Bennett Drew Ferris, Jonathan Green, Gaby Maimon  Current Biology 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mark E.J. Sheffield, Michael D. Adoff, Daniel A. Dombeck  Neuron 
Advertisements

Jean-Michel Mongeau, Mark A. Frye  Current Biology 
Flying Drosophila Orient to Sky Polarization
Visual Perception in the Brain of a Jumping Spider
Responses to Spatial Contrast in the Mouse Suprachiasmatic Nuclei
Pattern and Component Motion Responses in Mouse Visual Cortical Areas
Walking Modulates Speed Sensitivity in Drosophila Motion Vision
Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
Matias J. Ison, Rodrigo Quian Quiroga, Itzhak Fried  Neuron 
Starvation-Induced Depotentiation of Bitter Taste in Drosophila
Vincent B. McGinty, Antonio Rangel, William T. Newsome  Neuron 
Differential Impact of Behavioral Relevance on Quantity Coding in Primate Frontal and Parietal Neurons  Pooja Viswanathan, Andreas Nieder  Current Biology 
Octopamine in Male Aggression of Drosophila
Volume 27, Issue 15, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (March 2017)
Odor Processing by Adult-Born Neurons
Volume 23, Issue 13, Pages (July 2013)
Lior Cohen, Gideon Rothschild, Adi Mizrahi  Neuron 
A Role for the Superior Colliculus in Decision Criteria
Volume 27, Issue 19, Pages e2 (October 2017)
Aryeh Hai Taub, Rita Perets, Eilat Kahana, Rony Paz  Neuron 
James A. Strother, Aljoscha Nern, Michael B. Reiser  Current Biology 
Visual Perception in the Brain of a Jumping Spider
Lisa M. Fenk, Andreas Poehlmann, Andrew D. Straw  Current Biology 
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Jianing Yu, David Ferster  Neuron 
Effects of Locomotion Extend throughout the Mouse Early Visual System
Neuronal Control of Drosophila Courtship Song
Volume 78, Issue 5, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 23, Issue 13, Pages (July 2013)
Consequences of the Oculomotor Cycle for the Dynamics of Perception
Single-Unit Responses Selective for Whole Faces in the Human Amygdala
Volume 28, Issue 15, Pages e5 (August 2018)
Walking Modulates Speed Sensitivity in Drosophila Motion Vision
BOLD fMRI Correlation Reflects Frequency-Specific Neuronal Correlation
A Scalable Population Code for Time in the Striatum
Ethan S. Bromberg-Martin, Masayuki Matsumoto, Okihide Hikosaka  Neuron 
Mosquitoes Use Vision to Associate Odor Plumes with Thermal Targets
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages e5 (August 2017)
Feng Han, Natalia Caporale, Yang Dan  Neuron 
Volume 27, Issue 21, Pages e3 (November 2017)
Effects of Long-Term Visual Experience on Responses of Distinct Classes of Single Units in Inferior Temporal Cortex  Luke Woloszyn, David L. Sheinberg 
Serial, Covert Shifts of Attention during Visual Search Are Reflected by the Frontal Eye Fields and Correlated with Population Oscillations  Timothy J.
Pattern and Component Motion Responses in Mouse Visual Cortical Areas
Propagation of Dachsous-Fat Planar Cell Polarity
Consequences of the Oculomotor Cycle for the Dynamics of Perception
Bassam V. Atallah, William Bruns, Matteo Carandini, Massimo Scanziani 
Optic flow induces spatial filtering in fruit flies
Motion Processing Streams in Drosophila Are Behaviorally Specialized
Social Signals in Primate Orbitofrontal Cortex
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (November 2015)
Attention Reorients Periodically
Bonnie Chu, Vincent Chui, Kevin Mann, Michael D. Gordon 
Traces of Experience in the Lateral Entorhinal Cortex
John T. Serences, Geoffrey M. Boynton  Neuron 
Attention Samples Stimuli Rhythmically
Tuning to Natural Stimulus Dynamics in Primary Auditory Cortex
Dynamic Shape Synthesis in Posterior Inferotemporal Cortex
Visually Mediated Motor Planning in the Escape Response of Drosophila
Bettina Schnell, Ivo G. Ros, Michael H. Dickinson  Current Biology 
Bilal Haider, David P.A. Schulz, Michael Häusser, Matteo Carandini 
Marie P. Suver, Akira Mamiya, Michael H. Dickinson  Current Biology 
Christoph Kayser, Nikos K. Logothetis, Stefano Panzeri  Current Biology 
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages e4 (July 2018)
Volume 25, Issue 24, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages e4 (March 2019)
Gaby Maimon, Andrew D. Straw, Michael H. Dickinson  Current Biology 
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages e3 (March 2018)
Surround Integration Organizes a Spatial Map during Active Sensation
Jacqueline R. Hembrook-Short, Vanessa L. Mock, Farran Briggs 
Presentation transcript:

Abolishment of Spontaneous Flight Turns in Visually Responsive Drosophila  Bennett Drew Ferris, Jonathan Green, Gaby Maimon  Current Biology  Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 170-180.e5 (January 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.008 Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 A Behavioral Setup for Measuring Both Spontaneous and Visually Evoked Flight Turns in Drosophila (A) Experimental apparatus. (B) Still images showing a fly turning right and left. (C) An example trace of a fly flying in the context of a uniformly lit screen making spontaneous saccades. Saccades were picked algorithmically (STAR Methods) and are marked at their peaks (black dots). (D) An example trace shows a fly responding to loom stimuli whose center of expansion is to the left or right of the fly. Gray boxes indicate stimulus expansion. See also Figure S1. Current Biology 2018 28, 170-180.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.008) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Inhibiting Synaptic Transmission in Neurons Targeted by NP0212-GAL4 Largely Abolishes Spontaneous Saccades (A) Immunofluorescence of mCD8-GFP (green) and Brp (magenta) in the brain and thoracic ganglion of a NP0212 > GFP fly. Left: maximum z projection. Right: maximum z projections of three subsets in z. The scale bars represent 100 μm. (B) Example L–R WBA traces of spontaneous turning behavior in NP0212 > Shits and parental control flies at 19°C (blue) and 34°C (orange). (C) Ten-minute-long example traces. Saccades are indicated by black dots. Traces are aligned to the x axis in (D). Green arrowheads indicate the approximate onset times of five example, persistent turns to the left. (D) Top three sections: raster plot of saccades in NP0212 > Shits and parental controls. Every line represents an individual fly, and each saccade is indicated by a tick. Second from bottom: the average saccade rate of each genotype, binned every 30 s. Line and shaded regions indicate mean ± SEM. Bottom: temperature traces from 5 flies from each genotype overlaid. Time zero was set to when the bath hit 26°C. (E) Spontaneous saccade rate of NP0212 > Shits flies and parental controls at 19°C (blue) and 34°C (orange; black bars: mean ± SEM; ∗p < 0.05; Wilcoxon signed-rank test with a Bonferroni correction; n = 10–12). (F) Average L+R WBA of NP0212 > Shits flies and parental controls at 19°C (blue) and 34°C (orange; n = 10–12; black bars: mean ± SEM; ∗p < 0.05; Wilcoxon signed-rank test with a Bonferroni correction. Genotypes labeled with different letters have average L+R WBA values at 34°C that are significantly different; p < 0.05; Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction). See also Figures S2 and S3. Current Biology 2018 28, 170-180.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.008) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Slow Turns Are Abolished by Inhibiting Synaptic Transmission in Neurons Targeted by NP0212-GAL4 (A) Distribution of L−R WBA(lpf) during flight at 19°C for NP0212 > Shits (n = 11 flies, red) and parental controls (NP0212-GAL4 × w1118; n = 10; black and UAS-Shits × w1118; n = 12; gray). Line and shaded region indicate mean ± SEM. (B) Same as (A) but at 34°C. NP0212 > Shits flies’ L−R WBA(lpf) distributions display lower variance than both parental controls at both temperatures; p <<< 0.001; Levene’s test of variance. (C) Average power spectra of the L−R WBA of NP0212 > Shits flies (n = 11) and parental controls (NP0212-GAL4 × w1118; n = 10 and UAS-Shits × w1118; n = 12, colors as above) at the 19°C, binned between half-powers of ten. Spectra are plotted on a log10-log10 scale. Mean ± SEM. (D) Same as (C) but at 34°C. Significance asterisks indicate that NP0212 > Shits is significantly different from both parental controls; ∗∗∗p < 0.001; ∗∗p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test. See also Figure S3. Current Biology 2018 28, 170-180.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.008) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Flies in which Neurons Targeted by NP0212-GAL4 Have Impaired Synaptic Transmission Can Still Perform Two Types of Visually Evoked Turns (A) Responses to looming discs expanding from the left (1st and 3rd rows) and right (2nd and 4th rows) of w+; NP0212 > Shits and parental controls (n = 8 flies, 10 trials per fly). In the top two rows, the thick line indicates the mean across trials and thin lines represent individual trials. In the bottom two rows, the thick line indicates the the mean across flies and thin lines represent individual fly means. Arrowheads in 3rd column indicate trials with weak responses (see main text). (B) Average loom response in w+; NP0212 > Shits and parental controls (black bars: mean ± SEM) at 19°C and 34°C; each dot represents one fly. (C) Average responses to horizontally drifting grating to the right (1st and 3rd rows) and left (2nd and 4th rows) in w+; NP0212 > Shits and parental controls (n = 8 flies, 10 trials per fly). In the top two rows, the thick line indicates the mean across trials and thin lines represent individual trials. In the bottom two rows, the thick line indicates the mean across flies and thin lines represent individual fly means. (D) Average grating response in w+; NP0212 > Shits and parental controls (black bars: mean ± SEM) at 19°C and 34°C; each dot represents one fly. Blue, 19°C; orange, 34°C. In all traces, gray rectangles denote periods in which the visual stimulus was displayed. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test with a Bonferroni correction. See also Figures S4 and S5. Current Biology 2018 28, 170-180.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.008) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 The Neurons that Mediate the Spontaneous Saccade Phenotype in NP0212 > Shits Flies Are Likely to be Cha+ Neurons in the Thoracic Ganglion (A) Immunofluorescence of mCD8-GFP (green) and Brp (magenta) in the indicated driver lines in the brain and thoracic ganglion. (B) Mean spontaneous turning rate of flies of the indicated genotype at 19°C (blue) and 34°C (orange); each dot represents one fly. (Black bars: mean ± SEM; n = 7–18. Genotypes labeled with different letters have saccade rates that are significantly different at 34°C; Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗∗p < 0.001; Wilcoxon signed-rank test.) An outlier NP0212 > Shits, elav-GAL80 fly that had a spontaneous saccade rate of 91.6 turns/min and an outlier NP0212 > Shits, tsh-GAL80 fly that had a spontaneous saccade rate of 89.4 turns/min at 34°C are not shown on the plot. Current Biology 2018 28, 170-180.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.008) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Expressing shibirets in 38 Additional GAL4 Lines Does Not Recapitulate the Abolishment of Spontaneous Saccades Observed in NP0212 > Shits flies (A) Box plots showing the spontaneous turning rate at 34°C as a percentage of the turning rate at 19°C. The genotype median is indicated by the thick black horizontal line. Box boundaries show the first and third quartiles. Whiskers are 1.5 times the length of the inter-quartile range. (B) Bars indicate average turning rates of NP0212 > Shits and the other 38 GAL4 lines at 19°C (blue) and 34°C (orange). Black bars indicate SEM. Genotypes are sorted by the median relative turning rate. Current Biology 2018 28, 170-180.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.008) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions