Monica Rogers mrogers@tulsa-health.org Logic Model Monica Rogers mrogers@tulsa-health.org.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prof. R. Shanthini 09 Feb 2013 Source: Winner: Ahmedabad, India In only a few months of.
Advertisements

Sidewalk Bikeways: A Safety Problem, Not a Safety Solution.
Introducing Bicycle/Pedestrian Planning & School Travel Plans Presentation prepared for the 2010 Active Transportation Conference Jim Fisher, PhD, AICP.
Complete Streets: Building Momentum in Westchester 2012 Southern Westchester Energy Action Consortium.
Safe Routes. Many child pedestrian fatalities in Denmark, 1970s Odense pilot program reduced the number of injured school children by 30% to 40% Caught.
Performance measurement. Motivation Federal regulation – Intermodal surface transportation efficiency act of 1999 (ISTEA) – Transportation equity act.
VALET BIKE PARKING TEMPLATE. VALET BIKE PARKING What is it? A secure parking location which gives people confidence to bicycle to public events.
Umeå:s positive experiences with CIVITAS and how we would like to continue the work!
School travel planning an engineer will love. School travel in Moonee Valley Need: A more planned and coordinated approach to active travel program delivery.
Presentation to Beloit SRTS Taskforce Wednesday February 1, 2012 Safe Route to School (SRTS) Program.
Southern Nevada Strong Consortium Committee Meeting April 18, 2013.
Rutgers Environmental Barrier Analysis & Route Assessment Louis Hoffman Training Coordinator Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center Edward J. Bloustein.
2010 Wisconsin Safe Routes to School Funding SRTS Project Application Cycle Applications available January 2010 Applications due April 2, 2010 Approximately.
Building a New Generation of Healthy & Safe Walkers, Bike Riders & Bus Riders.
Bike Walk Ambassador Program Workplace Outreach and Campaigns Photos and Bike Walk Ambassador Programwww.bikesbelong.org.
MOVING TOWARD AN ELDER FRIENDLY MOBILITY FUTURE May 19, 2009 Presented by Marla Turner, Associate State Director AARP Texas.
Algebra 1 Notes 3.7 Percent of Change.
Your Health Matters: Growing Active Communities Take Action 1.
An Analysis of Case Studies for the Baltimore City Health Department By: Ashley Brown.
Federal Highway Administration University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Publication No. FHWA-HRT Bicycling and Walking in the.
Why a Bus Transit to Workplace Study? COST TO OWN A VEHICLE.
Federal Highway Administration University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Comprehensive Approach: The 5 E’s Lesson 24 Publication No. FHWA-HRT
Pinehurst School Traffic Safety Pinehurst School Traffic Safety Meeting May 13-14, 2014.
Bicycle & Pedestrian Safety on Campus Randolph Dillon English 106 August 4, 2003.
Mell Henderson, Director of Transportation & Michael Briggs, Transportation Planner Mid-America Regional Council.
INCORPORATING SAFETY IN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING Neil Pedersen Maryland DOT August 7, 2002.
PROMOTING BIKING AND WALKING AS FUN, HEALTHY FORMS OF TRANSPORTATION IN PHILADELPHIA ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS.
A Waterloo Region Case Study.  Waterloo Region  Connecting residents to your work  Ideas start off small  Plan for change  Moving forward  Your.
Town of Nags Head Board of Commissioners Parks and Recreation Plan Draft October 19, 2011 Live, Visit, Play, Thrive.
JEANETTE M. BALL, MS A HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT (HIA) ON A PROPOSED “ROAD DIET” AND RE-STRIPING PROJECT IN SPARTANBURG, SC 2012 GEORGIA-LINA BIKE SUMMIT.
Complete Streets Training Module 4b – Designing for All Users.
Don´t guess, ask! Using a market survey to promote sustainable mobility for the workplaces Sara Lukkarinen | Motiva Ltd.
Presented by Kara Viggiano, MPH Choose to Change
Ferndale Complete Streets Ordinance
Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Action Plan
RTD Bike Parking and Accessibility Plan RTD Board: Planning and Development Committee May 13, 2014.
Future Of Transportation National Survey
Breaking Down the Barriers of Bike Shares:
NE Pasco (The Hills) Multimodal Safety Action Plan Pasco County, FL
REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
Hillsborough MPO School Safety Study
Built Environment and Physical Activity – updates
Nashville-Davidson County Strategic Plan For Sidewalks and Bikeways
Vision zero IN NYC NYC's Data Driven Approach to Saving Lives
Na Xu, Yun Ye, Shofiyaa Abdul Samad LaGuardia Community College
Lesson Three: Healthy Starts at Home
Overview of Changes Made to CMAQ & System Performance Measures
regional bike routes ARE FOR everybody
Summary of research Project Your City.
Finance Committee & City Council August 8, 2016
2017 Bicycle Pedestrian Committee Update
Comprehensive Approach: The 5 E’s
NVTA Countywide Pedestrian Plan of July 2016
Measuring and capturing mind share
Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Vision/Goals/Objectives
Analysing road fatalities impacting children aged 0-17 in the case of Gauteng: Aliasgher Janmohammed (Ali), M Vanderschuren and S Van As.
Travis County Transportation and Natural Resources
Learning the Roads – Year 1 RAC Community Education
Hillsborough MPO School Safety Study
City of Wilmington Bike Plan Update
Non-Motorized Safety Planning in SW Michigan
Katie Chennisi, MPH Harris County Public Health
CTR Survey Snapshot 2015/2016 Cycle – To Date Paul Mason Roger Millar
Safe Routes to School Program Overview Cassandra Gascon Bligh
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
MPO Board Presentation
Minnesota State Planning Conference September 28, 2011
Elgin St Thomas Cycling Master Plan
Public Policy.
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
Presentation transcript:

Monica Rogers mrogers@tulsa-health.org Logic Model Monica Rogers mrogers@tulsa-health.org

Logic Model NOT new content! Content from Action Plan, just rephrased/rearranged Written to help focus, organize, and prioritize actions, outcomes, indicators for success Facilitates “walk-thru” of projects beginning to end

Elements Goal – what we want to be true (NOT what we want to accomplish/carry out!) Outcome – if the goal were true, what would that look like? Background – history, baseline data, what you’ve already done Methodology – what your methods are for making the goal come true - Processes, work that is going to be carried out, actions to be taken, etc. Indicators – of success! What you are going to measure and report out on that show the success of your work/methods. Increase/decrease X by a percent or certain amount, frequencies 4 out of 10 people will XYZ NOT process indicators – “will hold x number of food demonstrations” Process indicators tell us what you are doing, but not the success of your program!

Process indicators and how to improve Original process indicator: THD will hold 12 food demonstrations in 2018 This tells us what THD is doing (holding 12 food demonstrations) but doesn’t tell us if the demonstrations were successful, or even what constitutes success for THD What do we want the community to get out of food demonstrations? New knowledge? Healthy choices, new techniques, changed eating/cooking/habits? Etc! Better indicator: Of 12 food demonstrations, at least 10 will incorporate “food swap” strategies. Even better indicator: 75% of attendees of THD food demonstrations reported they “learned at least 1 food swap strategy they will incorporate” on post-class survey Best indicator: 50% of attendees of THD food demonstrations report on a 3-week follow up survey that they have “used at least 1 food swap during cooking since attending the food demonstration” Not always feasible, but try to write indicators that REALLY speak volumes about the success/impacts of the program!

Public Transportation Goal: What we want to be true! Tulsa residents choose to use public transportation Outcome: What the goal would look like if it were true. Tulsa residents have safe and easy access to public transportation options Background: History, baseline data In FY16, 2,906,741 people used MTTA public transportation options Methodology: what your methods are - Processes, work that is going to be carried out The CHIP subcommittee group will conduct a study with Tulsa Transit to identify barriers to transit ridership. CoT Traffic Engineering will use this data to prioritize infrastructure improvements near transit stops. Indicators: of success! How will you know if succeed? The number of MTTA users will increase by 5%

Active Transportation Goal: Tulsa County residents can safely choose active transportation options (walking and biking). Outcome: Tulsa County residents choose active transportation options (walking or biking) to commute.   Tulsa County bicyclists and pedestrians are safe in Tulsa County. Tulsa County municipalities adopt plans that facilitate active transportation (walking and biking). Background: In 2016, 1.3% of Tulsa County residents indicated that they walk to work. In 2016, 0.2% of Tulsa County residents indicated that they bike to work. In 2017, 5 Tulsa County municipalities had adopted the GO Plan. In 2016, there were X bicycle/pedestrian crashes. Methodology: In 2018, CHIP subcommittee will work with Tulsa County municipalities to adopt the GO Plan through meetings, data sharing, and engagement with community organizations. In 2018, CHIP subcommittee will identify opportunities to educate motorists, pedestrians, and bicyclists on bicycle/pedestrian safety. In 2018, CHIP subcommittee will conduct traffic calming demonstrations to provide information to citizens and decision makers on how low-cost improvements can increase safety for bicyclists/pedestrians. Indicators: Increase the percentage of people who report active transportation commuting by 10% Increase the number of municipalities who have adopted the GO Plan by 2 Decrease the number of bicycle/pedestrian crashes by 7%.

Questions? Monica Rogers mrogers@Tulsa-health.org