Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages e6 (June 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
Advertisements

Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages e4 (September 2017)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Loss of Bin1 Promotes the Propagation of Tau Pathology
Infection-Induced Intestinal Oxidative Stress Triggers Organ-to-Organ Immunological Communication in Drosophila  Shih-Cheng Wu, Chih-Wei Liao, Rong-Long.
Volume 92, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
PGRP-SD, an Extracellular Pattern-Recognition Receptor, Enhances Peptidoglycan- Mediated Activation of the Drosophila Imd Pathway  Igor Iatsenko, Shu Kondo,
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages e7 (July 2017)
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 135, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 27, Issue 22, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Jamaal L. Benjamin, Rhea Sumpter, Beth Levine, Lora V. Hooper 
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 84, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Shu-Jung Chang, Jeongmin Song, Jorge E. Galán  Cell Host & Microbe 
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages e4 (June 2017)
A Leptin Analog Locally Produced in the Brain Acts via a Conserved Neural Circuit to Modulate Obesity-Linked Behaviors in Drosophila  Jennifer Beshel,
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (February 2018)
Matthew H. Sieber, Carl S. Thummel  Cell Metabolism 
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (May 2014)
PP2A Regulatory Subunit PP2A-B′ Counteracts S6K Phosphorylation
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Unrestricted Synaptic Growth in spinster—a Late Endosomal Protein Implicated in TGF- β-Mediated Synaptic Growth Regulation  Sean T Sweeney, Graeme W Davis 
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Calcium Taste Avoidance in Drosophila
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
TALEN Gene Knockouts Reveal No Requirement for the Conserved Human Shelterin Protein Rap1 in Telomere Protection and Length Regulation  Shaheen Kabir,
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages (March 2015)
Codependent Activators Direct Myoblast-Specific MyoD Transcription
Piwi Is Required to Limit Exhaustion of Aging Somatic Stem Cells
GRM7 Regulates Embryonic Neurogenesis via CREB and YAP
Volume 63, Issue 6, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2009)
Let-7-Complex MicroRNAs Regulate the Temporal Identity of Drosophila Mushroom Body Neurons via chinmo  Yen-Chi Wu, Ching-Huan Chen, Adam Mercer, Nicholas S.
A Hierarchy of Cell Intrinsic and Target-Derived Homeostatic Signaling
Xin Xie, Tomas Venit, Nizar Drou, Piergiorgio Percipalle
Drosophila Maelstrom Ensures Proper Germline Stem Cell Lineage Differentiation by Repressing microRNA-7  Jun Wei Pek, Ai Khim Lim, Toshie Kai  Developmental.
Volume 27, Issue 11, Pages e4 (June 2017)
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 135, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 129, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)
Martin Häsemeyer, Nilay Yapici, Ulrike Heberlein, Barry J. Dickson 
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages e4 (June 2018)
Matthew H. Sieber, Carl S. Thummel  Cell Metabolism 
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Rab3 Dynamically Controls Protein Composition at Active Zones
Suman Paul, Anuj K. Kashyap, Wei Jia, You-Wen He, Brian C. Schaefer 
Volume 77, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
Translocation of a Vibrio cholerae Type VI Secretion Effector Requires Bacterial Endocytosis by Host Cells  Amy T. Ma, Steven McAuley, Stefan Pukatzki,
Presentation transcript:

Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages 719-730.e6 (June 2017) Lysosomal Degradation Is Required for Sustained Phagocytosis of Bacteria by Macrophages  Ching-On Wong, Steven Gregory, Hongxiang Hu, Yufang Chao, Victoria E. Sepúlveda, Yuchun He, David Li-Kroeger, William E. Goldman, Hugo J. Bellen, Kartik Venkatachalam  Cell Host & Microbe  Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages 719-730.e6 (June 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.05.002 Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell Host & Microbe 2017 21, 719-730. e6DOI: (10. 1016/j. chom. 2017 Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Ubiquitous Expression of ClC-b and Its Localization to Endolysosomes in Macrophages (A) Phylogeny of human and Drosophila chloride transporter proteins. Numbers shown are bootstrap test values (%). ClC-a, -b, and -c are annotated Drosophila chloride channel family subunits according to Flybase (http://flybase.org). Highlighted in red are the genes of interest of the current study. (B) The ClC-b genomic locus and alleles used in the study. (C) GFP::ClC-b expression in larval tissues. Larval tissues were fixed and stained with anti-GFP (green), phalloidin for actin (magenta), and DAPI for nuclear DNA (blue). Scale bars represent 20 μm. (D) GFP::ClC-b expression in larval lymph glands and fat bodies. GFP single was not amplified by using primary or secondary antibodies. Scale bar represents 50 μm. (E and F) LysoTracker staining in fat body (E) and macrophages (F) isolated from GFP::ClC-b larvae. Scale bars represent 10 μm. (G) Macrophages isolated from larvae expressing ClC-b::myc and YFP::Rab7 with Cg-GAL4 driver. Scale bar represents 10 μm. Cell Host & Microbe 2017 21, 719-730.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2017.05.002) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 ClC-b Mutants Show Defective Clearance of Septic Bacteria (A) Confocal image of fluorescent E. coli containing macrophages isolated from GFP::ClC-b larvae. Scale bar represents 10 μm. (B) CFU count from flies of the indicated genotypes at the indicated time points after E. coli injection. The dashed line reflects the amount of E. coli injected into flies. (C) CFU counts from flies of the indicated genotypes 1 day after E. coli injection. Values shown are normalized to the genomic rescue (gen-res) (ClC-b1;P[ClC-b+]) means. (D) CFU counts from ClC-b1 flies expressing ClC-b in macrophages (He > ClC-b). Values shown are normalized to genomic rescue (gen-res) means. (E) CFU counts from wild-type flies expressing RNAi in macrophages (He > ClC-b-IR). Values normalized to control (UAS-ClC-b-IR) means. (F) CFU counts from wild-type flies overexpressing ClC-b in macrophages. Values normalized to control (UAS-ClC-b) means. All values shown represent mean ± SEM. See also Figures S1 and S2. Cell Host & Microbe 2017 21, 719-730.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2017.05.002) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Chloride Transporter ClC-b Regulates Endolysosome Luminal Ca2+ Levels (A) Schematic description of the “uncoupled” mutation and CFU counts from ClC-b1 flies expressing ClC-bunc in macrophages. Values shown are normalized to genomic rescue (gen-res) means. (B) Schematic description of the experiment using TRPML::GCaMP5G to assess endolysosomal Ca2+. (C) Confocal image showing co-localization of the expressed TRPML::GCaMP5G with ClC-b::myc in an isolated larval macrophage. Scale bar represents 5 μm. (D) Representative traces showing changes in TRPML::GCaMP5G fluorescence in larval macrophages isolated from wild-type (blue) and ClC-b1 (red) larvae. Each trace represents mean values from ≥ten macrophages measured in a single experiment. Concentrations of MLSA1 and GPN were 40 and 200 μM, respectively. (E) Quantification of the endolysosomal Ca2+ measurement experiments. (F) CFU counts from flies of the indicated genotypes. trpml1 flies expressed the trpml+ transgene only in neurons to circumvent the pupal lethality observed in trpml-deficient flies. Values shown are normalized to trpml1/+ means. (G) CFU counts from flies overexpressing ClC-b in wild-type trpml1/+ genetic backgrounds. Values shown are normalized to UAS-ClC-b;trpml1/+ means. (H) CFU counts from ClC-b1 flies with or without overexpression of trpml in macrophages. Values are normalized to ClC-b1;UAS-trpml means. All values shown represent mean ± SEM. See also Figure S3. Cell Host & Microbe 2017 21, 719-730.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2017.05.002) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Impaired Degradation of Bacteria in ClC-b Mutant Macrophages Prevents Persistent Clearance of Bacteria (A) Confocal images showing isolated larval macrophages (HmlΔ>EGFP; green) at indicated time points after encountering fluorescent E. coli (magenta) during the short time course ex vivo phagocytosis assay. Scale bar represents 5 μm. (B) Quantification of fluorescent E. coli uptake in the short time course ex vivo phagocytosis assay. Data shown are from three independent replicates. (C) z stack projections of confocal images showing isolated larval macrophages with internalized fluorescent E. coli (green) at indicated time points in the ex vivo degradation assay. Nucleus was stained by DAPI (blue) and F-actin was stained by phalloidin (magenta). Scale bar represents 5 μm. (D) Quantification of the ex vivo degradation assay shown in (C). All values shown are normalized to genomic rescue (gen-res) means at time 0. (E and F) Schematic representation (E) and quantification (F) of the ex vivo sequential phagocytosis assay performed on isolated larval macrophages. (G and H) Schematic representation (G) and quantification (H) of the in vivo sequential E. coli injection assay. Values in (H) were normalized to the mean values of the genomic rescue (gen-res) flies with the relevant pre-injection. All values shown represent mean ± SEM. See also Figure S4. Cell Host & Microbe 2017 21, 719-730.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2017.05.002) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 PGRP-LE and Relish Signaling Are Necessary for Macrophage-Mediated Clearance of Bacteria (A–D) CFU counts from flies of the indicated genotypes. (A) PGRP-LE null (PGRP-LE112) and control (PGRP-LE112/+) flies. (B) Macrophage overexpression of PGRP-LE (He > LE) in PGRP-LE null flies. (C and D) RNAi-mediated knockdown of PGRP-LE (C) or Relish (D) in macrophages of wild-type flies. All CFU values (mean ± SEM) are normalized to means of the respective control genotype (blue bar). (E) z stack projections of confocal images of isolated larval macrophages with internalized/adhered fluorescent E. coli (red and green) from the ex vivo sequential phagocytosis assay. Shown are single larval macrophages isolated from RelE20 mutants and RelE20/+ control animals. Cells were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar represents 10 μm. (F) Quantification of data shown in (E). All values shown represent mean ± SEM. Cell Host & Microbe 2017 21, 719-730.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2017.05.002) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 ClC-b Facilitates Lysosomal Degradation of Bacteria to Activate PGRP-LE and Relish in Macrophages (A) CFU counts from flies overexpressing PGRP-LE in macrophages (He > PGRP-LE). Values normalized to wild-type (WT) UAS-PGRP-LE. (B) z stack projections of confocal images of isolated larval macrophages with internalized/adhered fluorescent E. coli (red and green) from the ex vivo sequential phagocytosis assay. Shown are single larval ClC-b1 macrophages with (He > LE) or without (UAS-LE) PGRP-LE overexpression. (C) Quantification of data shown in (B). (D) CFU counts from ClC-b1 flies overexpressing (O.E.) PGRP-LE in macrophages. Values normalized to ClC-b1;RelE20 PGRP-LE O.E. (E) CFU counts from ClC-b1 flies expressing N-terminal fragment of Relish (Rel68) in macrophages. Values are normalized to control (ClC-b1;UAS-Rel68/+). (F) CFU counts from flies pre-injected with PBS or TCT (16 μM) 1 day before E. coli injection. Values shown are normalized to PBS controls. All values shown represent mean ± SEM. (G) Model showing the ClC-b-mediated endolysosome-Relish signaling axis in Drosophila macrophages. See also Figure S5. Cell Host & Microbe 2017 21, 719-730.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2017.05.002) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 CLCN7 Mediates the Conserved Endolysosome-NF-κB Signaling Axis in Mammalian Macrophages (A) Western blots performed of RAW 264.7 cell lysates probed with anti-CLCN7 and anti-α-tubulin antibodies. Cells were transduced with lentivirus carrying control shRNA (Ctrl ShR) or shRNAs against CLCN7 (CLCN7 ShR1/2). (B) Quantification of viable internalized E. coli extracted from RAW 264.7 cells in the gentamicin protection assay. (C–E) IL-1β and TNF-α mRNA levels in the shRNA expressing RAW 264.7 cell lines. Values are normalized to Ctrl ShR (naive) (C and D) and to Ctrl ShR (+ E. coli) (E). (F) Effect of pharmacological inhibition of endosome maturation on IL-1β mRNA levels in the wild-type RAW 264.7 cell lines. Values are normalized to control (naive). Naive, without E. coli uptake; + E. coli, with E. coli uptake; + MDP, 10 μg/mL MDP treatment after E. coli uptake; Apilimod, 200 nM apilimod treatment after E. coli uptake; Control, 0.1% DMSO vehicle control. All values shown represent mean ± SEM. (G) Model showing the endolysosome-NF-κB signaling axis in Drosophila and mammalian macrophages. See also Figure S6. Cell Host & Microbe 2017 21, 719-730.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2017.05.002) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions