Question Do students report a better learning experience from faculty that participated in the 2009 Teaching Institute than faculty who did not participate.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Folahan O. Ayorinde, Ph.D. Folahan O. Ayorinde, Ph.D. CIRTL Network Meeting CIRTL Network Meeting June 3-4, 2009 June 3-4, 2009 Texas A&M University Texas.
Advertisements

International Collaboration in the Cloud: from Michigan to New Zealand Dr. Deanne Cranford-Wesley Davenport University and Dr. Krassie Petrova Auckland.
Meeting the Moodle QAP is not Rocket Science. Meeting the Moodle Course QAP Your course needs to get a MINIMUM total of 70 Points to Pass!
A Quality Matters “Quickie”
Outcomes Assessment- Full Implementation Meeting Fall 2009.
Teaching Large Classes Gosha Zywno Eric Kam Maureen Reed.
Student Experiences with Information Technology and their Relationship to Other Aspects of Student Engagement Thomas F. Nelson Laird and George D. Kuh.
SLS 1503 Information Literacy Assessment Study ILIS Presentation.
QEP -- What & Why? The Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) is part of the Reaffirmation Process for the Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association.
Identifying Promising Practices Promising Practices for Community College Student Success A FIRST LOOK.
Learning Community II Survey Spring 2007 Analysis by Intisar Hibschweiler (Core Director) and Mimi Steadman (Director of Institutional Assessment)
NWACC Library Instruction Program Teaching information literacy skills for academic success and lifelong learning.
Instructor Survey Responses Spring 2008 Office of Academic Planning and Assessment.
From Computer Based Simulations to 3D Virtual Learning Building Bridges to Collaborative Learning Spaces Diane D. Chapman, Sophia J. Stone, Dede Nelson.
Tenure Track Faculty Survey Spring  Population:241 ◦ Female: 79 ◦ Males: 162 ◦ Faculty of Color: 54  Sample:159 (66%) ◦ Females: 52 (66%) ◦ Males:
Eight Steps Closer College/PEQAB Connections CDOG Annual Conference June 2, 2014 James Brown.
Introducing the Quality Matters Continuing Education Rubric
Adult Teaching Methods. Touchstones u Adults learn in a variety of ways. u A variety of delivery formats and teaching methods should be used to facilitate.
Course 'Evaluations': A Strategic Approach TLC Session January 26, 2006.
Enjoyability of English Language Learning from Iranian EFL Learners' Perspective.
The purpose of this workshop is to introduce faculty members to some of the foundation issues associated with designing assignments for writing intensive.
Report of the Results of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement William E. Knight and Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Presentation to the Faculty.
Rebekka Darner, PhD University of Florida.  My past teaching experiences  Why did I start using Mastering?  How do I use Mastering?  Tutorials  Activities.
The New Teaching Institute Program Evaluation Report Lin Chengyan Eric Whitmer Anastasia Kalmykova.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
EVALUATION REPORT Derek R. Lane, Ph.D. Department of Communication University of Kentucky.
1 Learning Assistance Department Learning Assistance Department Student Learning Outcomes LERN 50 College Success Course A three unit course that meets.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
Venue: M038 Date: Monday May 30,2011 Time: 10:00 AM JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.5 Guidelines on: I ASSESSMENT DATA REPORT FORMAT. II COURSE ASSESSMENT CHART.
A Tour of CCSSE and SENSE Tools 2012 CCCSE Workshop.
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
Service-Learning and Grant Writing Workshop Tennessee Technological University February 23, 2010 Presented by: Shelley Brown Department of Sociology and.
Before & After: What Undergraduates and Alumni Say About Their College Experience and Outcomes Angie L. Miller, NSSE & SNAAP Research Analyst Amber D.
Quality Performance Dr. J. August 12, 2011 In-Service.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Getting Your SoTL Research Published: An Editor’s Perspective Liz Grauerholz Professor of Sociology Editor, Teaching Sociology University of Central Florida.
Spring 2013 Student Opinion Survey (SOS) Take it Seriously… YOUR OPINION COUNTS!!!
Designing for Learning Tools to Help Faculty Design More Inclusive Courses Beth Harrison, PhD University of Dayton.
INTRODUCTION TO BLENDED LEARNING Bill Wisser, Ph.D. Simmons College 24 April 2012.
David Torres Dean, Institutional Research Riverside Community College District.
Faculty Evaluation for Online Learning Institutional Standards and Emerging Practices Ellen Hoffman Eastern Michigan University.
Department of Secondary Education Program Assessment Report What We Assessed: Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and CA State Teaching Performance.
April 8, 2004Washington University Teaching Center Self-Evaluation as an Instructor; Course Redesign Regina Frey, Director Washington University Teaching.
Evidence-Based Teaching: Evaluative Strategies ED A SEPTEMBER 29, 2011 Dr. Anne Belcher, Dr. Linda Adamson, Instructors.
Student Engagement and Academic Performance: Identifying Effective Practices to Improve Student Success Shuqi Wu Leeward Community College Hawaii Strategy.
Instructional Strategies Teacher Knowledge, Understanding, and Abilities The online teacher knows and understands the techniques and applications of online.
Evidence-Based Teaching: Evaluative Strategies ED B MARCH 13, 2012 Dr. Anne Belcher, Dr. Linda Adamson, Instructors.
AND COURSE DESIGN ENGAGING STUDENTS IN ACTIVE LEARNING.
Oct. 4, 1999CSG Survey Presentation Overview 13 Responses 1.What are your top three issues in building your teaching and learning infrastructure? 46 2.What.
Research Problem The role of the instructor in online courses depends on course design. Traditional instructor responsibilities include class management,
Desire2Learn for Quality Matters Haomin Wang, Manager of Instructional Technology Mingming Shao, Instructional Designer Dakota State University.
Instructor Satisfaction with E-Learning David Dietrich, Ph.D. The University of Tennessee at Martin.
Measuring Mathematics Self Efficacy of students at the beginning of their Higher Education Studies With the TransMaths group BCME Manchester Maria.
Lisa Elfring Background /context  I teach Intro Cell/Molecular Biology (~360 students in one lecture) and am interested in learner-centered strategies.
Program Reviews Serving UIW since year to 5-year CONTEXT: – IMPROVE STUDENT LEARNING – CONVERSATION AMONG FACULTY – CONVERSATION WITH.
Del Mar College Utilizing the Results of the 2007 Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
Continuing Education Provincial Survey Winter 2012 Connie Phelps Manager, Institutional Research & Planning.
The Assessment of Blended Courses: Gathering and Using Faculty and Student Feedback to Maximize Program Effectiveness Orly Calderon, PsyD, Long Island.
Welcome to OTL541K! Week 2 Live Classroom. Let’s Get Started! Agenda: Introductions The big picture and course topics Review of course expectations Your.
Instruction, Assessment, and Student Outcomes in Online Learning Environments Eric Riedel Rebecca Jobe Jim Lenio Kimberlee Bethany Bonura 2016 AALHE Annual.
Use of Quality Matters in the Faculty Mentor-Mentee Relationship
Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
Helping US Become Knowledge-Able About Student Engagement
19 - Full time faculty completed the survey
SLO Summit 2014.
Academic Development Survey By School Spring 2007
Student Experience Survey 2016 Preliminary Analysis
Learning Community II Survey
Presentation transcript:

Question Do students report a better learning experience from faculty that participated in the 2009 Teaching Institute than faculty who did not participate in the Teaching Institute?

How can we measure a better learning experience? 1. Use of appropriate assessments 2. Clarity of presentations 3. Use of a variety of assignments 4. Use of assignments appropriate to learning 5.Clear presentation of class objectives 6.Use of activities that engage learners 7. Overall class satisfaction 8. Amount of perceived learning

Background Spring 2009, 76 faculty applied for the 2009 Teaching Institute. 40 Faculty were accepted and participated. A survey (using Flashlight) was created to measure each of the important outcomes.

Faculty from the 76 that applied for the 2009 Teaching Institute were asked to forward the survey link to their students. Students completed a survey that asked about outcomes related to their instructor in question (8 items) and their typical Sacramento State instructor (same 8 items).

Sample Size (N = 669) Students from 2009 TI faculty (n = 368) Students from non-TI faculty (n = 301)

The assessments in this course seem to get at the things that we were learning. t (667) = 5.98, p <.001, r =.23

My instructor was clear in his or her class presentations. t (667) = 7.17, p <.001, r =.27

The instructor used a variety of assignments to help me to learn the material. t (667) = 3.67, p <.001, r =.14

I found the assignments in this class to be particularly suited to the way I learn. t (667) = 4.37, p <.001, r =.17

My instructor was clear in the presentation of the class objectives. t (667) = 5.11, p <.001, r =.19

My instructor used classroom activities that helped me to engage with the material we were learning. t (667) = 7.87, p <.001, r =.29

Overall, I was satisfied with this class. t (667) = 4.82, p <.001, r =.18

Overall, I learned a lot in this class. t (667) = 1.86, p =.03, r =.07