LHC impedance: Comparison between phase 1 and IR3MBC – follow-up

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SPS impedance work in progress SPSU meeting August 11 th 2011.
Advertisements

Beam pipe impedance vs. Frequency 22 July 2015 | TU Darmstadt | Fachbereich 18 | Institut Theorie Elektromagnetischer Felder | Uwe Niedermayer | 1 An artifact,
RF quadrupole for Landau damping Alexej Grudiev 2013/10/23 ICE section meeting.
Elias Métral, 1st ICE meeting, 14/07/2010 /191 STATUS OF THE LHC INSTABILITIES E. Métral, N. Mounet and B. Salvant E. Métral, N. Mounet and B. Salvant.
Particle Studio simulations of the resistive wall impedance of copper cylindrical and rectangular beam pipes C. Zannini E. Metral, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Impedance aspects of Crab cavities R. Calaga, N. Mounet, B. Salvant, E. Shaposhnikova Many thanks to F. Galleazzi, E. Metral, A. Mc Pherson, C. Zannini.
AB-ABP/LHC Injector Synchrotrons Section CERN, Giovanni Rumolo 1 Final results of the E-Cloud Instability MDs at the SPS (26 and 55 GeV/c) G.
Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
Elias Métral, APC meeting, 02/02/2006 1/35 E. Métral, G. Arduini and G. Rumolo u Observations of fast instabilities in the SPS (1988 and 2002/3) and PS.
LSWG day: Impedance and beam induced heating Nicolas Mounet *, Daria Atapovych, Nicolò Biancacci, Elias Métral, Tatiana Pieloni, Stefano Redaelli, Benoit.
Status of the SPS impedance model C. Zannini, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant Acknowledgments: H. Bartosik, O.Berrig, G. Iadarola, E. Métral, N. Mounet, V.G. Vaccaro,
Update of the SPS transverse impedance model Benoit for the impedance team.
Update of the SPS transverse impedance model C. Zannini, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant Acknowledgments: H. Bartosik, O.Berrig, F. Caspers, E. Chapochnikova, G.
Elias Métral, LHC Beam Commissioning Working Group meeting, 08/06/2010 /191 SINGLE-BUNCH INSTABILITY STUDIES IN THE LHC AT 3.5 TeV/c Elias Métral, N. Mounet.
Status from the collimator impedance MD in the LHC Collimation team:R. Assmann, R. Bruce, A. Rossi. Operation team:G.H. Hemelsoet, W. Venturini, V. Kain,
BEPCII Transverse Feedback System Yue Junhui Beam Instrumentation Group IHEP , Beijing.
Injection Energy Review D. Schulte. Introduction Will review the injection energy So could answer the following questions: Which injection energy can.
Impedance of the CLIC-DRs: What we know so far and what else we need to study…. E. Koukovini-Platia M. Barnes, A. Grudiev, N. Mounet, Y. Papaphilippou,
Elias Métral, ICFA-HB2004, Bensheim, Germany, 18-22/10/ E. Métral TRANSVERSE MODE-COUPLING INSTABILITY IN THE CERN SUPER PROTON SYNCHROTRON G. Arduini,
Instability rise-time far above the TMCI threshold: Comparison between simple theory, MOSES and HEADTAIL E. Benedetto, E. Metral Acknowledgements: G. Rumolo,
Elias Métral, SPSU Study Group and Task Force on SPS Upgrade meeting, 25/03/2010 /311 TMCI Intensity Threshold for LHC Bunch(es) in the SPS u Executive.
News on TMCI in the SPS: Injecting high intensity bunches Benoit for the MD team: T. Bohl, K. Cornelis, H. Damerau, W. Hofle, E. Metral, G. Rumolo, B.
Elias Métral, LHC Beam Commissioning Working Group meeting, 30/11/2010 /241 PRELIMINARY FINDINGS FROM INSTABILITY MEASUREMENTS DURING THE 75ns AND 50ns.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
A first glance at the impedance of an SPS collimation system Nicolas Mounet, Benoit Salvant, Carlo Zannini Acknowledgments: collimation team (Daniele,
Elias Métral, LHC collimation working group meeting, 17/07/061/26 E. Métral for the RLC team LATEST ESTIMATES OF COLLIMATOR IMPEDANCE EFFECTS u Reminder:
Three examples of application of Sussix 1)Data from simulations  sensitivity 2)Data from measurements  frequency resolution.
Outcome of beam dynamics simulations - Scenarios, requirements and expected gains s LIU-SPS Coordination meeting 26/08/2015 A. Lasheen, E. Shaposhnikova,
Elias Métral, LIS meeting, 29/01/2008 1/26 GAMMA TRANSITION JUMP FOR PS2 W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, E. Métral and D. Möhl u Introduction with the case of.
Benchmarking Headtail with e-cloud observations with LHC 25ns beam H. Bartosik, W. Höfle, G. Iadarola, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Rumolo.
1 Transverse single-bunch instabilities in the CERN SPS and LHC Benoit Salvant for the impedance team: Gianluigi Arduini, Theodoros Argyropoulos, Mike.
HEADTAIL simulation during the accelerating ramp in the PS S. Aumon - EPFL & CERN Acknowledgement to B. Salvant, G. Rumolo.
XXIII European Synchrotron Light Source Workshop, November 2015 Eirini Koukovini-Platia Diamond Light Source Collective effects at Diamond Experimental.
Geometric Impedance of LHC Collimators O. Frasciello, S. Tomassini, M. Zobov LNF-INFN Frascati, Italy With contributions and help of N.Mounet (CERN), A.Grudiev.
INTRODUCTION FOR THIS (2nd) REVIEW ON LPL (LHC PERFORMANCE LIMITATIONS) => DURING RUN II ( ) E. Métral Follow-up of (1st) review on LPL during.
Transverse Damping Requirements
Cryo Problem MD Planning Tue (1.11.) C B Day Time MD MP Tue 01:00
Space charge studies at the SPS
The HEADTAIL Development Working Group (HDWG)
Follow up on SPS transverse impedance
Proposals for 2015 impedance-related MD requests for PSB and SPS
Sergey Antipov, Nicolo Biancacci, and david amorim
A. Al-khateeb, O. Chorniy, R. Hasse, V. Kornilov, O. Boine-F
MD2490 Measurement of the TMCI threshold at flat-top
Benchmarking the SPS transverse impedance model: headtail growth rates
IPAC’17, Copenhagen, Denmark 17. May 2017
MD2490: Measurement of the TMCI Threshold at Flat-Top
Luminosity Optimization for FCC-ee: recent results
LHC at 7 TeV/c: comparison phase 1 / IR3MBC
Space Charge Study Group
News on the TMCI and SPS transverse impedance
E. Métral, N. Mounet and B. Salvant
TCTP the CST side F. Caspers, H. Day, A. Grudiev, E. Metral, B. Salvant Acknowledgments: R. Assmann, A. Dallocchio, L. Gentini, C. Zannini Impedance Meeting.
G. Arduini, R. Calaga, E. Metral, G. Papotti, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant, R
R. Bartolini Diamond Light Source Ltd
E. Métral, G. Rumolo, R. Tomás (CERN Switzerland), B
Status from the collimator impedance MD in the LHC
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Tune shifts in LHC from collimators impedance
CERN / GSI Meeting on Collective Effects in CARE-HHH APD BEAM’07
W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, E. Métral, D. Möhl, G. Rumolo and B. Salvant
News on TMCI in the SPS: Injecting high intensity bunches
Some results on the LHC multibunch modes at 7 TeV/c
Simulating transition crossing in the PS with HeadTail
Observation of Transverse Mode Coupling Instability at the PS and SPS
CERN-SPS horizontal instability
LHC collimation review follow-up Impedance with IR3MBC option & comparison with phase 1 tight settings N. Mounet, B. Salvant and E. Métral Acknowledgements:
TMCI for LHC collimators (very preliminary results)
Presentation transcript:

LHC impedance: Comparison between phase 1 and IR3MBC – follow-up N. Mounet, B. Salvant and E. Métral Acknowledgements: G. Rumolo, A. Rossi. !! Still preliminary results !! N. Mounet, B. Salvant and E. Métral - BE/ABP/LIS - 24/11/2010

N. Mounet, B. Salvant and E. Métral - BE/ABP/LIS - 24/11/2010 Introduction IR3MBC is the collimation layout foreseen as an intermediate step before the phase 2 collimation → combined momentum – betatron cleaning in IR3. Impedance model: Collimators open in IR7, closer to the beam in IR3 and some additional collimators, including in cold sections (settings provided by A. Rossi), Rest of the machine as for phase 1: Beam screens, Warm pipe, MBW+MQW warm magnets, Broadband impedance from design report. Headtail simulations: Non linear bucket, Chromaticity = 2 in both planes, Kick=0.1 sigma in both planes, Nominal parameters for top energy (7TeV/c, Qx=64.31, Qy=59.32, norm. transverse emittances 3.75 mm.mrad (1 sig), long. emittance 2.5 eVs, RF voltage 16 MV, bunch length 7.55 cm, E/E (2 sig)=0.22e-3 ). N. Mounet, B. Salvant and E. Métral - BE/ABP/LIS - 24/11/2010

Multibunch modes: horizontal Better in horizontal, but… Stability diagrams from the octupoles N. Mounet, B. Salvant and E. Métral - BE/ABP/LIS - 24/11/2010

Multibunch modes: vertical … worse in vertical. In particular, huge tune shift (~1.3 10-3) with IR3MBC option. BUT this is supposed to be damped by transverse feedback. Now, is the real part of the tune shift an issue (for transverse mode coupling instability - TMCI - threshold) ? Stability diagrams from the octupoles N. Mounet, B. Salvant and E. Métral - BE/ABP/LIS - 24/11/2010

Horizontal and vertical dipolar (driving) impedance  Confirm a much stronger vertical impedance with IR3MBC w.r.t. phase 1 (red vs.magenta) above ~105 Hz) N. Mounet, B. Salvant and E. Métral - BE/ABP/LIS - 24/11/2010

Largest impedance contributors in IR3MBC configuration For those horizontal collimators: - very small halfgap due to small s (from small bx), quite large by,  Large vertical impedance (but not horizontal since bx is 10 times smaller). N. Mounet, B. Salvant and E. Métral - BE/ABP/LIS - 24/11/2010

Vertical dipolar impedance: largest contributors Rest of the machine = everything that is not a collimator in the current impedance model  Above a few MHz, one single IR3MBC collimator gives the same imag. part as the totality of the phase 1 collimators. N. Mounet, B. Salvant and E. Métral - BE/ABP/LIS - 24/11/2010

Single-bunch TMCI instability threshold (Headtail) In horizontal Without octupoles In vertical Vertical modes (coupling due to tilted collimator) Large positive tune shift of vertical mode -1  TMCI in the vertical plane at 1.4 1011 p+/bunch (vs 3.4 1011 in phase 1) N. Mounet, B. Salvant and E. Métral - BE/ABP/LIS - 24/11/2010

Single-bunch TMCI instability threshold In horizontal With octupoles at 500A In vertical The TMCI threshold seems higher (~ 1.9 1011 p+/b), but we need to simulate more turns to be sure. N. Mounet, B. Salvant and E. Métral - BE/ABP/LIS - 24/11/2010

N. Mounet, B. Salvant and E. Métral - BE/ABP/LIS - 24/11/2010 Conclusions At 7TeV, with the IR3MBC option, the horizontal impedance is lower than in phase 1, but the vertical one is much larger (for the imaginary part, factor between 1.5 at 10kHz and 3 at 10 GHz). In consequence, the multibunch transverse instability (thought to be the most critical effect at 7TeV) is a more critical issue than in phase 1 (well beyond the stability diagram). But this should be damped by the transverse feedback system. Without octupoles, the effect on single-bunch TMC (transverse mode coupling) instability threshold of such an impedance is worse by more than a factor two between IR3MBC and phase 1, according to Headtail simulations. With octupoles currents one needs to simulate more turns to be sure, but threshold is at least of 1.9 1011 protons per bunch.. The multibunch effect on the TMC instability threshold has still to be checked (involve parallel Headtail multibunch simulation, code is still under development). According to earlier results by Scott Berg it could be worse (http://www.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-wrap/getdoc/slac-pub-6829.pdf). N. Mounet, B. Salvant and E. Métral - BE/ABP/LIS - 24/11/2010