UNSTABLE Science Question 1: ABL Processes

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stratus. Outline  Formation –Moisture trapped under inversion –Contact layer heating of fog –Fog induced stratus –Lake effect stratus/strato cu  Dissipation.
Advertisements

Forecasting convective outbreaks using thermodynamic diagrams. Anthony R. Lupo Atms 4310 / 7310 Lab 10.
Analysis of Rare Northeast Flow Events By Joshua Beilman and Stephanie Acito.
Characteristics of Isolated Convective Storms
21:50 UTC western dryline On the dynamics of drylines Fine-scale vertical structure of drylines during the International H 2 O Project (IHOP) as seen by.
Weismann (1992) Weisman, M. L., 1992: The role of convectively generated rear- inflow jets in the evolution of long-lived mesoconvective systems. J. Atmos.
The primary initiation of deep convection from boundary-layer convection during CSIP School of Earth and Environment NATIONAL CENTRE FOR ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE.
UNSTABLE The UNderstanding Severe Thunderstorms and Alberta Boundary Layers Experiment Neil Taylor 1, Dave Sills 2, John Hanesiak 3, Jason Milbrandt 4.
The Understanding Severe Thunderstorms and Alberta Boundary Layers Experiment (UNSTABLE) 2008: Preliminary Results Neil M. Taylor 1, D. Sills 2, J. Hanesiak.
June 2, st UNSTABLE Science Workshop April
EXPLORING LINKAGES BETWEEN PLANT- AVAILABLE SOIL MOISTURE, VEGETATION PHENOLOGY AND CONVECTIVE INITIATION By Julian Brimelow and John Hanesiak.
An Overview of Environmental Conditions and Forecast Implications of the 3 May 1999 Tornado Outbreak Richard L. Thompson and Roger Edwards Presentation.
1 st UNSTABLE Science Workshop April 2007 Outline Taylor Factors important for CI Science Question 1 What do we need to resolve processes? Required.
A brief synopsis of Johnson and Mapes: Mesoscale Processes and Severe Convective Weather From Severe Convective Storms sections 3.3b, 3.3c.1, 3.4 By Matt.
Mesonet Observations during the UNSTABLE 2008 Pilot David Sills 1, Neil Taylor 2, Craig Smith 3, Geoff Strong 4 and John Hanesiak 5 1 Cloud Physics and.
Chapter 3 Mesoscale Processes and Severe Convective Weather Meteorology 515/815 San Francisco State University Spring 2006 Christopher Meherin.
4 th COPS meeting, Hohenheim, 25/9/06 CuPIDO (Cumulus Photogrammetric, In-situ, and Doppler observations over Orography) a survey July-August 2006 Catalina.
The Effect of the Terrain on Monsoon Convection in the Himalayan Region Socorro Medina 1, Robert Houze 1, Anil Kumar 2,3 and Dev Niyogi 3 Conference on.
The Understanding Severe Thunderstorms and Alberta Boundary Layers Experiment (UNSTABLE) 2008: Operations Overview Neil M. Taylor 1, D. Sills 2, J. Hanesiak.
Fine-Scale Observations of a Pre-Convective Convergence Line in the Central Great Plains on 19 June 2002 The Problem Questions: 1. How do mesoscale atmospheric.
Extratropical Synoptic-Scale Processes and Severe Convection John Monteverdi Doswell, C.A. III, and L.F. Bosart, 2001: Extratropical synoptic-scale processes.
Lecture 24: Thunder & Tornadoes (Ch 11) general statements about tornados soundings associated with severe thunderstorms & tornadoes July 1987 Edmonton.
The Simultaneous Observation of the Near-Dryline Environment (SONDE- 2008/2009?) Experiment Objectives and Hypotheses New Developments Talking Points Dr.
Unstable Science Question 2 John Hanesiak CEOS, U. Manitoba Unstable Workshop, Edmonton, AB April 18-19, 2007.
. Severe Weather Indices Variables used to ‘summarize’ the potential for Severe Weather formation Evolved over past 60 years Based on long history of severe.
The Understanding Severe Thunderstorms and Alberta Boundary Layers Experiment (UNSTABLE): Overview and Preliminary Results Neil M. Taylor 1, D. Sills 2,
Characteristics of Isolated Convective Storms Meteorology 515/815 Spring 2006 Christopher Meherin.
Roll or Arcus Cloud Supercell Thunderstorms.
Horizontal Convective Rolls MPO 551 Paper Presentation Dan Stern Horizontal Convective Rolls : Determining the Environmental Conditions Supporting their.
II. Synoptic Atmospheric Destabilization Processes Elevated Mixed Layer (EML) Synoptic Lifting Dynamic Destabilization Differential Advection.
1 Lake-Effect Snow (LES). 2 Overview of the Lake-Effect Process n Occurs to the lee of the Great Lakes during the cool season n Polar/arctic air travels.
The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom 陳登舜 ATM NCU Group Meeting REFERENCE : Liu., H., J. Anderson, and Y.-H. Kuo, 2012: Improved analyses.
1 The Thermodynamic Diagram Adapted by K. Droegemeier for METR 1004 from Lectures Developed by Dr. Frank Gallagher III OU School of Meteorology.
Simulating Supercell Thunderstorms in a Horizontally-Heterogeneous Convective Boundary Layer Christopher Nowotarski, Paul Markowski, Yvette Richardson.
Mesoscale Processes And Severe Convective Weather Chapter 3: Severe Convective Storms C.A. Doswell III Authors: Richard H. Johnson Brian E. Mapes Presenter:
Cloud Evolution and the Sea Breeze Front
Chapter 7: convective initiation
The Dryline The dryline can be defined as the near surface convergence zone between moist air flowing off the Gulf of Mexico and dry air flowing off of.
Doppler Lidar Winds & Tropical Cyclones Frank D. Marks AOML/Hurricane Research Division 7 February 2007.
Frontogenesis Frontogenesis: The generation of intensity of a front Warm air merged onto colder air Temperature gradient amplified at least one order of.
Convective Parameterization in NWP Models Jack Kain And Mike Baldwin.
Lecture 18 Lake Effect Storms. Homework Due Friday, December 12, 2014 TYU Ch 13: 2,4,,6, 7,18 ; TYPSS 3 TYU Ch 16: 1, 2, 3, 7, 11 ; TYPSS 2 Extra Credit,
Chapter 7: convective initiation squall line development in Illinois a visible satellite image loop of CI in the eastern US 35°N 103°W Fig. 7.2.
Matthew Lagor Remote Sensing Stability Indices and Derived Product Imagery from the GOES Sounder
Cloud Formation  Ten Basic Types of Clouds (Genera): l High: Ci, Cs, Cc l Middle: As, Ac l Low: St, Ns, Sc l Clouds of Great Vertical Extent: Cu, Cb 
TOPOGRAPHICALLY INDUCED CONVECTIVE CLOUD PATTERNS
Defining a Threat Area and Miller Techniques
Thermodynamics We Can See!
Shifting the diurnal cycle of parameterized deep convection over land
Characteristics of Isolated Convective Storms
AOS 101 Severe Weather April 1/3.
Alan F. Srock and Lance F. Bosart
Seamless turbulence parametrization across model resolutions
anelastic: Boussinesque: Homework 1.1 …eliminates sound waves
METR March 2004 Thermodynamics IV.
Mark A. Bourassa and Qi Shi
Testing of Mesonet Instrumentation
Luke LeBel – University at Albany
Observations of ClearAir Boundaries
A-J Punkka Weather Warning Service, FMI
IHOP Scientific Workshop
Stratocumulus Regime Extremely shallow moist layer and extreme capping; no mechanism to remove the cap; large scale subsidence strengthens the cap.
Neil Taylor Hydrometeorology and Arctic Lab
Genesis and Morphology of the Alberta Dryline
Neil Taylor1 and Bill Burrows2
Li, H., X. Cui, and D.-L. Zhang, 2017 Mon. Wea. Rev., 145, 181–197.
Julian Brimelow and John Hanesiak
Convective Parameterization in NWP Models
Kurowski, M .J., K. Suselj, W. W. Grabowski, and J. Teixeira, 2018
Presentation transcript:

UNSTABLE Science Question 1: ABL Processes Water Vapour and Convergence Boundaries Neil Taylor Hydrometeorology and Arctic Lab, Environment Canada Dave Sills Cloud Physics and Severe Weather Research Section, Environment Canada

1st UNSTABLE Science Workshop Outline Taylor Factors important for CI Science Question 1 What do we need to do to resolve processes? Required Instrumentation and deployment Sills Further instrumentation and deployment strategies (ATMOS, AMMOS, Aircraft) February 22, 2019 1st UNSTABLE Science Workshop 18-19 April 2007

Factors Important for CI: Water Vapour CI potential can depend critically on small variations in temperature (1˚C) and mixing ratio (1 gkg-1) Variations of this magnitude are common over short distances but not resolved by synoptic-scale observation networks Fabry (2006) February 22, 2019 1st UNSTABLE Science Workshop 18-19 April 2007

Factors Important for CI: Water Vapour Availability / Depth Availability (e.g., Td, mixing ratio) Conceptually: need lifted parcel to attain level of free convection (reduces CIN and increases CAPE) Impacts on stability (CAPE / CIN) CAPE likely overestimated using SFC-based parcels 1 gkg-1 change in mixing ratio 2.5x impact on CAPE as 1 ˚C scales < 20 km CIN more sensitive to changes in mixing ratio scales > 20 km CIN more sensitive to changes in temperature Depth (depth of mixed moist layer) Mixed-layer parcels better represent convective cloud-base heights than SFC-based parcels CI less likely in shallow moisture conditions Deeper moisture more conducive to severe storms February 22, 2019 1st UNSTABLE Science Workshop 18-19 April 2007

Factors Important for CI: ABL Convergence Strength / Depth of lift Important for CI / maintenance of existing storms More intense storms triggered by ABL convergence lines Local deepening of moisture associated with convergence lines Modify environment within ~10 km February 22, 2019 1st UNSTABLE Science Workshop 18-19 April 2007

Factors Important for CI: Meso. Circulations and Wind Shear Mesoscale circulations associated with ABL convergence lines and surface heterogeneities, e.g., land-breeze (see question 2) Divergence below the LFC can counter low-level convergence Erect updrafts extend higher into ABL – favoured with equal shear on both sides of convergence boundary Ambient shear tilts parcel updrafts allowing more entrainment along a longer trajectory below cloud base Shear acts to remove parcel from influence of low-level convergence February 22, 2019 1st UNSTABLE Science Workshop 18-19 April 2007

Mesoscale Circulations and Convergence Boundaries Ziegler and Rasmussen (1998) Crook and Klemp (2000) February 22, 2019 1st UNSTABLE Science Workshop 18-19 April 2007 Weiss et al. (2004)

Factors Important for CI: The Dryline Mesoscale boundary forms in AB foothills Associated with low-level convergence and strong gradient in moisture – focus for CI Well documented over U.S. Plains ‘Recently’ shown to be important for CI over the foothills though formation mechanism may differ from that in the Great Plains region One of the boundaries of primary interest for UNSTABLE February 22, 2019 1st UNSTABLE Science Workshop 18-19 April 2007

Factors Important for CI: The Dryline Dryline observed with and without mobile observations (Hill 2006) Drylines and severe storm tracks from summer 2000 Dryline transect (Strong) February 22, 2019 1st UNSTABLE Science Workshop 18-19 April 2007 Taylor (2004)

1st UNSTABLE Science Workshop Science Question 1 What are the contributions of ABL processes to the initiation of deep moist convection and the development of severe thunderstorms in the Alberta Foothills? What is ABL evolution especially wrt water vapour prior to and during CI? What is role and importance of mesoscale convergence boundaries and circulations associated with CI? How are they influenced by terrain and synoptic-scale processes? How do they affect storms (motion, intensity, morphology)? What is 4D characterization of the dryline and importance for CI? Which storms become severe and why? How related to boundaries associated with CI? Are conceptual models adequate? How improve observational network to aid forecasters? February 22, 2019 1st UNSTABLE Science Workshop 18-19 April 2007

What is Needed to Resolve ABL and Other Processes Related to CI? Mobile SFC Aircraft Soundings Profilers Tethersonde Fixed Mesonet N February 22, 2019 1st UNSTABLE Science Workshop 18-19 April 2007

Supplemental Instrumentation 19 Station Configuration 15 Station Configuration Fixed Mesonet stations (10-20) 2 radiosondes Tethersonde 2 WV radiometers Profiling radiometer (H2O profile) GPS PW sensors Eddy Correlation Flux Tower(s)? Additional Profiling Radiometer (T, RH)? Mobile AMMOS / Strong Mobile (T, P, RH) MARS (PW, SFC wx, profile – wind, T, RH) 3 radiosondes Aircraft Photography Locations of fixed radiometers, GPS sensors, tethersonde to be determined February 22, 2019 1st UNSTABLE Science Workshop 18-19 April 2007

Instrumentation Deployment* Design fixed mesonet to take advantage of existing stations and climatologically favoured regions for CI and severe storms (includes high-resolution lines of mesonet stations) Two fixed sounding locations upstream (at low-levels) of foothills – catch moist advection and pre-storm ABL Fixed tethersonde, WV radiometers, GPS PW sensors, profiling radiometer(?) in primary study area near expected CI regions Mobile surface platforms to be deployed on intensive observation days to obtain four-dimensional characteristics of ABL and upper troposphere Target mesoscale boundaries and favoured CI regions within study area(s) ‘Bookend’ AMMOS (and Strong’s) mobile mesonet with mobile radiosondes Attempt to place MARS near to, and east of, observed boundaries (thermal, moisture, wind profiles) Supplement ground-based observations with aircraft stepped traverses * Details of deployment will appear in UNSTABLE field plan February 22, 2019 1st UNSTABLE Science Workshop 18-19 April 2007

1st UNSTABLE Science Workshop Summary CI depends on thermodynamic and kinematic processes both at the surface and aloft Water vapour availability / depth, ABL convergence, mesoscale circulations, ambient wind shear, the dryline all considered important for CI in the AB foothills These features are not resolved by existing observation networks – uncertainty remains with respect to their role and significance for CI in the region on varying spatial and temporal scales Have posed science questions to address these uncertainties in the context of the UNSTABLE field experiment Targeted, high-resolution measurements are required to resolve processes associated with CI and severe thunderstorm development UNSTABLE will include fixed and mobile surface, upper-air and profiling measurements – central to the success of UNSTABLE will be the ATMOS / AMMOS mesonet stations and aircraft measurements… February 22, 2019 1st UNSTABLE Science Workshop 18-19 April 2007