Volume 132, Issue 5, Pages (March 2008)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MCDB 4650 Developmental Genetics in Drosophila
Advertisements

Volume 13, Issue 20, Pages (October 2003)
John F. Golz, Emma J. Keck, Andrew Hudson  Current Biology 
CYP3A Variation and the Evolution of Salt-Sensitivity Variants
MicroRNAs Act as Cofactors in Bicoid-Mediated Translational Repression
Leslie Dunipace, Abbie Saunders, Hilary L. Ashe, Angelike Stathopoulos 
Volume 26, Issue 18, Pages (September 2016)
The generation and diversification of butterfly eyespot color patterns
Tony DeFalco, Nicole Camara, Stéphanie Le Bras, Mark Van Doren 
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (September 2015)
Structural Rules and Complex Regulatory Circuitry Constrain Expression of a Notch- and EGFR-Regulated Eye Enhancer  Christina I. Swanson, Nicole C. Evans,
Drosophila piwi Mutants Exhibit Germline Stem Cell Tumors that Are Sustained by Elevated Dpp Signaling  Zhigang Jin, Alex S. Flynt, Eric C. Lai  Current.
Seven-up Controls Switching of Transcription Factors that Specify Temporal Identities of Drosophila Neuroblasts  Makoto I. Kanai, Masataka Okabe, Yasushi.
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Volume 146, Issue 6, Pages (September 2011)
Andres Laan, Tamar Gutnick, Michael J. Kuba, Gilles Laurent 
Genetic Identification and Separation of Innate and Experience-Dependent Courtship Behaviors in Drosophila  Yufeng Pan, Bruce S. Baker  Cell  Volume 156,
Volume 134, Issue 4, Pages (August 2008)
The Cadherin Flamingo Mediates Level-Dependent Interactions that Guide Photoreceptor Target Choice in Drosophila  Pei-Ling Chen, Thomas R. Clandinin 
Impulse Control: Temporal Dynamics in Gene Transcription
Vivek S. Chopra, Joung-Woo Hong, Michael Levine  Current Biology 
Melissa Hernandez-Fleming, Ethan W. Rohrbach, Greg J. Bashaw 
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (September 2005)
Act up Controls Actin Polymerization to Alter Cell Shape and Restrict Hedgehog Signaling in the Drosophila Eye Disc  Aude Benlali, Irena Draskovic, Dennis.
Distinct Protein Domains and Expression Patterns Confer Divergent Axon Guidance Functions for Drosophila Robo Receptors  Bettina Spitzweck, Marko Brankatschk,
John F. Golz, Emma J. Keck, Andrew Hudson  Current Biology 
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Edwards Allen, Zhixin Xie, Adam M. Gustafson, James C. Carrington  Cell 
Reinforcement Can Overcome Gene Flow during Speciation in Drosophila
Mechanisms of Odor Receptor Gene Choice in Drosophila
Precision of Hunchback Expression in the Drosophila Embryo
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Cofactor-Interaction Motifs and the Cooption of a Homeotic Hox Protein into the Segmentation Pathway of Drosophila melanogaster  Ulrike Löhr, Leslie Pick 
Muscles in the Drosophila second thoracic segment are patterned independently of autonomous homeotic gene function  Sudipto Roy, L.S. Shashidhara, K VijayRaghavan 
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
CYP3A Variation and the Evolution of Salt-Sensitivity Variants
HBL-1 Patterns Synaptic Remodeling in C. elegans
BTB/POZ-Zinc Finger Protein Abrupt Suppresses Dendritic Branching in a Neuronal Subtype-Specific and Dosage-Dependent Manner  Wenjun Li, Fay Wang, Laurent.
Little Effect of the tan Locus on Pigmentation in Female Hybrids between Drosophila santomea and D. melanogaster  Daniel R. Matute, Ian A. Butler, Jerry.
Nick Reeves, James W. Posakony  Developmental Cell 
The Genomic Response of the Drosophila Embryo to JNK Signaling
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 125, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Paramutation: From Maize to Mice
Lethal Giant Larvae Acts Together with Numb in Notch Inhibition and Cell Fate Specification in the Drosophila Adult Sensory Organ Precursor Lineage  Nicholas.
Volume 132, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
insomniac and Cullin-3 Regulate Sleep and Wakefulness in Drosophila
Evolution of yellow Gene Regulation and Pigmentation in Drosophila
Volume 96, Issue 4, Pages (February 1999)
Let-7-Complex MicroRNAs Regulate the Temporal Identity of Drosophila Mushroom Body Neurons via chinmo  Yen-Chi Wu, Ching-Huan Chen, Adam Mercer, Nicholas S.
Recruitment of Ectodermal Attachment Cells via an EGFR-Dependent Mechanism during the Organogenesis of Drosophila Proprioceptors  Adi Inbal, Talila Volk,
Rapid Evolutionary Rewiring of a Structurally Constrained Eye Enhancer
Inferring Tumor Phylogenies from Multi-region Sequencing
Aljoscha Nern, Yan Zhu, S. Lawrence Zipursky  Neuron 
Volume 131, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
The sterol-sensing domain of Patched protein seems to control Smoothened activity through Patched vesicular trafficking  Verónica Martı́n, Graciela Carrillo,
Dishevelled Activates JNK and Discriminates between JNK Pathways in Planar Polarity and wingless Signaling  Michael Boutros, Nuria Paricio, David I Strutt,
Interaxonal Interaction Defines Tiled Presynaptic Innervation in C
Tumor Suppressor CYLD Regulates JNK-Induced Cell Death in Drosophila
Shadow Enhancers Foster Robustness of Drosophila Gastrulation
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 21, Issue 23, Pages (December 2011)
Marelle Acts Downstream of the Drosophila HOP/JAK Kinase and Encodes a Protein Similar to the Mammalian STATs  Xianyu Steven Hou, Michael B Melnick, Norbert.
Allison L. Blum, Wanhe Li, Mike Cressy, Josh Dubnau  Current Biology 
Enhancer Control of Transcriptional Bursting
Replacement of Fab-7 by the gypsy or scs Insulator Disrupts Long-Distance Regulatory Interactions in the Abd-B Gene of the Bithorax Complex  Ilham Hogga,
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 132, Issue 5, Pages 783-793 (March 2008) The Evolution of Gene Regulation Underlies a Morphological Difference between Two Drosophila Sister Species  Sangyun Jeong, Mark Rebeiz, Peter Andolfatto, Thomas Werner, John True, Sean B. Carroll  Cell  Volume 132, Issue 5, Pages 783-793 (March 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.014 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Abdominal Pigmentation of D. yakuba and D. santomea In all panels, the dorsal abdominal tergites are shown. (A and E) In D. yakuba, male abdominal segments A5 and A6 are fully pigmented (A) while females have partially pigmented A5 and fully pigmented A6 (E). (B and F) In D. santomea, males lack dark abdominal pigmentation including the male-specific pigmentation in A5 and A6 segments (B), and females have only a light narrow pigment stripe in A2-A5 segments (F). (C and D) The two types of F1 hybrid males differ in pigmentation. F1 hybrid males from a D. yakuba mother have fully pigmented A5 and A6 tergites similar to that of D. yakuba males (C), whereas F1 hybrid males from D. santomea mothers exhibit reduced male-specific and striped pigmentation (D) but are much more pigmented than D. santomea males. (G and H) In contrast to males, both types of F1 females appear similar: the A5 segment has only a narrow pigment stripe while A6 is partially pigmented. Cell 2008 132, 783-793DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.014) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The Yellow and Tan proteins Act in Concert to Promote Dark Pigmentation of D. melanogaster (A) D. melanogaster males are intensely pigmented in segments A5 and A6 and exhibit narrow stripes of pigmentation on segments A2-A4. (B) In yellow mutants, the deposition of black melanin in the cuticle is abolished, but the cuticle is still patterned with a brown pigment. (C) The tan5 mutant lacks black melanin, and the remaining cuticle pattern is weakly pigmented in the wild-type spatial pattern. (D) In the yellow/tan double mutant, the coloration of the cuticle resembles the yellow mutant, but the contrast in A5-A6 pigmentation is greatly reduced. (E) Abdominal tergites of the heterozygous pnr-GAL4 are similar to those of wild-type flies. (F) In the yellow mutant background, driving expression of UAS-yellow with pnr-GAL4 rescues the yellow phenotype only where the domain of pnr expression and the endogenous brown pigmentation overlap. (G) Ectopic expression of tan in the yellow mutant background produces ectopic brown pigments in the pnr expression domain. (H) The coexpression of both yellow and tan results in black melanin pigment deposition in the pnr expression domain. Cell 2008 132, 783-793DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.014) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Expression of the tan and yellow Genes Correlates with the Presence and Absence of Abdominal Pigmentation (A–D) Expression of tan. (A) Males of D. yakuba express high levels of tan in segments A5 and A6 late during pupal development (in the 4 hr until eclosion). (B) In contrast, tan transcript is undetectable in abdominal segments of D. santomea males over the corresponding time window of pupal development. At earlier time points (12 hr before eclosion), tan is expressed in association with each bristle organ of both D. yakuba and D. santomea (not shown). (C) In hybrid male progeny from a D. yakuba mother, tan is expressed in a pattern and at a level similar to those of the D. yakuba male. (D) In the reciprocal hybrid cross, males from a D. santomea mother exhibit a weak and sparse pattern of tan expression of segments A5 and A6. Expression of tan in D. santomea mothered hybrid males is consistently stronger than that of pure D. santomea males, but variable; a representative sample is shown. (E–H) Expression of yellow. (E) In D. yakuba, yellow is strongly expressed throughout abdominal segments A5 and A6 during the 12 hr leading up to eclosion. (F) In the corresponding developmental window in D. santomea, strong expression of yellow is absent in A5 and A6 segments and is only expressed in cells associated with bristles, where Yellow is required for proper pigmentation (12 hr before eclosion shown). (G) In F1 hybrids from a D. yakuba mother, expression of yellow in abdominal tergites resembles normal levels observed in D. yakuba. (H) D. santomea mothered hybrids likewise show strong expression of yellow in A6, and weak expression in A5, consistent with the pigmentation pattern of these hybrids (cf. Figure 1D). Cell 2008 132, 783-793DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.014) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Identification of a Specific CRE Governing tan Expression in the Abdomen (A) Genomic organization of the tan locus. The closed black and gray boxes indicate exons of tan and the two neighboring genes (Gr8a and CG15370), respectively. The designs of reporter gene and mutant rescue constructs are shown below as black horizontal bars, and their observed activities are recorded in the right-hand column. The region sequenced for analysis of intraspecific variation is depicted as a gray bar underneath the gene schematic. (B) The mel t_MSE CRE drives reporter expression in the abdomen in a strong male-specific pattern in segments A5 and A6 and in a striped pattern in segments A2–A4. (C) One copy of the t_rescue transgene completely restores the abdominal pigmentation phenotype of the t5 mutant. (D) In contrast, the t_rescue(ΔMSE) construct, which lacks the t_MSE region, is unable to restore abdominal pigmentation in a t5 mutant background. Cell 2008 132, 783-793DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.014) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Restoration of tan Expression in D. santomea Partially Restores Abdominal Pigmentation (A) The abdomens of D. santomea males lack pigmentation. (B) A D. santomea male bearing one copy of the t_rescue transgene displays partial pigmentation in the A6 segment and a lightly pigmented narrow stripe in segments A2–A5. (C) In homozygous t_rescue males, the A6 segment is almost fully pigmented (with a tan but not black pigment) and A2–A5 segments are pigmented in a full striped pattern. (D) In females homozygous for the t_rescue construct, stripes in segments A2–A6 are also well-pigmented. Cell 2008 132, 783-793DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.014) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Evolution of t_MSE Function (A) Sequence alignment of the region that includes two functional changes (sites 272 and 323 highlighted in red) in the D. santomea t_MSE CRE. Nucleotides conserved across five species are highlighted in green. Phylogenetic relationships are depicted in the left panel; D. melanogaster (D. mel), D. simulans (D. sim), D. sechellia (D. sec), D. erecta (D. ere), D. yakuba (D. yak), and D. santomea (D. san). (B–I) EGFP reporter expression in late pupae driven by a variety of t_MSE constructs. (B) The D. yakuba t_MSE CRE drives reporter expression in the pupal abdomen. (C) The D. santomea t_MSE[AA] CRE lacks activity in the abdomen. (D) The D. santomea t_MSE[Δ30] CRE lacks activity in the pupal abdomen. (E) The D. santomea t_MSE[Δ212] CRE also lacks activity in the pupal abdomen. (F) In males transformed with the yak t_MSE[A272] construct, EGFP reporter expression is abolished. (G) In males transformed with the yak t_MSE[A323] construct, EGFP reporter expression is reduced. (H) In males transformed with the san t_MSE[T272] reporter construct, EGFP expression is restored to a subset of cells along the posterior edge of the A6 segment. (I) In males transformed with the san t_MSE[T272C323] construct, expression of EGFP is stronger than in the san t_MSE[T272] male (compare with H), indicating that substitutions at positions 272 and 323 in the D. santomea t_MSE contributed to the loss of CRE activity. Cell 2008 132, 783-793DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.014) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Three Independent Origins of Loss-of-Function Alleles at t_MSE in D. santomea (A) Polymorphic sites in the largest haplotype block of the D. santomea t_MSE and the inferred ancestral state (ANC, using D. yakuba and D. teissieri as outgroup sequences). See Figure S3 for a complete description. Sites 272 and 323 (asterisks) were identified as critical to t_MSE function. The 24 surveyed alleles can be grouped into three distinct haplotype classes based on allelic states at these sites. (B) The most parsimonious haplotype network relating the three haplotype classes. The ordering of mutations along a particular branch is arbitrary. Polymorphisms within haplotype classes are not shown for simplicity. The size of each circle is proportional to the sampled frequency of the haplotype. Cell 2008 132, 783-793DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.014) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions