Understanding New Expectations for Rigor in Mathematics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Rigor Grade 2 Overview.
Advertisements

Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Rigor Grade 5.
Professional Development on the Instructional Shift of Rigor Rigor: Illustrations of Conceptual Understanding, Fluency, and Application.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Rigor
Math Common Core Standards
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Taking a Look at Rigor.
Advances in the PARCC Mathematics Assessment August
Understanding the Smarter BalanceD Math Summative Assessment
Common Core State Standards K-5 Mathematics Kitty Rutherford and Amy Scrinzi.
CAIM Inservice: November 15, Focus: 2-3 topics focused on deeply in each grade. 2.Coherence: Concepts logically connected from one grade to.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
ADAPTED FROM A WORKSHOP PREPARED FOR THE RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION BY KRISTINA SPARFVEN The Rigors of Ratio and Proportional Reasoning in the.
1 New York State Mathematics Core Curriculum 2005.
Sub-claim A: Students solve problems involving the major content for their grade level with connections to practices Sub-Claim B: Students solve problems.
M ATH C OMMITTEE Mathematical Shifts Mathematical Practices.
Alaska Mathematics Standards: Content and Mathematical Practices
Reading the Mathematics Evidence Tables 1. Master Claim: On-Track for college and career readiness. The degree to which a student is college and career.
Math Instruction What’s in and What’s out What’s in and What’s out! Common Core Instruction.
UNDERSTANDING CCSS AND K- 12 INSTRUCTIONAL SHIFTS IN MATH Jamie Sirois, Cooperative Middle School, Statham, NH Adapted From: Maxine Mosely CCRS 101 NH-CCRS.
Instructional Shifts for Mathematics. achievethecore.org 2 Instructional Shifts in Mathematics 1.Focus: Focus strongly where the Standards focus. 2.Coherence:
Three Shifts of the Alaska Mathematics Standards.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Review Focus and Coherence A Closer look at Rigor.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Functions A Close Look at Grade 9 Module.
Getting to the Core of the Oklahoma Academic Standards for Mathematics: Number and Operations in Middle School Presented by Heather Sparks and Corbie Jackson.
ECD is a deliberate and systematic approach to assessment development that will help to establish the validity of the assessments, increase the comparability.
Advances in the PARCC Mathematics Assessment August
Making Sense Of The New Standards K-12 Alliance Staff Developer Training January 25, 2013.
Transitioning to the Common Core: MDTP Written Response Items Bruce Arnold, MDTP Director California Mathematics Council – South Conference November 2,
Unit 1: Representing relationships mathematically 450 mins~ 5.63 days In this unit, students solidify their previous work with functional relationships.
Sunnyside School District
MATH – High School Common Core Vs Tested Kansas Standards Please note: For informational purposes, all Common Core standards are listed, and the tested.
Section 2 Systems of Professional Learning Module 2 Grades 6-12: Focus on Content Standards.
S TANDARDS FOR M ATHEMATICAL P RACTICE In the classroom.
PA Core Instructional Frameworks Structure of the Math Frameworks.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Common Core Math Instructional Shifts. Introduction  Be college and career ready  Greater master through focus and coherence  Aspirations for math.
Welcome Principals Please sit in groups of 3 2 All students graduate college and career ready Standards set expectations on path to college and career.
Did You Know? ??????????????????. Mathematics Educators to the Career and College Ready Conference A Quick Look at Critical Topics in Mathematics Reform.
Vacaville USD October 28, AGENDA Problem Solving, Patterns, Expressions and Equations Math Practice Standards and High Leverage Instructional Practices.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
SBAC Claim 1: Concepts and Procedures Students can explain and apply mathematical concepts interpret and carry out mathematical procedures with precision.
Performance Task and the common core. Analysis sheet Phases of problem sheet Performance task sheet.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
Assessing Math Looking closer at PARCC Task Types 2.
SBAC-Mathematics November 26, Outcomes Further understand DOK in the area of Mathematics Understand how the new SBAC assessments will measure student.
Mathematics Curriculum Evaluation Toolkit Transitioning to the Common Core May 16, 2014 Pam Tyson & Hilary Dito.
CCSS & Smarter Balanced Mathematics: Key Shifts to Claims tinyurl.com/UPK5math University of Portland Brian Graham Camas School District TOSA M.Ed.
Grade 4: Alignment to Mathematics Grade-Level Standards.
Standards for Mathematical Practice and the
Core Math Instruction RtI Innovations in Education Conference, Milwaukee, WI October 12-13, 2017.
Ridgefield Public Schools PEARSON ENVISION MATH 2.0 March 23, 2017
What to Look for Mathematics Model Algebra 1
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 6
Cumberland County Schools Mathematics Common Core
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Fifth Grade Parent Night 2018 Options for MS Math
Assessment Information
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Understanding New Expectations for Rigor in Mathematics
NEA and AFT Item Review Boot Camp Working Session: Mathematics
Graph f(x) = −
Math Shifts Focus Coherence Rigor
Compound Inequalities
Understanding New Expectations for Rigor in Mathematics
Claim 1: Concepts and Procedures
Claim 2: Problem Solving
Presentation transcript:

Understanding New Expectations for Rigor in Mathematics High School Level

Turn and talk to the person next to you…name three aspects of rigor So What is Rigor? Turn and talk to the person next to you…name three aspects of rigor

3 Aspects Conceptual Understanding Procedural Skill and Fluency Application: ……which means

Rigor includes: Conceptual Understanding: Students need a conceptual understanding of key concepts, such as place value and ratios. Teachers support students’ ability to access concepts from a number of perspectives so that students are able to see math as more than just a set of mnemonics or discrete procedures.

High school rigor includes: Conceptual Understanding: Explain and use the relationship between the sine and cosine of complementary angles. Other words that indicate need for conceptual understanding are interpret, recognize, describe, etc.

Rigor includes: Procedural Skill and Fluency: Students need to have speed and accuracy when performing calculations. Teachers should structure class/homework time for students to practice core functions such as single-digit multiplication so students have access to more complex concepts and procedures.

High school rigor includes: Procedural Skill and Fluency: The ability to see structure in expressions and to use this structure to rewrite expressions is a key skill in everything from advanced factoring (e.g., grouping) to summing series to the rewriting of rational expressions to examine the end behavior of the corresponding rational function.

Rigor includes: Application: Students need to be able to use math flexibly for applications. Teachers should provide opportunities for students to apply math in context. Teachers in content areas outside of math, particularly science, ensure that students are using math to make meaning of and access content.

High school rigor includes: Application: Represent constraints by equations or inequalities, and by systems of equations and/or inequalities, and interpret solutions as viable or nonviable options in a modeling context. For example, represent inequalities describing nutritional and cost constraints on combinations of different foods

And… 8 Mathematical Practices Application to real‐world Modeling Multiple approaches

What is evidence of aspects of rigor? What do students “say and do” in the classroom? Turn and talk.

Analyzing a Task to Better Understand Rigor Michelle’s Conjecture https://www.parcconline.org/sites/parcc/files/PARCC_SampleItems_Mathematics_HSAlgIMathIIMichelleConjecture_081913_Final_0.pdf

Michelle wanted to investigate the effects of the vertex on a graph of f(x) = x2 +6x when f(x) is replaced by f(x + k). Michelle graphed functions of the form f(x + k) for k = 1, 2, 3 and 4. For each of the functions she graphed, the x-coordinate of the vertex was negative and different for each value of k, the the y-coordinate of the vertex was the same for each value of k. Michelle made three conjectures based on her results. The x-coordinate of the vertex depends on the value of k. The x-coordinate of the vertex is negative for all values of k. The y-coordinate is independent of the value of k.

Sub-Claim C: Highlighted Practices MP Sub-Claim C: Highlighted Practices MP.3,6 with Connections to Content3 (expressing mathematical reasoning) The student expresses grade/course level appropriate mathematical reasoning by constructing viable arguments, critiquing the reasoning of others, and/or attending to precision when making mathematical statements.. CCSS.Math.Practice.MP3 Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. For High School, Sub-Claim C includes Major, Additional and Supporting Content. CCSS.Math.Practice.MP6 Attend to precision.

Build new functions from existing functions. CAS: 2.1.e.i (CCSS.Math.Content.HSF.BF.B.3) Identify the effect on the graph of replacing f(x) by f(x) + k, k f(x), f(kx), and f(x + k) for specific values of k (both positive and negative); find the value of k given the graphs. Experiment with cases and illustrate an explanation of the effects on the graph using technology. Include recognizing even and odd functions from their graphs and algebraic expressions for them. Colorado Academic Standard: 2.1.e.i was aligned to the Common Core State Standard F.BF.B.3

Evidence Table Evidence Statement Key Evidence Statement Text Clarification MP Calculator F-BF.3-4 Identify the effect on the graph of a quadratic function of replacing f(x) by f(x) + k, kf(x), f(kx), and f(x + k) for specific values of k (both positive and negative); find the value of k given the graphs. Experiment with cases using technology. 1) Illustrating an explanation is not assessed here (See sub-claim D) 5, 3, 8 Item Specific

How do we know if students are successful? How are conceptual understanding, procedure fluency, and/or application emphasized in this task? How could evidence for math content be demonstrated in student work? How could evidence for the standards of mathematical practice be demonstrated in student work?

Does the item address this claim?

Does the item address this standard? Build new functions from existing functions. CAS: 2.1.e.i (CCSS.Math.Content.HSF.BF.B.3) Identify the effect on the graph of replacing f(x) by f(x) + k, k f(x), f(kx), and f(x + k) for specific values of k (both positive and negative); find the value of k given the graphs. Experiment with cases and illustrate an explanation of the effects on the graph using technology. Include recognizing even and odd functions from their graphs and algebraic expressions for them.

Can we gather this evidence?

WARNING The evidence tables are meant to clarify the details of assessment items. Within a standard there may only be a portion that needs clarification and that is the only part addressed in the evidence tables. The tables are only a supplementary document.

Does the item address this standard of mathematical practice? CCSS.Math.Practice.MP3 Construct viable argument and critique the reasoning of others.