Observation and Evaluation of the Use of Clickers in CU Physics Courses Kennda Lynch ASTR 5835 Teaching Seminar, Spring 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
College Algebra Course Redesign Southeast Missouri State University.
Advertisements

POGIL vs Traditional Lecture in Organic I Gary D. Anderson Department of Chemistry Marshall University Huntington, WV.
Why do we use clickers?. Much educational research shows clickers produce: Better learning More active, engaged learning More spirited class discussion.
Economics 1 Principles of Microeconomics Instructor: Ted Bergstrom.
Data Collection and Interpretation
LECTURE 12 Announcements lectures 9-10 available online solutions to Chapter 25 problems available online Announcements lectures 9-10 available online.
Programming 1 Feedback Session. The unit has improved my understanding of programming. 1.Strongly Agree 2.Agree 3.Neutral 4.Disagree 5.Strongly Disagree.
Supplementing lectures with additional online materials Matthew Juniper, CUED June 2007.
Improving Students’ understanding of Feedback
Physics 1100 –Spring 2012 Physics Conceptual Physics Dr. James Wolfson.
HKN/RESCUE PCS SURVEY. Student Comments: “Have exam related to the lecture material. Have better text book. Have a recitation. Problem.
Perceptions of the Role of Feedback in Supporting 1 st Yr Learning Jon Scott, Ruth Bevan, Jo Badge & Alan Cann School of Biological Sciences.
Project Management Take a Tour of the Online Course.
Improving Learning via Tablet-PC-based In-Class Assessment Kimberle Koile, MIT CS and AI Lab David Singer, MIT Brain & Cognitive Sciences Classroom Presenter.
Presentation for Photography Evaluation This presentation is going to show what data I gathered and the results from the questionnaire I created.
Rebekka Darner, PhD University of Florida.  My past teaching experiences  Why did I start using Mastering?  How do I use Mastering?  Tutorials  Activities.
1 What do We Learn from Challenging TEFL CALL Students’ Projects? Presenter: Professor Lyra Riabov Southern New Hampshire University NNETESOL Fall 2006.
Nash- AP Chemistry Chemistry Podcasting- what is it and why? I want to explain what you should expect and how things will work this year.
Flipping the Large Intro Bio Class, Round 2 Jung H. Choi, School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA Abstract In fall 2011.
Welcome to Physics 4A! Introductions  Fill out the survey  Meet neighbors  Meet me What is this class about? How will the class be organized? Pre-class.
The Physical World: Multimedia physics at a distance Jon Rosewell, Fiona Thomson - CES Canan Tosunoglu Blake - IET The Open University.
Inessa Levi 11/05/2012.  Friendly, flexible and responsive course management system  Specifically geared towards mathematics and sciences  Tutorial.
Lab Orientation EDUC W200 Fall Goals Introductions for instructor and students Familiarize students with the course syllabus Familiarize students.
STEM Seminar – 23 rd November 2011 Overview Background Implementation of support initiative Methodology Evaluation Conclusions.
Evaluation and Website Overview Ellen Iverson Cathy Manduca.
Science Case Network GAPS IN REACHING DIVERSE AUDIENCES Aditi Pai Networking Conference August 6-7, 2012 RCN-UBE Project #
Student TAs in DSU Physics Labs Samuel Tobler, PhD Physics and Astronomy Teaching and Learning Conference April 2015.
Foundations of Sociological Inquiry Trust and Trickery in Social Research.
Teaching CP in Scotland 02/09/ how you attract students to your CP course - how do you keep them interested - goals/aims of your course - course.
Syllabus Highlights Spring Full syllabus is on myCourses! Exams (3 hourly + 1 final – drop one) : 300 points Attendance 12 points Homework 60 points.
Moderated by Bill Shields M.S. Department of Geography-Geology A Discussion of Large Lectures.
Faculty Inspiration & Goal of PFL Inspiration -I was motivated by Dee Silverthorn's colloquium. She gives her students assignments on the material prior.
Jeff Johnston Assistant Director, Center for Teaching Lecturer, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Vanderbilt University Meeting the learning.
Y axis represents number of candidates OSCE/VIVA course: April 2009 course evaluation and candidate feed back Total candidates:22 1: very poor 2:
Undergraduate Students’ Perception of an Online Course in Music Appreciation Herschel V. Beazley Professor of Music (Retired) and Governor’s Teaching Fellow.
A New Approach to Performing Course Evaluations: Using Q Methodology to Better Understand Student Attitudes Joe Jurczyk Susan Ramlo University of Akron.
Using Alice in an introductory programming course for non-CS majors Adelaida A. Medlock Department of Computer Science Drexel University
Final FRCA VIVA Course Evaluation 11 th and 12 th June 2009.
Learning Gains, Student Attitudes, and impacts on LA’s in Phys 1110 (Sp ‘03) S. Pollock With NSF/STEM-TP support.
Final FRCA SOE Course Evaluation Course 1 : June 1 st – 2 nd 2015.
Student Stats BIO 110 & I felt the use of clickers enhanced my learning experience. 81% 88% 2.I felt that clicker questions made me pay attention.
Introduction.  Introduction to course and syllabus  Meet and greet activity  Before next time.
Enhancing students’ sense of responsibility in learning by a weekly reflection activity.
Research Problem Across the Undergrad Science curriculum some concepts are consistently hard to acquire despite repeated exposure and appear to have a.
Welcome to PHY2049 Physics for Engineers and Scientists II Dr. Bindell.
Collaborative Problem Solving: Selected Parables Dave Dempsey Professor of Meteorology Department of Earth & Climate Sciences San Francisco State University.
Introduction Wednesday, September 8,  Register clickers  Introduction to course and syllabus  Meet and greet activity  Before next time.
Graduate Student Teacher Training and Support at Clemson Meredith Burr Department of Mathematical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC
Using Lecture Tutorials and ConcepTests to Engage Students Karen M. Kortz, Ph.D. Early Career Geoscience Faculty Workshop Monday, June 13, 2011 Teaching.
Clinical Anatomy Lecture Intro. Outline Syllabus Dissection Project Contracts Set the Baseline.
GLOBAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT INTRODUCTION. WELCOME I am Hudson Rogers and I will be the instructor for this course. Over the next few weeks we will explore.
Idiom of the Day IN THE LOOP To keep someone informed and up-to-date about what’s happening – usually in the workplace.
Nicole Broadnax and Marilyn Dunn EDEL 529 Data Entry 2: Case Study.
Active Learning in the Third Year Statistical Physics Module at the University of the Witwatersrand Jonathan Keartland School of Physics, University of.
Welcome to Physics 4A for Spring 2015! Getting Started  Fill out the survey Check whether you are trying to ADD If pre-registered, you MUST show up today.
IF GIRLS AREN’T INTERESTED IN COMPUTING CAN WE CHANGE THEIR MINDS? Julie Fisher Monash University, Melbourne, Australia,
1 Computer Science 1021 Programming in Java Geoff Draper University of Utah.
Reflections on Using Simulation Based Methods to Teach Statistical Methods Amanda Ellis and Melissa Pittard University of Kentucky, Department of Statistics.
Stephen L. Firsing III, PhD, MPA, MA John Delport, PhD Fredanna A.D. M’Cormack McGough, PhD, RD John Yannessa, PhD Mariel Celina Po, BS Kaitlyn Brown,
Diana Skrzydlo and Nam-Hwui Kim
Course Evaluation Title of the Course Code of the Course
2009 Teacher Workshop Evaluation and Assessment Teaching Staff
“The Places My Granddad Built”
Stella Kakavouli & Panagiotis Metaxas Computer Science Department
Welcome to Physics 1D03 !.
Welcome to Physics 1D03 !.
Grad V.S. Undergrad Clickers V.S. Non-clickers
What do we want to do today?! Sunday:
The arrows in the bottoms corners will take you forward and backwards through the slides, the home button will take you here, in case you want to start.
Presentation transcript:

Observation and Evaluation of the Use of Clickers in CU Physics Courses Kennda Lynch ASTR 5835 Teaching Seminar, Spring 2008

Study Objective Evaluate the differences in perceived teaching effectiveness in a clicker course and in a non- clicker course Evaluate the differences in perceived teaching effectiveness in a clicker course and in a non- clicker course Evaluate the differences in perceived effectiveness of clickers in two different clicker- based courses. Evaluate the differences in perceived effectiveness of clickers in two different clicker- based courses. Evaluate the difference in perceived effectiveness of clickers between students who had previous experience with clickers and students who have not Evaluate the difference in perceived effectiveness of clickers between students who had previous experience with clickers and students who have not

Study Set-up Course Observations Course Observations Observed 2 lectures each of two different introductory Physics courses Observed 2 lectures each of two different introductory Physics courses Instructor Questionnaire Instructor Questionnaire Interviewed instructors from both courses Interviewed instructors from both courses Reviewed course Websites & Syllabus Reviewed course Websites & Syllabus Surveyed Students Surveyed Students Surveyed 129 students in Course A (Instructor of course B declined survey) Surveyed 129 students in Course A (Instructor of course B declined survey)

Instructor Questionnaire Course A Instructor Course A Instructor 3 years teaching at CU 3 years teaching at CU 1 st time using clickers in a course 1 st time using clickers in a course Thinks clickers are great for large intro courses but does not know if they will use them upper level, smaller courses Thinks clickers are great for large intro courses but does not know if they will use them upper level, smaller courses Course B Instructor Course B Instructor 3 years teaching at CU 3 years teaching at CU Has used clickers before and will use clickers again Has used clickers before and will use clickers again Course B Co-Instructor Course B Co-Instructor 16 years of teaching at CU 16 years of teaching at CU Has used clickers before and will use clickers again Has used clickers before and will use clickers again

Student Survey 1. Is this your 1st clicker course? A. Yes B. No 2. Do you think the use of clickers is helping you to understand the material in this particular course? A. Yes B. No C. Other___________________________________________ 3. Do you think courses that use clickers are better than courses that do not? A. Yes B. No C. It depends on the course D. It depends on the instructor E. Both C & D 4. Would you take another course that uses clickers? A. Yes B. No C. Only if I have to (i.e. the course is required for my major)

Overall Results

Question 2: Do you think the use of clickers is helping you to understand the material in this particular course?

Question 3: Do you think courses that use clickers are better than courses that do not?

Question 4: Would you take another course that uses clickers?

Comments from Question 2 Sometimes Sometimes I don't know I don't know No, but it makes me come to class No, but it makes me come to class Sort of some questions help, a lot do not Sort of some questions help, a lot do not This is a terrible course to judge by… This is a terrible course to judge by… When material relevant to the lab or tutorials When material relevant to the lab or tutorials Clickers can only do so much… Clickers can only do so much… Only to answer questions on exams Only to answer questions on exams when they give hard problems or concepts it just confuses me when they give hard problems or concepts it just confuses me Depends on the nature of the question Depends on the nature of the question The time could be better spent explaining concepts The time could be better spent explaining concepts It gives me a chance to think about the material It gives me a chance to think about the material

Qualitative Observations Websites & Syllabus Websites & Syllabus Course and Clicker expectations well laid out in both classes Course and Clicker expectations well laid out in both classes Course B lists weekly Clicker questions Course B lists weekly Clicker questions In Class Observations of Instructor In Class Observations of Instructor Course A Course A Course B Course B Some Fun Student Observations Some Fun Student Observations

Conclusions Overall students think clickers help them learn. Overall students think clickers help them learn. Clickers effectiveness may depend on experience of instructor (dont have any supporting data) Clickers effectiveness may depend on experience of instructor (dont have any supporting data) Clickers may not be good for every class Clickers may not be good for every class