A Crash Course in Radio Astronomy and Interferometry: 4

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Crash Course in Radio Astronomy and Interferometry: 2
Advertisements

A Crash Course in Radio Astronomy and Interferometry: 1. Basic Radio/mm Astronomy James Di Francesco National Research Council of Canada North American.
Basics of mm interferometry Turku Summer School – June 2009 Sébastien Muller Nordic ARC Onsala Space Observatory, Sweden.
Imaging & Deconvolution Interferometry, Visibilities ➛ Image, Deconvolution methods CASS Radio Astronomy School 2010 Emil Lenc ASKAP Software Scientist.
NAIC-NRAO School on Single-Dish Radio Astronomy. Arecibo, July 2005
Eleventh Synthesis Imaging Workshop Socorro, June 10-17, 2008 Wide Field Imaging II: Mosaicing Debra Shepherd.
Deconvolution of Laser Scanning Confocal Microscope Volumes: Empirical determination of the point spread function Eyal Bar-Kochba ENGN2500: Medical Imaging.
Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Expanded Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array Whoever North American.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Lecture 13 Further with interferometry – Resolution and the field of view; Binning in frequency and.
SKADS: Array Configuration Studies Implementation of Figures-of-Merit on Spatial-Dynamic-Range Progress made & Current status Dharam V. Lal & Andrei P.
Interferometric Spectral Line Imaging Martin Zwaan (Chapters of synthesis imaging book)
A rough guide to radio astronomy and its use in lensing studies Simple stuff other lecturers may assume you know (and probably do)
The Shapes Of Cross Correlation Interferometers Daniel Birman Boaz Chen
Radio `source’ Goals of telescope: maximize collection of energy (sensitivity or gain) isolate source emission from other sources… (directional gain… dynamic.
BDT Radio – 1b – CMV 2009/09/04 Basic Detection Techniques 1b (2009/09/04): Single pixel feeds Theory: Brightness function Beam properties Sensitivity,
Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop 2010 June 8-15 Widefield Imaging II: Mosaicing Juergen Ott (NRAO)
1 Synthesis Imaging Workshop Error recognition R. D. Ekers Narrabri, 20 Sep 2006.
1 Imaging and Deconvolution David J. Wilner Harvard-Smithsonian CfA Observing with ALMA: A Workshop McMaster University, June 1, 2009.
1 Synthesis Imaging Workshop Error recognition R. D. Ekers Narrabri, 14 May 2003.
OVSA Expansion Pipeline Imaging. Log-spiral array: “uv” distribution Left: sampling of Right: inner region of spatial Fourier plane sampled spatial Fourier.
Array Design David Woody Owens Valley Radio Observatory presented at NRAO summer school 2002.
CSIRO; Swinburne Error Recognition Emil Lenc University of Sydney / CAASTRO CASS Radio Astronomy School 2012 Based on lectures given previously.
Sensitivity Mark Wieringa Australia Telescope CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 11 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Interferometry Basics
Imaging and Deconvolution
14 Sep 1998R D Ekers - Synth Image Workshop: INTRODUCTION 1 Synthesis Imaging Workshop Introduction R. D. Ekers 14 Sep 1998.
1 Patch Complexity, Finite Pixel Correlations and Optimal Denoising Anat Levin, Boaz Nadler, Fredo Durand and Bill Freeman Weizmann Institute, MIT CSAIL.
J.M. Wrobel - 19 June 2002 SENSITIVITY 1 SENSITIVITY Outline What is Sensitivity & Why Should You Care? What Are Measures of Antenna Performance? What.
Ninth Synthesis Imaging Summer School Socorro, June 15-22, 2004 Mosaicing Tim Cornwell.
Survey Quality Jim Condon NRAO, Charlottesville. Survey Qualities Leiden 2011 Feb 25 Point-source detection limit S lim Resolution Ω s Brightness sensitivity.
Telescope Technologies
Molecular Gas and Dust in SMGs in COSMOS Left panel is the COSMOS field with overlays of single-dish mm surveys. Right panel is a 0.3 sq degree map at.
Radio Interferometry and ALMA T. L. Wilson ESO. A few basics: Wavelength and frequency  -1 temperature max (mm) ~ 3/T(K) (for blackbody) Hot gas radiates.
F. Levrier (LERMA - ENS) J. Pety (LERMA - IRAM Grenoble) P. Salomé (LERMA - Observatoire de Paris) STAR FORMAT meeting, Heidelberg, 4-5 may 2010 Making.
Interferometry Discuss Group & Python Tutorial Adam Leroy & Scott Schnee (NRAO) February 28, 2014.
Primary Beam Shape Calibration from Mosaicked, Interferometric Observations Chat Hull Collaborators : Geoff Bower, Steve Croft, Peter Williams, Casey Law,
Interferometry Basics Andrea Isella Caltech Caltech CASA Radio Analysis Workshop Pasadena, January 19, 2011.
AST 443: Submm & Radio Astronomy November 18, 2003.
Ninth Synthesis Imaging Summer School Socorro, June 15-22, 2004 Spectral Line II John Hibbard.
PACS NHSC Data Processing Workshop – Pasadena 10 th - 14 th Sep 2012 Measuring Photometry from SPIRE Observations Presenter: David Shupe (NHSC/IPAC) on.
Counting individual galaxies from deep mid-IR Spitzer surveys Giulia Rodighiero University of Padova Carlo Lari IRA Bologna Francesca Pozzi University.
Imaging Molecular Gas in a Nearby Starburst Galaxy NGC 3256, a nearby luminous infrared galaxy, as imaged by the SMA. (Left) Integrated CO(2-1) intensity.
The Very Small Array Angela Taylor & Anze Slosar Cavendish Astrophysics University of Cambridge.
Observing Strategies at cm wavelengths Making good decisions Jessica Chapman Synthesis Workshop May 2003.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Lecture 14 Reprise: dirty beam, dirty image. Sensitivity Wide-band imaging Weighting –Uniform vs Natural.
The Australia Telescope National Facility Ray Norris CSIRO ATNF.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Lecture 16 Further with interferometry – Digital correlation Earth-rotation synthesis and non-planar.
Digital Aperture Photometry ASTR 3010 Lecture 10 Textbook 9.5.
Effectiveness of the Correlator Field of View Weighting Technique in Source Attenuation Dylan R. Nelson 1, S. S. Doeleman 2, C.J. Lonsdale 2, D. Oberoi.
1 Combining Single Dish and Interferometer Data Naomi McClure-Griffiths ATNF ATNF Astronomical Synthesis Imaging Workshop September 24-28, 2001 or Seeing.
Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array Short Spacing.
In conclusion the intensity level of the CCD is linear up to the saturation limit, but there is a spilling of charges well before the saturation if.
+ Lister Staveley-Smith – Narrabri Synthesis Workshop 15 May Merging Single-Dish Data  Bibliography  The short-spacing ‘problem’  Examples –Images.
All-sky source search Aim: Look for a fast method to find sources over the whole sky Selection criteria Algorithms Iteration Simulations Energy information.
1/20 Radio interferometric imaging of spatial structure that varies with time and frequency Urvashi Rau ( NRAO ) Wednesday Lunch Talk 29 Aug 2012 Outline.
Degradation/Restoration Model
CLEAN: Iterative Deconvolution
Data Reduction and Analysis Techniques
Data Reduction and Analysis Techniques
Wide-field imaging Max Voronkov (filling up for Tim Cornwell)
Observational Astronomy
Observational Astronomy
Deconvolution and Multi frequency synthesis
Image Error Analysis Fourier-domain analysis of errors.
Introduction to Difmap
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 11
Goals of telescope: Radio `source’
Modern Observational/Instrumentation Techniques Astronomy 500
Wide Field Imaging II: Mosaicing Debra Shepherd & Mark Holdaway
Presentation transcript:

A Crash Course in Radio Astronomy and Interferometry: 4 A Crash Course in Radio Astronomy and Interferometry: 4. Deconvolution Techniques James Di Francesco National Research Council of Canada North American ALMA Regional Center – Victoria (thanks to S. Dougherty, C. Chandler, D. Wilner & C. Brogan)

Deconvolution difficult to do science on dirty image deconvolve b(x,y) from ID(x,y) to recover I(x,y) information is missing, so be careful! (there’s noise, too) dirty image “CLEAN” image

Deconvolution Algorithms uses non-linear techniques effectively interpolate/extrapolate samples of V(u,v) into unsampled regions of the (u,v) plane aims to find a sensible model of I(x,y) compatible with data requires a priori assumptions about I(x,y) CLEAN (Högbom 1974) is most common algorithm in radio astronomy a priori assumption: I(x,y) is a collection of point sources variants for computational efficiency, extended structure deconvolution requires knowledge of beam shape and image noise properties (usually OK for aperture synthesis) atmospheric seeing can modify effective beam shape deconvolution process can modify image noise properties

Basic CLEAN Algorithm Initialize a residual map to the dirty map Deconvolution Basic CLEAN Algorithm Initialize a residual map to the dirty map a CLEAN component list Identify strongest feature in residual map as a point source Add a fraction g (the loop gain) of this point source to the clean component list (g ~ 0.05-0.3) Subtract the fraction g times b(x,y) from residual map If stopping criteria* not reached, go back to step 2 (an iteration), or… Convolve CLEAN component (cc) list with an estimate of the main dirty beam lobe (i.e., the “CLEAN beam”) and add residual map to make the final “restored” image b(x,y) ID(x,y) I(x,y) * Stopping criteria = N x rms (if noise limited), or Imax/N (if dynamic range limited), where N is some arbitrarily chosen value

Deconvolution CLEAN CLEAN model ID(x,y) restored image residual map

“Restored” Images CLEAN beam size: Deconvolution “Restored” Images CLEAN beam size: natural choice is to fit the central peak of the dirty beam with elliptical Gaussian unit of deconvolved map is Jy per CLEAN beam area (= intensity, can convert to brightness temperature) minimize unit problems when adding dirty map residuals modest super resolution often OK, but be careful photometry should be done with caution CLEAN does not conserve flux (extrapolates) extended structure missed, attenuated, distorted phase errors (e.g. seeing) can spread signal around

Measures of Image Quality Deconvolution Measures of Image Quality “dynamic range” ratio of peak brightness to rms noise in a region void of emission (common in astronomy) an easy to calculate lower limit to the error in brightness in a non-empty region “fidelity” difference between any produced image and the correct image a convenient measure of how accurately it is possible to make an image that reproduces the brightness distribution on the sky need a priori knowledge of correct image to calculate fidelity image = input model / difference fidelity is the inverse of the relative error

Summary Radio Telescopes are cool Single-dish telescopes measure “temperatures” across the sky They have fat beams making details hard to see Interferometers use optics to achieve high resolution Antenna pairs sample the FT of the image plane, an inverse FT of the ensemble of visibilities returns the image Resulting images are spatially filtered; only compact emission seen “Dirty” images can be deconvolved (with care), e.g., CLEAN Weighting can be used to manipulate resolution and/or surface brightness sensitivity Mosaics can be used to increase field-of-view but can be observationally expensive