Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UV as an Amplifier Rather Than Inducer of NF-κB Activity
Advertisements

Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
Biochemical Specialization within Arabidopsis RNA Silencing Pathways
Fabien Darfeuille, Cecilia Unoson, Jörg Vogel, E. Gerhart H. Wagner 
The Mcm2-7 Complex Has In Vitro Helicase Activity
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (December 2009)
Purusharth Rajyaguru, Meipei She, Roy Parker  Molecular Cell 
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Angiogenin-Induced tRNA Fragments Inhibit Translation Initiation
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
A Mechanism for Inhibiting the SUMO Pathway
Monica C. Rodrigo-Brenni, Erik Gutierrez, Ramanujan S. Hegde 
Short RNAs Repress Translation after Initiation in Mammalian Cells
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
The Role of ABCE1 in Eukaryotic Posttermination Ribosomal Recycling
Division of Labor in an Oligomer of the DEAD-Box RNA Helicase Ded1p
Oliver I. Fregoso, Shipra Das, Martin Akerman, Adrian R. Krainer 
Yongli Bai, Chun Yang, Kathrin Hu, Chris Elly, Yun-Cai Liu 
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
m6A Facilitates eIF4F-Independent mRNA Translation
Gracjan Michlewski, Sonia Guil, Colin A. Semple, Javier F. Cáceres 
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
RRNA Modifications in an Intersubunit Bridge of the Ribosome Strongly Affect Both Ribosome Biogenesis and Activity  Xue-hai Liang, Qing Liu, Maurille.
Fabien Darfeuille, Cecilia Unoson, Jörg Vogel, E. Gerhart H. Wagner 
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages (September 2010)
PARP1 Represses PAP and Inhibits Polyadenylation during Heat Shock
Cap-Assisted Internal Initiation of Translation of Histone H4
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
RNA Polymerase Pausing Regulates Translation Initiation by Providing Additional Time for TRAP-RNA Interaction  Alexander V. Yakhnin, Helen Yakhnin, Paul.
Gracjan Michlewski, Jeremy R. Sanford, Javier F. Cáceres 
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
Cap-Assisted Internal Initiation of Translation of Histone H4
Volume 135, Issue 7, Pages (December 2008)
Per Stehmeier, Stefan Muller  Molecular Cell 
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages (July 2010)
Jens Herold, Raul Andino  Molecular Cell 
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
The Pathway of HCV IRES-Mediated Translation Initiation
20S Proteasome Differentially Alters Translation of Different mRNAs via the Cleavage of eIF4F and eIF3  James M. Baugh, Evgeny V. Pilipenko  Molecular.
A Critical Role for Noncoding 5S rRNA in Regulating Mdmx Stability
Sichen Shao, Ramanujan S. Hegde  Molecular Cell 
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages e5 (May 2017)
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
The DEAD-Box Protein Ded1 Modulates Translation by the Formation and Resolution of an eIF4F-mRNA Complex  Angela Hilliker, Zhaofeng Gao, Eckhard Jankowsky,
Autoantigen La Promotes Efficient RNAi, Antiviral Response, and Transposon Silencing by Facilitating Multiple-Turnover RISC Catalysis  Ying Liu, Huiling.
Polypyrimidine Tract Binding Protein Blocks the 5′ Splice Site-Dependent Assembly of U2AF and the Prespliceosomal E Complex  Shalini Sharma, Arnold M.
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
The ISG15 Conjugation System Broadly Targets Newly Synthesized Proteins: Implications for the Antiviral Function of ISG15  Larissa A. Durfee, Nancy Lyon,
tRNA Binds to Cytochrome c and Inhibits Caspase Activation
Richard W. Deibler, Marc W. Kirschner  Molecular Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
The ISG15 Conjugation System Broadly Targets Newly Synthesized Proteins: Implications for the Antiviral Function of ISG15  Larissa A. Durfee, Nancy Lyon,
Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 129, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
SIRT1 Regulates the Function of the Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome Protein
Oliver I. Fregoso, Shipra Das, Martin Akerman, Adrian R. Krainer 
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Shintaro Iwasaki, Tomoko Kawamata, Yukihide Tomari  Molecular Cell 
Meiotic Inactivation of Xenopus Myt1 by CDK/XRINGO, but Not CDK/Cyclin, via Site- Specific Phosphorylation  E. Josué Ruiz, Tim Hunt, Angel R. Nebreda 
Jörg Hartkamp, Brian Carpenter, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Molecular Cell 
James H. Cormier, Taku Tamura, Johan C. Sunryd, Daniel N. Hebert 
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Misfolded Membrane Proteins Are Specifically Recognized by the Transmembrane Domain of the Hrd1p Ubiquitin Ligase  Brian K. Sato, Daniel Schulz, Phong.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 709-722 (December 2005) Inhibition of Eukaryotic Translation Initiation by the Marine Natural Product Pateamine A  Woon-Kai Low, Yongjun Dang, Tilman Schneider-Poetsch, Zonggao Shi, Nam Song Choi, William C. Merrick, Daniel Romo, Jun O. Liu  Molecular Cell  Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 709-722 (December 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.10.008 Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Identification of eIF4A as the Primary Protein Target of PatA (A) Structures of PatA and analogs. (B) SDS-PAGE analysis of B-PatA bound proteins from RKO cell lysate after silverstaining. (C) B-PatA pull-downs performed as in (B) by using indicated lysates. (D) Confirmation of B-PatA target protein (eIF4A) in RKO and RRL lysates by immunoblotting. (E) B-PatA pull-downs performed as in (C) by using RKO cell lysate, including the PatA analogs 90, 96, and DMDA-PatA as competitors (20 μM) in the preincubation step. (F and G) Target proteins identified by B-PatA pull down were individually overexpressed in HeLa cells and cellular proliferation determined by incorporation of [3H]-thymidine (G). Error bars in (G) are ± one standard deviation (SD) for quadruplicate readings. Molecular Cell 2005 20, 709-722DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.10.008) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 PatA and DMDA-PatA Are Potent Inhibitors of Protein Translation Initiation (A–E) Metabolic labeling of HeLa cells was performed as described in the text with either [35S]-methionine and cysteine labeling mix (filled circles) to measure de novo protein synthesis or [3H]-uridine (open triangles) for de novo RNA synthesis and indicated concentrations of drugs for 1 hr. Error bars are ± one SD for quadruplicate readings. (E) IC50 values for inhibition. (F–H) In vitro protein translation efficiency was quantified by determination of luciferase activity translated from bicistronic reporter RNAs, with the first cistron encoding Firefly luciferase and the second cistron encoding Renilla luciferase. Solid bars represent cap-dependent (first cistron) activity, and clear bars represent respective IRES (second cistron) activity. Readings were taken in triplicate, and error bars represent + one standard deviation. (F) Cap-dependent versus HCV IRES-dependent translation under PatA treatment. (G) Cap-dependent versus HCV IRES-dependent translation under CHX treatment. (H) Cap-dependent versus EMCV IRES-dependent translation under PatA treatment. Molecular Cell 2005 20, 709-722DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.10.008) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 PatA Increases the Activity of eIF4AI through Binding to the N-Terminal Domain (A) C-terminal deletion, 4AI(Δ245–406), and N-terminal deletion, 4AI(Δ1–220), mutants were expressed by in vitro translation with [35S]-methionine incorporation. Affinity pull-downs were performed as in Figure 1 by using B-PatA. Input lanes are 1/20th of total input. (B) Purified 6×His-eIF4AI. (C) Affinity pull-down of purified 6×His-eIF4AI with detection of target protein by immunoblotting using His tag-specific antibody. (D) ATPase activity of 6×His-eIF4AI in the presence of indicated analog or DMSO. (E) Determination of half-maximal amount of poly(U) RNA for activation of ATPase activity under saturating (500 μM) ATP. Concentration of nucleotides was divided by 20 to account for the 20 residue size of the eIF4A binding region. In (D) and (E), each point was measured in duplicate and error bars represent ± one SD. (F) Comparison of Km and kcat or kact. ND, not determined. (G and H) Helicase activity of 6×His-eIF4AI in the presence of DMSO or varying concentrations of DMDA-PatA (G), and in the presence of 6×His-4B with, or without DMDA-PatA (H). “d” indicates duplex structure and “ss” indicates single-stranded oligo. Molecular Cell 2005 20, 709-722DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.10.008) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 PatA Modulates the Affinity of eIF4A for Associated Proteins (A and B) 6×His-eIF4AI captured proteins from HeLa lysates treated as indicated, identified by SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotting with indicated antibodies. (C) Coimmunoprecipitation of eIF4AI from 293T cell lysate with transiently overexpressed Flag-tagged eIF4B. (D) Proteins captured by m7GTP-Sepharose resin in the presence of DMDA-PatA or DMSO were visualized by immunoblotting with indicated antibodies. Molecular Cell 2005 20, 709-722DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.10.008) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 PatA Inhibits Translation Initiation after 48S Complex Formation but Does Not Mimic GMPPNP Inhibition (A–C) 48S and 80S particles bound to radiolabeled uncapped β-globin (A), capped β-globin (B), or EMCV IRES RNA (C) in the presence of PatA alone (100 μM), or in combination with CHX (0.75 mM) or GMPPNP (1.25 mM), were resolved by sucrose density gradient centrifugation followed by fractionation and scintillation counting. (D) Toeprinting profile for GMPPNP and DMSO treatment or GMPPNP and PatA treatment. Fraction 2 represents free RNA, and fraction 8 represents 48S complexes as determined by scintillation counting. Sequencing ladder was for reverse transcription product. Lane 1 (purified RNA) was the extension reaction in buffer only. (E) Sequence as determined from sequencing ladder. Sequence highlighted in gray represents the GMPPNP toeprint as described (Anthony and Merrick, 1992), and toeprint residues as observed in (D) are in bold text within the highlight. Numbering of the toeprint residues follows the convention of Anthony and Merrick [1992] where the A of the ATG is +1. Lowercase are sequences not observed in sequencing ladder. Molecular Cell 2005 20, 709-722DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.10.008) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Disruption of Cellular (Poly)Ribosome Profile and Redistribution of Translation Initiation Factors under PatA Treatment (A–D) Polyribosome profiles determined from 293T cells after 30 min treatment with DMSO (A), 100 nM PatA (B), 100 μg/ml CHX (C), or 100 nM analog 90 (D). (E and F) Polyribosome profiles determined from HeLa cells after 1 hr treatment with DMSO (E), or 20 nM PatA (F). Immunoblotting panels in (F) correspond to antibodies labeled in (E). Far right lanes in (E) and (F) are whole lysate. Molecular Cell 2005 20, 709-722DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.10.008) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Induction of Stress Granules by PatA Localization of indicated endogenous proteins by immunoflourescence in HeLa cells. Detected proteins are indicated above each column, with overlays in the third column. Treatment time was 3 hr. (A) 10 nM PatA or DMSO. (B) 25 nM PatA, 0.5 mM arsenite, and 100 μg/ml CHX. Molecular Cell 2005 20, 709-722DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.10.008) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions