MORGAN ROWE Raven, Cameron, Ballantyne, & Yazbeck LLP/s.r.l

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UNDE NL/NB Regional Conference
Advertisements

Managing the Health and Safety of Contractors
Health and Safety Chapter 10.
NPF SENIOR LOCAL EMPLOYER REPRESENTATIVE (SLER) OHS ACCOUNTABILITIES
Sack Goldblatt Mitchell LLP. Prior to the coming into force of Bill 168 amendments to the Occupational Health and Safety Act), there were three main possible.
Hazard Prevention Program
The Revised Federal EEO Complaint Process Prepared by the IHS Equal Employment Opportunity and Civil Rights Office May 16, 2000.
Worker Focused Safety Program Violence in the Workplace Worker Training Module 4.
Chapter Implementing Equal Employment Opportunity 3.
Theme 7: Occupational Health and Safety Act 85 of 1993
Grievance. Some important points from collective agreement Leaves Wages Designated University holidays Hours of work and work assignment.
QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS July 31, Who selected the employee representatives that sit on the Committee? Union: 83 % Management: 14 % Don't know:
Welcome To The Joint Occupational Health And Safety Committee Appointments 2013 Course 1 Presented By The BCGEU.
12 NYCRR PART PUBLIC EMPLOYER WORKPLACE VIOLENCE PREVENTION PROGRAMS.
THE NATIONAL SITUATION ON THE HEALTHAND THE SAFETY AT WORK in Poland prepared by: Małgorzata Żydło Danmar Computers.
The Campaign for McMaster University Environmental & Occupational Health Support Services and Central Joint Health and Safety Committee Developed from.
Mary Yaager Executive Officer. The Federal Government established an inquiry into workplace bullying. The Terms of Reference were broad and included;
ARH & ASSOC. HUMAN RESOURCES CONSULTANTS. RISK ASSESSMENT EMPLOYERS ARE REQUIRED TO CONDUCT A RISK ASSESSMENT TO DETERMINE THE RISKS OF WORKPLACE VIOLENCE.
ASSESSMENT TASK 5 PRESENTATION ON : THE LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. THE LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. THE LEVEL OF THE STAKEHOLDER. THE LEVEL OF THE STAKEHOLDER.
Module 1.  Objectives - Provide information about worker rights under OSHA law - Learn how to file a complaint, and rights against discrimination and.
NEW FACULTY ORIENTATION AUGUST 18, 2015 The First Line of Response: Student Disclosure of Sexual Misconduct.
Ergonomics Regulatory Requirements Bawan Saravanabawan, Labour Program, HRSDC February 4, 2008.
NPF EMPLOYEES O H S ACCOUNTABILITY HS2_ Agenda References Rights & Responsibilities First Aid and Emergency measures Local OHS Committee Structure.
1 GAEP Study Tour An Overview of the Ombudsman for Workplace Safety May 16, 2007.
OHS Seminar DO THE TIME – avoid the crime! Miles Crawley 8 June 2007.
Procedure for the resolution of grievances in the ILO.
Worker Focused Safety Program Violence in the Workplace Worker Training Module 2.
 Canada Occupational Health and Safety Regulation 20 (Part XX) was proclaimed dealing with Violence Prevention in the Work Place.  Work Place Violence.
1 WA Legal and Policy Documents School Education Regulations 2000 Occupational Safety and Health Act 1984 –Occupational Safety And.
Health & Safety 2014.
Work Place Committees and Health and Safety Representatives Training Module 1- LEGAL REQUIREMENTS AND THE ROLE OF WORK PLACE COMMITTEES AND HEALTH AND.
Legal Rights and Responsibilities of Employers, Supervisors and Employees Lesson 2.
Your name You and the Law Understanding Your Obligations Under the OHSA 1.
Health & Safety Supervisors Training Training Objectives 1.Your Duties as a Supervisor 2.[Parish] H & S Policy and Procedures 3.Rights of Employees.
GRIEVANCES AND DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES
Level 2 Diploma in Customer Service
Anti-Bullying Parent Presentation Hannah Caldwell Elementary School
The Military Ombudsman Bill [B9 of 2011]
Role of the Ministry of Labour Inspectors
Procedure for the resolution of grievances in the ILO
Occupation Health & Safety Act
Sexual Harassment Seminar
Broward Office of the Inspector General
Procedures and documentation that protect relationships with employees
An Overview of PSE Labour Relations after Bill 7
Chapter 7 SAFETY AND HEALTH AT WORK. Chapter 7 SAFETY AND HEALTH AT WORK.
Whistleblower Program
Navigating Stormy Waters a brief guide to selected contractual conundrums in the employment sphere James Pullar Taylor Shaw.
Public Employer Workplace Violence Prevention Program
People Responsible For Health and Safety
THE ABC’S OF FILING A VIOLENCE PREVENTION COMPLAINT
MUTUAL RESPECT.
OHS Staff Introduction Training
Broward Office of the Inspector General
Harassment/Discrimination Located Under Personnel
Complainant files complaint in person or through online reporting system to one of the entities defined by an arrow Bemidji State University Sexual Violence.
Roadmap to COR.
Lesson 2 Legal Rights and Responsibilities
Basics of a Joint Health and Safety Committee
Navigating the Education System
Anti-Harassment, Sexual Harassment and Non-Discrimination
Presented By: Eric G. Rodriguez
UNFAIR LABOUR PRACTICE COMPLAINTS
The Halton District School Board expects that everyone associated with the Board has a right to be treated with respect and dignity and to teach, learn.
National Health and Safety Conference October 2018
Equality and Human Rights Commission
Occupational Safety and Health and the working Environment
Agency Framework – Prevention and Resolution of Harassment and Violence in the Workplace Presentation to the Labour Management Consultation Committee.
Annual Training for Supervisors
Presentation transcript:

UTE NATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY CONFERENCE: BILL C-65 AND RECENT WPV DECISIONS MORGAN ROWE Raven, Cameron, Ballantyne, & Yazbeck LLP/s.r.l OCTOBER 12, 2018

OVERVIEW BILL C-65: An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code (harassment and violence), the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act and the Budget Implementation Act, 2017, No. 1 RECENT WORK PLACE VIOLENCE DECISIONS PSAC v AGC , 2016 FCR 33; Seaspan Marine v Int’l Longshore and Warehouse Union, 2017 LNOHSTC 10 Pronovost v CRA, 2017 FC 1077 Canada Post Corp. v King, 2017 LNOHSTC 16 NRC v PIPSC, 2018 LNOHSTC 1

BILL C-65: Canada Labour Code 1) A new definition of “harassment and violence” Current definition (Section 20.2, Canada Occupational Health and Safety Regulations): “work place violence” constitutes any action, conduct, threat or gesture of a person towards an employee in their work place that can reasonably be expected to cause harm, injury or illness to that employee. New definition (Bill C-65): harassment and violence means any action, conduct or comment, including of a sexual nature, that can reasonably be expected to cause offence, humiliation or other physical or psychological injury or illness to an employee, including any prescribed action, conduct or comment.

BILL C-65: Canada Labour Code 2) New information collection and reporting requirements for employers 125(1)(c) except as provided for in the regulations, investigate, record and report, in accordance with the regulations, all accidents, occurrences of harassment and violence, occupational illnesses and other hazardous occurrences known to the employer; 139.‍1 The Minister shall prepare and publish an annual report that contains statistical data relating to harassment and violence in work places to which this Part applies. The report shall not contain any information that is likely to reveal the identity of a person who was involved in an occurrence of harassment and violence.

BILL C-65: Canada Labour Code 3) More specific obligations to provide training 125(1) (z.‍16) take the prescribed measures to prevent and protect against harassment and violence in the work place, respond to occurrences of harassment and violence in the work place and offer support to employees affected by harassment and violence in the work place; (z.‍161) ensure that employees, including those who have supervisory or managerial responsibilities, receive training in the prevention of harassment and violence in the work place and are informed of their rights and obligations under this Part in relation to harassment and violence; (z.‍162) undergo training in the prevention of harassment and violence in the work place;

BILL C-65: Canada Labour Code 4) Former employees may file complaints 125 (4) Except as provided for in the regulations, the obligations set out in paragraphs (1)‍(c) and (z.‍16) apply to an employer in respect of a former employee in relation to an occurrence of harassment and violence in the work place if the occurrence becomes known to the employer within three months after the day on which the former employee ceases to be employed by the employer.

BILL C-65: Canada Labour Code 5) Changes to internal health & safety complaint processes Employee may report harassment and violence complaints to supervisor or person designated in policy; Complaints may be oral or in writing; The Employer must attempt to resolve the complaint as soon as possible Harassment and violence complaints are to be referred directly to the Minister; do not pass through H&S committees

BILL C-65: Canada Labour Code 6) The Minister’s power to combine complaints 127.1 (9.‍2) The Minister may combine an investigation into a complaint relating to an occurrence of harassment and violence with an ongoing investigation relating to the same employer and involving substantially the same issues and, in that case, the Minister may issue a single decision.

BILL C-65: Canada Labour Code 7) Limited role for H&S committees/representatives in harassment complaints Review recommendations of competent person and collaborate to implement Review data and information collected re incidents of work place violence and harassment No role in investigating harassment/work place violence complaints, unless it is as part of a work refusal Not entitled to receive any information, without an individual’s consent, that is likely to reveal the identity of a person who was involved in an occurrence of harassment and violence in the work place, unless it is part of a work refusal or an Appeals Officer decision

BILL C-65: PESRA 8) Parliamentary employees brought within Part II of the Code

RECENT DECISIONS OF NOTE “…an employer has a duty to appoint a competent person to investigate the complaint if the matter is unresolved, unless it is plain and obvious that the allegations do not relate to work place violence even if accepted as true. The employer has very little discretion in this respect. If the employer chooses to conduct a preliminary review of a complaint (or a so-called fact-finding process), it will therefore have to be within these strict confines and with a view to resolving the matter informally with the complainant. Any full-fledged investigation must be left to a competent person agreed to by the parties and with knowledge, training and experience in these matters.” Public Service Alliance of Canada v Canada (Attorney General), [2016] 3 FCR 33

RECENT DECISIONS OF NOTE Seaspan Marine v Int’l Longshore and Warehouse Union, 2017 LNOHSTC 10 Adopts PSAC v AGC decision for principles that: Employer may only engage in fact-finding in aid of informal resolution Only a competent person may conduct a full investigation of a complaint A complaint may only be considered “resolved” where “all parties involved in the incident are satisfied with the outcome of the resolution process”

RECENT DECISIONS OF NOTE “Intimidation of any kind is toxic to interpersonal relationships and contributes to an unhealthy work environment for both the employer and the employees. Work place violence prevention is meant to reprimand incidents that would not necessarily be contrary to the collective agreement — when they are examined in isolation in the context of a grievance, or when they would not necessarily amount to psychological harassment, but where Parliament has nonetheless deemed it necessary to ban it in general in order to provide a safe, healthy, and violence-free work place. The place, the means, and the tone used by a manager to warn or reprimand an employee are important elements to consider when an employee makes a work place violence complaint.” Pronovost v Canada Revenue Agency, 2017 FC 1077 at para 19

RECENT DECISIONS OF NOTE Additional take-away from Pronovost: Competent investigator reports may be reviewed for procedural unfairness (ex. not letting the complainant comment on the testimony of the respondent); And for reasonableness (ex. the investigation was not thorough or serious; the investigation report is deficient)

RECENT DECISIONS OF NOTE “The substantive issue raised by the appeal thus turns on whether Mr. Stienke was "impartial and seen by the parties to be impartial" within the meaning of paragraph 20.9(1)(a) of the Regulations. The employer contends that Mr. Stienke appears on a list of "competent persons" agreed upon by the employer and CUPW (at the National Joint Health and Safety Committee), that he was impartial and that Mr. King and his union representative never challenged Mr. Stienke's impartiality until the report was issued and the recommendations implemented. The CUPW argues the contrary position, pointing out that Mr. Stienke was not impartial and concerns were raised about his impartiality before and during his investigation.” Canada Post Corp. v King, 2017 LNOHSTC 16

RECENT DECISIONS OF NOTE Natural Resources Canada v PIPSC, 2018 LNOHSTC 1 The Minister may investigate and render directions on whether an appointed person meets the qualifications as a “competent person” The Minister may engage in this investigation even after an investigation has commenced, including assessing actions and behaviour during the investigation

OPEN TO FLOOR FOR QUESTIONS

THANK YOU!