Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment An Overview of Purpose, Structures and Systems Approved by Curriculum Committee 11.23.10 Approved by Academic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Assessment Toolbox Linda Suskie Middle States Commission on Higher Education AB Tech February 2005.
Advertisements

Course Syllabus Development Abdullateef Haidar. Contents Introduction Introduction Some considerations Some considerations Components of course syllabus.
Developing an Outcomes Assessment Plan. Part One: Asking a Meaningful Question OA is not hard science as we are doing it. Data that you collect is only.
GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23,
Writing Assessment Plans for Secondary Education / Foundations of Educations Department 9 th Annual Assessment Presentation December 3, 2013 Junko Yamamoto.
ACADEMIC DEGREE ASSESSMENT & GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay Arts & Sciences Faculty Meeting March 12,
An Overview of Service Learning: Building Bridges, Making Connections
A Practical Guide. The Handbook Part I BCCC Vision of Assessment Guiding Principles of Assessment Part II The Assessment Model Part III A guide on how.
Comparison of School and KSU Assessment of Teachers
What Behaviors Indicate a Student is Meeting Course Goals and Objectives? “Indicators”
OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT Developing and Implementing an Effective Plan.
Lamar State College-Port Arthur February 16 & 17, 2011.
Measuring Student Learning March 10, 2015 Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
CHAPTER 3 ~~~~~ INFORMAL ASSESSMENT: SELECTING, SCORING, REPORTING.
Dallas Baptist University College of Education Graduate Programs
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Understanding Teaching Effectiveness and Assessment Projects.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Timothy S. Brophy, Ph.D., Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida Office of the Provost.
Direct vs Indirect Assessment of Student Learning: An Introduction Dr. Sheila Handy, Chair Business Management and Co-Chair University Assessment Committee.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
Learning & Teaching in FCA: Pathways and Loops!
Authentic Assessment Lynne E. Houtz, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Education Creighton University.
Assessing General Education Workshop for College of the Redwoods Fred Trapp August 18, 2008.
RET conference An External Evaluation of the RET Program in the Materials Science and Engineering Department, University of Arizona: Our Model &
Winter  Provide information and examples of the SLO process to help faculty use assessment to improve teaching and learning  Provide tools and.
Alternative Assessment
ASSESSING STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES IN DEGREE PROGRAMS CSULA Workshop Anne L. Hafner May 12, 2005.
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH. Outcomes assessment can tell us if our students are really learning what we think they should be able to do.
On SLOA (SLO Assessment). (after Munch) Will Lecture die? No…
PTEU Conceptual Framework Overview. Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching, Learning and Leadership Conceptual Framework Theme:
Welcome to Curriculum Mapping… The attendee will understand the purpose of curriculum mapping, with a focus on the alignment of instruction with desired.
Write On! Your Course Outline. Pedagogy Unbound Series Facilitated by: Deborah Richards Florence Daddey.
Richard Beinecke, Professor and Chair Suffolk University Institute for Public Service.
Assessing Your Assessments: The Authentic Assessment Challenge Dr. Diane King Director, Curriculum Development School of Computer & Engineering Technologies.
A Basic Guide to Academic Assessment Presented by Darby Kaikkonen Director of Institutional Research.
THE SLO PROCESS #1 create/update SLO’s, rubrics, & assessment methods #2 assess all students in all sections of all courses #3 maintain SLO assessment.
PLC Team Leader Meeting
The Professional Development Plan for License Renewal in Wisconsin Goal Writing Workshop.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Introduction to Academic Assessment John Duffield Office of Academic Assessment Georgia State University September 2013.
What Your Program Needs to Know about Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA.
1 Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment Norma Ambriz * February 14, 2008 Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment Norma Ambriz * February 14, 2008 A.
Assessment of Course-Level Learning Outcomes in Psychology.
Course Description And Assessment Information
Identifying Outcomes Peggy Maki Senior Scholar Assessing for Learning American Association for Higher Education
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Overview of Student Growth and T-TESS. Keys of Appraisal Student growth is a part of the appraisal process: Formative Ongoing and Timely Formalize what.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP By: Dr. Shemeka McClung Director Ms. Arnitra Hunter Research Associate Institutional Research.
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Montgomery College Fall 2011 Orientation.
Learning Goals Development & Assessment The Basics of Goals-Based Course Design.
Understanding Assessment Projects. Learning Objectives for this Session After completing this session you should be able to… 1.Articulate the requirements.
Creating a Culture of Assessment
Consider Your Audience
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK! C. Griffin.
Developing a Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Plan and Report
Assessment of Student Learning
Creating Analytic Rubrics April 27, 2017
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Course Description And Assessment Information
February 21-22, 2018.
Deborah Anne Banker Committee Chair
Rubrics: a good tool for engaging thoughtful learning
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK! C. Griffin.
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment An Overview of Purpose, Structures and Systems Approved by Curriculum Committee Approved by Academic Senate

Bibliographic Sources Suskie - Assessing Student Learning (2009) Banta - Designing Effective Assessment (2009) Woolvoord - Assessment Clear and Simple (2010) Maki - Assessing for Learning (2004)

Purpose The SLOA process: Discipline faculty engage in discussions about what a student in a course/program "should look like" after they complete the course/program. Faculty develop a shared vision of what course completers should know (content knowledge), be able to do (skills and processes), and dispositions (values, ethical positions, and attitudes) that are desirable.

Purpose Informs faculty about student learning in the major identified areas of a course deemed to be most important for student learning. SLOAs differ from the course grade which is a holistic, nonspecific assessment often including other things like class participation and time management (e.g., meeting deadlines etc.).

SLOA Component #1 Discipline Faculty will: Identify the knowledge or skill(s) that students will demonstrate (SLO/SLOSThe number depends on the course and the level of the outcome, how global or how particular it is).

SLOA Component #2 Discipline Faculty will: Identify the assessment activity that students will perform to demonstrate the knowledge or skill(s), (e.g., test item(s), test, essay, documented essay, research paper, project, performance, oral presentation, portfolio, etc.)

SLOA Component #3 Discipline Faculty will: Identify the assessment activity evaluation tool that all faculty teaching the specific course will use to measure the students demonstrated performance (mutually agreed- upon rubric, evaluation scale, description of performance levels, etc.).

SLOA Component #4 Discipline Faculty will: Determine the desired minimum individual student performance, meaning the individual passing achievement (e.g, score, rubric level, evaluation scale, description of performance level, etc.).

SLOA Component #5 Determine or Discuss the collective course performance (performance based on the total number of students who complete the course/course section) using one of the two alternate approaches.

Component #5 - Approach A Set an initial collective course performance target. Assess the course outcome and analyze information (e.g., assessments, pedagogy, assessment activity, assessment instrument, outcome), in relationship to the initial collective course performance target. Collaborate on possible modifications (target as well as other factors) and strategies.

Approach A Example Students will demonstrate their knowledge and skills of operant conditioning by designing an operant conditioning program to increase a behavior chosen by the student. 50% of the students will score at the proficient level when evaluated by the Operant Conditioning Rubric.

Component #5 Approach B Assess the course outcome and analyze information (e.g., assessments, pedagogy, assessment activity, assessment instrument, outcome), and in relationship to this analysis discuss collective course performance.

Approach B Example Students will demonstrate their knowledge and skills of operant conditioning by designing an operant conditioning program to increase a behavior chosen by the student. Students will score at the proficient level when evaluated by the Operant Conditioning Rubric. After analyzing information (e.g., assessments, pedagogy, assessment activity, assessment instrument, outcome), collective course performance shall be discussed.

1. Have faculty assess all outcomes in all courses. Enter the assessment data for all sections of all courses and all outcomes into filemaker. 2. Have faculty assess one outcome in all courses. Enter the assessment data for all sections of one outcome for all courses into filemaker. Assessment Options

3. Have faculty choose one course and assess all outcomes for that course Enter the assessment data for all sections of all outcomes in one course into filemaker. 4. Have faculty choose one course and one outcome for that course to assess in each discipline or program. Enter the assessment data for all sections of the chosen course and chosen outcome into filemaker.