Folding studies of immunoglobulin-like β-sandwich proteins suggest that they share a common folding pathway  Jane Clarke, Ernesto Cota, Susan B Fowler,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The (Greek) Key to Structures of Neural Adhesion Molecules
Advertisements

Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Can Non-Mechanical Proteins Withstand Force
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages (September 2006)
Alfonso Jaramillo, Shoshana J. Wodak  Biophysical Journal 
Molecular Model of the Human 26S Proteasome
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Complex Energy Landscape of a Giant Repeat Protein
Volume 128, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages (November 1995)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Microsecond Unfolding Kinetics of Sheep Prion Protein Reveals an Intermediate that Correlates with Susceptibility to Classical Scrapie  Kai-Chun Chen,
Catalytic Center Assembly of HPPK as Revealed by the Crystal Structure of a Ternary Complex at 1.25 Å Resolution  Jaroslaw Blaszczyk, Genbin Shi, Honggao.
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (December 2015)
Changbong Hyeon, Ruxandra I. Dima, D. Thirumalai  Structure 
Crystal Structure of the Human High-Affinity IgE Receptor
Crystal Structure of PMM/PGM
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 5, Issue 7, Pages (July 1997)
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Hongwei Wu, Mark W. Maciejewski, Sachiko Takebe, Stephen M. King 
Crystal Structure of β-Arrestin at 1.9 Å
Structural Basis for Protein Recognition by B30.2/SPRY Domains
Naomi Courtemanche, Doug Barrick  Structure 
Structure of the Human IgE-Fc Cε3-Cε4 Reveals Conformational Flexibility in the Antibody Effector Domains  Beth A. Wurzburg, Scott C. Garman, Theodore.
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
Structure, Exchange Determinants, and Family-Wide Rab Specificity of the Tandem Helical Bundle and Vps9 Domains of Rabex-5  Anna Delprato, Eric Merithew,
Volume 2, Issue 8, Pages (August 1994)
Solution Structure of the RAIDD CARD and Model for CARD/CARD Interaction in Caspase-2 and Caspase-9 Recruitment  James J Chou, Hiroshi Matsuo, Hanjun.
Epigenetics: SUPERMAN Dresses Up
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
The Structure of Chorismate Synthase Reveals a Novel Flavin Binding Site Fundamental to a Unique Chemical Reaction  John Maclean, Sohail Ali  Structure 
Microtubule Interaction Site of the Kinesin Motor
Volume 4, Issue 10, Pages (October 1996)
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e4 (January 2018)
Untangling the Influence of a Protein Knot on Folding
Volume 112, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Alex Bateman, Cyrus Chothia  Current Biology 
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
The 4 Å X-Ray Structure of a Tubulin:Stathmin-like Domain Complex
Volume 30, Issue 5, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Brandon Ho, Anastasia Baryshnikova, Grant W. Brown  Cell Systems 
The structure of ribosomal protein S7 at 1
Crystal Structure of a Polymeric Immunoglobulin Binding Fragment of the Human Polymeric Immunoglobulin Receptor  Agnes E. Hamburger, Anthony P. West,
Volume 5, Issue 10, Pages (October 1997)
In Search of the Hair-Cell Gating Spring
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: the crystal structure reveals a structural NADP+ molecule and provides insights into enzyme deficiency  Shannon.
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (May 2000)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Crystal Structure of β-Arrestin at 1.9 Å
Kinetic Folding Mechanism of Erythropoietin
Structure of GABARAP in Two Conformations
Presentation transcript:

Folding studies of immunoglobulin-like β-sandwich proteins suggest that they share a common folding pathway  Jane Clarke, Ernesto Cota, Susan B Fowler, Stefan J Hamill  Structure  Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages 1145-1153 (September 1999) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80181-6

Figure 1 Structure of the Ig-like β-sandwich proteins described in this study. (a–c) Ig I-set domains TWlg 18′ (b) and TI I27 (c). (d,e) Ig V-set domain CD2d1. (f–h) fnIII domains TNfn3 (g) and FNfn10 (h). The proteins differ in the number and arrangement of peripheral β strands. The cartoons (a,d,f) show the sandwich ‘opened up’ to illustrate the arrangement of the strands into two sheets: all proteins have strands B, C, E, F and G, shown in black. The diagrams were constructed using MolScript [32], with the following coordinate files: 1wit.brk (TWlg 18′ [27]), 1tit.brk (TI I27 [33]), 1hng.brk (CD2d1 [34]), 1fnf.brk (FNfn10 [35]) and 1ten.brk (TNfn3, [36]). Structure 1999 7, 1145-1153DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80181-6)

Figure 2 Structure-based sequence alignment. The structures were aligned in a pairwise fashion using the program Insight and compared by inspection. An alignment of all five proteins was made, and regions where the structures superimposed were determined. Regions of alignment are shown as follows: red, all five (or four) proteins align; green, Ig proteins align; blue, fnIII proteins align; orange, three proteins align. See also Table 1. Residue numbers are indicated. Structure 1999 7, 1145-1153DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80181-6)

Figure 3 The common core residues of TWIg18′ and TNfn3 form a common network of interactions. The Cα trace is shown with the buried sidechains of the residues of the common core displayed. Two views are shown, in (a) the A–B–E sheet is facing the viewer, in (b) the C–F–G sheet is frontmost. The colour coding is as follows: B strand, yellow; C strand, green; E strand, blue; F strand, orange; G strand, red. Residues are numbered according to Figure 2. Structure 1999 7, 1145-1153DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80181-6)

Figure 4 The dependence of the refolding and unfolding rates (in s-1) on the concentration of denaturant. The line shows the kinetics expected for a two-state kinetic process. At low concentrations of denaturant log kf becomes less dependent on [denaturant], and deviates from the expected curve in CD2d1, TI I27, and FNfn10. This non-linearity (which is independent of protein concentration) indicates the presence of a folding intermediate (see text). Some of the data have been described in detail elsewhere: TWIg18′, (unfolding kinetics only) [27]; TI I27 [28]; TNfn3 [30]. Note that for FNfn10, [GdmSCN] has been adjusted to account for non-linear dependence of ΔG on denaturant concentration (see the Materials and methods section). Structure 1999 7, 1145-1153DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80181-6)

Figure 5 Relationship between rate constants for folding and unfolding (in s-1) with stability. (a) Correlation between the logarithm of the rate constant for folding and stability of Ig-like proteins. Data on FNfn9 from Spitzfaden et al. [7] have been included. FNfn9 is homologous with FNfn10 and TNfn3. Filled circles indicate fnIII domains and open circles Ig domains. (b) Relationship between the logarithm of the folding rate constants and stability for a large number of two-state proteins. Data are taken from Jackson [8] and data therein. No correlation between log kf and ΔGD–N is observed. Data for CspB domains (red diamonds), SH3 domains (black squares) and ACBP proteins (blue circles) are highlighted. (c) There is no correlation between the logarithm of the unfolding rate of Ig-like proteins and stability. Filled circles indicate fnIII domains and open circles Ig domains. (d) Relationship between the logarithm of the unfolding rate constants and stability for a large number of two-state proteins. Data are taken from Jackson [8] and data therein. A weak correlation between log ku and ΔGD–N is observed. Data for CspB domains (red diamonds), SH3 domains (black squares) and ACBP proteins (blue circles) are highlighted. There is a correlation between log ku and ΔGD–N for the CspB and ACBP proteins. Structure 1999 7, 1145-1153DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80181-6)