Consistency of Teacher Judgement

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Qualifications Update: Practical Electronics Qualifications Update: Practical Electronics.
Advertisements

School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Implementing Mathematics K-6
Consistent teaching – K-6 Science and Technology
K-6 Science and Technology Curriculum Directorate
[Insert faculty Banner] Consistency of Assessment
Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority
School Certificate Requirements for Students with Special Education Needs Key Messages.
Curriculum Leadership Workshop for Science Head Teachers Science Unit Curriculum Directorate Reporting.
Assessment Curriculum Leadership Workshop for Science Head Teachers Science Unit Curriculum Directorate.
Assessment Assessment should be an integral part of a unit of work and should support student learning. Assessment is the process of identifying, gathering.
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of moderation © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
Consistency of Assessment Creative Arts What is Assessment? Assessment is the process of identifying, gathering and interpreting information about.
1 © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training English K-6 Syllabus Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment.
1 SESSION 3 FORMAL ASSESSMENT TASKS CAT and IT ASSESSMENT TOOLS.
[Insert faculty Banner] Consistency of Assessment
Record of School Achievement 2012 Board of Studies NSW.
What is moderation and why should we moderate?
School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate Reporting.
[Insert faculty Banner] Consistency of Teacher Judgement
[Insert faculty Banner] Consistency of Moderation Mathematics 7-10.
Consistency of Teacher Judgement Human Society and Its Environment 7-10 © 2007 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
Consistency of Assessment
Consistent Teacher judgement
Implementing Mathematics K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of teacher judgement © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Record of School Achievement: Requirements for Students with Special Education Needs Key Messages.
Successful Learning Conference 2013 Making Adjustments for Students with Special Education Needs, Years June, 2013.
Consistency of assessment Technology subjects (7-12)
Technology subjects (7-12) Consistency of moderation.
Reporting to Parents’ Presentation for Primary Schools
Performance Descriptors Consultation October 2014 Summary.
Implementing Mathematics K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of teacher judgement © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Overall Teacher Judgements
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
Australian Curriculum Science K-6
Kazakhstan Centres of Excellence Teacher Education Programme Assessment of teachers at Level Two.
Workshop 3 Early career teacher induction: Literacy middle years Workshop 3 Literacy teaching and NSW syllabus 1.
VCE Texts and Traditions Accreditation period Units 1–4: 2010–2014.
Reporting student achievement Human Society and Its Environment © 2007 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
Workshops to support the implementation of the new languages syllabuses in Years 7-10.
1 Assessment of student achievement of outcomes from the 7-10 Science syllabus.
Introducing Unit Specifications and Unit Assessment Support Packs National 1 and 2.
[Insert faculty Banner] Consistency of Teacher Judgement Mathematics 7-10.
Consistency of Teacher Judgement Creative Arts 7-10.
NSW Stage 6 Mathematics Implementation of Mathematics General 1 and 2 in 2013.
Human Society and its Environment K-6 (HSIE) Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
[Insert faculty Banner] Moderation in Practice Science 7-10.
Consistency of Moderation
Practical Craft Skills CPD Presentation Unit Specifications and Unit Assessment Support Packs (UASP) National 3, 4 and 5.
Consistency of Moderation Languages What is moderation? Moderation is a process where teachers compare judgements to either confirm or adjust them.
Assessing Student Learning Workshop 2: Making on-balance judgements and building consistency.
OCTOBER 2014 CONSULTATION ON PERFORMANCE DESCRIPTORS INTRODUCATION Curriculum and Assessment.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Australian Curriculum English Achievement Standards PRESENTER: CHRIS THOMPSON SAETA COUNCIL MEMBER.
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING DET Staff Site.
NSW Record of School Achievement A pathway to the HSC A pathway to employment Implementing a proposed NSW Record of School Achievement Board of Studies.
MATHEMATICS KLA Years 1 to 10 Planning MATHEMATICS Years 1 to 10.
Record of School Achievement Requirements and Students with Special Education Needs Key Messages NSW Education Standards Authority.
Higher School Certificate Requirements and Students with Special Education Needs Key Messages NSW Education Standards Authority.
What is moderation and why should we moderate?
2014 Teachers Award and the classroom
Reporting Requirements K-10 Information for Schools
Assessment.
Consistency of Teacher Judgement
Year One School Reports Information for Parents
Assessment of student achievement of outcomes from the 7-10 Science syllabus Use this as a screen saver.
Assessment & Reporting
Presentation transcript:

Consistency of Teacher Judgement PDHPE 7-10

Assessment in PDHPE Assessment for learning Assessment of learning Point in time judgement Made against syllabus standards, CPDs or A-E scale ongoing process provides direction for teaching and learning

The relationship between A-E Grades and CPDs Year 7 Semester 1 A-E reporting scale used to make judgements on student achievement related to the syllabus outcomes and content taught during that semester only. Semester 2 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 BOS CPDs used to make judgement It is important to recognise the different roles that the A-E reporting scales and CPDs have in assessment and reporting. CPDS are only used at the end of Stage 5 (Year 10) to make a judgement on student achievement during Year 10 for the SC award. Reporting scales are used for each reporting period e.g. at the end of each Semester. Schools are required to make judgements of student achievement based on the syllabus content and outcomes covered for that semester only. This is a point in time judgement about the content the students has accessed during that semester.

A-E Grades At the beginning of a reporting period, teachers will consider what students are expected to learn. At the end of the reporting period, teachers will consider how well students have achieved. This is reported by using the common A-E grade scale. At the beginning of a reporting period, teachers will consider what students are expected to learn. That is, the knowledge, skills and understanding that is typically spelt out in the syllabuses and the teaching/learning programs developed by schools. At the end of the reporting period, teachers will consider how well students have achieved. This is addressed by using the common A-E grade scale which summarises the degree to which students have demonstrated their achievement of the knowledge, skills and understanding they have had the opportunity to learn. How well takes into account the breadth and depth of their learning.

Common Grade Scale Grade Grade Descriptions A B C D E The student has an extensive knowledge and understanding of the content and can readily apply this knowledge. In addition, the student has achieved a very high level of competence in the processes and skills and can apply these skills to new situations. B The student has a thorough knowledge and understanding of the content and a high level of competence in the processes and skills. In addition, the student is able to apply this knowledge and these skills to most situations. C The student has a sound knowledge and understanding of the main areas of content and has achieved an adequate level of competence in the processes and skills. D The student has a basic knowledge and understanding of the content and has achieved a limited level of competence in the processes and skills. E The student has an elementary knowledge and understanding in few areas of the content and has achieved very limited competence in some of the processes and skills.

Course Performance Descriptors Course performance descriptors describe the main features of a typical student's performance at each grade measured against the syllabus standards. The final judgement of the most appropriate grade is made on the basis of available assessment information and with reference to the course performance descriptors. Course performance descriptors have been developed for each course. They describe the main features of a typical student's performance at each grade measured against the syllabus objectives and outcomes for the course. You will make the final judgement of the most appropriate grade on the basis of available assessment information and with reference to the course performance descriptors. The grades awarded should reflect the relative emphasis placed on the assessable objectives of school programs and the syllabus. For example, where a school has placed considerable emphasis on the development of research skills, that emphasis should be reflected in the assessment program.

What is consistency? Consistency in relation to assessment occurs when teachers are able to make judgements about student learning that are not dependent on: the individual teacher student location time. These are based on a shared understanding of syllabus standards of learning.

Why do we need consistency? To: Develop shared or common interpretations of standards and expectations of what constitutes achievement of syllabus standards Develop shared understandings of what students’ achievements look like Develop accuracy and reliability in making judgements Ensure judgements are equitable in terms of implications for student learning Strengthen the value of teachers’ judgements Inform well-targeted teaching programs

How can consistency be developed? Participate in professional dialogue with colleagues. Develop a common task across the grade and corporate mark. Select individual work samples and discuss what the student demonstrates in the sample. Build in structured time to meet with faculty members to discuss consistency issues. Review work samples from other schools and discuss allocation of grades.

How can consistency be developed?

Getting to know the standards You become familiar with the standards by reading the descriptions for each grade the tasks and activities the work samples, and the grade commentaries.

Getting to know the standards Think of students who have produced work of a similar standard to develop a “mental picture” of the knowledge, skills and understanding represented by that grade. Discussions with your colleagues may also be helpful.

Participate in professional dialogue Discuss the syllabus framework Discuss outcomes and what they mean Share interpretations and understandings Use work samples collaboratively Shared understanding of student achievement at a particular point

Using Work Samples Work samples aligned to grades assist teachers to have a clear understanding of the standards at each grade level. Teachers can use this information to assist them to consistently apply the Common Grade Scale to award grades to students. For each subject area in each stage, the samples of student work, together, show the standard of work typically produced by students performing at that grade level.

Using Work Samples The samples of work for a subject area for a particular grade, when taken collectively, enable teachers to clearly see the quality of work typically produced by students who will be awarded each grade at the end of the stage.

Assessment of learning in PDHPE Allocation of grades Point in time judgement Made against syllabus standards, CPDs or A-E scale

Allocating Grades Decision about the most appropriate grade should be an on-balance professional judgement that: is based on evidence gathered in a number of assessment activities, across a range of contexts and over a period of time gives greater weight to those activities undertaken towards the end of the course considers the maximum level of demonstrated student achievement represents the best overall description of the student's achievement, at the end of Stage 5.

Choosing the right grade Reporting with grades requires teachers to use their on-balance judgement in relation to standards. This is a key professional skill.

Choosing the right grade An on-balance judgment does not just focus on a single piece of work. Teachers weigh up the assessment information collected for a student up to that point in time. This information will come from both formal assessment activities and informal observations and will be built up over time and in different situations.

Processes for developing consistency collaboratively plan teaching programs which clearly state the intended learning collaboratively develop common assessment practices and/ tasks examine student work against the syllabus standards.

Collaborative planning and quality assessment processes Develop appropriate learning and assessment activities Examine tasks to determine standard expected Examine work samples against standards Establish cut-offs between the grade levels Go to PDHPE Unit website for a detailed process at: http://www.curriculumsupport.education.nsw.gov.au/secondary/pdhpe/pdhpe7_10/pdhpe7_10/index.htm

Resources Curriculum K-12 website http://www.curriculumsupport.education.nsw.gov.au/ PDHPE Email ListServe To register send an email to PDHPE.Unit@det.nsw.edu.au Board of Studies web site http://www.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/ Assessment Resource Centre http://arc.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au// NSW HSC Online PDHPE http://hsc.csu.edu.au/pdhpe/ HSC Assessment Bank

Contacts For further information contact: Rosemary Davis CEO PDHPE Ph: 9886 7651 rosemary.davis@det.nsw.edu.au Janice Atkin Senior Curriculum Adviser PDHPE Ph: 9886 7684 janice.atkin@det.nsw.edu.au