Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mus81 and Yen1 Promote Reciprocal Exchange during Mitotic Recombination to Maintain Genome Integrity in Budding Yeast  Chu Kwen Ho, Gerard Mazón, Alicia.
Advertisements

Xuan Li, Carrie M. Stith, Peter M. Burgers, Wolf-Dietrich Heyer 
The Mre11 Complex Is Required for Repair of Hairpin-Capped Double-Strand Breaks and Prevention of Chromosome Rearrangements  Kirill S. Lobachev, Dmitry.
Crossover and Noncrossover Pathways in Mouse Meiosis
Control of Crossing Over
Strand Invasion Structures in the Inverted Repeat of Candida albicans Mitochondrial DNA Reveal a Role for Homologous Recombination in Replication  Joachim.
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 2001)
Molecular Model of the Human 26S Proteasome
Fungal BRCA2 Ortholog Brh2 Brings 5′ End Strand Invasion Back on Stage
Mus81 and Yen1 Promote Reciprocal Exchange during Mitotic Recombination to Maintain Genome Integrity in Budding Yeast  Chu Kwen Ho, Gerard Mazón, Alicia.
Recombination Mechanisms
Ben B. Hopkins, Tanya T. Paull  Cell 
Top3-Rmi1 DNA Single-Strand Decatenase Is Integral to the Formation and Resolution of Meiotic Recombination Intermediates  Hardeep Kaur, Arnaud De Muyt,
Pervasive and Essential Roles of the Top3-Rmi1 Decatenase Orchestrate Recombination and Facilitate Chromosome Segregation in Meiosis  Shangming Tang,
Chromosome-wide Rad51 Spreading and SUMO-H2A
Volume 14, Issue 19, Pages (October 2004)
A Rad51 Presynaptic Filament Is Sufficient to Capture Nucleosomal Homology during Recombinational Repair of a DNA Double-Strand Break  Manisha Sinha,
Volume 119, Issue 7, Pages (December 2004)
Mus81/Mms4 Endonuclease and Sgs1 Helicase Collaborate to Ensure Proper Recombination Intermediate Metabolism during Meiosis  Lea Jessop, Michael Lichten 
Nayef Mazloum, William K. Holloman  Molecular Cell 
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages (August 2010)
The Single-End Invasion
Hsin-Yen Wu, Hsuan-Chung Ho, Sean M. Burgess  Current Biology 
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Thorsten Allers, Michael Lichten  Cell 
Neal Sugawara, Xuan Wang, James E. Haber  Molecular Cell 
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages (April 2012)
Hideo Tsubouchi, G.Shirleen Roeder  Developmental Cell 
Volume 130, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
Single Holliday Junctions Are Intermediates of Meiotic Recombination
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (November 2005)
The Fuss about Mus81  James E Haber, Wolf-Dietrich Heyer  Cell 
Intermediates of Yeast Meiotic Recombination Contain Heteroduplex DNA
Meiosis-Specific DNA Double-Strand Breaks Are Catalyzed by Spo11, a Member of a Widely Conserved Protein Family  Scott Keeney, Craig N Giroux, Nancy Kleckner 
Early Decision Cell Volume 117, Issue 1, Pages 9-15 (April 2004)
Brh2 Promotes a Template-Switching Reaction Enabling Recombinational Bypass of Lesions during DNA Synthesis  Nayef Mazloum, William K. Holloman  Molecular.
The DNA Damage Response: Making It Safe to Play with Knives
Jill E. Falk, Andrew Chi-ho Chan, Eva Hoffmann, Andreas Hochwagen 
An AT-Rich Sequence in Human Common Fragile Site FRA16D Causes Fork Stalling and Chromosome Breakage in S. cerevisiae  Haihua Zhang, Catherine H. Freudenreich 
Distinct Pathways for snoRNA and mRNA Termination
DNA Looping Facilitates Targeting of a Chromatin Remodeling Enzyme
Volume 73, Issue 3, Pages e3 (February 2019)
Allyson M Holmes, James E Haber  Cell 
Crossover Homeostasis in Yeast Meiosis
Homology Requirements and Competition between Gene Conversion and Break- Induced Replication during Double-Strand Break Repair  Anuja Mehta, Annette Beach,
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
Recombination: Holliday Junction Resolution and Crossover Formation
Volume 117, Issue 1, Pages (April 2004)
The Meiosis-Specific Hop2 Protein of S
Gradual Implementation of the Meiotic Recombination Program via Checkpoint Pathways Controlled by Global DSB Levels  Neeraj Joshi, M. Scott Brown, Douglas K.
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 49, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Generating Crossovers by Resolution of Nicked Holliday Junctions
Hsin-Yen Wu, Sean M. Burgess  Current Biology 
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
The DNA Damage Response: Making It Safe to Play with Knives
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages (August 2008)
Multiple Rad5 Activities Mediate Sister Chromatid Recombination to Bypass DNA Damage at Stalled Replication Forks  Eugen C. Minca, David Kowalski  Molecular.
Zhu Zhu, Woo-Hyun Chung, Eun Yong Shim, Sang Eun Lee, Grzegorz Ira 
Huan Chen, Michael Lisby, Lorraine S. Symington  Molecular Cell 
Volume 57, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (May 2005)
Increased Recombination Intermediates and Homologous Integration Hot Spots at DNA Replication Origins  Mónica Segurado, Marı́a Gómez, Francisco Antequera 
Meiotic DNA Breaks at the S. pombe Recombination Hot Spot M26
Sex and the Single (Double-Strand) Break
Xiaorong Wang, Peter Baumann  Molecular Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages 517-524 (February 2008) Rad52 Promotes Postinvasion Steps of Meiotic Double-Strand-Break Repair  Jessica P. Lao, Steve D. Oh, Miki Shinohara, Akira Shinohara, Neil Hunter  Molecular Cell  Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages 517-524 (February 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.12.014 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Experimental System (A) Map of the HIS4LEU2 locus showing diagnostic restriction sites and position of the probe, Probe 4. DNA species detected following Southern hybridization are shown below. SEI-1 and SEI-2 are the two major SEI species detected with Probe 4 (Hunter and Kleckner, 2001). Lollipops indicate restriction sites: X, XhoI; B, BamHI; and N, NgoMIV. (B) Image of one-dimensional (1D) gel hybridized with Probe 4 showing DNA species detailed in (A). (C) Predicted structures of SEI and dHJ joint molecule intermediates. (D) Image of native/native 2D gel hybridized with Probe 4. Species detailed in (A) are highlighted. (E) 2D gel assay for detecting noncrossovers and crossovers (Martini et al., 2006). XhoI-digested DNA is resolved in the first dimension, digested in the gel with BamHI to determine the status of the central polymorphism, and then resolved again in the second dimension. The eight spots detected by Southern hybridization with Probe 4 correspond to those shown in (A). Four crossover products are observed because crossovers can carry either the BamHI or the NgoMIV allele. Molecular Cell 2008 29, 517-524DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.12.014) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The N-Terminal Region of Rad52 Promotes Postinvasion Steps of Meiotic Recombination (A) Images of 1D gels from wild-type, rad52Δ, and rad52-327 time course experiments. (B) Quantitation of DSBs and crossovers (COs), and analysis of meiotic divisions (MI ± MII) in wild-type, rad52Δ, and rad52-327 strains, and control strains (rad52Δ dmc1Δ, rad52-327 dmc1Δ, and rad51Δ dmc1Δ). “% DNA” is percentage of total hybridizing DNA. MI ± MII are cells that have completed either the first or second meiotic divisions, as determined by the number of DAPI staining bodies. The dashed gray line marks a break in the x axis. (C) Dark exposures of the DSB regions from 1D gels, highlighting the late forming species formed in rad52Δ cells (see Figure S2). (D) 2D analysis of joint molecules (JMs). In each case, a representative 2D panel is shown together with a blowup of the JM region. SEI and dHJ species are indicated by forked lines and tridents, respectively. (E) Quantitation of JM formation in wild-type, rad52Δ, and rad52-327. No JM species were detected in control strains, rad52Δ dmc1Δ, rad52-327 dmc1Δ, and rad51Δ dmc1Δ. (F) Noncrossover analysis for wild-type, rad52Δ, rad52-327, and rad52-327 dmc1Δ time course experiments (see Figure 1E for details). Each panel shows a representative late time point. Red circles highlight noncrossover signals. (G) Quantitation of noncrossover formation in wild-type, rad52Δ, rad52-327, and rad52-327 dmc1Δ strains. Molecular Cell 2008 29, 517-524DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.12.014) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Joint Molecule Analysis in the ndt80Δ Background (A) Representative images from 2D gel analysis of JMs in ndt80Δ, ndt80Δ rad52Δ, and ndt80Δ rad52-327 cells. Lower panels show blowups of the JM regions. dHJ species are indicated by tridents. (B) Quantitation of JM formation in ndt80Δ, ndt80Δ rad52Δ, and ndt80Δ rad52-327 cells. Molecular Cell 2008 29, 517-524DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.12.014) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Model for Postinvasion Steps of Meiotic DSB Repair Homologs are shown in red and black; dashed lines indicate nascent DNA. Solid black arrows indicate pathways in wild-type cells. Dashed red arrows indicate pathways in the rad52Δ mutant. Assignment of a crossover or noncrossover fate follows homolog pairing and Dmc1-catalyzed strand invasion by one DSB end to form a nascent D loop (Borner et al., 2004; Hunter and Kleckner, 2001). The contribution of Rad51 strand-exchange activity at this stage is uncertain. (A) Along the crossover pathway, the nascent JM is converted into an SEI. After extension by DNA synthesis, the nascent strand is displaced “end first” and then undergoes Rad52-catalyzed annealing to the second DSB end. A second round of DNA synthesis and ligation then forms a canonical dHJ. (B) In rad52Δ cells, second-end capture fails, but a cryptic dHJ is formed and subsequently resolved into a half-crossover and a broken chromatid. (C and D) Along the noncrossover pathway, the initial D loop is extended by DNA synthesis but ultimately disassembles via “end-last” displacement. The two ends then undergo Rad52-catalyzed annealing to seal the break. In rad52Δ cells, annealing fails, leaving a broken chromatid. Molecular Cell 2008 29, 517-524DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.12.014) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions