Preparing a Patent Application

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supplementary International Search (SIS) (PCT Rule 45bis)
Advertisements

H I R S C H & P A R T N E R S A v o c a t S o l i c i t o r R e c h t s a n w a l t CHEMICAL INVENTIONS IN FRANCE Recent decisions and case law Dr Denis.
On Patent Claims and how to write them Jonah Probell not an attorney.
Incorporation by Reference
Anatomy of a Patent Application Presented by: Jeong Oh Director, Office of Technology Transfer & Industrial Development Syracuse University April 30, 2009.
How to read a patent? Karen Curé.
MSE-415: B. Hawrylo Chapter 14 - Patents There are 4 types of intellectual property that are relevant to product design and development
The America Invents Act (AIA) - Rules and Implications of First to File, Prior Art, and Non-obviousness -
September 14, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December.
CS 5060, Fall 2009 Digital Intellectual Property Law Drafting a software patent application October 19th Lecture.
Invention Spotting – Identifying Patentable Inventions Martin Vinsome June 2012.
The Research Problem PE 357. Selecting the problem Can be for research or a literature review -To break the problem down more … -needs to be of interest.
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Business and Administrative Communication SIXTH EDITION.
Technical Writing II Acknowledgement: –This lecture notes are based on many on-line documents. –I would like to thank these authors who make the documents.
by Eugene Li Summary of Part 3 – Chapters 8, 9, and 10
Patent Overview by Jeff Woller. Why have Patents? Patents make some people rich – but, does that seem like something the government should protect? Do.
® ® From Invention to Start-Up Seminar Series University of Washington The Legal Side of Things Invention Protection Gary S. Kindness Christensen O’Connor.
Lauren MacLanahan Office of Technology Licensing GTRC.
Current and Future USPTO Practice RESTRICTION PRACTICES AT THE USPTO 1 © AIPLA 2015.
Fundamentals of Patenting and Licensing for Scientists and Engineers Part 2: Fundamentals in Patenting Book by Matthew Ma Summarized by Constance Lu.
Information Disclosure Statements
Utility Requirement in Japan Makoto Ono, Ph.D. Anderson, Mori & Tomotsune Website:
2 23,503 hours in FY 2013, compared with 21,273 hours in FY ,651 interview hours in FY 13 have been charged through the AFCP program. Interview.
Contents of US Patent Applications & Filing Requirements
International IP Issues Federal Lab Consortium Meeting International IP Issues Dr Roisin McNally - European Patent Attorney 20 September 2006.
European Patent Applicants Filing in China Common Mistakes Zheng Li Zhongzi Law Office September, 2014.
Initial "Inventor" Interview (Practical Legal And Business Considerations) Greg Allen 3M Innovative Properties Company 1 August 26, 2010 AIPLA’s Practical.
GE 121 – Engineering Design Engineering Design GE121 Reporting the Outcome Lecture 7A.
July 18, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December 10,
ENG - W232 The Formal Business Report. Audience supervisors at Air America.
Hamre, Schumann, Mueller & Larson, P.C U.S. Patent Claims By James A. Larson.
1 Drafting Mechanical Claims Glenn M. Massina, Esq. RatnerPrestia, PC August 26, 2010.
New Sections 102 & 103 (b) Conditions for Patentability- (1) IN GENERAL- Section 102 of title 35, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: -`Sec.
Revisions to Japanese Patent Law Before the law was revised, a Divisional Applications could not be filed after a Notice of Allowance 2.
Chris Fildes FILDES & OUTLAND, P.C. IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting AIPLA Annual Meeting, October 20, 2015 USPTO PILOT PROGRAMS 1 © AIPLA 2015.
Patent Application – Invention name here Inventor: Your Name Assignee: Your Name Filed: Today’s date References Cited: Use Google Patent search to find.
Patent Searching Basics Patrick M. Torre, Ph.D. November 18, 2015.
Written Presentations of Technical Subject Writing Guide vs. Term paper Writing style: specifics Editing Refereeing.
1 Patent Prosecution: Best Practices for Reducing Costs While Improving Patent Quality February 9, 2010.
(c) 2004, David Schnapf, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP 1 Examiner Use of Background Statements David Schnapf Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton.
Patents and the Patenting Process Patents and the Inventor’s role in the Patenting Process.
Academic Writing Fatima AlShaikh. A duty that you are assigned to perform or a task that is assigned or undertaken. For example: Research papers (most.
Yuichi Watanabe Osha Liang LLP January 26, 2016 Practice Tips: Prosecution of Japan-origin US applications 1 © AIPLA 2015.
© 2012 Copyright Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC William C. Rowland Fang Liu Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney Introduction to Intellectual Property.
Patent Application Preparation
Patents and Trade Secrets
US Patents.
AIPLA ID Committee Meeting AIPLA Spring Meeting (Seattle) May 2, 2013
PATENT OFFICE PROSECUTION
Patents and Trade Secrets
Writing Requirements Lecture # 23.
PATC Module 2 – Infringement/Validity
Preparing a Patent Application
Tim Saulsbury -- Continuations in Part
SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL WRITING Patents
Invention Title Principle Inventor MM DD, 201X.
Drafting Mechanical Claims
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
Nuts and Bolts of Patent Law
Global Innovation Management Workout on Writing a Patent
Supplementary International Search (SIS) (PCT Rule 45bis)
Preparing Conference Papers (1)
PATC Module 2 – Infringement/Validity
Chapter Four Engineering Communication
Upcoming changes in the European Patent Office practice on allowing claim amendments in pending patent applications (Article 123(2) EPC) Christof Keussen.
Chapter Four Engineering Communication
US Patent Applications
Chapter Four Engineering Communication
Preparing Conference Papers (1)
Claim drafting strategies when filing a European patent application or entering the European phase of a PCT-application Christof Keussen
Presentation transcript:

Preparing a Patent Application

Preparing a Patent Application Title Related Art Technical Field Background Summary Drawings Description Abstract

Preparing a Patent Application Title Short and precise Does not contain trade-mark, coined word or personal name Does not telegraph the inventive features Does describe type of claims System Method Apparatus Combination of at least first two Cf. Rule 80(1)(a), MOPOP §9.01 , MPEP §606, PCT Applicant’s Guide §59

Preparing a Patent Application Related Art Usually identify if patent application relates to previously filed application Eg. priority application, parent of divisional, continuation, CIP Generally do not reference foreign applications unless claiming priority from them Incorporation by reference: Recommended for US Not permitted in CA Recommendation: insert incorporation by reference when filing and simply remove when requested to do so by Examiner

Preparing a Patent Application Technical Field Specifies technical field to which invention relates Used to limit scope of prior art search Sometimes may want to limit or broaden depending on scope of claims to which you think you are entitled Does not telegraph the inventive features “The present disclosure relates to <specify> and in particular to <specify> Cf. Rule 80(1)(b) MOPOP §9.01 , MPEP 608.01(c)(1), PCT Applicant’s Guide §§113-116

Preparing a Patent Application In class exercise Students draft Title and Technical Field portions of patent application directed to the invention discussed during the Inventor Interview exercise

Preparing a Patent Application Background Describe the problem Remember your notes from Inventor Interview Make a compelling case for the problem Describe the prior art, which may be references or approaches Even more important in light of Free World Trust If you craft narrowing amendment to avoid a prior art reference, may need to rely on “subjective” essentiality to render it essential Cannot do this if not referenced in specification Can do in prosecution: cf. Patent Act, s. 38.2(2) Try to avoid characterizing as “prior art” May be held as an admission Describe shortcomings of each reference DO NOT TELEGRAPH THE INVENTIVE CONCEPT Admission as prior art? Create an obviousness argument May be required in some jurisdictions (e.g. Europe’s problem-solution approach)

Preparing a Patent Application Background (cont’d) Objectives Modern view – do not state any May state what is “desirable” Be careful of making a promise that is not kept You can make an innocuous “desirability” statement as a lead-in to description Cf. Rule 80(1)(c), MOPOP §9.01 , MPEP 608.01(c)(2), PCT Applicant’s Guide §113

Preparing a Patent Application In class exercise Students to draft Background paragraph for a patent application directed to invention discussed during the Inventor Interview exercise, discussing one (mythical) prior art reference student considers to be the “best” reference

Preparing a Patent Application Summary First introduction to inventive concept Modern approach: after drawings and as initial part of description Describe inventive concept in terms that allow understanding of technical problem, even if not expressly stated as such, and its solution Avoid citing advantages Generally tracks independent claim(s) and abstract May be useful as an initial cut at claims (see notes re claim drafting) Try to keep consistent and current Insert consistory clauses and keep them current (CA) Avoid reference to invention Emphasize “aspects” of disclosure and “example embodiments” Cf. Rule 80(1)(d), MPEP 608.01(d)

Preparing a Patent Application Drawings Determine which drawings and in which order you want to use Work in conjunction with detailed description Start from general or background Proceed to main embodiment Describe alternative embodiments as needed You may need additional views to be prepared Add reference numerals as you proceed Leave space for additional numerals Even numbers / increments of 5 Perhaps use leading digit to identify figure number Consider glossary for consistency of terminology or review and revise Describe each figure both in Drawings section and as introduced Avoid reference to invention Emphasize “aspects” of disclosure and “example embodiments”

Preparing a Patent Application Drawings (cont’d) Cf. Patent Act, Section 37, Rule 80(1)(e), 82, 83, MOPOP c. 10, MPEP 608.01(f), PCT Applicant’s Guide §143-178

Preparing a Patent Application Drawing Descriptions Exercise students draft descriptions of drawing figures in handout click drawing to display drawing figures in handout

Preparing a Patent Application Description Work in conjunction with drawings in selected order Describe structure first then operation Work recursively to describe structure Introduce all elements in figure Name each element (CONSISTENTLY!) and assign reference numeral Name comes before reference numeral Use reference numerals consistently – especially embodiment to embodiment Use names consistently (glossary or parts list) You may need to revise in light of claim terminology Try to use “simple” and acceptable terminology of the art – don’t be too fancy For each element: Describe connections to other elements (may involve duplication) Describe operation of element (this may entail introduction of new figure) Describe simple equivalents but not alternative embodiments Describe composition, size, manufacturer, part number as appropriate for purposes of best mode and enablement Avoid patent profanity: essential, must, preferred, best, obvious etc.

Preparing a Patent Application Description (cont’d) Once main embodiment structure described, describe operation of main embodiment Operation may not follow structure but structure completely described Use flow chart describing method actions Avoid reference to steps or ordering Flow chart(s) should track broadest method claim(s) Describe each action as an element and each arrow as a connection Apply “structural” approach to flow chart Now describe alternative embodiments with reference to figures if appropriate Boilerplate Consistory clauses (modern approach) / omitted EP claims Cf. Rule 80(1)(f), MOPOP c. 9, MPEP §608.01(g) MPEP §608.01(h) PCT Applicant’s Guide §§113-116

Preparing a Patent Application Abstract Used for searching Single paragraph, multiple sentences Not just repetition of claim language Use “plain” English (avoid “said” if re-using some claim language) Brief – around 150 words Generally tracks independent claim(s) and summary May be useful as an initial cut at claims (see notes re claim drafting) Try to keep consistent and current Cf. Rule 79, MOPOP c. 8, MPEP 608.01(b), PCT Applicant’s Guide §§179-188A