Sustained Performance Radiation Protection at Vogtle Clark Bourne Plant Health Physicist – Vogtle (USA)

B r u t e F o r c e ! Every 0.1 mrem counts! Never give up!!! How did we get where we are? Often times, it felt like… B r u t e F o r c e ! Passion! Every 0.1 mrem counts! Never give up!!! I need more dose! Indira says, “No more dose for you, Buddy!” Tenacity! Teamwork! Knock on 1000 doors... maybe one will open!

Key Factors for Sustained Performance Ownership & Accountability Source Term Management Technology

Key Factors for Sustained Performance 1) Ownership & Accountability Management Commitment to be a top quartile performer Non-outage exposure Consistently trending down “Every 0.1 mrem counts!” Planning/Scheduling Work Execution through Lessons Learned Work Force Engagement Focus on Excellence Challenging/Aggressive Goal Setting Constant vigilance on “What Could Go Wrong?” Use of daily MELT Use of Operational Risk Awareness process

Non-outage exposure Routine RWP Exposure Trends mrem Chemistry has had increased sampling requirements due to zinc addition and tighter pH control. Operations has had increased dose due to IV requirements and training of new operators.

Key Factors for Sustained Performance 1) Ownership & Accountability (cont’d) Outage exposure Outage Scheduling Incorporates Lessons Learned into schedule HP takes the lead to include contingencies from industry Operating Experience and solicit support from appropriate groups e.g., core barrel lifts, CRDM volumetric inspections, pzr weld overlays, radiography Sensitivity and awareness that these events can happen to us! Planners sensitive to plant conditions that impact dose Contractor Incentives $$$ Dose is 20% of their performance score We are nuclear plants with no boundaries. We share our successes and failures as one family. We owe it to ourselves to not let anyone go down. Our burden is more as we forge into the next generation of nuclear plants.

Key Factors for Sustained Performance 1) Ownership & Accountability (cont’d) Outage exposure (cont’d) Mock-up training / Dry Runs for risk significant evolutions SG primary manways/diaphragms Nozzle dams HP surveys SG channel heads Under reactor head and reactor cavity SG vacuum bag change-outs Shielding installation Core barrel lifts Tri-nuke filter loading RCS filter change-outs Rx head EXCEL scaffolding CETNAs PZR SWOL

Key Factors for Sustained Performance 2) Source Term Reduction Implemented EPRI Constant elevated pH program (7. 2) Zinc addition on both units AOA concerns on Unit 1 resulted in suspension of zinc for Cycle 13 Approval to add Zn for full cycle received for both units Shutdown Chemistry Controls Repeatable performance each outage due to consistency and commitment to the process Constant vigilance to “stay the course” Use of macroporous resin in shutdown mixed bed demin Ultrasonic Fuel Cleaning – 8 campaigns, 4 per unit Use of tri-nuke filtration in Rx cavity and SFP Use of 0.1 um filtration on RCS filter

Key Factors for Sustained Performance 2) Source Term Reduction (cont’d) Shielding Permanent shielding support frames for SG handhole platforms Permanent reactor head shielding Radwaste Processing Facility design Design Changes to add several more permanent support frames in containment Storage of temporary lead shielding in containment Shielding is on Plant’s Major Issues List Temporary Shielding usage improvements Purchase of Radishield, head stand shielding for CRDM volumetric inspection, PZR SWOL applications Shielding MIL is a followup to the Radiation Exposure Reduction item that was completed in 2005.

Key Factors for Sustained Performance 3) Technology Examples of Integration of technology to support plant operations: Identification of leakage inside bioshield at power via HP Robot Midloop sight glass and reactor cavity level monitored in the control room and OCC via HP cameras Core Barrel lifts directed through Central Monitoring Station 15 area monitoring teledosimeters used to monitor lift 10 camera views SNC Task Manager in Central – direct communications with lift director in containment

Key Factors for Sustained Performance 3) Technology (cont’d) Use of remote monitoring for high radiological risk tasks Normal operations Areas where Radiax antenna is available, have remote telemetry to Central Monitoring Station Radwaste liner/filter surveys Spent filter placement into liner Resin sluice monitoring Area monitoring for zinc injection trending outside containment Localized setup available for other areas (video, audio and telemetry)

Key Factors for Sustained Performance 3) Technology (cont’d) Use of remote monitoring for high radiological risk tasks Outages All personnel in containment wear teledose Dose management effectiveness for high rad job coverage is quadrupled Permanent design change to wire camera, audio, and telemetry from inside containment all the way to Central Monitoring Station Added to system incrementally over past decade Other groups use the tools

Key Factors for Sustained Performance 3) Technology (cont’d) Use of video/DVD/still pictures to record jobs for training and event reconstruction Acceptance of technology by HP techs and radworkers is the key to RMT success RMT has changed the persona of the HP tech Use of robotics HP has a robot for inspections inside bioshield at power Upper reactor head and under head inspections

Key Factors for Sustained Performance 3) Technology (cont’d) Electronic Survey Mapping system Radiological Survey Mapping System (RadIS) Developed by SNC, Vogtle first to implement in 2000 Over 100,000 surveys electronically generated/approved and submitted to document control (completely paperless) iPIX photos available on maps showing 360º view of room Link between Radis and telemetry software allows area monitoring data to be displayed directly on survey maps

Annual Site Exposure and Cycle Average (Rem/Unit) * - 2 outage year