Cross Compliance Implementation & Control in England

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IAA focused on the E. coli cross- contamination guidance Introductions What we hope to cover today  Background to IAA and the benefits  The process.
Advertisements

Position of biodiversity in future CAP Nina Dobrzyńska Department for Direct Payments Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Poland Ryn, 29th September.
Our Water, Our Resource, Our Responsibility Module 2: Water Management Unit 1: Roles, Responsibility and Legislation Muckno Mill Lough.
Air Quality and Land Use Planning Land Use Consultants 11 th March 2008 Susanne Underwood.
Copyright, 1996 © Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc. DAVID SMALL DIRECTOR OF FOOD, FARMING AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY.
COBIT 5: Framework, BMIS, Implementation and future Information Security Guidance Presented by.
THE ADMINISTRATION, REGULATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAW 1 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY; LOCAL AUTHORITIES; SECRETARY OF STATE 1 Environmental Law.
Seveso II in the UK Mark Maleham tel + 44 (0)
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
OFFICIAL CONTROL OF FOOD LABELLING AND FOOD QUALITY CONTROL Dr. Pirjo-Liisa Penttilä Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Finland.
Health and Safety Executive Health and Safety Executive Regulation of distribution and farm level uses Paul Adamson & Helena Cooke.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Overview of legal framework Regional Workshop - School for Drafting Regulations 3-14 November 2014 Abdelmadjid.
Guidance for AONB Partnership Members Welsh Member Training January 26/
Fedral Agricultural Research Centre Institute of Rural Studies Cross-compliance – Greening of the First Pillar? Heike Nitsch “Nature Conservation and the.
1 Integrating water issues in farm advisory services The English Experience FAS and Water Workshop 21 st October 2009.
POVERTY IMPACT ASSESSMENT IRELAND’S EXPERIENCE Gerry Mangan POVERTY IMPACT ASSESSMENT IRELAND’S EXPERIENCE Gerry Mangan.
Why can voluntary agreements between water companies, farmers and authorities help to implement the European WFD and CAP reforms? Ingo Heinz University.
Enver AKSOY, MSc Head of Strategy Development Board of MoFAL Policy approaches of Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock to pasture management in.
Review of the implementation in England of the Habitats and Wild Birds Directives Nature Directors 23 May 2012 Robin Mortimer, Defra.
Better Regulation Richard Gregg Defra Delivery Transformation Programme Manager.
Public money for Public goods A new CAP for Europe’s biodiversity Ariel Brunner EU Agriculture Policy Officer European Division, BirdLife International.
Water Framework Directive and the SRDP Jannette MacDonald Land Unit, SEPA.
Better Regulation Executive Making regulation work for everyone Karen Hill Better Regulation Executive 01 March 2007 From Enforcement to Compliance: Delivering.
Introduction to SEPA The Scottish Environment Agency For CaSPr Waste Workshop Glasgow 19 October 2006 Claudette Hudes NetRegs Team Leader.
Update on contaminated land A Defra view Presented by: Maggie Charnley Date: 10 September 2014.
CCAT approach to assess potential effects of CC measures on biodiversity and landscape Juan José Oñate.
Bob Slater CFE Coordinator Warwickshire & Worcestershire 14 th May 2014.
“Nature Conservation and the EU Policy for Sustainable Land Management in the New EU Member States” Kilian Delbrück, BMU, Bonn Summary.
RDR, CAP and Forestry Sandy Greig Head of Forestry Authority Forestry Commission, England.
Western Balkans Veterinary Network ‘Western Balkans Veterinary Network’- advancing animal welfare through education, research and professional training.
Health in Strategic Environmental Assessment Colleen Williams: Department of Health Paul Fisher: Health Protection Agency
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) A Scottish replacement to Air Passenger Duty (APD) Elaine McCall Environmental Assessment Team The Scottish Government.
Administrative burdens in EU agriculture: an evidence base CAP Simplification Expert Group 24 April 2007 Jenny McInnes Department for Environment Food.
Measuring and reducing administrative burdens in EU agriculture CAP Simplification Stakeholder Conference October 2006 Jenny McInnes Department for Environment,
CAP 2021 Priorities of the Netherlands
Legislation Carl James.
Improving the Garment Sector in Lao PDR:
Risk Communication in Medicines
Environmental policies in Europe
WAgriCo An NFU Perspective
Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs
9/16/2018 The ACT Government’s commitment to Performance and Accountability – the role of Evaluation Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Thursday,
Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development
Directore General for Agriculture and Rural Development
LWT’s Conservation Strategy: 25 year forward look
Exmoor’s Ambition for our post- Brexit farming & environment futures.
National Environment Policy Presentation
CEBS’ role in the CRD implementation
The Commission Communication on implementation (COM (2012) 95) in relation to Water Industry Directives (Urban Waste Water Treatment, Drinking Water,
Thomas Dworak Ecologic Institute
Preparing a River Basin Management Plan WFD Characterisation Manager
ISO management systems
How the proposed new delivery model for the CAP will provide the ground for the further development of Smart Villages’ approaches? Beata Adamczyk European.
COBIT 5: Framework, BMIS, Implementation and future Information Security Guidance Presented by.
CAP post-2020 state of play Caroline Pottier
OECD good practices for setting up an RIA system Regional Capacity-Building Seminar on Regulatory Impact Assessment Istanbul, Turkey 20 November 2007.
The Commission proposal for the CAP post 2013
8-c) Expert Group & River Basin Network on WFD & Agriculture
Strong needs for coordination at EU level
WFD and Agriculture Activity under the CIS 2005/2006 Work Programme
7th Environment Action Programme to 2020 Living well, within the limits of our planet Evaluation - COM (2019) May 2019.
SusCatt Increasing productivity, resource efficiency and product quality to increase the economic competitiveness of forage and grazing based cattle.
UK experience of Programmes of Measures
Candidate Pack Operations Officer.
WFD and agriculture Putting policy linkages into practice
© Fresh Thoughts Consulting
Andrea Tilche Unit Head of the Water Key Action
Leverage effect of PAFs : experience from CAP integration
WFD CIS Working Group Meeting Brussels, 4/4/2019
Presentation transcript:

Cross Compliance Implementation & Control in England James Jansen Farming for the Future Programme Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs July 2007 1

DEFRA Executive agencies ‘NDPBs’ (Agriculture & Environment Policy) 2 Implementation / “Control” Policy Executive agencies Rural Payments Agency Animal Health Agency Veterinary Medicines Agency Etc… ‘NDPBs’ Environment Agency Natural England National Park Authorities Etc… 2

Importance of agriculture and place of cross compliance Agricultural activities cover c.¾ of the land area of the UK – 18.4m Ha Agriculture has major environmental impacts e.g. 60% N, & 40% P entering English watercourses 2.2m tonnes of top soil lost per year in England & Wales Pesticides – removal from drinking water costs c.£78m per year Cross compliance is key mechanism to deliver basic standards of environmental protection – in return for £1.5bn subsidy 3

Cross Compliance in England Statutory Management Requirements 19 standards Good Agricultural & Environmental Condition 17 standards Soil management and protection (4) Maintenance of habitats & landscape features (13) Permanent Pasture All the SMRs and over half of GAECs re-enforce existing English legislation 4

Hedge & watercourse protection – 2 metre protection zones next to hedges & watercourses

Overgrazing and unsuitable supplementary feeding controls

Cross Compliance Design in England Internal working groups with Defra agencies – soils, biodiversity, set-aside & inspection/controls Workshop with stakeholders prior to recommendations to Ministers – influential on approach to soils 12-week consultation in 2004 GAECs developed to tackle key environmental externalities; SMRs assessed for clarity and readability. Continuing dialogue with stakeholders e.g. farmer “roundtables” Pilot inspection process should be considered Regulatory Impact Assessment used to identify costs and benefits of standards 7

Support to Farmers Cross Compliance Handbook for England Incorporates: Detailed requirements Legal Information Inspection and Enforcement Information 8

Support to Farmers 2 Cross Compliance Handbook for England Moving towards a simpler, streamlined approach for ‘08: Loose leaf Farmers can order booklet to suit their needs Farming activities linked to requirements Summaries of standards Clear “must” / “must not” format Signposting of supplementary information 9

Support to Farmers 3 Additional guidance booklets explain cross compliance objectives and help farmers deliver Habitats / Soils Guidance Explanations of GAECs Best practice How to comply Easy reference Popular with farmers 10

Support to Farmers 4 Momenta advice programme (GAECs & SMRs) 11 (Key part of FAS) Website: 97,000+ visits in first two years Helpline: 11,000+ calls in first two years Events: 23,000+ attended in first two years e.g. farm walks, workshops 1-to-1 advice: 34,000+ receiving advice in first two years In addition: National Press Attending Shows Mail shots Text messaging Surveys show awareness of cross compliance issues raised from 47% in 2004 to 97% in 2005 11

Cross Compliance Controls 4 Competent Control Authorities (CCAs) in England Rural Payments Agency - GAECs; SMRs 1-9,11-12 Animal Health Agency - SMRs 13-18 Veterinary Medicines - SMR 10 Environment Agency - SMRs 2-4 12

CCA Co-ordination CCA Co-ordination Body Rural Payments Agency Veterinary Medicines Animal Health Envt. Agency Initially managed by Defra, now RPA 13

Risk Assessment Each CCA undertakes own risk assessment e.g. RPA Selection of 1% of Farmers for Inspection: 68% risk assessed 12% referrals 20% random Random element provides a baseline for non- compliance rates among the whole population 17 teams/350 inspectors assess compliance 14

Emerging Impact of Cross Compliance Indications that: 40% of farmers have changed their practices to meet cross compliance; 34% have noted environmental or other benefits, such as increased wildlife and reduced runoff from fields; A monitoring and evaluation programme is being developed to explore these further. 15

Cross Compliance Evolution Continuing to adapt the way we interact with farmers to improve compliance and reduce burdens: Farmer workshops to identify concerns/needs; Simplifying the Handbook to identify clear “you must” / “you must not” requirements; Signposting of additional information; Better targeting advice to improve compliance (trial use of workshops to improve performance); Providing information on the inspection process. 16

Future Challenges Early stage of the journey – aim to move from detailed set standards towards outputs/outcomes (e.g. Soil Protection Review) and empowering farmers to deliver Aspiration to reduce number of GAEC standards Cross compliance a key tool to recognise emerging challenges such as the Water Framework Directive, and strengthen the industry to prepare Greater integration with other policy measures e.g. set-aside, Pillar II 17

Key Points Talk to farmers and stakeholders so they understand process from an early stage; Trial the inspection process to provide a “reality-check”; Providing information/advice is challenging, but key to changing behaviour; An opportunity to deliver environmental benefits and help farmers prepare for future challenges 18

Thank you Newcastle University November 2003