University-Wide Course Evaluation Committee Peter Biehl, Chair, Department of Anthropology Krissy Costanzo, Committee Staff Support; Academic Affairs March.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)

Advertisements

The 1 st National Quality Assurance Conference November 17-18, 2011 Student Feedback on Teaching and Learning at The University of the West Indies, St.

Online Internal Grant Process: An Effective Means to Infuse and Sustain General Education Goals University of Delaware Martha Carothers Catherine Davies.

Career and College Readiness Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Assessment Literacy MODULE 1.

Assessment Literacy Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Career and College Readiness MODULE 1.

Rich Veit Judy Nye Laura Jannone. Why a New First-Year Seminar First-year seminars are offered at more than 95% of American colleges and universities.

Tyra Goodgain & Debi Higbie-Holmes, Make It Happen! Innovation Grant: FYE Student Ambassadors Program ~ Information Session Montgomery College.

Promotion and Tenure Workshop 1. Evaluation Procedure There is only one evaluation procedure leading to recommendations regarding promotion, tenure and.

Bernie Engel, Professor and Head Agricultural and Biological Engineering 1 March 25, 2014.

© 2008 Brigham Young University–Idaho. © 2010 Brigham Young University–Idaho COURSE LEAD RESPONSIBILITIES TRAINING Feb. 7,

1. 2 Evaluation Report A preliminary report to the faculty and administrators of the online distance learning program in the Department of Educational.

How to Create a Non-Course Survey Presenter: David J Neiss CoursEval Implementation & Support Specialist.

Student Focus Groups UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COLLEGE OF PHARMACY 1 Formative Evaluation Using Student Focus Groups Heidi M. Anderson, Ph.D. University of.

ACADEMIC DEGREE ASSESSMENT & GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay Arts & Sciences Faculty Meeting March 12,

Science ROCKS! Welcome to the Hamilton County District In-service: August 4, 2011.

Implementation of PBL program for 2 nd year students in 2007 Presented by: Dr. Mirwais Sorosh Lecturer, KMU Human Anatomy Dept.

Products being integrated to create Home Base OpenClass Collaboration Schoolnet Instructional Tools and Assessment PowerSchool Student Information Core.

Educational Teams: Variation at McGill Teaching in a different way Lynn McAlpine McGill University Canada

How Do We Do It All? Teacher Educator’s Responsibilities in Addition to Teaching & Scholarship Dr. Patti Powell Professor of Education Trinity Christian.

Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.

Prepare Understand the accommodation process & choose level of engagement. Engage Follow procedures for receiving accommodations.

Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Athletic Program Leader Proposed Adaptations.

Strategic Plan Briefing Session Progress and Challenges Spring

Results of the Faculty Survey on Internationalization at Villanova: A Preliminary Report Prepared for the International Leadership Committee Prepared by.

Institutional Course Evaluation Solution Faculty Senate Executive Committee September 12, 2012 Carol VanZile-Tamsen, Ph.D.; Associate Director, Office.

Student Evaluations. Introduction: Conducted: Qualtrics Survey Fall 2011 o Sample Size: 642 o FT Tenured: 158, FT Untenured: 59 o Adjunct: 190 o Students:

IN SUPPORT OF STUDENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE COURSE TRANSFORMATION PROGRAM Senate Resolution 1012.

New Web-Based Course Evaluation Services Available to Schools and Departments Presentation to Faculty Council November 6, 2009.

Retention Plan  Between 2007 and 2009, several committees, including A&S department chairs, issued recommendations for student retention.  Their.

SUMMER SESSION (003). Plan of Presentation Preparation Data / Statistics Difficulties Recommendations.

Using the UB Course Evaluation System A Guide for Staff The UB Course Evaluation System is powered by.

So You Want to Switch Course Management Systems? We Have! Come Find Out What We’ve Learned. Copyright University of Okahoma This work is the intellectual.

Evaluating and Improving Foundations: General Education & Assessment Mo Noonan-Bischof Elaine M. Klein Nancy Westphal-Johnson.

Using the UB Course Evaluation System A Guide for Faculty The UB Course Evaluation System is powered by.

University Senate August 26, 2014 KEY FINDINGS FROM THE COACHE FACULTY JOB SATISFACTION SURVEY.

The online bachelor’s degree completion program in Early Childhood & Family Studies is the first undergraduate online program at the University of Washington.

Presented by Kelley Engle HACC York April 19, 2011.

1 What Students Need to Know from The National Student Survey 17 June 2010 Sami Benyahia, Director.

The Tenure and Promotion Application Process. Each candidate is responsible for compiling the materials for his/her application with the assistance of.

Faculty Handbook The Faculty Handbook states that the normal full-time teaching load is 15 credits per term, including 12 credits of assigned courses and.

End of Course Evaluation Taimi Olsen, Ph.D., Director, Tennessee Teaching and Learning Center Jennifer Ann Morrow, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Evaluation,

Final Update on the New Faculty Course Evaluation & Online System November, 2003.

Postgraduate Taught Experience Survey (PTES) 2010 Interim Results Dr Pam Wells Adviser, Evidence-Informed Practice.

JABSOM Annual Faculty Reporting Instructions For Reporting Session: July 1 – June 30.

© 2011 Partners Harvard Medical International Strategic Plan for Teaching, Learning and Assessment Program Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Center Strategic.

+ Adjunct at College of Charleston 101 August 18, 2015 Kendall Deas, Ph.D College of Charleston.

Work of the Faculty Leadership Team An Overview. Our Charge Serving to recommend process Serving to set up a strategic plan.

02 April 2012 Provost's Report to College Senate.

Faculty Evaluation for Online Learning Institutional Standards and Emerging Practices Ellen Hoffman Eastern Michigan University.

Visioning 2 Committee 15,800 by 2018 JoyceArmstrongFamily Sciences 13 JessicaGullionSociology GovernorJacksonFinancial AidMarkHamnerInstitutional Research.

Progress in Graduate Attribute Assessment in Mechanical Engineering at McMaster University M.F. Lightstone July

Dr. Amina M R El-Nemer Lecturer Maternity and Obstetric Nursing Dep. IQAP Manager Program Specification.

Concerns, Data, Next Steps.  New Administration Software from Scantron  New Academic Senate Policy  New Items/Survey Form (ACE, Iowa Item Pool)  New.

Evaluation of Teaching Recommendations of the Teaching Effectiveness Committee University Senate Meeting May 1, 2007.

The Use of Formative Evaluations in the Online Course Setting JENNIFER PETERSON, MS, RHIA, CTR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SCIENCES.

ASSESSMENT DO THIS, NOT THAT! UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO ASSESSMENT DAY

Program Assessment – an overview Karen E. Dennis O: sasoue.rutgers.edu.

P&T Update: College of Medicine, Carol S. Weisman, PhD Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs Distinguished Professor of Public Health Sciences.

Making an Excellent School More Excellent: Weston High School’s 21st Century Learning Expectations and Goals

College of Arts & Sciences Lecturer Promotion Dossier assembly workshop fall 2016.

Academic Year UNC Asheville

College of Arts & Sciences Lecturer Promotion Dossier assembly workshop fall 2017.

Course Evaluation Committee

UF Quest: Faculty Senate Presentation 3

FACULTY ACTIVITY REPORTS

Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update

Improving the First Year: Campus Discussion March 30, 2009

Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations

Institutional Course Evaluation Solution

Presentation transcript:

University-Wide Course Evaluation Committee Peter Biehl, Chair, Department of Anthropology Krissy Costanzo, Committee Staff Support; Academic Affairs March 26, 2014

Importance of Course Evaluations Allows students to give anonymous feedback on the quality of their course Used by instructors to improve courses for future students, make them more relevant, and improve teaching effectiveness Assists in the promotion and tenure process Allows departments to improve their curriculum Gives comparisons for benchmarking purposes

Current State – Decentralized Approach

What are the advantages of online evaluations? Equal Access Green Anonymous Better Feedback Improved Analysis

Course Evaluations can be taken anywhere! At Home In Class In the Quad In a Lab In the student lounge Library

Student Surveys University at Buffalo

Student Survey Taking

Faculty Home University at Buffalo

Comparison Summaries

ed Results

Administrator Reporting

Flexible for UBs Needs Accommodates… Team Teaching Primary Instructors, Secondary Instructors, Teaching Assistants, Course Coordinators etc. Cross listing Multi-tiered setup to accommodate the needs of colleges, departments, and programs for: Reporting Questions

University Core Item Set 1.The course was well organized. (Organization) 2.The course was intellectually challenging and stimulating. (Difficulty) 3.The work load in the course was reasonable and appropriate. (Workload) 4.Methods of evaluating student work were fair and appropriate. (Grading) 5.Overall, this was an excellent course. (Overall Course). 6.Please comment on the elements of the course you found particularly effective. (Qualitative) 7.Please comment on course improvements you would suggest. (Qualitative)

University Core Item Set Cont. 8.The instructor clearly presented what students should learn (the expected learning outcomes) for the course. (Breadth of Coverage) 9.The course content (assignments, readings, lectures, etc.) helped me meet the learning expectations set forth by the instructor. (Learning/Value, Assignments/Readings) 10.The instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course. (Enthusiasm) 11.The instructor made students feel welcome in seeking help/advice in or outside of class. (Individual Rapport) 12.The instructor presented material clearly. (Clarity, Communication, Learning) 13.Overall, this was an excellent instructor. (Overall Instructor) 14.Please comment on how effective the instructor was in teaching this course. (Qualitative)

Project Timeline Recommendation to Faculty Senate - March 26, 2014 March – Complete student focus groups and finalize item bank April – Enter contract with vendor; begin system setup and testing with Campus Labs in preparation for Pilot in Summer 2014 May – Testing and departmental training June – Pilot during first summer session with College of Arts & Sciences, Graduate School of Education, and School of Nursing. July/August: Make any necessary adjustments to system from pilot, campus-wide training and promotion. Fall 2014: University wide rollout to include Pharmacy, Dental Medicine and SMBS (with some exceptions).

Questions?