RAD52 Facilitates Mitotic DNA Synthesis Following Replication Stress

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Advertisements

Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (April 2015)
David T. Long, Vladimir Joukov, Magda Budzowska, Johannes C. Walter 
Haley D.M. Wyatt, Shriparna Sarbajna, Joao Matos, Stephen C. West 
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (August 2015)
The DNA Damage Response: Ten Years After
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 54, Issue 3, Pages (May 2014)
FBH1 Catalyzes Regression of Stalled Replication Forks
Quantitative Live Cell Imaging Reveals a Gradual Shift between DNA Repair Mechanisms and a Maximal Use of HR in Mid S Phase  Ketki Karanam, Ran Kafri,
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
SMARCAD1 Phosphorylation and Ubiquitination Are Required for Resection during DNA Double-Strand Break Repair  Sharmistha Chakraborty, Raj K. Pandita,
Radiation resistance and stem-like cells in brain tumors
Dana Branzei, Marco Foiani  Cell 
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 25, Issue 24, Pages R1156-R1158 (December 2015)
Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Richard C. Centore, Stephanie A. Yazinski, Alice Tse, Lee Zou 
Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages (November 2015)
Distinct but Concerted Roles of ATR, DNA-PK, and Chk1 in Countering Replication Stress during S Phase  Rémi Buisson, Jessica L. Boisvert, Cyril H. Benes,
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 53, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Coupling of Homologous Recombination and the Checkpoint by ATR
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
SMARCAL1 Resolves Replication Stress at ALT Telomeres
Paradigms for the Three Rs: DNA Replication, Recombination, and Repair
Volume 59, Issue 3, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 66, Issue 5, Pages e8 (June 2017)
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages e4 (November 2018)
Andrew J. Deans, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
A Hand-Off Mechanism for Primosome Assembly in Replication Restart
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
Shane M. Harding, Jonathan A. Boiarsky, Roger A. Greenberg 
Ramiro E. Verdun, Laure Crabbe, Candy Haggblom, Jan Karlseder 
Fanconi Anemia (Cross)linked to DNA Repair
Volume 25, Issue 21, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (November 2016)
Maya Capelson, Victor G. Corces  Molecular Cell 
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (February 2016)
Single-Stranded DNA Orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR Switch at DNA Breaks
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 71, Issue 2, Pages e3 (July 2018)
Julien Soudet, Pascale Jolivet, Maria Teresa Teixeira  Molecular Cell 
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
HURP Is Part of a Ran-Dependent Complex Involved in Spindle Formation
Replication-Independent Repair of DNA Interstrand Crosslinks
The DNA Damage Response: Ten Years After
Mahesh Ramamoorthy, Susan Smith  Cancer Cell 
Volume 37, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages (August 2008)
Multiple Rad5 Activities Mediate Sister Chromatid Recombination to Bypass DNA Damage at Stalled Replication Forks  Eugen C. Minca, David Kowalski  Molecular.
Huan Chen, Michael Lisby, Lorraine S. Symington  Molecular Cell 
Volume 57, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
Single-Stranded DNA Orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR Switch at DNA Breaks
Bradley A. Stohr, Lifeng Xu, Elizabeth H. Blackburn  Molecular Cell 
Cdk1 Negatively Regulates Midzone Localization of the Mitotic Kinesin Mklp2 and the Chromosomal Passenger Complex  Stefan Hümmer, Thomas U. Mayer  Current.
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages (May 2015)
Presentation transcript:

RAD52 Facilitates Mitotic DNA Synthesis Following Replication Stress Rahul Bhowmick, Sheroy Minocherhomji, Ian D. Hickson  Molecular Cell  Volume 64, Issue 6, Pages 1117-1126 (December 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.10.037 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2016 64, 1117-1126DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.10.037) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 RAD52 Persists at Sites of On-Going DNA Synthesis in Mitosis Following Replication Stress (A) Previously proposed model for MiDAS. (B and C) Representative images (B) and quantification (C) of EdU incorporation (red) on isolated metaphase chromosomes (DAPI, blue) following replication stress (RS) (+APH). (D and E) Representative western blots of soluble and insoluble fractions (D) and quantification (E) following pre-treatment with (+APH) or without (−APH) APH. (F and G) Representative immunofluorescence (IF) images (F) and quantification (G) of the co-localization of RAD52 (green) with MUS81 or FANCD2 twin foci (red). DNA was stained using DAPI (blue). Data are means of three independent experiments. Error bars represent SEM. Scale bars, 10 μm. See also Figure S1. Molecular Cell 2016 64, 1117-1126DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.10.037) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 RAD52 Is Essential for MiDAS and MUS81 Recruitment in Mitosis (A and B) Representative IF images (A) and quantification (B) of EdU foci (red) that co-localize with FANCD2 twin foci (green) in prometaphase cells following the indicated siRNA depletions (top panel) and RS. (C and D) Representative IF images (C) and quantification (D) of 53BP1 nuclear bodies (green) in G1 daughter cells following the indicated siRNA depletions (top panel) and RS. (E–G) Experimental workflow (E), representative IF images (F), and quantification (G) of EdU foci (red) after RAD52i. DNA was stained using DAPI (blue). Data are means of three independent experiments. Error bars represent SEM. Scale bars, 10 μm. See also Figure S2. Molecular Cell 2016 64, 1117-1126DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.10.037) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 RAD52 Is Required for the Recruitment of MUS81 and POLD3 to Chromatin in Mitosis (A and B) Representative IF images (A) and quantification (B) of co-localized MUS81 foci (red) and FANCD2 twin foci (green). (C and D) Representative images (C) and quantification (D) of co-localized SLX4 foci (red) and FANCD2 twin foci (green). (E and F) Representative western blots (E) and quantification (F) of soluble and insoluble fractions after the indicated siRNA treatments (top). DNA was stained using DAPI (blue). Data are means of three independent experiments. Error bars represent SEM. Scale bars, 10 μm. See also Figure S3. Molecular Cell 2016 64, 1117-1126DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.10.037) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Consequences of Defective MiDAS (A and B) Representative images (A) and quantification (B) of PICH-positive UFBs (red) with FANCD2 foci (green) at their bridge termini. (C–E) Experimental workflow (C), representative images (D), and quantification (E) of MiDAS (EdU foci, red) as indicated. DNA was stained using DAPI (blue). Data are means of three independent experiments. Error bars represent SEM. Scale bars, 10 μm. (F and G) Clonogenic assays (F) and quantification (G) of U2OS cells following indicated treatments in S-phase or mitosis. (H) Model proposing that MiDAS can occur via an MMBIR-like process. Replication fork disruption, perhaps due to the presence of DNA secondary structures at AT-rich regions or R-loops, followed by limited 5′ end resection of the generated DNA end, exposes a region of microhomology that can anneal with the partially single-stranded template DNA. The annealing step might require a DNA helicase to facilitate template denaturation. Processing of the resulting replication intermediate by the activated SLX-MUS complex (SLX4 in complex with MUS81-EME1 and other nucleases) in early mitosis is then associated with POLD3-dependent conservative DNA repair synthesis. This process would account for the high level of CNVs that arise at CFS loci in cancer cells. For clarity, the replication fork merging with the MiDAS bubble from the right is omitted. However, if this fork were also disrupted, DNA synthesis could arise on both sister chromatids via the same mechanism. See also Figure S4. Molecular Cell 2016 64, 1117-1126DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.10.037) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions