Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
c-Jun Is Essential for Organization of the Epidermal Leading Edge
Advertisements

Levels of Polyadenylation Factor CstF-64 Control IgM Heavy Chain mRNA Accumulation and Other Events Associated with B Cell Differentiation  Yoshio Takagaki,
Anthony J. Cesare, Makoto T. Hayashi, Laure Crabbe, Jan Karlseder 
Volume 135, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages (November 2011)
Late mitotic failure in mice lacking Sak, a polo-like kinase
Structure of the Papillomavirus DNA-Tethering Complex E2:Brd4 and a Peptide that Ablates HPV Chromosomal Association  Eric A. Abbate, Christian Voitenleitner,
Early Replication of Short Telomeres in Budding Yeast
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Human Wapl Is a Cohesin-Binding Protein that Promotes Sister-Chromatid Resolution in Mitotic Prophase  Rita Gandhi, Peter J. Gillespie, Tatsuya Hirano 
Condensin Is Required for Nonhistone Protein Assembly and Structural Integrity of Vertebrate Mitotic Chromosomes  Damien F. Hudson, Paola Vagnarelli,
The Mouse Spo11 Gene Is Required for Meiotic Chromosome Synapsis
Growth Arrest Failure, G1 Restriction Point Override, and S Phase Death of Sensory Precursor Cells in the Absence of Neurotrophin-3  Wael M ElShamy, Lena.
Mark H Kaplan, Ulrike Schindler, Stephen T Smiley, Michael J Grusby 
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 53, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 116, Issue 6, Pages (June 1999)
S. pombe Aurora Kinase/Survivin Is Required for Chromosome Condensation and the Spindle Checkpoint Attachment Response  Janni Petersen, Iain M. Hagan 
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (March 2001)
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 19, Issue 17, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (May 2006)
Christine Michaelis, Rafal Ciosk, Kim Nasmyth  Cell 
Distal Sequences, but Not ori-β/OBR-1, Are Essential for Initiation of DNA Replication in the Chinese Hamster DHFR Origin  R.F Kalejta, X Li, L.D Mesner,
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Both E12 and E47 Allow Commitment to the B Cell Lineage
TRF2 Protects Human Telomeres from End-to-End Fusions
TALEN Gene Knockouts Reveal No Requirement for the Conserved Human Shelterin Protein Rap1 in Telomere Protection and Length Regulation  Shaheen Kabir,
Regulation of Sister Chromatid Cohesion between Chromosome Arms
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (April 1996)
Cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation of the translational repressor eIF-4E binding protein-1 (4E-BP1)  Kate J. Heesom, Alexandra Gampel, Harry Mellor,
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2002)
Ramiro E. Verdun, Laure Crabbe, Candy Haggblom, Jan Karlseder 
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
The Mouse Mps1p-like Kinase Regulates Centrosome Duplication
Chk1 Is Required for Spindle Checkpoint Function
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 7, Issue 11, Pages (November 1997)
Histone–GFP fusion protein enables sensitive analysis of chromosome dynamics in living mammalian cells  Teru Kanda, Kevin F. Sullivan, Geoffrey M. Wahl 
A Role for the FEAR Pathway in Nuclear Positioning during Anaphase
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
The Prolyl Isomerase Pin1 Functions in Mitotic Chromosome Condensation
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Hong-Guo Yu, Douglas Koshland  Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Polo-like Kinase 1 Triggers the Initiation of Cytokinesis in Human Cells by Promoting Recruitment of the RhoGEF Ect2 to the Central Spindle  Mark Petronczki,
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages (May 2002)
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (June 2011)
Timing and Checkpoints in the Regulation of Mitotic Progression
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (February 2003)
Securin is not required for cellular viability, but is required for normal growth of mouse embryonic fibroblasts  Junjie Mei, Xingxu Huang, Pumin Zhang 
Mahesh Ramamoorthy, Susan Smith  Cancer Cell 
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
Volume 135, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Mis6, a Fission Yeast Inner Centromere Protein, Acts during G1/S and Forms Specialized Chromatin Required for Equal Segregation  Shigeaki Saitoh, Kohta.
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (February 2005)
Brian H. Lee, Brendan M. Kiburz, Angelika Amon  Current Biology 
Two Distinct Pathways Remove Mammalian Cohesin from Chromosome Arms in Prophase and from Centromeres in Anaphase  Irene C Waizenegger, Silke Hauf, Andreas.
Increased Recombination Intermediates and Homologous Integration Hot Spots at DNA Replication Origins  Mónica Segurado, Marı́a Gómez, Francisco Antequera 
KNL1/Spc105 Recruits PP1 to Silence the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint
Cdk1 Negatively Regulates Midzone Localization of the Mitotic Kinesin Mklp2 and the Chromosomal Passenger Complex  Stefan Hümmer, Thomas U. Mayer  Current.
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages (May 2015)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages 759-770 (December 2001) Scc1/Rad21/Mcd1 Is Required for Sister Chromatid Cohesion and Kinetochore Function in Vertebrate Cells  Eiichiro Sonoda, Takahiro Matsusaka, Ciaran Morrison, Paola Vagnarelli, Osamu Hoshi, Tatsuo Ushiki, Kuniharu Nojima, Tatsuo Fukagawa, Irene C. Waizenegger, Jan-Michael Peters, William C. Earnshaw, Shunichi Takeda  Developmental Cell  Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages 759-770 (December 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00088-0

Figure 1 Generation of SCC1−/−/− DT40 Clones (A) Schematic representation of the chicken SCC1 locus, the three gene disruption constructs, and the configuration of the targeted loci. Black boxes indicate the positions of exons that were disrupted. RI indicates EcoRI restriction sites. (B) Southern blot analysis of wild-type (WT), heterozygous mutant (+/+/−) and (+/−/−), and homozygous mutant (−/−/−) clones. EcoRI enzyme-digested genomic DNA was hybridized with the probe DNA shown in (A). (C) Western blot analysis of the time course of Scc1 repression following the addition of the tetracycline analog doxycycline at time 0. Extracts from 106 cells prepared from wild-type (WT) or Scc1− cells at the times indicated following tet addition were immunoblotted with a polyclonal antibody against Scc1. (D) Western blot analysis of the Scc1 protein in cells synchronized at the G1/S boundary. Immunoblot for Scc1 of total protein prepared from 106 asynchronous wild-type cells (lane 1), G1/S phase synchronized SCC1−/−/−Scc1+ cells (lane 2), or G1/S phase synchronized SCC1−/−/−Scc1− cells (lane 3). (E) Growth curves of cultures of the indicated genotypes in the absence or presence of doxycycline (tet). Representative curves from three separate experiments are shown. (F) Mitotic index in SCC1−/−/−Scc1− cells at various times following tet addition. Two hundred cells were scored following analysis by DAPI staining. Developmental Cell 2001 1, 759-770DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00088-0)

Figure 2 Cell Cycle Analysis of Scc1-Deficient DT40 Cells (A) Flow cytometric analysis of synchronized SCC1−/−/− cell cultures with (Scc1−) or without (Scc1+) addition of doxycycline. Cells were harvested and stained with propidium iodide to detect total DNA (horizontal axis, linear scale) at the time points indicated after their release from nocodazole-mimosine G1/S phase arrest. (B) Time course analysis of mitotic progression in Scc1+ and Scc1−SCC1−/−/− cells following release from synchronization at the G1/S boundary. Developmental Cell 2001 1, 759-770DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00088-0)

Figure 3 Phenotypic Characterization of Mitotic Scc1-Deficient Cells (A–J) Synchronized SCC1−/−/− cells cultured in the presence or absence of doxycycline, as indicated, were stained for tubulin (green) and DNA (blue) 6–7 hr after release from the G1/S phase block. Boxes show close-ups of chromosomal regions in which the monopolar attachment can be seen more clearly. (K–T) Synchronized SCC1−/−/− cells expressing CENP-H/GFP cultured in the presence or absence of doxycycline, as indicated, were stained for DNA (blue) 6–7 hr after release from the G1/S phase block. CENP-H/GFP fluorescence is shown in green. Arrows indicate paired sister kinetochores. (A, F, K, P), (B, C, G, H, L, M, Q, R), (D, I, N, S), and (E, J, O, T) represent cells in prophase, prometaphase/metaphase, anaphase, and cytokinesis, respectively. Developmental Cell 2001 1, 759-770DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00088-0)

Figure 4 Loss of Sister Chromatid Cohesion in SCC1−/−/− Cells (A–D) Scc1+ (A and B) and Scc1− (C and D) cells were subjected to FISH with a probe specific for the trisomic OVALBUMIN locus on chromosome 2 (green) 5 hr after release from G1/S phase block. Nuclear DNA was stained with DAPI (red). (E–H) Metaphase spreads were prepared from Scc1+ (E and F) and Scc1− (G and H) cells 6 hr after release from synchronization at the G1/S boundary. Arrows indicate paired sister chromatids. Note the marked separation in Scc1− cells. (I–L) Synchronized populations of Scc1+ (I and J) and Scc1− (K and L) cells were subjected to atomic force microscopy 6 hr after release from synchronization at the G1/S boundary. A close-up of an area along the chromosome is shown in (J) and (L) to emphasize the increased separation between the main body of the sister chromatids in Scc1-deficient cells (L). Developmental Cell 2001 1, 759-770DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00088-0)

Figure 5 Chromosome Condensation and Condensin Binding in the Absence of Scc1 Chromosome spreads from asynchronous populations of colcemid-blocked SCC1−/−/−Scc1+ cells (A–C) or colcemid-blocked SCC1−/−/−Scc1− cells that had been treated with tet for 24 hr (D–F) were stained with DAPI for DNA (blue) and with a polyclonal antibody recognizing ScII/SMC2 (red). Merged images are shown in (A) and (D), with single channels shown for ScII/SMC2 (B and E) and for DNA (C and F). Developmental Cell 2001 1, 759-770DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00088-0)

Figure 6 Defective Accumulation of INCENP at Kinetochores in Scc1-Deficient Cells Chromosome spreads from asynchronous populations of colcemid-blocked SCC1−/−/−Scc1+ cells (A and B) or colcemid-blocked SCC1−/−/−Scc1− cells that had been treated with tet for 24 hr (C and D) were stained with DAPI (A and C) and antibodies to CENP-C (red) and INCENP (green) (B and D). Boxes show close-ups of chromosomal regions in which the loss of INCENP from the inner centromere can be seen more clearly, as diagrammed in the panels at right. Developmental Cell 2001 1, 759-770DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00088-0)

Figure 7 Defective Homologous Recombinational DNA Repair in the Absence of Cohesin (A) Chromosome aberrations occurring in the macrochromosomes of synchronized cells 7 hr after release from G1/S block were stained and counted as described (Sonoda et al., 1998). Cells were treated with colcemid for the last 3 hr and, where indicated, were treated with two Gy γ irradiations 4 hr after release from synchronization. Data are presented as the number of aberrations per 100 cells. (B) Reduced levels of SCE in Scc1+ cells compared to controls. After doxycycline addition, the cells were labeled with BrdU during two cell cycles with or without 4NQO treatment (0.2 ng/ml) for the last 8 hr. Spontaneous and 4NQO-induced SCEs in the major chromosomes of 100 metaphase cells were scored. Histograms show the frequency of cells with the indicated numbers of SCEs per cell. Developmental Cell 2001 1, 759-770DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00088-0)