Volume 12, Issue 21, Pages (October 2002)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date of download: 9/17/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Dissociated spinal neurons express cameleon in culture. (a) Side view of the posterior.
Advertisements

Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Spatial Representation of Odorant Valence in an Insect Brain
Spatiotemporal correlation of exocytic events and fluorescence changes in bovine chromaffin cells expressing SCORE. (A, I) Bright-field image of ECD array.
Volume 8, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Jie Zheng, William N. Zagotta  Neuron 
PKA Dynamics in a Drosophila Learning Center: Coincidence Detection by Rutabaga Adenylyl Cyclase and Spatial Regulation by Dunce Phosphodiesterase  Nicolas.
Martin D Bootman, Michael J Berridge  Current Biology 
Representations of Odor in the Piriform Cortex
The Molecular Basis of Odor Coding in the Drosophila Larva
Representation of Natural Stimuli in the Rodent Main Olfactory Bulb
Pattern and Component Motion Responses in Mouse Visual Cortical Areas
Volume 95, Issue 11, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (January 2017)
Walking Modulates Speed Sensitivity in Drosophila Motion Vision
Olfactory Coding in the Honeybee Lateral Horn
Vision: In the Brain of the Beholder
Matt Wachowiak, Lawrence B. Cohen  Neuron 
Magnetic Stimulation of One-Dimensional Neuronal Cultures
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages (July 2003)
Retinal Representation of the Elementary Visual Signal
Hai-Yan He, Wanhua Shen, Masaki Hiramoto, Hollis T. Cline  Neuron 
Bennett Drew Ferris, Jonathan Green, Gaby Maimon  Current Biology 
Representations of Taste Modality in the Drosophila Brain
Volume 27, Issue 15, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (March 2017)
Regulation of Airway Ciliary Activity by Ca2+: Simultaneous Measurement of Beat Frequency and Intracellular Ca2+  Alison B. Lansley, Michael J. Sanderson 
Volume 112, Issue 2, Pages (January 2003)
Miklós Bech, Uwe Homberg, Keram Pfeiffer  Current Biology 
3D Single Molecule Tracking with Multifocal Plane Microscopy Reveals Rapid Intercellular Transferrin Transport at Epithelial Cell Barriers  Sripad Ram,
Dynamics of Learning-Related cAMP Signaling and Stimulus Integration in the Drosophila Olfactory Pathway  Seth M. Tomchik, Ronald L. Davis  Neuron  Volume.
In Vivo Imaging of Neuronal Activity by Targeted Expression of a Genetically Encoded Probe in the Mouse  Thomas Bozza, John P McGann, Peter Mombaerts,
Effects of Locomotion Extend throughout the Mouse Early Visual System
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 23, Issue 13, Pages (July 2013)
SK2 Channel Modulation Contributes to Compartment-Specific Dendritic Plasticity in Cerebellar Purkinje Cells  Gen Ohtsuki, Claire Piochon, John P. Adelman,
Punishment Prediction by Dopaminergic Neurons in Drosophila
Asako Sawano, Hiroshi Hama, Naoaki Saito, Atsushi Miyawaki 
3D Single Molecule Tracking with Multifocal Plane Microscopy Reveals Rapid Intercellular Transferrin Transport at Epithelial Cell Barriers  Sripad Ram,
Functional Connectivity and Selective Odor Responses of Excitatory Local Interneurons in Drosophila Antennal Lobe  Ju Huang, Wei Zhang, Wenhui Qiao, Aiqun.
Walking Modulates Speed Sensitivity in Drosophila Motion Vision
Benjamin Scholl, Daniel E. Wilson, David Fitzpatrick  Neuron 
Georg B. Keller, Tobias Bonhoeffer, Mark Hübener  Neuron 
Feng Han, Natalia Caporale, Yang Dan  Neuron 
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Rapid Actin-Based Plasticity in Dendritic Spines
Dendritic Spines and Distributed Circuits
Volume 101, Issue 10, Pages (November 2011)
Pattern and Component Motion Responses in Mouse Visual Cortical Areas
Hartwig Spors, Amiram Grinvald  Neuron 
Volume 77, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Timing, Timing, Timing: Fast Decoding of Object Information from Intracranial Field Potentials in Human Visual Cortex  Hesheng Liu, Yigal Agam, Joseph.
Allan M Wong, Jing W Wang, Richard Axel  Cell 
Benjamin Scholl, Daniel E. Wilson, David Fitzpatrick  Neuron 
Imaging Inhibitory Synaptic Potentials Using Voltage Sensitive Dyes
Bettina Schnell, Ivo G. Ros, Michael H. Dickinson  Current Biology 
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 77, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Polarized Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Microscopy
Sensory-Evoked Intrinsic Optical Signals in the Olfactory Bulb Are Coupled to Glutamate Release and Uptake  Hirac Gurden, Naoshige Uchida, Zachary F.
Mercè Izquierdo-Serra, Jan J. Hirtz, Ben Shababo, Rafael Yuste 
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2002)
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Olfactory Coding in the Honeybee Lateral Horn
Pairing-Induced Changes of Orientation Maps in Cat Visual Cortex
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Cristopher M. Niell, Stephen J Smith  Neuron 
A Temporal Channel for Information in Sparse Sensory Coding
Neurophysiology of the BOLD fMRI Signal in Awake Monkeys
Presentation transcript:

Volume 12, Issue 21, Pages 1877-1884 (October 2002) Genetically Expressed Cameleon in Drosophila melanogaster Is Used to Visualize Olfactory Information in Projection Neurons  André Fiala, Thomas Spall, Sören Diegelmann, Beate Eisermann, Silke Sachse, Jean-Marc Devaud, Erich Buchner, C.Giovanni Galizia  Current Biology  Volume 12, Issue 21, Pages 1877-1884 (October 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01239-3

Figure 1 Cameleon Expression and Imaging Setup (A) Whole-mount preparation of a Drosophila brain expressing cameleon 2.1 in projection neurons under the control of the Gal4 line GH 146. The image was taken with a color CCD camera (Axiocam, Zeiss) and was contrast enhanced with an unsharp mask filter (PhotoShop 5.5 program, Adobe). AL: antennal lobe, CX: calyx, LPL: lateral protocerebral lobe, arrowheads: inner antennocerebral tract. The scale bar represents 50 μm. Approximate areas imaged for the AL (see Figure 2) and the CX (see Figure 3) are indicated by boxes. (B) Imaging setup for in vivo cameleon imaging. The 440 nm excitation is provided by a xenon lamp and a monochromator and is focused via a water immersion objective onto the brain. Emission wavelengths passing a 470 nm dichroic long pass mirror (DCLP 470 nm) are split up by a second dichroic long pass mirror (DCLP 520 nm), and the two beams are guided through band pass filters (BP 473–494 nm for the ECFP emission, and BP 530–565 nm for the EYFP emission). The two emissions are simultaneously recorded by two independent CCD cameras. Current Biology 2002 12, 1877-1884DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01239-3)

Figure 2 Odorant-Evoked Calcium Responses in the Drosophila Antennal Lobe (A) Frontal view of the two ALs of one brain, as seen with EYFP fluorescence, after contrast enhancement. Compare this figure with Figure 1A for orientation and position of the area in the whole brain. The squares mark the positions evaluated in (C). This animal's position was slightly oblique; therefore, the symmetry line is not vertical. The scale bar represents 25 μm. (B) Comparison of spatial FRET difference patterns between animals. Color-coded results from three different individuals for single stimulations per odorant for three different odorants are shown. To the right, areas with the strongest activity for each odorant are superimposed onto an EYFP fluorescence image providing a morphological view. Here, purple areas indicate responses to octanol (OCT), cyan areas indicate responses to benzaldehyde (BEA), and yellow areas indicate responses to isoamyl acetate (IAA). Areas responding both to BEA and IAA are green, and overlapping regions of OCT and BEA are blue. While the glomeruli could not unequivocally be identified from their morphology, the similarity of the activity patterns between animals suggests that homologous glomeruli are excited by the same odorant in different animals. In each image, false-color coding scales the responses between −2.0% EYFP/ECFP and the maximum, which is indicated in each image (e.g., 5.8 for the upper octanol). (C) Time courses of the responses to the odorants BEA, IAA, OCT, and the control mineral oil (MOL) in fly 2 (single stimulation each). Two different glomeruli are evaluated; the upper row of graphs correspond to position 1 in (A), and the lower row of graphs correspond to position 2 in (A). For each glomerulus and odorant, the response is shown for the EYFP (yellow line) and the ECFP (blue line) signal (both as % ΔF/F). The EYFP/ECFP ratio change is shown as a black line (also as % ratio). All curves are shifted to baseline before odorant stimulus onset (t = 0 s). Odorant stimulation is indicated by the gray bar. (D) Spatiotemporal response patterns, shown as a sequence of images from the AL. Adjacent images are 0.66 s apart, i.e., every second frame is shown. Frame numbers are indicated in the upper-right corner of each frame, with 0 denoting stimulus onset. Odorant stimulus is indicated by the red bar. Ratio values above 0 are false-color coded on top of the morphological view of the two ALs. Note the bilateral symmetry of the odorant-evoked signals, the spatial differences between OCT and IAA, and the very weak responses to BEA in this animal. See also the movies in the Supplementary Material available with this article online. Current Biology 2002 12, 1877-1884DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01239-3)

Figure 3 Odorant-Evoked Calcium Responses in the Drosophila Calyx (A) A view onto one calyx, as seen with EYFP fluorescence and after contrast-enhancement, with the adjacent inner antennocerebral tract. The numbered squares mark the positions evaluated in (C). Compare this figure with Figure 1A for position of the area in the whole brain. The scale bar represents 25 μm. (B) Comparison of spatial FRET difference patterns for repeated stimulation within one animal, with a single stimulation in each trial. Color-coded results for the three different odorants benzaldehyde (BEA), isoamyl acetate (IAA), and octanol (OCT) are shown. In each image, false-color coding scales the responses between −2.0 and the maximum, which is indicated in each image (e.g., 2.6 for the upper octanol). The outline of the CX is indicated by a black line. (C) Time courses of the responses to single stimulations with BEA, OCT, IAA, and the control mineral oil (MOL). Two different coordinates are evaluated: coordinate 1 in (A) refers to the upper row, and coordinate 2 in (A) refers to the lower row. For each coordinate, the response is shown for the EYFP (yellow line) and the ECFP (blue line) signal (both as % ΔF/F). The EYFP/ECFP ratio is shown as a black line (also as % ratio). All curves are shifted to baseline before odorant stimulus onset (t = 0 s). Odorant stimulation is indicated by the gray bar. (D) Averages of the time courses of three responses to stimulations with BEA, OCT, IAA, and MOL. The same animal and coordinates that are shown in (C) are shown. Current Biology 2002 12, 1877-1884DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01239-3)

Figure 4 Spatiotemporal Response Patterns in the Calyx Odorant-evoked response patterns, shown as a sequence of images from the calyx. Adjacent images are 0.66 s apart. The odorant stimulus is indicated by the red bar. Ratio values above 0 are false-color coded on top of the morphological view of the calyx. Note the spatial differences between BEA, OCT, and IAA. See also the movies in the Supplementary Material available with this article online. The scale bar represents 25 μm. Current Biology 2002 12, 1877-1884DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01239-3)