MCB3421 2013 Class 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Motivation “Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution” Christian Theodosius Dobzhansky.
Advertisements

Nothing in (computational) biology makes sense except in the light of evolution after Theodosius Dobzhansky (1970)
MCB 5472 Blast, Psi BLAST, Perl: Arrays, Loops J. Peter Gogarten Office: BPB 404 phone: ,
Bioinformatics Phylogenetic analysis and sequence alignment The concept of evolutionary tree Types of phylogenetic trees Measurements of genetic distances.
Evidence of Evolution.
No similarity vs no homology If two (complex) sequences show significant similarity in their primary sequence, they have shared ancestry, and probably.
Basics of Comparative Genomics Dr G. P. S. Raghava.
Classification of Living Things. 2 Taxonomy: Distinguishing Species Distinguishing species on the basis of structure can be difficult  Members of the.
Some basics: Homology = refers to a structure, behavior, or other character of two taxa that is derived from the same or equivalent feature of a common.
MCB Class 2. TA: Amanda Dick Office: BioPhysics 402B.
MCB Class 1. Protein structure: Angles in the protein backbone.
"Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution" Theodosius Dobzhansky.
Bioinformatics and Phylogenetic Analysis
"Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution" Theodosius Dobzhansky.
"Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution" Theodosius Dobzhansky.
Identifying functional residues of proteins from sequence info Using MSA (multiple sequence alignment) - search for remote homologs using HMMs or profiles.
"Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution" Theodosius Dobzhansky.
Cenancestor (aka MRCA or LUCA) as placed by ancient duplicated genes (ATPases, Signal recognition particles, EF) The “Root” strictly bifurcating no reticulation.
"Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution" Theodosius Dobzhansky.
Protein structure:. Angles in the protein backbone.
TGCAAACTCAAACTCTTTTGTTGTTCTTACTGTATCATTGCCCAGAATAT TCTGCCTGTCTTTAGAGGCTAATACATTGATTAGTGAATTCCAATGGGCA GAATCGTGATGCATTAAAGAGATGCTAATATTTTCACTGCTCCTCAATTT.
Mechanisms of Evolution Convergent Divergent Adaptive radiation.
D.5: Phylogeny and Systematics
Protein Evolution and Sequence Analysis Protein Evolution and Sequence Analysis.
Chapter 26: Phylogeny and the Tree of Life Objectives 1.Identify how phylogenies show evolutionary relationships. 2.Phylogenies are inferred based homologies.
1 Orthology and paralogy A practical approach Searching the primaries Searching the secondaries Significance of database matches DB Web addresses Software.
Homologous Structures vs. Analogous Structures
Simplify the display  Show only alpha carbons  Turn off show backbone oxygen  Colour secondary structure  Turn 3 D display on.
Sequence Analysis CSC 487/687 Introduction to computing for Bioinformatics.
Building and visualizing phylogeny Henrik Lantz Dept. of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, BMC, Uppsala University.
You have worked for 2 years to isolate a gene involved in axon guidance. You sequence the cDNA clone that contains axon guidance activity. What do you.
PHYLOGENY AND SYSTEMATICS Chapter 25. Sedimentary rocks are the richest source of fossils  Fossils are the preserved remnants or impressions left by.
Protein Structure Prediction: Homology Modeling & Threading/Fold Recognition D. Mohanty NII, New Delhi.
Molecular and Genomic Evolution Getting at the Gene Pool.
Globins. Globin diversity Hemoglobins ( , etc) Myoglobins (muscle) Neuroglobins (in CNS) Invertebrate globins Leghemoglobins flavohemoglobins.
Phylogeny & Systematics
Ayesha M.Khan Spring Phylogenetic Basics 2 One central field in biology is to infer the relation between species. Do they possess a common ancestor?
Evidence of Evolution Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. – Theodosius Dobzhansky.
Cladograms or Phylogenetic Trees. Phylogenetic Trees or Cladograms By studying inherited species' characteristics and other historical evidence, we can.
Ch. 26 Phylogeny and the Tree of Life. Opening Discussion: Is this basic “tree of life” a fact? If so, why? If not, what is it?
Substitution Matrices and Alignment Statistics BMI/CS 776 Mark Craven February 2002.
Evidence of Evolution.
TOPIC 7- EVIDENCE FOR THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION
Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Evolutionary genomics can now be applied beyond ‘model’ organisms
Title: Different Types of Evolution
Basics of Comparative Genomics
Principles of Evolution
Evidence for Evolution.
Protein Sequence Alignments
The Nature of Change and Variation
Simplify the display Show only alpha carbons
Welcome to AP Biology Saturday Study Session
Common Ancestry and Evolution
MCB Class 1.
D.5: Phylogeny and Systematics
MCB Class 1.
Divergent Evolution Divergent evolution is the accumulation of differences that can lead to speciation.
Phylogeny and Systematics
Evidence YOU watch (with Headphones) Evolution Primer #4.
LECTURE 1: Phylogeny and Systematics
ATP binding sites – Shared Ancestry versus Convergent Evolution
Structural evidence: Embryonic similarities Vestigial organs
Chapter 26- Phylogeny and Systematics
Basics of Comparative Genomics
BLAST, unix, Perl continued
Evidence of evolution Ch.12 and Ch.13.
Introduction to bioinformatics Lecture 5 Pair-wise sequence alignment
Presentation transcript:

MCB3421 2013 Class 1

Protein structure:

Angles in the protein backbone

spdbf - viewer aka Deep View Free and powerful program Steep learning curve Interacts with modeling server available at http://ca.expasy.org/ http://spdbv.vital-it.ch/ Gale Rhodes’ Tutorial is at http://spdbv.vital-it.ch/TheMolecularLevel/SPVTut/index.html

Simplify the display Show only alpha carbons Color secondary structure Turn 3 D display on

1HEW Backbone as ribbon Sidechains only in binding pocket Substrate in yellow Non-polar residues of binding pocket in turquoise

"Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution" Theodosius Dobzhansky "Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution"

Homology bird wing bat wing human arm by Bob Friedman

homology vs analogy A priori sequences could be similar due to convergent evolution   Homology (shared ancestry) versus  Analogy (convergent evolution) bird wing butterfly wing bat wing fly wing

Related proteins In the above mantra "similar function" can refer to: Present day proteins evolved through substitution and selection from ancestral proteins. Related proteins have similar sequence AND similar structure AND similar function. In the above mantra "similar function" can refer to: identical function, similar function, e.g.: identical reactions catalyzed in different organisms; or same catalytic mechanism but different substrate (malic and lactic acid dehydrogenases); similar subunits and domains that are brought together through a (hypothetical) process called domain shuffling, e.g. nucleotide binding domains in hexokinse, myosin, HSP70, and ATPsynthases.

homology Two sequences are homologous, if there existed an ancestral molecule in the past that is ancestral to both of the sequences Homology is a "yes" or "no" character (don't know is also possible). Either sequences (or characters share ancestry or they don't (like pregnancy). Molecular biologist often use homology as synonymous with similarity of percent identity. One often reads: sequence A and B are 70% homologous. To an evolutionary biologist this sounds as wrong as 70% pregnant. Types of Homology Orthology: bifurcation in molecular tree reflects speciation Paralogy: bifurcation in molecular tree reflects gene duplication

Sequence Similarity vs Homology The following is based on observation and not on an a priori truth: If two (complex) sequences show significant similarity in their primary sequence, they have shared ancestry, and probably similar function. (although some proteins acquired radically new functional assignments, lysozyme -> lense crystalline).

The Size of Protein Sequence Space (back of the envelope calculation) Consider a protein of 600 amino acids. Assume that for every position there could be any of the twenty possible amino acid. Then the total number of possibilities is 20 choices for the first position times 20 for the second position times 20 to the third .... = 20 to the 600 = 4*10780 different proteins possible with lengths of 600 amino acids. For comparison the universe contains only about 1089 protons and has an age of about 5*1017 seconds or 5*1029 picoseconds. If every proton in the universe were a super computer that explored one possible protein sequence per picosecond, we only would have explored 5*10118 sequences, i.e. a negligible fraction of the possible sequences with length 600 (one in about 10662).

no similarity vs no homology If two (complex) sequences show significant similarity in their primary sequence, they have shared ancestry, and probably similar function. THE REVERSE IS NOT TRUE: PROTEINS WITH THE SAME OR SIMILAR FUNCTION DO NOT ALWAYS SHOW SIGNIFICANT SEQUENCE SIMILARITY for one of two reasons: a)  they evolved independently (e.g. different types of nucleotide binding sites); or b)   they underwent so many substitution events that there is no readily detectable similarity remaining. Corollary: PROTEINS WITH SHARED ANCESTRY DO NOT ALWAYS SHOW SIGNIFICANT SIMILARITY.