Family and peer factors related to the development of aggression in adolescent dating relationships John H. Grych & Kara Lindstedt Marquette University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Yell / The Law and Special Education, Second Edition Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Advertisements

Accredited Supplier Communications Plan FY09-10 Q1 to Q4 May 2009, v2.0 Home Access Marketing & Stakeholder Engagement Team.
Self-Perceived Health in Early Adulthood: An examination of distal, childhood effects John Cairney, PhD Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Centre for.
Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
Feichter_DPG-SYKL03_Bild-01. Feichter_DPG-SYKL03_Bild-02.
Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Appendix 01.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 28.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 38.
Are they really out to get us? Examining Interpersonal Perceptions in an Intergroup Context.
Chapter 1 Image Slides Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Board of Early Education and Care Retreat June 30,
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt ShapesPatterns Counting Number.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
1 Positive attitudes are not enough: Minority language survival in the Canadian Prairies Jaya Nagpal & Elena Nicoladis University of Alberta.
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
This module: Telling the time
Pearls of Functional Algorithm Design Chapter 1 1 Roger L. Costello June 2011.
VOORBLAD.
15. Oktober Oktober Oktober 2012.
The links between sibling relationships and the whole family
We are learning how to read the 24 hour clock
1..
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
25 seconds left…...
: 3 00.
5 minutes.
Types of clocks. Types of clocks Sand clock or Hourglass clock.
Negative Parenting and Late Adolescents’ Mental Health: The Protective Function of Relationships with Grandparents Kristen E. Rabe, Bethany S. Quinn, &
H to shape fully developed personality to shape fully developed personality for successful application in life for successful.
Weisburd, Lawton, Ready, Rudes, Cave, and Nelson Presented by Breanne Cave 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
Clock will move after 1 minute
PSSA Preparation.
Long-term Sequelae of Sub-clinical Depressive Symptoms in Early Adolescence Joe Allen Joanna Chango David Szwedo Megan Schad University of Virginia Copies.
Select a time to count down from the clock above
Murach’s OS/390 and z/OS JCLChapter 16, Slide 1 © 2002, Mike Murach & Associates, Inc.
Joanna Bettmann Schaefer, Ph.D, LCSW Research Director Re
Promoting AAA Peer Influences: The Case of Teen Driving B. Bradford Brown University of Wisconsin-Madison Youth-Nex Conference on “Forward thinking: Preparing.
Parenting and Self-Regulation: Keys To Understanding Children’s Emotionality Kimberly L. Day, Ph.D.
O Children exposed to higher levels of interparental conflict appear to be more sensitive to later parental disagreements o They report greater threat,
Marital Satisfaction and the Development of Autonomy and Close Friendships in Early Adolescence Jessica R. Meyer L. Wrenn Thompson Kathleen Boykin McElhaney.
Adolescent Attachment to Parents: Predicting Later Adolescent Rejection Sensitivity I would like to thank the William T. Grant Foundation, Spencer Foundation,
Interparental Conflict, Young Adult Adjustment, and Appraisals Among Emerging Adults Christine R. Keeports & Laura D. Pittman Northern Illinois University.
Interparental Conflict & Children’s Internalizing Psychopathology: Examining the Role of Children’s Appraisals & Emotions Jennifer K. Hauser & John H.
Emotional Processes Involved in Children's Adjustment to Interparental Conflict: An Attachment Perspective Sarah Raynor, Stacy Braun, and John Grych Marquette.
Actor-Partner Effects: Attachment and Psychological Aggression in Romantic Relationships Elizabeth A. Goncy & Manfred H. M. van Dulmen Kent State University.
Adolescent Romantic Relationships: The Impact of Rejection Sensitivity and the Moderating Role of Attachment Security By: Emily Marston, Amanda Hare, Erin.
 Triangulation into Interparental Conflict  The act of involving adolescents in conflicts between parents  This may include one parent enlisting the.
Parental Influence on Adolescent Academic Outcomes: Socio- Economic and Relational Aspects of Family Context Kathy L. Bell, UNCG Katie Jodl, University.
Dads Do Matter: Adolescents’ Relationships With Dads Predicting Later Rejection Sensitivity I would like to thank the William T. Grant Foundation, Spencer.
Grandparent Social Support: Links to Socio-emotional and Academic Functioning Among Late Adolescents Adeya Richmond Laura D. Pittman Sandra Yu Rueger Northern.
Attachment and Development in Adolescent Romantic Couples’ Relationship Quality Sharon C. Risch University of Tennessee.
Child Psychopathology Environmental causes Behavior, emotion, and cognition Family factors Reading for today: Chapter 2.
Romantic Partners Promotion of Autonomy and Relatedness in Adolescence as a Predictor of Young Adult Emotion Regulation. Elenda T. Hessel, Emily L. Loeb,
Family Influences Adolescents’ Romantic Relationships.
Introduction Results Method Conclusions
DISCUSSION (continues) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND CONTACT
Introduction Results Hypotheses Discussion Method
Testing the Attachment Theory of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy Erin Floyd and Sheila Eyberg Department of Clinical and Health Psychology University.
Introduction Results Conclusions Method
Introduction Results Method Conclusions
Introduction Results Conclusions Hypotheses Method
Introduction Results Hypotheses Discussion Method
Attachment Insecurity and Abuse in Adolescent Romantic Relationships Erin Miga, Joseph P. Allen & Nell Manning University of Virginia This study was.
Presentation transcript:

Family and peer factors related to the development of aggression in adolescent dating relationships John H. Grych & Kara Lindstedt Marquette University

Thanks to… Greg FoscoPatrick Gunderson Nicole HartLaura Klockow Sarah RaynorDiana Robbins Joanne Hepp, Mary Kohl and the students of Alexander Hamilton High School

Research on Aggression in Adolescent Romantic Relationships - Guided primarily by social learning theory; modeling, reinforcement as mechanisms - Aggression viewed as a response to conflict - Focus on family of origin - Emphasis on individual characteristics as mediators; Eg., beliefs about justifiability of aggression

The Interpersonal Context of Dating Aggression: Peer Relationships -Developmentally, may serve as a bridge between family relationships and romantic relationships - Provide new interpersonal opportunities that can reinforce or counter family experiences - Limited empirical data supports peer influences on dating aggression

Can positive peer relationships buffer the effect of family aggression on dating behavior?

The Interpersonal Context of Dating Aggression: Attachment Relationships - Parent-child interactions shape Internal Working Models of relationships - Expectations for others behavior - Ability to regulate emotions - Highly anxious individuals may perceive a range of behaviors as threats to the relationship - Aggression may be an attempt to keep partner close, avoid dissolution of the relationship (maintain proximity)

Is there continuity in the quality of parent-child, peer, and adolescent romantic relationships? Do qualities of these relationships predict dating aggression?

Questions Examined in the Present Study 1. Do peer relationships moderate the link between interparental conflict and dating aggression? 2. Does integrating family and peer relationships with cognitive and emotional processes provide better prediction of aggression in teen dating relationships?

Anger regulation Attitudes re: Aggression. Interparental conflict Dating aggression

Parental alienation Parental closeness Anger regulation Peer alienation Attitudes re: Aggression. Interparental conflict Peer closeness Romantic Attach. Dating aggression

Method Sample year olds (172 girls, 115 boys) -Ethnicity: 57% Anglo American 20% Latino 12% African American 4% Asian 4% Biracial or other 2% Native American

Measures - Dating aggression. Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI; Wolfe, 2001) - Interparental conflict: Childrens Perception of Interparental Conflict Scale (CPIC; Grych, Seid, & Fincham, 1992) - Parent-Child Relationship: Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA; Armsden & Greenberg, 1987) - Peer Relationships: Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA) - Romantic Attachment Style: Experiences in Close Relationships Scale (ECR; Brennan, Shaver, & Clark, 1998). Anxiety and Avoidance scales

1.Do positive peer relationships buffer the effects of interparental conflict on dating aggression? Boys: No Girls: Yes StepVariable b R 2 1. Interparental Conflict Peer Closeness Interaction of Interparental Conflict & Peer Closeness -.18*.05*

Plot of Conflict-Closeness Interaction (Girls) Interparental Conflict DATINGAGGDATINGAGG Poor peer rels r =.28 Close peer rels r = -.06

2.Does integrating family and peer relationships with cognitive and emotional processes better predict aggression in teen dating relationships ?

Dating Aggression Girls Boys Individual factors Attitudes re: Aggression.25*.29* Anger regulation.23*.50* Family factors Interparental Conflict Closeness to Mother Closeness to Father Alienation from Mother.21*.19 Alienation from Father Peer factors Closeness to Peers Alienation from Peers.12.23* Anxious Rom. Attach..20*.27* Avoidant Rom. Attach * p <.07 * p <.05

Dating Aggression Girls Boys Individual factors Attitudes re: Aggression.25*.29* Anger regulation.23*.50* Family factors Interparental Conflict Closeness to Mother Closeness to Father Alienation from Mother.21*.19 Alienation from Father Peer factors Closeness to Peers Alienation from Peers.12.23* Anxious Rom. Attach..20*.27* Avoidant Rom. Attach * p <.07 * p <.05

Dating Aggression Girls Boys Individual factors Attitudes re: Aggression.25*.29* Anger regulation.23*.50* Family factors Interparental Conflict Closeness to Mother Closeness to Father Alienation from Mother.21*.19+ Alienation from Father Peer factors Closeness to Peers Alienation from Peers.12.23* Anxious Rom. Attach..20*.27* Avoidant Rom. Attach * p <.07 * p <.05

Dating Aggression Girls Boys Individual factors Attitudes re: Aggression.25*.29* Anger regulation.23*.50* Family factors Interparental Conflict Closeness to Mother Closeness to Father Alienation from Mother.21*.19+ Alienation from Father Peer factors Closeness to Peers Alienation from Peers.12.23* Anxious Rom. Attach..20*.27* Avoidant Rom. Attach * p <.07 * p <.05

Mediational model for boys Interparental conflict Alienation From Mother Closeness To Mother Anger Regulation Aggressive Attitudes Alienation From Peers Closeness To Peers Anxious Rom. Attach. Dating Aggression.79**.90** 2.85* +p <.08 *p <.05 **p <.01.12* *.42**.34** Notes: path coefficients are unstandardized

Mediational model for girls Interparental conflict Alienation From Mother Closeness To Mother Anger Regulation Aggressive Attitudes Alienation From Peers Closeness To Peers Anxious Rom. Attach. Dating Aggression.57**.31* p <.08 *p <.05 **p <.01.15**.02** ** Notes: path coefficients are unstandardized

Predicting Anxious Romantic Attachment Alienation From Mother Closeness To Mother Anxious Rom. Attach Alienation From Peers Closeness To Peers Anger Regulation

Predicting Anxious Romantic Attachment in Boys Alienation From Mother Closeness To Mother Anxious Rom. Attach. Alienation From Peers Closeness To Peers Anger Regulation +p <.08 *p <.05 **p < **.20.05*.08**.01.40*.03+ Notes: path coefficients are unstandardized

Predicting Anxious Romantic Attachment in Girls Alienation From Mother Closeness To Mother Anxious Rom. Attach. Alienation From Peers Closeness To Peers Anger Regulation +p <.08 *p <.05 **p < **.01.04*.13**.02**.53**.11+ Notes: path coefficients are unstandardized

Conclusions 1. Good peer relationships can buffer the adverse effects of interparental conflict on dating aggression, at least for girls 2. Integrating interpersonal relationships and individual characteristics provides better prediction of adolescent dating aggression 3. Alienation shows continuity from parent-child to peer relationships and predicts orientation toward romantic relationships; closeness/support may be more relationship-specific.