Pre-supernova mass-loss predictions for massive stars

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Observations with MOST Pulsations in Wolf-Rayet stars : André-Nicolas Chené (NRC/HIA/CGO) Anthony F. J. Moffat (Université de Montréal) André-Nicolas Chené.
Advertisements

Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University.
14 May 2004ALMA Workshop UMD Margaret Meixner (STScI) Stars and Their Evolution: as viewed by ALMA Margaret Meixner STScI.
The Flavours of SN II Light Curves Iair (“ya-eer”) Arcavi Advisor: Avishay Gal-Yam.
Possible contributions of the Groupe d’Astrophysique des Hautes Energies (GAPHE) to the GAIA data processing Eric Gosset, Gregor Rauw, Yaël Nazé & Hugues.
From Progenitor to Afterlife Roger Chevalier SN 1987AHST/SINS.
Metallicity Dependent Wolf-Rayet winds Metallicity Dependent Wolf-Rayet winds PAUL CROWTHER.
LOCATions of WR stars, SNE IB/c and GRBs Giorgos Leloudas Oskar Klein Centre, Stockholm University IAU 279, Nikko, 8 March 2012.
 Wolf-Rayet Stars & the Luminous Blue Variables 2014/11/12 Wednesday Luqian Wang.
Bing Jiang, Astronomy Department, NJU 1 Progenitors of SN Ia : Circumstellar Interaction, Rotation, and Steady Interaction, Rotation, and Steady.
Engine-Driven Supernovae Alicia M. Soderberg Caltech Astronomy Dept. Zwicky Supernova Workshop January
NASA's Chandra Sees Brightest Supernova Ever N. Smith et al. 2007, astro-ph/ v2.
Hot Gas in Planetary Nebulae You-Hua Chu Robert A. Gruendl Martín A. Guerrero Univ. of Illinois.
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
A Broader Perspective on the GRB-SN Connection Alicia M. Soderberg Caltech Schramm Symposium, Dec
Radio studies of mysterious Type IIn supernovae Poonam Chandra National Centre for Radio Astrophysics Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Collaborators:
Stellar Winds and Mass Loss Brian Baptista. Summary Observations of mass loss Mass loss parameters for different types of stars Winds colliding with the.
Lots of Dust from Massive Galactic WR Stars Tony Moffat – Univ. de Montréal Sergey Marchenko – Science Systems and Applications Inc., Lanham, MD M1-67/WR124.
1 GRB, SN and identification of the hosts GRB, SN and identification of the hosts Valentina Grieco by means of evolution models chemical Trieste, 28 nov.
STUDYING NEBULAE EJECTED FROM MASSIVE STARS WITH HERSCHEL Chloi Vamvatira-Nakou ARC meeting - 11 February 2010 Centre Spatiale de Liège (CSL) (PhD student.
Massive star feedback – from the first stars to the present Jorick Vink (Keele University)
A few Challenges in massive star evolution ROTATIONMAGNETIC FIELD MULTIPLICITY How do these distributions vary with metallicity? How do these distributions.
The Role of Giant LBV Eruptions in the Evolution of Very Massive Stars Nathan Smith CASA, U. Colorado In collaboration with Stan Owocki (U. Delaware) In.
Different Kinds of “Novae” I. Super Novae Type Ia: No hydrogen, CO WD deflagration --> detonation Type Ia: No hydrogen, CO WD deflagration --> detonation.
Multi-Epoch Star Formation? The Curious Case of Cluster Stephen Eikenberry University of Florida 11 April 2007.
Linear spectropolarimetry Jorick Vink (Armagh Observatory)
Radio and X-ray observations of SN 2009ip Poonam Chandra National Centre for Radio Astrophysics January 4, 2013 Collaborators: Raffaella Margutti (Harvard),
Are Stellar Eruptions a Common Trait of SNe IIn? Baltimore, MD 06/29/11 Ori Fox NPP Fellow NASA Goddard Based on arXiv:
Warm Absorbers: Are They Disk Outflows? Daniel Proga UNLV.
Progenitor stars of supernovae Poonam Chandra Royal Military College of Canada.
Y. Matsuo A), M. Hashimoto A), M. Ono A), S. Nagataki B), K. Kotake C), S. Yamada D), K. Yamashita E) Long Time Evolutionary Simulations in Supernova until.
Formation of Dust in Supernovae and Its Ejection into the ISM Takaya Nozawa (IPMU, Univ. of Tokyo) Collaborators; T. Kozasa (Hokkaido Univ.), N. Tominaga.
Eruptive Mass Loss in Massive Stars Nathan Smith - University of Arizona.
The Chemistry of PPN T. J. Millar, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester.
Study of the type IIP supernova 2008gz Roy et al. 2011, MNRAS accepted.
The Upper Main Sequence O stars OBN and OBC stars Wolf-Rayet stars Meredith Danowski Astronomy 411 Feb. 14, 2007.
A New Window on Radio and X-ray emission from Strongly Interacting Supernovae Poonam Chandra Royal Military College of Canada Collaborators: Roger Chevalier,
Masaki Yamaguchi, F. Takahara Theoretical Astrophysics Group Osaka University, Japan Workshop on “Variable Galactic Gamma-ray Source” Heidelberg December.
Lower Limit to Stellar Masses >/= 0.08 Msun Substellar objects – Brown Dwarfs.
Lecture 9: Wind-Blown Bubbles September 21, 2011.
M. F. Bietenholz Imaging of Radio Supernovae. Introduction Radio emission from a supernova was first detected in the 1972 (SN 1970G; Gottesman et al.,
A Brief History 4 Stages of Star Formation (Shu, Adams, Lizano, 1987)
Single versus Binary Star Progenitors of Type IIb Supernovae
On the origin of Microturbulence in hot stars
CSI in SNRs You-Hua Chu Inst of Astron and Astroph
The signature of a wind reverse shock in GRB’s Afterglows
Supernova Progenitors From Stellar Populations And Supernova Remnants
New Radio Observations of
Progenitors of long GRBs
Keck Observations of Two Supernovae Hours After Explosion Shock-Breakout Flash Spectroscopy as a New Window into the Evolution and Death of Massive Stars.
Supernova Interaction with Dense Mass Loss
HST/COS Observations of O(He) Stars
Mid-infrared Observations of Aged Dusty Supernovae
Why is circumstellar interaction of SNe important?
RADIO EMISSION FROM SNe & GRBs, AND THE NEED FOR SKA
Consensus and issues on dust formation in supernovae
Evolution of the circumstellar medium around massive stars
Observations: Cosmic rays
2010/12/16 Properties of interstellar and circumstellar dust as probed by mid-IR spectroscopy of supernova remnants (超新星残骸の中間赤外分光から探る星間・星周ダスト) Takaya.
Dust in supernovae Takaya Nozawa
Supernovae as sources of dust in the early universe
Single Vs binary star progenitors of Type Iib Sne
On the non-steady-state nucleation rate
Dust Enrichment by Supernova Explosions
A Search for Quiet Massive X-Ray Binaries
Midwest Workshop on SUPernovae and TRansients Niharika Sravan
Takuma Suda, Asao Habe, Masayui Fujimoto (Hokkaido Univ.)
The X-ray information on the progenitors of Core-Collapse Supernovae
Formation and evolution of dust in hydrogen-poor supernovae
From Massive Stars to SNe
Presentation transcript:

Pre-supernova mass-loss predictions for massive stars Jorick Vink (Keele University)

Outline Introduction Mass loss predictions OB & WR - f(Z) Mass loss predictions OB & LBV - f(T) Radio SNe with variable CSM Summary

Evolution of a Massive Star

Radiation-driven wind by Lines Lucy & Solomon (1970) Castor, Abbott & Klein (1975) = CAK Wind STAR Fe dM/dt = f (Z, L, M, Teff)

Radiation-driven wind by Lines Abbott & Lucy (1985) dM/dt = f (Z, L, M, Teff)

OB Mass loss parameter study

Wind momenta for Galactic O stars Models Vink, de Koter & Lamers (2000)

Vink et al. (2001) Mokiem et al. (2007) Wind momenta at low Z Data (Mokiem) Models (Vink) Vink et al. (2001) Mokiem et al. (2007)

Which element drives WR winds? - Fe  WR mass loss depends on Z host - C  it does NOT depend on Z host

Z-dependence of WR winds WN WC Vink & de Koter (2005, A&A 442, 587)

This is a gif file Lamers et al. (1995), Crowther et al. (2006) Vink et al. (1999): Fe IV III

Stars should pass the bistable limit During evolution from O  B LBVs on timescales of years

LBVs in the HRD Smith, Vink & de Koter (2004)

The mass loss of LBVs Stahl et al. (2001) Vink & de Koter (2002) Models Data Stahl et al. (2001) Vink & de Koter (2002)

Stars should pass the bistable limit During evolution from O  B LBVs on timescales of years Implications for circumstellar medium (CSM) Mass-loss rate up ~ 2 wind velocity down ~ 2 CSM density variations ~ 4

Radio Supernovae S=Flux SN Ic 1990B Weiler et al. (2000) Time

SN-CSM interaction  radio Weiler et al. (2002)

Mass Loss Results from Radio SNe OB star? WR?

CSM: a constant mass-loss rate Wind Density Radius

CSM: a varying LBV mass-loss rate Wind Density Radius

The Radio SN 2001ig Ryder et al. (2004)

The Radio SN 2001ig Ryder et al. (2004)  t = 150 days

Predicted period AGB star  w = 10 km/s  Period = 50 years Ryder et al. (2004) AGB star  w = 10 km/s  Period = 50 years

Predicted period AGB star  w = 10 km/s  Period = 50 years Ryder et al. (2004) AGB star  w = 10 km/s  Period = 50 years LBV  w = 100 km/s  Period = 5 years ! Kotak & Vink (2006)

WR Binary Pinwheel nebulae? Tuthill et al. (1999) But……

2003bg: the twin of 2001ig 2003bg , 2001ig Soderberg et al. (2006)

Progenitors AGB star Binary WR system WR star LBV b

Progenitors AGB star Binary WR system WR star LBV Kotak & Vink (2006)

Speculation on Radio SNe that show sinusoidal variations H-rich H-poor OB/RSG  LBV  WR SN II  ?  Ibc

Summary Monte Carlo mass loss predictions successful:  OB & WR stars as a function of Z  The bistability jump between O and B  LBV mass loss variability Radio SNe with (quasi)-sinusoidal modulations may have LBV progenitors

The bi-stability Jump HOT Fe IV low dM/dt high V(inf) Low density COOL Fe III dM/dt = 5 dM/dt HOT V(inf) = ½ vinf HOT High density = 10 HOT