Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Three-Color Alternating-Laser Excitation of Single Molecules: Monitoring Multiple Interactions and Distances Nam Ki Lee, Achillefs N. Kapanidis, Hye Ran.
Advertisements

Probing α-310 Transitions in a Voltage-Sensing S4 Helix
Probing α-310 Transitions in a Voltage-Sensing S4 Helix
Volume 91, Issue 8, Pages (October 2006)
Masahiro Ueda, Tatsuo Shibata  Biophysical Journal 
K-Space Image Correlation Spectroscopy: A Method for Accurate Transport Measurements Independent of Fluorophore Photophysics  David L. Kolin, David Ronis,
Urea-Induced Unfolding of the Immunity Protein Im9 Monitored by spFRET
Measurement of Single Macromolecule Orientation by Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Polarization Microscopy  Joseph N. Forkey, Margot E. Quinlan,
Volume 111, Issue 5, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 87, Issue 4, Pages (October 2004)
M.C. Murphy, Ivan Rasnik, Wei Cheng, Timothy M. Lohman, Taekjip Ha 
Ion Permeation through a Narrow Channel: Using Gramicidin to Ascertain All-Atom Molecular Dynamics Potential of Mean Force Methodology and Biomolecular.
Volume 107, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (October 2008)
Joseph M. Johnson, William J. Betz  Biophysical Journal 
Aleš Benda, Yuanqing Ma, Katharina Gaus  Biophysical Journal 
Cylindrical Illumination Confocal Spectroscopy: Rectifying the Limitations of Confocal Single Molecule Spectroscopy through One-Dimensional Beam Shaping 
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
A. Delon, Y. Usson, J. Derouard, T. Biben, C. Souchier 
Vassili Ivanov, Min Li, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Biophysical Journal 
DNA Translocation Governed by Interactions with Solid-State Nanopores
Laser-Assisted Single-Molecule Refolding (LASR)
Sean A. McKinney, Chirlmin Joo, Taekjip Ha  Biophysical Journal 
Yong Wang, Paul Penkul, Joshua N. Milstein  Biophysical Journal 
Christopher Deufel, Michelle D. Wang  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 100, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Francesca Pennacchietti, Travis J. Gould, Samuel T. Hess 
Volume 95, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 74, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Volume 99, Issue 9, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 102, Issue 11, Pages (June 2012)
Abir M. Kabbani, Christopher V. Kelly  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Kinesin Moving through the Spotlight: Single-Motor Fluorescence Microscopy with Submillisecond Time Resolution  Sander Verbrugge, Lukas C. Kapitein, Erwin.
Calculating the Free Energy of Association of Transmembrane Helices
Pulsed Interleaved Excitation
Samuel T. Hess, Watt W. Webb  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Anna M. Popova, Peter Z. Qin  Biophysical Journal 
Stochastic Pacing Inhibits Spatially Discordant Cardiac Alternans
The Effect of Dye-Dye Interactions on the Spatial Resolution of Single-Molecule FRET Measurements in Nucleic Acids  Nicolas Di Fiori, Amit Meller  Biophysical.
Characterization of the Photoconversion on Reaction of the Fluorescent Protein Kaede on the Single-Molecule Level  P.S. Dittrich, S.P. Schäfer, P. Schwille 
Richa Dave, Daniel S. Terry, James B. Munro, Scott C. Blanchard 
L. Stirling Churchman, Henrik Flyvbjerg, James A. Spudich 
Transcription Initiation in a Single-Subunit RNA Polymerase Proceeds through DNA Scrunching and Rotation of the N-Terminal Subdomains  Guo-Qing Tang,
Volume 106, Issue 10, Pages (May 2014)
A Flexible Approach to the Calculation of Resonance Energy Transfer Efficiency between Multiple Donors and Acceptors in Complex Geometries  Ben Corry,
Robust Driving Forces for Transmembrane Helix Packing
Fluorescence Fluctuation Spectroscopy of mCherry in Living Cells
Volker Kiessling, Marta K. Domanska, Lukas K. Tamm  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 101, Issue 5, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 111, Issue 5, Pages (September 2016)
Single-Molecule Three-Color FRET
Kinetics of P2X7 Receptor-Operated Single Channels Currents
Polarized Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Microscopy
Stochastic Pacing Inhibits Spatially Discordant Cardiac Alternans
Volume 115, Issue 12, Pages (December 2018)
Yuri G. Strukov, A.S. Belmont  Biophysical Journal 
Alexander Spaar, Christian Münster, Tim Salditt  Biophysical Journal 
The Dual-Color Photon Counting Histogram with Non-Ideal Photodetectors
Kevin McHale, Andrew J. Berglund, Hideo Mabuchi  Biophysical Journal 
Jochen Zimmer, Declan A. Doyle, J. Günter Grossmann 
Volume 112, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 93, Issue 8, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 108, Issue 8, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 102, Issue 9, Pages (May 2012)
Orientation of the Myosin Light Chain Region by Single Molecule Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Polarization Microscopy  Margot E. Quinlan, Joseph.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages 2939-2953 (April 2005) Accurate FRET Measurements within Single Diffusing Biomolecules Using Alternating- Laser Excitation  Nam Ki Lee, Achillefs N. Kapanidis, You Wang, Xavier Michalet, Jayanta Mukhopadhyay, Richard H. Ebright, Shimon Weiss  Biophysical Journal  Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages 2939-2953 (April 2005) DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.104.054114 Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Alternating-laser excitation microscopy. (A) Microscope setup for ALEX. EOM, electrooptical modulator; P, polarizer; DM, dichroic mirror; OBJ, objective; PH, pinhole; F, filter; APD, avalanche photodiode. Modulators combined with polarizers result in alternating-laser excitation. After spatial and spectral filtering, emitted fluorescence photons were detected on APDs. (B) Time traces for a high-E DNA. The emission streams are fDexcDem,fAexcDem,fDexcAem, and fAexcAem, where fXexcYem represents the emission rate in the Y emission detection channel while X-excitation is on. Burst a is due to a high-E D-A species (low fDexcDem and high fDexcAem). Burst b is due to a D-only species (high fDexcDem and very low fAexcAem). D-only species (stars); D-A species (solid circles). Biophysical Journal 2005 88, 2939-2953DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.104.054114) Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Sorting single molecules using ALEX-based EPR-S histograms. (A) Expected location of labeled molecules depending on D-A stoichiometry and D-A distance. (B) Species required for recovering all corrections factor needed for accurate-E measurements using the method that depends on laser-alternation characteristics. D-only species provides the D-leakage factor l, A-only species provides the A-direct-excitation factor d, and two D-A species with large difference in E provide the γ-factor. (C) Species required for recovering all corrections needed for accurate-E measurements using the method that is independent of laser-alternation characteristics. D-only species provides the D-leakage factor l, a D-A species with E ∼ 0 (“simple-coincidence” control) provides the modified A-direct-excitation factor d′, and a D-A species with appreciable E provides the γ-factor. Use of A-only species is not necessary. Biophysical Journal 2005 88, 2939-2953DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.104.054114) Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 ALEX-based EPR-S histograms for DNA fragments used for the determination of accurate-E. Light and dark gray curves in EPR and S histograms: individual and sum of Gaussian fits to the one-dimensional histograms. (A–E) Histogram for T1B28, T1B23, T1B18, T1B13, and T1B8 DNA, respectively. The thick solid lines correspond to EPR, S-values as predicted for D-A species using γ=0.71 and β=1.25. Biophysical Journal 2005 88, 2939-2953DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.104.054114) Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 ALEX-based distance measurement and its dependence on detection-correction factor-γ. (A) EPR-1/S plot for the DNA of Fig. 3 and its dependence on alignment. Mean EPR-1/S values and linear fit for optimal alignment (solid circles and solid line); mean EPR-1/S values and linear fit for suboptimal alignment (open circles and dotted line). Error bars are the standard deviations of three measurements; error bars for EPR are not visible (<0.01). With optimal alignment, the linear fit yields γ=0.71, and β=1.25. Suboptimal alignment changes the correction factors (γ=1.05; β=1.30), leading to changes in EPR and 1/S; however, corrected values of E are identical to the one obtained by optimal alignment (Table 1; Fig. 4 B). (B) Relation between EPR and E, and its dependence on γ. Optimal alignment (●); suboptimal alignment (○). (Gray lines) EPR-E correction curves for γ=0.71, and γ=1.05. (Dotted lines) EPR-E correction curves for 0.25<γ<4. Differences between EPR and E are maximal for intermediate values of E, and for γ ≫ 1 and γ ≪ 1. (C) Relation between RPR and R, and its dependence on factor-γ . The differences between RPR and R increase linearly with increasing R. Biophysical Journal 2005 88, 2939-2953DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.104.054114) Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 A single ALEX measurement can recover accurate-E. EPR-S histogram for a mixture of D-only, A-only, T1B28, and T1B13 DNA. (Dotted rectangle) Area of histogram shown in the EPR histogram. D-only species were used for D-leakage correction, A-only species for A-direct-excitation correction, and the T1B28/T1B13 pair for determination of γ. Biophysical Journal 2005 88, 2939-2953DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.104.054114) Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Comparison of E-values measured for DNA fragments with values predicted from cylindrical models of DNA. ALEX-based E (Esm) (●). Ensemble E (Eens) (○). Theoretical E (Ethe) was calculated (Clegg et al., 1993; Norman et al., 2000) using Ethe=[1+{[3.4(n−1)+L]2+[d−a   cos(θ+φ)]2+[a   sin(θ+φ)]2}1/2/R0)6]−1 where n is the interprobe separation (in bp), L is the rise of the terminal probe along the helix axis, d is the radial distance of the center of the donor probe from the helix axis (in Å), a is the radial distance of the center of the acceptor probe from the helix axis (in Å), θ is the rotation angle for fluorophores separated by n bp (calculated using θ = 34 (n-1)), φ is the cylindrical angle between radially extended donor and acceptor when spaced by 1 bp, and Ro is the Förster radius (in Å). The solid curve represents Ethe for a DNA model with the donor probe proximal to the DNA helical axis (L=4Å, a=25Å, d=0Å, φ=232°, and Ro=69Å), whereas the dotted curve represents Ethe for a DNA model with the donor probe distal from the DNA helical axis (L=4Å, a=25Å, d=15Å, φ=232°, and Ro=69Å). Error bars are the standard deviations of three measurements. In all cases, Esm-values fit better to theoretical values than Eens. Biophysical Journal 2005 88, 2939-2953DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.104.054114) Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 EPR-S histograms for RNAPσTMR,366 complexed with DNA carrying an acceptor at various positions, and γ-determination. Histograms display only the D-A species; D-only and A-only species were removed using FAexcAem>20 photons and FDexcDem>20 photons, respectively. (A–D) Complexes with acceptor at +64, +29, +28, and +25, respectively. (E) Linear relation between EPR and 1/S allows extraction of β- and γ-factors; each point reflects the averages and standard deviations of three experiments. Biophysical Journal 2005 88, 2939-2953DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.104.054114) Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions