Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages 759-765 (April 2015) MRI scanning in patients with new and existing CapSureFix Novus 5076 pacemaker leads: Randomized trial results Jayaprakash Shenthar, MD, DM, FACC, Goran Milasinovic, MD, PhD, Ahmed Al Fagih, MD, Marco Götte, MD, PhD, Gregory Engel, MD, Steven Wolff, MD, PhD, Hung-Fat Tse, MD, PhD, Julie Herr, BA, John Carrithers, PhD, Jeffrey Cerkvenik, MS, Claas Philip Nähle, MD Heart Rhythm Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages 759-765 (April 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.12.035 Copyright © 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Terms and Conditions
Figure 1 Study visit flowchart. F/U = follow-up; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging. Heart Rhythm 2015 12, 759-765DOI: (10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.12.035) Copyright © 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Terms and Conditions
Figure 2 CONSORT diagram: PCT analysis population. MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; PCT = pacing capture threshold. Heart Rhythm 2015 12, 759-765DOI: (10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.12.035) Copyright © 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Terms and Conditions
Figure 3 Atrial pacing capture threshold changes from the pre-9–12-week visit to the 1-month post-MRI/control visit. MRI = magnetic resonance imaging. Heart Rhythm 2015 12, 759-765DOI: (10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.12.035) Copyright © 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Terms and Conditions
Figure 4 Ventricular pacing capture threshold changes from the pre 9-12 week visit to the one-month post-MRI/control visit. Heart Rhythm 2015 12, 759-765DOI: (10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.12.035) Copyright © 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Terms and Conditions