Volume 53, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Spatial Neglect and Attention Networks
Advertisements

Diffusion tensor imaging and Tract-Based Spatial Statistics in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment  Yawu Liu, Gabriela Spulber, Kimmo K.
Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
Soyoun Kim, Jaewon Hwang, Daeyeol Lee  Neuron 
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 46, Issue 5, Pages (June 2005)
Davide Nardo, Valerio Santangelo, Emiliano Macaluso  Neuron 
Disrupted Neural Synchronization in Toddlers with Autism
Elizabeth V. Goldfarb, Marvin M. Chun, Elizabeth A. Phelps  Neuron 
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Lior Shmuelof, Ehud Zohary  Neuron 
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 87, Issue 4, Pages (August 2015)
A Source for Feature-Based Attention in the Prefrontal Cortex
Maurizio Corbetta, Gaurav Patel, Gordon L. Shulman  Neuron 
Avi Mendelsohn, Yossi Chalamish, Alexander Solomonovich, Yadin Dudai 
Michael S Beauchamp, Kathryn E Lee, Brenna D Argall, Alex Martin 
The Neural Basis of Body Form and Body Action Agnosia
Volume 76, Issue 5, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Daphna Shohamy, Anthony D. Wagner  Neuron 
Disruption of Large-Scale Brain Systems in Advanced Aging
Brain Networks and Cognitive Architectures
Rajeev D.S. Raizada, Russell A. Poldrack  Neuron 
Volume 87, Issue 3, Pages (August 2015)
Predicting Value of Pain and Analgesia: Nucleus Accumbens Response to Noxious Stimuli Changes in the Presence of Chronic Pain  Marwan N. Baliki, Paul.
Volume 77, Issue 4, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages (August 2007)
Perirhinal-Hippocampal Connectivity during Reactivation Is a Marker for Object-Based Memory Consolidation  Kaia L. Vilberg, Lila Davachi  Neuron  Volume.
Volume 77, Issue 4, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
Perceptual Learning and Decision-Making in Human Medial Frontal Cortex
Scale-Invariant Movement Encoding in the Human Motor System
Unreliable Evoked Responses in Autism
Volume 79, Issue 4, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 74, Issue 4, Pages (May 2012)
Attentional Modulations Related to Spatial Gating but Not to Allocation of Limited Resources in Primate V1  Yuzhi Chen, Eyal Seidemann  Neuron  Volume.
Neural Correlates of Visual Working Memory
The Generality of Parietal Involvement in Visual Attention
Jack Grinband, Joy Hirsch, Vincent P. Ferrera  Neuron 
Talia Konkle, Aude Oliva  Neuron  Volume 74, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Jianing Yu, David Ferster  Neuron 
Between Thoughts and Actions: Motivationally Salient Cues Invigorate Mental Action in the Human Brain  Avi Mendelsohn, Alex Pine, Daniela Schiller  Neuron 
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages (February 2005)
Maurizio Corbetta, Gaurav Patel, Gordon L. Shulman  Neuron 
Michael S Beauchamp, Kathryn E Lee, Brenna D Argall, Alex Martin 
The Functional Neuroanatomy of Object Agnosia: A Case Study
Lior Shmuelof, Ehud Zohary  Neuron 
Volume 81, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 74, Issue 4, Pages (May 2012)
The Future of Memory: Remembering, Imagining, and the Brain
Volume 63, Issue 5, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Uri Hasson, Orit Furman, Dav Clark, Yadin Dudai, Lila Davachi  Neuron 
Human Dorsal and Ventral Auditory Streams Subserve Rehearsal-Based and Echoic Processes during Verbal Working Memory  Bradley R. Buchsbaum, Rosanna K.
Volume 68, Issue 1, Pages (October 2010)
Visual Feature-Tolerance in the Reading Network
Cerebral Responses to Change in Spatial Location of Unattended Sounds
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (November 2015)
Orienting Attention Based on Long-Term Memory Experience
Arielle Tambini, Nicholas Ketz, Lila Davachi  Neuron 
John T. Serences, Geoffrey M. Boynton  Neuron 
Volume 76, Issue 5, Pages (December 2012)
Christa Müller-Axt, Alfred Anwander, Katharina von Kriegstein 
Predicting Value of Pain and Analgesia: Nucleus Accumbens Response to Noxious Stimuli Changes in the Presence of Chronic Pain  Marwan N. Baliki, Paul.
Taosheng Liu, Franco Pestilli, Marisa Carrasco  Neuron 
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages (September 2002)
The anatomy of attention.
Visual Feature-Tolerance in the Reading Network
Presentation transcript:

Volume 53, Issue 6, Pages 905-918 (March 2007) Breakdown of Functional Connectivity in Frontoparietal Networks Underlies Behavioral Deficits in Spatial Neglect  Biyu J. He, Abraham Z. Snyder, Justin L. Vincent, Adrian Epstein, Gordon L. Shulman, Maurizio Corbetta  Neuron  Volume 53, Issue 6, Pages 905-918 (March 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.02.013 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Dorsal and Ventral Attention Networks (A) ROIs defined by activation fMRI studies and used as seed regions for FC analyses. Dorsal network regions, yellow; ventral network regions, orange. Region sizes were controlled to be about 900 mm3. (B) For each of the four right hemisphere DAN ROIs, group statistical maps were obtained using a random-effects analysis on the Fisher-transformed correlation maps and corrected for multiple comparisons at a significance level of p < 0.05 (z = 3, cluster size = 17 voxels). The four FC maps were combined to produce the conjunction map shown. Voxels in yellow are positively correlated with all four ROIs; red, positively correlated with three of four ROIs; green, negatively correlated with three of four ROIs; blue, negatively correlated with all four ROIs. Arrow points to the major right-lateralized region in the DAN, which overlaps with the VAN. (C) FC maps from the five VAN ROIs were used to produce the conjunction map. Color code similar to (B). Neuron 2007 53, 905-918DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2007.02.013) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Lesion and Task Performance of Patients (A) Left panel: group lesion anatomy (n = 11; purple, damaged in one to three patients; blue, damaged in four to seven patients) and ROIs constructed for FC analyses (DAN, green; VAN, red). Right panel: lesion overlap (n = 11) overlaid on patients' average anatomical image. Values denote the number of patients in which the particular voxel was damaged by lesion. (B) Performance in the Posner task, compared with age-matched controls. Left, percent miss; right, RTs averaged across hit trials. Error bars denote SEM. Neuron 2007 53, 905-918DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2007.02.013) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Left-Right pIPS FC (A) Temporal correlation between left and right pIPS in patients (n = 11), elderly controls (n = 12), and young controls (n = 12). (B) Rebalancing of task-evoked responses between left and right pIPS at chronic stage. (C) Temporal correlations of all homologous pairs of regions in DAN, only left-right pIPS correlation was impaired acutely. (D) Across acute patients, left-right pIPS FC significantly correlated with % miss (left panel) and RT (right panel) in detecting targets in the left VF following an invalid cue. Filled circle indicates the subject with largest lesion (200,928 mm3). Error bars denote SEM. Neuron 2007 53, 905-918DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2007.02.013) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 MFG-STS FC (A) Temporal correlations between MFG and STS was significantly impaired in patients compared with controls and did not recover at the chronic stage. Error bars denote SEM. (B) Task-evoked responses in MFG and STS. (C) Across acute patients, MFG-STS FC significantly correlated with % miss in detecting targets in the left VF following valid (left panel) or invalid (middle panel) cues and in right VF following valid cues (right panel). Neuron 2007 53, 905-918DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2007.02.013) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Left-Right SMG FC (A) Temporal correlation between left and right SMG was significantly impaired in patients compared with controls and did not recover at the chronic stage. Error bars denote SEM. (B) Task-evoked responses in left and right SMG. (C) Across acute patients, L-R SMG FC significantly correlated with % miss (left) and RT (right) in detecting targets in the left VF following an invalid cue. (D) Across acute patients, interhemispheric FC in pIPS and in SMG correlate with each other. Neuron 2007 53, 905-918DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2007.02.013) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 MFG as a Potential Link between DAN and VAN (A) Correlation between MFG-STS FC and left-right pIPS FC across acute patients. (B) Part of MFG ROI is temporally correlated with both networks. MFG ROI used in FC analyses (yellow) and the overlap region (orange) between DAN (thresholded as 3/4) and VAN (thresholded as 4/5). Overlap between MFG ROI and the DAN-VAN overlap region is shown in red. Neuron 2007 53, 905-918DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2007.02.013) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Median Split of All Patients Based on VF Bias at the Acute Stage (A) Behavioral performance of each subgroup at acute and chronic stages. (B) A white matter region (red) was damaged in all patients from the severe subgroup but spared in all patients from the mild subgroup. Top: streamline diffusion tensor tractography (sDTT) of the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF, pink) and the arcuate fasciculus (AF, green), with the lesion spot shown in red. The relatively abrupt anterior ending of the SLF was likely due to the crossing corticospinal tracts. Bottom: probabilistic DTT seeded in the lesion (red). Voxels in which >5% of all tracts from the seed pass through are shown in dark blue. Voxels in which >10% of tracts from the seed pass through are shown in light blue. (C) The subgroup with severe VF bias also had more impaired left-right pIPS FC, MFG-STS FC and left-right SMG FC. Neuron 2007 53, 905-918DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2007.02.013) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Single Case with Right Dorsal Medial Parietal Lesion (A) pIPS ROI (red) overlaid on patient's own anatomical image. (B) Comparison of the single case (N39) to the mean of all the other patients (n = 11). Left, interhemispheric pIPS FC. Middle (% miss) and Right (RT), measurements of rightward visual field bias (% miss and RT) evaluated as (left VF) − (right VF), collapsed across valid and invalid trials. Error bars denote SEM. Neuron 2007 53, 905-918DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2007.02.013) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions