Jurgen A. Marteijn, Jan H.J. Hoeijmakers, Wim Vermeulen  Molecular Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DNA Repair Nucleotide Excision Repair XP and CS BiS222 By Jooyoung Chang 장주영 Class #01 / Stu. #
Advertisements

DNA repair. spontaneous vs. induced mutation gametic vs. somatic mutation lethal or conditional mutation Classification of the mutation.
DNA damage, repair and recombination
Oxidative Damage of DNA Oxidative damage results from aerobic metabolism, environmental toxins, activated macrophages, and signaling molecules (NO) Compartmentation.
DNA Repair. Cell Cycle Checkpoint activation DNA Repair: Base Excision Repair Nucleotide excision repair Mismatch repair DSB repair SENESCENCE / APOPTOSIS.
The Mutability and Repair of DNA
Karp/CELL & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 3E
Nermeen Jouda Bch 550 Supervised by Dr Gihan.
Control of skin cancer by the circadian rhythm Background presented by Nathalie Javidi-Sharifi Druker Lab.
Nucleotide Excision Repair ( NER ) 核苷酸切除修理 Nucleotide excision repair ( NER ) operates by a cut-and-patch mechanism that removes a variety of bulky lesions.
Maintenance of genomes Correcting replication errors Repairing DNA damage.
Replisome, PCR, and DNA Repair C483 Spring Which proteins are responsible for the unwinding of the double-stranded DNA during replication? A)
UvrD Helicase Unwinds DNA One Base Pair at a Time by a Two-Part Power Stroke Jae Young Lee, Wei Yang Cell Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December.
Lecture 7 DNA repair Chapter 10 Problems 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14
Gihan E-H Gawish, MSc, PhD Ass. Professor Molecular Genetics and Clinical Biochemistry KSU 10 TH WEEK DNA damage, repair & Mutagenesis.
DNA Replication. Replication Occurs during cell division Must be accurate.
The Mitochondrial Basis of Aging Nuo Sun, Richard J. Youle, Toren Finkel Molecular Cell Volume 61, Issue 5, Pages (March 2016) DOI: /j.molcel
Transcription Course: Molecules to Cells Lecturer: David Mu DNA Repair.
Genome Organization: Cohesin on the Move
Destruction of RhoA CULtivates Actin
Expanding the Biologist’s Toolkit with CRISPR-Cas9
Rewiring Cas9 to Target New PAM Sequences
The DNA Damage Response: Ten Years After
RNA ACTIVE FIGURE General features of a replication fork ACTIVE FIGURE General features of a replication fork. The DNA duplex is unwound.
CHIPping Away at Base Excision Repair
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Skill Development in Graduate Education
Sequential Assembly of the Nucleotide Excision Repair Factors In Vivo
The Mechanism of DNA Replication
DNA Polymerases at the Replication Fork in Eukaryotes
Yea-Lih Lin, Philippe Pasero  Molecular Cell 
Fungal BRCA2 Ortholog Brh2 Brings 5′ End Strand Invasion Back on Stage
Distinct Roles for the XPB/p52 and XPD/p44 Subcomplexes of TFIIH in Damaged DNA Opening during Nucleotide Excision Repair  Frédéric Coin, Valentyn Oksenych,
How To Choose a Good Scientific Problem
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 51, Issue 4, Pages (August 2013)
RNA Processing and Genome Stability: Cause and Consequence
Oxidative and Energy Metabolism as Potential Clues for Clinical Heterogeneity in Nucleotide Excision Repair Disorders  Mohsen Hosseini, Khaled Ezzedine,
PAF Makes It EZ(H2) for β-Catenin Transactivation
Regulation of DNA Damage Responses by Ubiquitin and SUMO
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages (December 2014)
Eukaryotic Transcription Activation: Right on Target
DNA Replication: Keep Moving and Don't Mind the Gap
DNA Mismatch Repair: Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde?
Tonko Buterin, Christoph Meyer, Bernd Giese, Hanspeter Naegeli 
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Lucas T. Gray, Alan M. Weiner  Molecular Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
A Method that Will Captivate U
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (April 2006)
Need for Speed: Mechanical Regulation of a Replicative Helicase
Bent out of Shape: RNA Unwinding by the DEAD-Box Helicase Vasa
DNA Damage in Stem Cells
Volume 59, Issue 6, Pages (September 2015)
CRISPR-Mediated Base Editing without DNA Double-Strand Breaks
Fanconi Anemia (Cross)linked to DNA Repair
Shining a Light on Xeroderma Pigmentosum
Reconsidering DNA Polymerases at the Replication Fork in Eukaryotes
Avanti Kulkarni, David M. Wilson 
Endogenous DNA Damage as a Source of Genomic Instability in Cancer
Genome Organization: Cohesin on the Move
Nancy E. Thomas, Marianne Berwick, Marila Cordeiro-Stone 
For MutY, It's All about the OG
The DNA Damage Response: Ten Years After
How To Choose a Good Scientific Problem
DNA damage, DNA repair and disease
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages (March 2017)
DNA Repair Has a New FAN1 Club
Presentation transcript:

Check, Check …Triple Check: Multi-Step DNA Lesion Identification by Nucleotide Excision Repair  Jurgen A. Marteijn, Jan H.J. Hoeijmakers, Wim Vermeulen  Molecular Cell  Volume 59, Issue 6, Pages 885-886 (September 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.09.007 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 A Three-Step Damage Recognition and Verification Model of NER NER removes the main UV lesions (cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers [CPD] and 6-4 photoproducts [6-4 pp]), cyclopurines from oxidative origin, different intra-strand crosslinks (e.g., Cis-Pt), numerous bulky chemical adducts, e.g., benzo[α]-pyrene and even completely artificial, man-made cholesterol adducts. Check 1: XPC detects indirectly DNA damage by probing the DNA for improper base-pairing everywhere in the genome (GG-NER). If helix distortions are detected, XPC binds not to the lesion itself, but on the opposite strand. By this indirect approach to detect DNA lesions, XPC recognizes also several non-NER substrates like mismatches (Sugasawa et al., 2009), showing the importance of additional damage verification steps. Recognition in TC-NER is achieved by RNA Polymerase 2 (RNAP2) that stalls at lesions. TC-NER detects a different subset of lesions than XPC. Check 2: Next, TFIIH verifies the DNA damage using strand threading in the 5′-3′ direction by XPD helicase, while XPB may unwind the undamaged opposite strand. RNAP2 completely covers the lesion on which it has been stalled and needs therefore most likely to backtrack to give TFIIH access to these damages. Check 3: In addition to its affinity for chemically altered nucleotides, XPA promotes TFIIH-mediated lesion scanning and thereby completes the damage-verifying process of NER to ensure that only true NER substrates are excised by the endonucleases. Molecular Cell 2015 59, 885-886DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.09.007) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions