Measure of muon velocity in EEE data

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam-plug and shielding studies related to HCAL and M2 Robert Paluch, Burkhard Schmidt November 25,
Advertisements

1 Preliminary stuff Summer09 ppMuMuX sample with CMSSW_3_3_2 –it requires opposite charge generated dimuons from heavy processes or K, pi, K0 L decays.
Daniele De Gruttola (TOF group – Salerno University and INFN ) 2009 cosmic rays data analysis 09/Dec/09 ALICE - TOF meeting - CERN.
Emittance–momentum matrix1 Demonstrating the emittance-momentum matrix Mark Rayner, MICE Video Conference, 21 January Initial 4D.
Chapter 13 Analyzing Quantitative data. LEVELS OF MEASUREMENT Nominal Measurement Ordinal Measurement Interval Measurement Ratio Measurement.
Chapter 14 Analyzing Quantitative Data. LEVELS OF MEASUREMENT Nominal Measurement Nominal Measurement Ordinal Measurement Ordinal Measurement Interval.
Beam line characterization with the TOFs1 Demonstrating the emittance-momentum matrix Mark Rayner, CM26 California, 24 March Initial.
Source Dynamics from Deuteron and Anti-deuteron Measurements in 200 GeV Au+Au Collisions Hugo E Valle Vanderbilt University (For the PHENIX Collaboration)
Cosmic Ray Detection Experimental Report Alisa Bredensteiner Endeavour Institute Santa Cruz Institute of Particle Physics Quarknet August 2010.
Muon alignment with Cosmics: Real and Monte Carlo data S.Vecchi, S.Pozzi INFN Ferrara 37th Software Week CERN June 2009.
Update on the new reconstruction software F. Noferini E. Fermi center INFN CNAF EEE Analysis Meeting - 14/09/20151.
Ronald Bruijn – 10 th APP Symposium Antares results and status Ronald Bruijn.
Response of AMANDA-II to Cosmic Ray Muons and study of Systematics Newt,Paolo and Teresa.
K charged meeting 10/11/03 K tracking efficiency & geometrical acceptance :  K (p K,  K )  We use the tag in the handle emisphere to have in the signal.
V.Patera – KLOE GM – Otranto – 10 June 2002 K  reconstruction status K + K - retracking features New vs Old : resolution New vs Old : efficiencies Conclusion.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Calibration of the COSY-TOF STT & pp Elastic Analysis Sedigheh Jowzaee IKP Group Talk 11 July 2013.
CMS WEEK – MARCH06 REVIEW OF MB4 COMMISSIONING DATA Giorgia Mila
Secondary Vertex reconstruction for the D + Elena Bruna University of Torino ALICE Physics Week Erice, Dec. 6 th 2005.
Chunhui Chen, University of Pennsylvania 1 Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the Tevatron Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the.
1. Last measurement of the distances between schools gave following results: G.Ferraris – A.Volta 1.41 km A.Volta – M.D’Azeglio 1.15 km G.Ferraris – M.D’Azeglio.
A. De Caro for the ALICE TOF Offline Group (University of Salerno and INFN)
1 Update on CompareTFandDMBLCTs.cc Analyzer that compares LCTs read out from the Track Finder (input FIFO) with those read out through the EMU data path.
EEE telescope time resolution D. De Gruttola, M.P. Panetta, C. Cicalò.
MuID Twopack Efficiencies: Measurements with Cosmic Rays & High Voltage inforamtion.
Data vs MC … issues of the K +- group 1.Accidentals … contribution from Erika & Roberto 2.DC background.
RD Instruments Home of the ADCP Measuring Water in Motion and Motion in Water AVOIDING BIASED DATA DURING REAL TIME HADCP DATA COLLECTION.
Tau31 Tracking Efficiency at BaBar Ian Nugent UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA Sept 2005 Outline Introduction  Decays Efficiency Charge Asymmetry Pt Dependence.
EEE: PILOT RUN Status of CAGLIARI telescopes November 6, 2014 Corrado Cicalo, Stefano Boi, Luisella Stori, Giulia Murtas, Federico Cinus.
KEK Cosmic Tests Run Status + Summary Dan Burke 22/01/06.
QWG Sept 20-22, Jundong Huang Indiana University 1 DØ Quarkonium Production at DØ Jundong Huang Indiana University Quarkonium Workshop FermiLab September.
K. Holubyev HEP2007, Manchester, UK, July 2007 CP asymmetries at D0 Kostyantyn Holubyev (Lancaster University) representing D0 collaboration HEP2007,
Update on the new reconstruction software F. Noferini E. Fermi center INFN CNAF EEE Analysis Meeting - 28/09/20151.
MARCH 18, 2014 DATA ANALYSIS. WHAT TO DO WITH DATA Take a look at your data Histogram Descriptive statistics Mean, mode, range, standard deviation/standard.
Group refractive index ● Method ● Additional runs ● Wavelength distribution ● Systematics ● Results.
Brunel University London Field-off LiH Energy Loss Rhys Gardener CM45 – July 28th.
Comparison of algorithms for hit reconstruction in the DTs: Test of calibration procedures for t trig and drift velocity on Test Beam data Test of calibration.
R.W. Assmann, V. Boccone, F. Cerutti, M. Huhtinen, A. Mereghetti
I.I.S. A. Volta LODI Extreme Energy Events project 1 1.
Update on the analysis of muon angular distributions in equatorial coordinates F.Riggi Dept. of Physics and INFN, Catania.
Parameterization of EMC response for
Preliminary search for long distance correlations in EEE
Beam Energy-Loss measurement
Event selection algorithm
Marco Incagli – INFN Pisa
Plots for the performance paper
Analysis and paper on chamber and telescope performance
Plots for the performance paper
Tracking results from Au+Au test Beam
Investigations of CME in muon flux detected in hodoscopic mode
Kevin Burkett Harvard University June 12, 2001
Update on coincidences
Multigap Resistive Plate Chambers for EAS study in the EEE Project
Inclusive and dijet b productions at CDF
Motion Physics Part 1.
Investigation of multi-messenger and rare events in EEE
for the PHENIX collaboration
Talk general structure
J/   analysis: results for ICHEP
I.I.S. Alessandro Volta, Lodi
Muon's speed determination using DQM database
Calibration of DT-MTCC data
Search for long distance correlations by selecting multi-tracks events Update n.1 P.La Rocca and F.Riggi.
Prof.ssa Antonella Azzone Prof. Francesco Cirrottola
Search for anomalous EEE
Liceo giolitti-gandino BRA
Status report on CATA-01/POLA-01 coincidence measurements
Search for anomalous EEE
Physics event timing Use Pythia to generate hadronic decays at 125 GeV
Update on POLA-01 measurements in Catania
First steps in data visualisation with CERN-Root Software
Presentation transcript:

Measure of muon velocity in EEE data Sandro Torrisi I.I.S.- I.T. Guglielmo Marconi, Catania 50 students and 2 teachers ASL convention 2018: 20 students ICD 2017 partecipation Erice Conference 2017 partecipation Joined to EEE project: 2017 Activities at the school on a weekly basis FOTO

Outline Time of flight, track lenght and velocity distributions for different data sets of CATA-02 telescope Comparison of CATA-02 and CAGL-01 distributions Muon velocity distributions for different time of flight and track lenght bins Mean muon velocity vs time of flight and track lenght Time of flight – track lenght scatterplot Conclusions

Top-bottom chamber distance = 100 cm CATA-02 17/04/2018 ChiSquare <10 RunNumber <10 no cut no cut ns Top-bottom chamber distance = 100 cm cm cut: tof > o cut: tof > o ns cm/ns

CATA-02 17/04/2018 ChiSquare < 10 Run Number < 10 Cut: 3<tof(ns)<7 Track Lenght (cm) Tof (ns) V = 30 cm/ns V = 26 cm/ns 100 3.3 3.8 180 6.3 6.9 ns <V> = 25.5 cm/ns Track Lenght cm/ns cm

CATA-02 ChiSquare < 10 Run Number < 10 Cut: 3<tof(ns)<7 16/01/2018 TIME <V> (cm/ns) σ(v) (cm/ns) 23/01/2016 25.61 3.02 22/01/2017 25.78 3.23 16/01/2018 25.51 15/04/2018 25.81 4.21 17/04/2018 4.17 23/01/2016 23/01/2016 cm/ns

<V> = 28.4 cm/ns σ(v) = 3.1 cm/ns CATA-02 vs CAGL-01 cm/ns Comparison between the muon velocity distributions obtained from the data of CATA-02 and CAGL-01 in the same day (17/04/2018) with the same time of flight cut: (3.0<tof(ns)<7.0) <V> = 25.5 cm/ns σ(v) = 4.2 cm/ns cm/ns

Muon velocity distributions for ΔL bins CATA-02 17/04/2018 ΔL(cm) Similar velocity distribution for different track lenght ranges Velocity (cm/ns)

Mean muon velocity vs time of flight cm/ns ns cm/ns cm

Time of flight distribution for muon vertical tracks 101 < Tl (cm) < 102 105 < Tl (cm) < 106

CAGL-01 tl(cm) tof(ns) CATA-02 tl(cm) tof(ns)

Conclusions Mean muon velocity of about 26 cm/ns in CATA-02 data is indipendent from analyzed period, while the standard deviation increase from 3.0 to 4.2 cm/ns in recent data CAGL-01 data show a mean velocity of 28  3 cm/ns Mean velocity is rather indipendent from track lenght while seems to depend from time of flight The width of the velocity distribution is strongly related to the width of the time of flight distribution Track lenght-time of flight scatterplots show small correlation