Leveraging Data Visualization to Enhance Benchmarking Reports

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SHELLY POTTS, PH.D. UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF EVALUATION AND EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY Quality Assurance Mechanisms.
Advertisements

Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment
Trends in Teacher Evaluation Systems in Public Education CEC’S POSITION ON SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER EVALUATION.
Facilities Management 2013 Manager Enrichment Program U.Va.’s Strategic Planning Initiatives Colette Sheehy Vice President for Management and Budget December.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Strategic Planning and the NCA Special Emphasis A Focus on Community Engagement and Experiential Learning.
 Faculty-Synergy of Teaching and Research  Students-Academic Excellence ◦ Open enrollment, establishing benchmarks and outcome-determined excellence.
 Introductions  Charge from President Blake  Timeline  Structure  Outcomes.
WASC Accreditation Process DUE Managers Meeting December 2, 2009 Sharon Salinger and Judy Shoemaker.
The Role of the Office Institutional Research and Program Assessment at Baruch College Presented by: John Choonoo, Director Jimmy Jung, Assistant Director.
Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.
UGA’S STRATEGIC PLANNING DASHBOARD Allan Aycock Director for Assessment and Accreditation Shweta Doshi Business Intelligence Application Analyst 1.
Sub-theme Three The Self-Assessment Process and Embedding QA into the Life of an Institution by Terry Miosi, Ph.D. UAE Qualification Framework Project.
Year Seven Self-Evaluation Workshop OR Getting from Here to There Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
Leading Change. THE ROLE OF POLICY IN CHANGE Leading Change – The Role of Policy Drift to Quantitative Compliance- Behavior will focus on whatever is.
Mission and Mission Fulfillment Tom Miller University of Alaska Anchorage.
From a galaxy far, far away... The Compact Process A View from 40,000 feet Laura Coffin Koch Associate Vice Provost University of Minnesota.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
Academic Program Review Chair’s Workshop John E. Sawyer, Ph.D. Associate Provost Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
New Frameworks for Strategic Enrollment Management Planning
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
1 Planning and Programming for Effective Use of External Audit Resources Victor Rezendes Managing Director Strategic Issues U.S. General Accounting Office.
Funding Formula University Funding Review. Purpose Outline an engagement process and position the review within the context of the government’s overall.
SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY Comprehensive Review for Reaffirmation of Accreditation Presentation to Campus Forum October 21, 2015 Christopher Oberg, Vice President/COO.
30/10/2006 University Leaders Meeting 1 Student Assessment: A Mandatory Requirement For Accreditation Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chair-Person National Quality.
HLC Criterion Five Primer Thursday, Nov. 5, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT DR. SHEMEKA MCCLUNG DIRECTOR ARNITRA HUNTER RESEARCH ASSOCIATE.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
2016 AIR Pre-Conference Workshop
Administration, Finances, and Resources
Planning in the Context of Budget Reduction
Internal Audit White Paper
Discipline/Department Improvement Process (DIP) and Program Improvement Process (PIP) at WCC Monday, November 19, 2012.
Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) Module #4: SLO Annual Report
Data You Can Use for Accreditation
Assessment Basics PNAIRP Conference Thursday October 6, 2011
Frederick Burrack – Director Chris Urban – Assistant Director
New developments in the UK Higher Education
Student Learning outcomes assessment
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Tennessee Board of Regents Strategic Plan
TSMO Program Plan Development
Director, Institutional Research
Outcome Assessment Using a Total Quality Management Paradigm
Improving the First Year: Campus Discussion March 30, 2009
Webinar: ESSA Improvement Planning Requirements
Enhancing Accountability Alabama’s Colleges and Universities
EDUCAUSE Core Data Service
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
Learning gain metrics and personal tutoring: Opportunities and ethics
Title and Total Compensation Project
Objective of the workshop
Institutional Effectiveness
Campus Improvement Plans
Learning gain metrics and personal tutoring: Opportunities and ethics
Campus Improvement Plans
CUNY Graduate School and University Center
Minnesota State University, Mankato
Fort Valley State University
Accreditation Leadership Committee Opening Meeting
NON-ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT AND REPORTING FY’17
NON-ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT REPORTING FY’17
Objective of the workshop
CSUN Re-Accreditation
Internal Quality Assurance in Higher Education Institutions
Presentation transcript:

Leveraging Data Visualization to Enhance Benchmarking Reports John Stanley, Director of Institutional Research Christi Palacat, Undergraduate Research Assistant University of Hawai’i – West O’ahu CAIR Conference XLIII ● November 14 – 16, 2018, Anaheim, CA

What is benchmarking? Benchmarking compares an institution’s organizational activities and key performance indicators with those of other institutions in order to provide context and gauge outcomes. Typically includes a combination of data collection, statistical analysis, and subjective judgment.

Benchmarking requirements Standard 2, CFR 2.10 “The institution disaggregates data according to racial, ethnic, gender, age, economic status, disability, and other categories, as appropriate. The institution benchmarks its retention and graduation rates against its own aspirations as well as the rates of peer institutions.” Standard 4, CFR 4.6 The institution periodically engages its multiple constituencies, including the governing board, faculty, staff, and others, in institutional reflection and planning processes that are based on the examination of data and evidence. These processes assess the institution’s strategic position, articulate priorities, examine the alignment of its purposes, core functions, and resources, and define the future direction of the institution.

Trends in the use of benchmarking Key performance indicators (KPIs) used increasingly in college rankings, accreditation reports, national accountability systems, and state-support funding formulas for public colleges. Proliferation of public databases designed to increase transparency and report school performance (i.e., IPEDS, College Scorecard, Voluntary System of Accountability, The Equality of Opportunity Project).

Examples of benchmarking data sources

IPEDS Data Feedback Report & College Scorecard

Benchmarking attempts to answer the following questions How well are we doing compared to others? How good do we want to be? Who is doing it the best (i.e., value added)? How do they do it? How can we adapt what they do to our institution? How can we be better than the best?

Who are your peer institutions? Peer – similar role, scope, mission “The success or failure of inter-institutional comparisons hinges upon the process of selecting peer institutions. This can be one of the most political processes with which the institutional researcher will have to deal”. (Teeter and Brinkman in The Primer for Institutional Research)

Reasons for having peer institutions Strategic Planning Inform policy Accreditation Performance Benchmarking Faculty compensation Teaching loads Tuition schedules Budget alignment Used by other institutions for performance comparison Surveys supply peer lists to prospective students and parents to compare cost and graduation rates

Peer selection process at UH West Oahu UH West Oahu peer list revised in Spring 2018. The entire process can be described here: www.tinyurl.com/uhwopeers Peer Revision Timeline Source: UH West Oahu peer revision presentation (Spring 2018)

Analytics used in the process 1. IPEDS Dashboard to benchmark similarly sized, baccalaureate-level colleges 2. Cluster analysis to identify “like” institutions Discriminant Function Analysis Agglomerative Cluster Analysis Power BI Cluster Analysis Dashboard Potential Peer Profiles

www.tinyurl.com/UHWOIPEDS www.tinyurl.com/westoahu8000 www.tinyurl.com/uhwopeerstudy www.tinyurl.com/westoahuca

What’s missing? What’s missing when trying to gauge institutional performance? Can we estimate “value added”, or the amount that the university improved students’ outcomes. Value

A couple of WSCUC tools to the answer http://grd.lluh.us (courtesy of Dr. Ken Nelson, Loma Linda U.)

A couple of WSCUC tools to the answer http://wgr.lluh.us (courtesy of WSCUC Fellows, John Stanley, Dr. Serge Herzog, Dr. Ken Nelson

https://westoahu.hawaii.edu/academics/institutional-research/ Questions? jstanley@hawaii.edu https://westoahu.hawaii.edu/academics/institutional-research/