Petrophysical Characterization of the Barnett Shale: Status

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title Petrophysical Analysis of Fluid Substitution in Gas Bearing Reservoirs to Define Velocity Profiles – Application of Gassmann and Krief Models Digital.
Advertisements

United Nations Statistics Division/DESA
E Guevara, Bureau of Economic Geology, PBGSP Annual Meeting, 2/27-28/06, Austin, TX SPRABERRY AND DEAN SANDSTONES (LOWER PERMIAN, LEONARDIAN), MIDLAND.
2014 RMS-AAPG Luncheon, Oct 1st, Denver, CO
Geological and Petrophysical Analysis Of Reservoir Cores
LABORATORY DETERMINATION OF POROSITY
Tim Armitage.  Shale Gas Reservoir's  The problems with Shale Reservoirs  What is needed to Create a usable model  Possible solutions to Porosity.
Well logging course for fourth year
Unconventional Petrophysical Analysis in Unconventional Reservoirs
G. Leśniak 1, R. Cicha-Szot 1, M. Stadtmüller 1, M. Mroczkowska-Szerszeń 1, L. Dudek 1, G. Tallec 2, A. Butcher 2, H. Lemmens 2, P. Such 1 1 Oil and Gas.
United Nations Statistics Division/DESA International Recommendations for the Index of Industrial Production (IIP)
Barnett Shale Fracture Overview
New Directions and the Importance of Geology Susan Smith Nash, Ph.D. AAPG.
1 Beyond California Water Plan Update 2005 California Water and Environmental Modeling Forum Annual Meeting, March 3 rd, 2005.
Porosity, Carbonate Content and TOC
West Virginia Geological & Economic Survey
A Petrophysical Comparison of the Barnett and Woodford Shales Jeff Kane Bureau of Economic Geology PBGSP Annual Meeting February 26-27, 2007.
Well Logging/Nuclear Kevin Kapka. Basic History The use of radiation to analyze formations appeared shortly after World War II. The initial application.
Techniques and Technology in the Evaluation of Unconventional Shale Gas Resources Robert S. Kuchinski Weatherford Oil Tool Middle East 3rd India Unconventional.
Analysis of the Devonian Shale in Kentucky for Potential CO 2 Sequestration and Enhanced Natural Gas Production Brandon C. Nuttall, James A. Drahovzal,
Improved Permeability Measurement using T 2 Bin-Distribution and Bulk Volume Irreducible from Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Tools Case Study: Granite Wash,
Fluid Saturation Introduction
Chapter 2.2 Principles of Technology I Edinburg North High School.
Susan Pool Ray Boswell J. Eric Lewis Jonathan P. Mathews WVGES USDOE/NETL WVGES Penn State.
INTEGRATED SYNTHESIS OF PERMIAN BASIN DEPOSITIONAL HISTORY AND STRATIGRAPHIC ARCHITECTURE: DATA AND MODELS FOR RECOVERING EXISTING AND UNDISCOVERED OIL.
POROSITY DETERMINATION
Tom Beebe Project Manager
NEW REGIONAL RESERVOIR PLAY CHARACTERIZATION PROGRAMS IN TEXAS & NEW MEXICO at the Bureau of Economic Geology Principal Investigators: Stephen C. Ruppel.
Conceptual Model of Selenium Release from Shale Units Within the Meade Peak Member of the Phosphoria Formation Kathryn Johnson, Ph.D. Understanding release.
Uncertainty in AVO: How can we measure it? Dan Hampson, Brian Russell
Seismic Data Driven Reservoir Analysis FORT CHADBOURNE 3-D Coke and Runnels Counties, TX ODOM LIME AND GRAY SAND.
LOOKING AT GRAPHS: TYPES, INTERPRETATION, AND MEANING This fine day November the 18 th, 2014 One month left guys!
Stephen C. Ruppel, Bureau of Economic Geology, PBGSP Annual Meeting, 2/27-28/06, Austin, TX Stephen C. Ruppel Bureau of Economic Geology The Jackson School.
University of the Western Cape Department of Earth Sciences Bellville, South Africa. Acknowledgements: Chris Samakinde would like to thank Inkaba yeAfrica,
Study of the Niobrara Formation in the Borie Field Abdulaziz Muhanna Alhubil, Gabrijel Grubac, Joe Lawson, Rachael Molyneux & David Scadden.
Ongoing and Future Work Computed Tomography (CT) Scanning of Cores CT scanning of rock cores enable non-destructive fine scale characterization of rock.
North Texas Earthquake Study Group EARTHQUAKES AND FLUID DISPOSAL – A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE Acknowledgements: Cliff Frohlich and the USGS Earthquake Hazards.
LABORATORY DETERMINATION OF POROSITY
AN OVERVIEW OFENGINEERING GEOLOGY. Quartz Pyroxene Clay Faults Folds Domes Site Investigation Plate Tectonic Dunas sabkhas Rock cycle Weathering Physiographic.
Heptanes-Plus Characterization
Near-surface Geologic Environments
Appalachian storage Hub (ASH) project
THE DEVONIAN WOODFORD FORMATION: SOURCE AND RESERVOIR?
An Integrative Modeling Of Ras Budran Field, Gulf Of Suez, Egypt
Mechanical Properties
G e o l g y a n d R s r v i D p m t T h w M u B H . S N c f E J k U x
Petrophysical Characterization of the Barnett Shale: Progress Report
The Eagle Ford Shale Outcrop Studies Related to the Oil and Gas Potential of a Major Unconventional Reservoir. Brian E. Lock University of Louisiana,
Formation Evaluation Fundamentals
Small scale reflection seismology
Opuwari et al_LASUFOC_2017
Class I Injection Well Application Issues
THE DEVONIAN WOODFORD FORMATION: SOURCE AND RESERVOIR?
Dario Grana, Tapan Mukerji
Porosity Logs Shale Density porosity (solid black line)
Seismic Response What causes a seismic response?
UPDATE ON PROJECT ACTIVITIES 2006 PROGRAM YEAR
Fluid Saturations Introduction
Michael Tice, Department of Geology & Geophysics, Texas A&M University
Estimating Future Oil & Gas Production in Texas
The Kitchen Source Organic-Rich Rocks, usually shales
A Geologic Model 1m 75 m Perm 250 mD Sand Shale 0.1 mD 50 m Slide 16
Gas Condensate Blockage
Gas Condensate Blockage
Estimating a Population Mean:  Known
POROSITY DETERMINATION FROM LOGS Most slides in this section are modified primarily from NExT PERF Short Course Notes, However, many of the NExT.
Petrophysical Characterization of the Barnett Shale: Status
Summary of bulk porosity measurements and bulk porosity interpretation from LWD density neutron data recorded in the horizontal well. Summary of bulk porosity.
NEW REGIONAL RESERVOIR PLAY CHARACTERIZATION PROGRAMS
U12-6 Unit 12 Warm-Up – 05/01 Write the equation for the Combined Gas Law. What variable is held constant when using this law? Rearrange the Combined Gas.
Presentation transcript:

Petrophysical Characterization of the Barnett Shale: Status Jeff Kane Bureau of Economic Geology PBGSP Annual Meeting February 27-28, 2006

Overview Database construction Geophysical log analysis model Texas United Blakely #1 Finish up Jeffrey A. Kane, Bureau of Economic Geology , PBGSP Annual Meeting, 2/27-28/2006, Austin, TX

Database construction Current wireline database consists of: 7 wells with geochemical data 2 with log data 1 with mineralogy data 1 with limited P & P data 1 with capillary pressure data 2 with core descriptions Jeffrey A. Kane, Bureau of Economic Geology , PBGSP Annual Meeting, 2/27-28/2006, Austin, TX

Database construction Many of these core data were recently provided by Dan Jarvie of Humble Geochemical Services, so I would like to thank him for his generosity Jeffrey A. Kane, Bureau of Economic Geology , PBGSP Annual Meeting, 2/27-28/2006, Austin, TX

Geophysical log modeling A quick historical look A mineralogical model Kerogen Jeffrey A. Kane, Bureau of Economic Geology , PBGSP Annual Meeting, 2/27-28/2006, Austin, TX

Geophysical log modeling – some history Much of the methodology used today appears to come from work originally performed on the T.P. Sims #2 (ResTech, 1991) This methodology comes from work done in the Devonian Shale (GRI, 1989) Since then little published information has been found in the public sector. Jeffrey A. Kane, Bureau of Economic Geology , PBGSP Annual Meeting, 2/27-28/2006, Austin, TX

Geophysical log modeling - Mineralogy Jeffrey A. Kane, Bureau of Economic Geology , PBGSP Annual Meeting, 2/27-28/2006, Austin, TX

Geophysical log modeling - Kerogen Kerogen is one of the wildcards we have to deal with – it appears as porosity to logs It has a density of about 1.0 to 1.2 g/cc; however it is probably more variable than this range suggests It has a hydrogen index of about 0.65 to 0.70 (water = 1.0) Jeffrey A. Kane, Bureau of Economic Geology , PBGSP Annual Meeting, 2/27-28/2006, Austin, TX

Geophysical log modeling - Kerogen (from Guidry and Olszewski, 1990) where: Wk is the weight of kerogen TOC is the weight fraction of total organic carbon S1 is the weight fraction of free oil CS1 is the weight fraction of carbon in the free oil Ck is the weight fraction of carbon in the kerogen Guidry and Olszewski (1990) suggest 0.87 and 0.75 for CS1 and Ck respectively. Jarvie (1999) recommends a value of 0.83 for CS1. Jeffrey A. Kane, Bureau of Economic Geology , PBGSP Annual Meeting, 2/27-28/2006, Austin, TX

Geophysical log modeling - Kerogen where: Vk is the volume fraction of kerogen Wk is the weight of kerogen rB is the bulk density rk is the kerogen density Jeffrey A. Kane, Bureau of Economic Geology , PBGSP Annual Meeting, 2/27-28/2006, Austin, TX

Geophysical log modeling - Kerogen The preceding is from derived from core data, not log data Initially, correlations have to be developed to estimate kerogen volume from logs This work is currently underway Jeffrey A. Kane, Bureau of Economic Geology , PBGSP Annual Meeting, 2/27-28/2006, Austin, TX

Geophysical log modeling We have a mineralogical model of clay, quartz, calcite, dolomite, pyrite, apatite, kerogen, and fluids (water and gas) We have a set of logs that have known or estimated responses to each of these model points We can construct a set of equations to describe these relationships Jeffrey A. Kane, Bureau of Economic Geology , PBGSP Annual Meeting, 2/27-28/2006, Austin, TX

Geophysical log modeling This leads to a set of simultaneous equations that allow us to solve for the volumes of the geologic constituents present This is fundamentally the same approach used by programs such as ELAN™ and OPTIMA™ We will be using the Geolog™ package MultiMin™ Jeffrey A. Kane, Bureau of Economic Geology , PBGSP Annual Meeting, 2/27-28/2006, Austin, TX

Overview of what the logs show Texas Blakely #1 wireline log analysis Jeffrey A. Kane, Bureau of Economic Geology , PBGSP Annual Meeting, 2/27-28/2006, Austin, TX

Texas United Blakely #1 Jeffrey A. Kane, Bureau of Economic Geology , PBGSP Annual Meeting, 2/27-28/2006, Austin, TX

Texas United Blakely #1 Jeffrey A. Kane, Bureau of Economic Geology , PBGSP Annual Meeting, 2/27-28/2006, Austin, TX

Texas United Blakely #1 Jeffrey A. Kane, Bureau of Economic Geology , PBGSP Annual Meeting, 2/27-28/2006, Austin, TX

Texas United Blakely #1 Jeffrey A. Kane, Bureau of Economic Geology , PBGSP Annual Meeting, 2/27-28/2006, Austin, TX

Texas United Blakely #1 Jeffrey A. Kane, Bureau of Economic Geology , PBGSP Annual Meeting, 2/27-28/2006, Austin, TX

Texas United Blakely #1 Jeffrey A. Kane, Bureau of Economic Geology , PBGSP Annual Meeting, 2/27-28/2006, Austin, TX

Texas United Blakely #1 Jeffrey A. Kane, Bureau of Economic Geology , PBGSP Annual Meeting, 2/27-28/2006, Austin, TX

Texas United Blakely #1 Jeffrey A. Kane, Bureau of Economic Geology , PBGSP Annual Meeting, 2/27-28/2006, Austin, TX

Texas United Blakely #1 Jeffrey A. Kane, Bureau of Economic Geology , PBGSP Annual Meeting, 2/27-28/2006, Austin, TX

Summary We have just begun to build an extensive Barnett database We already have a basic model to analyze the Barnett from wireline logs Work to date suggest that logs will be of great value in providing detailed data on Barnett mineralogy and facies. More core-based work is necessary to verify this and and refine our initial model Jeffrey A. Kane, Bureau of Economic Geology , PBGSP Annual Meeting, 2/27-28/2006, Austin, TX