DYNAMICS & CONTROL QDR 3 TEAM 4

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Timothy Burkhard - Phil Barat - John Gyurics
Advertisements

February 17, Aerodynamics 2 PDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason Tang.
Aircraft Motion and Control
INTRODUCTION TO STABILITY AND CONTROL. STABILITY SUMMARY Axes, Moments, Velocities – Definitions Moments and Forces Static Longitudinal Stability  Tail.
6th grade Springton Lake
AAE 451 Aircraft Design Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review #2 Team Members Oneeb Bhutta, Matthew Basiletti, Ryan Beech, Mike Van Meter.
Basic Aerodynamic Theory
1.Unzip the File F16Sim.zip This will create a directory F16Sim and it will contain all the files needed to perform the non-linear simulations 2.Open MATLAB.
Boiler Xpress 1 Final Presentation April 26, 2001 Kacie BurtonKevin Dahya Kerem KorayMellisa Glaser Wael NourTanya Tuinstra.
Boy Scouts Aviation Merit Badge Control Surfaces.
DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.
Stability and Control.
Dynamics & Control PDR 1 Purdue University AAE 451 Fall 2006 Team 4 Tung Tran Matt Drodofsky Haris Md Ishak Matt Lossmann Mark Kock Ravi Patel Ki-bom Kim.
Dane BatemaBenoit Blier Drew Capps Patricia Roman Kyle Ryan Audrey Serra John TapeeCarlos Vergara Critical Design Review Team 1.
DR2 Stability and Control Preliminary Design Review and Performance PDR October 24, 2000 Presented By: Christopher Peters …and that’s cool Team DR2 Chris.
March 1, Aerodynamics 3 QDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason Tang Joe.
March 10, Dynamics & Controls 2 PDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason.
Aero Engineering 315 Lesson 39 Dynamic Stability.
Part 2 - Pitch and Roll Yaw
Basic Aeronautics and Aerodynamics
Flight Simulator X By Dane Wrye, Aaron Pena, and Ben Ghusn.
1)Aileron 2)Elevator 3)Rudder Aileron Ailerons can be used to generate a rolling motion for an aircraft. LOCATION: Ailerons are small hinged sections.
6.02 Flight Controls References: FTGU pages 30-31
BASICS OF RC PLANE. Overview  What is RC Plane?  RC Planes’ Parts and their Role  How planes fly?  Concepts and Terminologies of RC Plane  Stability.
Introduction to Control / Performance Flight.
Fundamentals of Flight Transportation Mr. O. Structure of an Aircraft: Thrust is generated by a propeller or jet turbines.
Principles of Flight Chapter 3 – Stability and Control.
AAE 451 Aircraft Design First Flight Boiler Xpress November 21, 2000
Smart Icing Systems Review, June 19-20, Aircraft Autopilot Studies Petros Voulgaris Vikrant Sharma University of Illinois.
1 Real World Design Challenge Aircraft Overview 24 Sep Mrs. McDaniel Dr. Chris Shearer,
AAE 451 AERODYNAMICS PDR 2 TEAM 4 Jared Hutter, Andrew Faust, Matt Bagg, Tony Bradford, Arun Padmanabhan, Gerald Lo, Kelvin Seah November 18, 2003.
February 24, Dynamics & Controls 1 PDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason.
Theory of Flight All are demonstrated by the flight of the bird!
Critical Design Review
Dynamics & Control PDR 2 Purdue University AAE 451 Fall 2006 Team 4 Eparr Tung (in my) Tran Matt Dwarfinthepantssky Nazim Haris Mohammad Ishak (no, it’s.
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 7 – Control effectiveness (2)
Chapter 5 Linear Design Models.
By Bala M. Dhareneni.  A pitch motion is an up or down movement of the nose of the aircraft  The pitch axis is perpendicular to the aircraft centerline.
Transportation Unit 3 - Flight. Introduction Fixed Wing Heavier than air, atmospheric transportation vehicles sustain flight by utilizing the scientific.
Dynamics & Controls PDR 2
AAE 451 AERODYNAMICS QDR 2 TEAM 4 Jared Hutter, Andrew Faust, Matt Bagg, Tony Bradford, Arun Padmanabhan, Gerald Lo, Kelvin Seah November 6, 2003.
STRUCTURES & WEIGHTS PDR 1
VEHICLE SIZING PDR AAE 451 TEAM 4
Controls Chapter 6 Lecture 13.
AAE 451 Senior Design – Critical Design Review
CGS Ground School Principles Of Flight Controls © Crown Copyright 2012
DYNAMICS & CONTROL PDR 1 TEAM 4
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lectures 22, 23
Design Refining a design.
Dynamics & Controls PDR 1
6.02 Flight Controls References: FTGU pages 30-31
Team One Dynamics and Control PDR 2 10 March, 2005
PROPULSION PDR 2 AAE 451 TEAM 4
CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW
Author: Harry L. Whitehead
STRUCTURES & WEIGHTS PDR 2
c/Maj Christopher Greves
Dynamics and Control PDR 2
Team “Canard” September 19th, 2006
DYNAMICS & CONTROL QDR 1 TEAM 4
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 7-Control effectiveness
Boom Supersonic 11/11/17 Agenda
COST QDR TEAM 4 Jared Hutter, Andrew Faust, Matt Bagg, Tony Bradford,
PROPULSION QDR 1 AAE 451 TEAM 4
6.02 Flight Controls References: FTGU pages 30-31
PROPULSION PDR 1 AAE 451 TEAM 4
Grab their Attention with Active Learning!
PROPULSION QDR 2 AAE 451 TEAM 4
Dynamics & Controls PDR 2
STRUCTURES & WEIGHTS QDR 1
Presentation transcript:

DYNAMICS & CONTROL QDR 3 TEAM 4 Jared Hutter, Andrew Faust, Matt Bagg, Tony Bradford, Arun Padmanabhan, Gerald Lo, Kelvin Seah December 2, 2003

OVERVIEW Aircraft Walk-Around Tail Re-Sizing Stability Check Modal Analysis 6-DOF Simulation

CONCEPT REVIEW Empennage High Wing UPDATED Avionics Pod Twin Booms Horizontal and Vertical Tails High Wing S = 39.3 ft2 b = 14.0 ft, c = 2.8 ft AR = 5 UPDATED Avionics Pod 20 lb; can be positioned front or aft depending on requirements Twin Booms 3 ft apart; 5.7 ft from Wing MAC to HT MAC Twin Engine 1.8 HP each

CONCEPT REVIEW Empennage RESIZED High Wing UPDATED Avionics Pod Horizontal and Vertical Tails RESIZED High Wing S = 39.3 ft2 b = 14.0 ft, c = 2.8 ft AR = 5 UPDATED Avionics Pod 20 lb; can be positioned front or aft depending on requirements Twin Booms 3 ft apart; 5.7 ft from Wing MAC to HT MAC Twin Engine 1.8 HP each

TAIL RE-SIZING Horizontal and Vertical Tails were resized using updated Wing Geometry. Modified Class 1 Approach: Fixed volume coefficients, get new tail size; Verified results with OEI yaw-trimming with rudder; Verified stability of modal responses; Iterated …

TAIL RE-SIZING RESULTS HORIZONTAL TAIL VERTICAL TAIL = 9.01 ft2 1.00 ft 1.68 ft ½ = 1.80 ft2 2.69 ft 1.19 ft 3.0 ft 1.19 ft 5.37 ft 1.68 ft Volume Coefficients: = 0.50 = 0.04 Chord-wise Span-wise Elevator 0.84 ft 2.67 ft Rudder 0.35 cVT 2.42 ft

RUDDER DEFLECTION IN OEI CONDITIONS Roskam (AAE 421 Textbook) Required rudder deflection: DRnO: = 28 ft/s Deflection Limit: = 25° FAR 23, 25 requires that for  = 0° In this case, = 29.57 ft/s FAR 23, 25 Limit Max Deflection 1.2 Stall Speed Limit

MODAL ANALYSIS Lateral-Directional Subsystem Longitudinal Subsystem Mode Poles Natural Frequency (rad/sec) Damping Ratio Dutch Roll -0.86 ± j 1.50 1.73 0.497 Roll -5.22 Spiral -0.84 Side Velocity Mode Poles Natural Frequency (rad/sec) Damping Ratio Phugoid -0.05 ± j 0.61 0.084 0.616 Short Period -7.59, -34.80 Altitude ≈ 0

MIL-F-8785C GUIDELINES Lateral-Directional Subsystem Longitudinal Subsystem Mode Poles Natural Frequency (rad/sec) Damping Ratio Dutch Roll -0.86 ± j 1.50 1.73 0.497 Roll -5.22 Spiral -0.84 Side Velocity  0.4, OK!  0.08, OK! Stable, non-oscillatory – OK! Stable, does not diverge – OK! Mode Poles Natural Frequency (rad/sec) Damping Ratio Phugoid -0.05 ± j 0.61 0.084 0.616 Short Period -7.59, -34.80 Altitude ≈ 0 “Must be heavily damped” – OK!

6-DOF SIMULATION The 6-DOF motion was simulated in MATLAB. Assumed flat earth, rigid body and steady winds. Aircraft was trimmed at loiter conditions, and linearized the system about trim. Comparisons between nonlinear and linear time responses: Elevator Step Input, e = 5° Aileron Step Input, a = 5° Rudder Step Input, r = 5°

6-DOF SIMULATION WITH ELEVATOR STEP INPUT

6-DOF SIMULATION WITH AILERON STEP INPUT

6-DOF SIMULATION WITH AILERON STEP INPUT

6-DOF SIMULATION WITH AILERON STEP INPUT

6-DOF SIMULATION WITH RUDDER STEP INPUT

6-DOF SIMULATION WITH RUDDER STEP INPUT

QUESTIONS?

APPENDIX

RUDDER DEFLECTION IN OEI CONDITIONS ref. “Airplane Flight Dynamics and Automatic Flight Controls” (Roskam) Section 4.2.6 [rad] where @ 2,000 ft  [slug/ft3] V [ft/sec] P [hp] yT [ft] for fixed pitch

IDENTIFICATION OF POLES Lateral-Directional Subsystem Dutch Roll Mode Only pole in this subsystem with both e and m parts. Roll Mode Pole is negative; relatively large magnitude. Spiral Mode Can be positive (in the case of the Predator), or negative. Small magnitude, so not typically a problem. Side Velocity Mode Only pole in this subsystem that has zero magnitude.

IDENTIFICATION OF POLES Longitudinal Subsystem Phugoid Mode Complex conjugate pair. The m parts have a smaller magnitude than that of the other conjugate pair, indicating longer period (lower frequency). e parts are of small value, light damping. Short Period Mode Complex conjugate pair. The m parts have a larger magnitude than that of the other conjugate pair, indicating shorter period (higher frequency). e parts are of larger value, heavier damping. Altitude Pole Only pole in this subsystem that is purely real.