change of time base. Three phases are shown (a–c), of which a and b were fit by a double-exponential function. Phase c was fit by a single exponential with a time constant of 4.3±0.9s (n=8). Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2416-2433DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76486-1) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Slowed inactivation during the high Na+-conducting state in Kv1.5 channels. (A) 135mM Nai+/5mM Nao+. Currents were recorded every 20s during 400-ms prepulses from −80mV to 60mV, followed by a test pulse to a variable potential between +10 and +80mV, as indicated in the twin-pulse protocol at top. Lines through test pulse data are biexponential fits to current decay. (B) Time constants of Na+ current inactivation versus depolarization voltage, during the prepulses, fitted to single exponentials (τ), and during test pulses as in A, fitted to double exponentials (τ1 and τ2). The lines through the data were obtained by fitting τ-V curves to obtain q (see Materials and Methods). For τ and τ1, q was 0.03±0.05 e0 (n=5) and 0.05±0.05 e0 (n=9), respectively, and 0.11±0.01 e0 for τ2 (n=9). (C) Relative amplitudes of τ1 and τ2 from B as a function of potential. (D) As for A, with a 10-s conditioning pulse and 400-ms test pulse, both from −80mV to 60mV. The interval between the two pulses was 250ms. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2416-2433DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76486-1) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Na+ currents through R487V mutant Kv1.5 channels. (A) Whole-cell current recordings from Kv1.5-R487V in 135mM Nai+/135mM Nao+. The depolarizing pulse was from −80mV holding potential to +80mV for 100ms or 14s. Traces from the same cell are superimposed. (B) Expanded scale tail current recordings from the experiment shown in A. Trace a, 100-ms depolarization; trace b, end of 14-s pulse. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2416-2433DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76486-1) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Na+ permeation and K+ permeation through Kv1.5 channels both allow slow Na+ tail currents. (A) 135mM NMGi+/1mM Ko++135mM NMGo+. The current was recorded for 1s at +10mV from −80mV. The inset is the enlarged tail current. (B) As for A, except that external NMG+ was replaced by 135mM Nao+. A and B were obtained from the same cell. (C) 5mM Ki++135mM NMGi+/135mM Nao+. The pulse was from −80mV to +60mV for 1s. Note the rising phase and the slow decay of Na+ tail current. (D) As for C, except that external Na+ was replaced with 135mM NMGo+. C and D were recorded from the same cell. Similar results were seen in five other cells. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2416-2433DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76486-1) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Voltage-dependent deactivation of inactivated Kv1.5 Na+ currents. (A) Symmetrical 135mM Nai+/Nao+. The current was recorded at +60mV for 400ms from −80mV. (B) As for A, except for repolarization to different voltages between −120 and −20mV. The pulse was given every 20s. Current tracings are shown at 20-mV repolarization intervals. (B, inset) Enlarged tail currents. Biexponential fits to obtain τ1 and τ2 are shown as lines through data points. The fast initial current spike is caused by capacitance. (C) Time constants of Na+ current deactivation versus repolarization potential. τ1 was fitted to the rising phase of the tail current, while τ2 was fitted to the slower decay phase, as indicated in the inset. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2416-2433DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76486-1) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Repolarization negative to −20mV is required to allow recovery of C-type inactivated Na+ currents. (A) In symmetrical 135mM Nai+/Nao+, current was recorded during a control prepulse to +60mV and, during a second test pulse to +60mV, after 10s at −20mV. (B) As for A, with an additional 2-s repolarization to −80mV before the second depolarizing test pulse, as indicated in the pulse protocol shown above the current recording. Arrows indicate Na+ tail currents at −80mV. Note the breaks in and change of time base in both A and B. (C) Peak outward currents during the test pulses normalized to the currents in preceding prepulses. Hatched bar data were obtained from eight cells, using the protocol in A (−20mV test) and B (−80mV test). * Significant difference from prepulse amplitude, p<0.05. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2416-2433DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76486-1) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 Recovery of C-type inactivated Kv1.5 channels in symmetrical Na+ solutions. (A) Symmetrical 135mM Nai+/Nao+. Currents were recorded using the twin-pulse protocol shown at the top, which was repeated every 20s to allow full recovery from inactivation between tests. A 400-ms prepulse was followed by a 20-ms test pulse after a variable interpulse interval. (B) Time course for the recovery of the fast Na+ tail current (Itail (fast)). The amplitude was measured from the instantaneous peak to the end of the fast tail and normalized to the peak outward current (Ipeak) during the prepulse. The ratio was plotted against the interpulse interval. The best fit to data was a double exponential with time constants as 1.1±0.2s (τ1) and 3.7±1.3s (τ2). The data were obtained from four to nine cells. The dotted line represents recovery to control level, measured as the fraction of fast tail amplitude after a 20-ms depolarization to peak outward current during the prepulse. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2416-2433DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76486-1) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 10 State diagram of the model used to describe sodium permeation through Kv1.5. Solid and dashed arrows denote, respectively, dominant transitions at positive (+80mV) and negative (−80mV) potentials. Numbers are rate constants for respective transitions in ms−1. For nondominant transitions at either +80 or −80mV, rates were set to zero. The rates adjacent to each rate were those used in the model simulations of ionic currents under conditions of symmetrical Na+ (135mM Nai/o+). Values in parentheses denote changes required to simulate currents under conditions of low external Nao+ (5mM). All other rates were obtained from Hesketh and Fedida (1999). The C, I, and R states in the model conduct Na+ with ratios of 1:0.15:1, respectively. All closed states are nonconducting. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2416-2433DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76486-1) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 11 Simulations of Kv1.5 Na+ current inactivation produced by the model in Fig. 10. (A) Simulation of current inactivation and tails during brief depolarizations in symmetrical 135mM Nai+/Nao+. An initial 20-ms depolarization was given from −80 to +80mV, and this was incremented by 20ms for each subsequent pulse. With increasing test pulse duration, the initial fast tail was progressively reduced, as the rising phase became apparent. (B) Model simulation of ionic current in the presence of symmetrical sodium (135mM Na+i/o). The simulation protocol involves an initial 400-ms depolarization to +80mV followed by a repolarization to −80mV, 300ms or 1s in length. Repolarization is then followed by a test pulse to +80mV lasting 1s. The dashed line denotes zero ionic current. (C) Changes in the proportion of channels in specific states during various phases of the simulation protocol illustrated in B. (Top) Proportion of channels in state C0 (thick line), C4I (dotted line), and C0I (thin line) during the repolarization pulse. (Bottom) Proportion of channels in state I (dotted line), R (thin line), and O (thick line) during the second test pulse in B, after a 1-s repolarization period. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2416-2433DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76486-1) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 12 Model simulations of Na+ ionic currents and recovery from inactivation. (A) Model simulation of ionic current recovery after an inactivating test pulse (+80mV, 400ms), in the presence of symmetrical 135mM Nai/o+. Repolarization times were 300ms, 500ms, 700ms, 1s, 2s, 4s, 6s, 8s, and 10s, and test pulse durations were 0.3–2s. The inset shows a single ionic current trace during a 20-ms depolarization, after an 8-s repolarization period. (B) Peak level of test pulse outward current relative to peak level of prepulse current as a function of the length of the repolarizing pulses. Points were obtained from the simulations illustrated in Fig. 11 A. The smooth line through the points represents a double-exponential curve with time constants of 0.9 and 3.7s that were obtained from the experimental data illustrated in Fig. 2 C. (C) Model simulation of ionic currents with a protocol identical to that in A, but in the presence of 5mM Nao+. (D) Peak level of test pulse current relative to peak level of prepulse current as a function of the length of the repolarizing pulses. Points were obtained from the simulations illustrated in Fig. 11 C. Lines through points do not represent any function. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2416-2433DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76486-1) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 13 Effect of 5mM Ki+ on inward Na+ tail currents. (A) Experimental data obtained using pulses of increasing duration from −80 to +60mV every 20s. The pipette contained 135mM NMGi++5mM Ki+. The decrease in outward current for later depolarizations reflects accumulated inactivation even at such a low pulse rate. (B) As in A, except that Nao+ was replaced by NMGo+. (C) Modification of the model of Na+ permeation through Kv1.5 incorporating two states in the inactivation pathway. Rates were 0.003ms−1 and 0.002ms−1 for the O to I1 and I1 to I2 transitions, respectively. Rates for the I2 to R transition and the I1 to C4I transition were 0.05ms−1 and 0.003ms−1, respectively. All other rates were unchanged from the model in Fig. 10. Solid and dashed arrows denote, respectively, transitions dominant at positive (+60mV) and negative (−80mV) potentials. (D) Model simulation of data presented in A, using the scheme presented in C. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2416-2433DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76486-1) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2416-2433DOI: (10 Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2416-2433DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76486-1) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions