April 7, 2011 EMPLOYMENT LAW. The American System: Employment at will. Employee rights to privacy in at will system. Term contracts and just cause. Some.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Promoting A Respectful Workplace
Advertisements

Sexual Harassment 2012 Laws & Case History Laws & Case History Sexual Harassment is Sexual Harassment is Types of Harassment Types of Harassment Importance.
FEDERALLY EMPLOYED WOMEN (FEW) AND COMPLIANCE UNDERSTANDING YOUR RIGHTS Presented By: Melvie Hall-Bellinger FEW National Vice President - Compliance.
1 What You Don’t Know Can Hurt You Selected Employment Law Topics Gerard Solis Associate General Counsel.
Sheheryar Sardar Sardar Law Firm LLC
Several federal statutes prohibit discrimination in employment. – Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of – Civil War Reconstruction Statutes. – The.
Equal Opportunity and the Law Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Equal Employment Opportunity 1964–1991
Wrongful Termination and Employment Discrimination OBE 118 Fall 2004 Professor McKinsey Illegal discrimination in the firing, firing, promoting of employees.
Principles and Development of Employment Discrimination Law in the U.S. Professor Glenn George University of North Carolina School of Law Visiting Professor,
Wrongful Termination and Employment Discrimination OBE 118 Fall 2004 Professor McKinsey Illegal discrimination in the firing, firing, promoting of employees.
Sexual Harassment Training. Statistics of Sexual Harassment Sexual harassment is a form of sex discrimination that violates Title VII of the Civil Rights.
Employment Discrimination Copyright © Jeffrey Pittman.
The University of Texas at Austin General Compliance Training Program Equal Employment Opportunity.
EMPLOYMENT LAW.  Describe the rights and responsibilities of employees and employers.  Identify federal, state, and local laws and agencies dealing.
Chapter 3 The Legal and Ethical Environment Nature of employment laws Key equal employment opportunity laws Employment-at-will Fair Labor Standards Act.
Employee Law Challenge. Requires employers to pay men & women similar wage rates for similar work? Name the Act… 2 point question 1. Civil Rights Act.
1 Civil Rights & Harassment Prevention Information for NRCS Partners.
Workplace Legal Matters. Terms Affirmative action – a government plan to provide access to jobs for people who have suffered discrimination in the past.
Diversity and Rights in the Workplace
Providing Equal Employment Opportunity and a Safe Workplace
Copyright © 2008 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 40 Equal Employment Opportunity Law Twomey Jennings Anderson’s.
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Frequently Asked Questions about Strikes and Job Security If the union gets in here I can’t ever lose my job because the union will get it back for me.
EMPLOYMENT LAW.  The American System: Employment “at will.”  Employee rights to privacy in “at will” system.  Term contracts and “just cause.”  Some.
Sexual Harassment Annual Education 2013.
Employment Discrimination.  Fifth Amendment – Prohibits the federal government from: ◦ Depriving individuals of “life, liberty, or property” without.
4/00/ © 2000 Business & Legal Reports, Inc. BLR’s Human Resources Training Presentations Grounds for Termination.
Iowa Civil Rights Commission Disclaimer The information contained in this presentation is a brief overview and should not be construed as legal advice.
Jody Blanke, Professor Computer Information Systems and Law Mercer University, Atlanta 1.
Chapter 24 Discrimination in Employment
Several federal statutes prohibit _______________ in _________________. – Title VII of the ___________________. – Civil War _______________________. –
Unit Three Seminar HR420: Employment Law Louis Lopez, Jr., Ph.D. Instructor School of Business and Management.
1 Equal Employment Opportunity and Discrimination in Employment.
Law for Business Mr. Bernstein Employment Discrimination, pp January 14, 2015.
Chapter 24 Employment Protection And Equal Opportunity.
Chapter 24 Student Presentation. When is Discrimination Illegal? ●Discrimination: The unorthodox treatment of employees is recognized as illegal when.
Illegal and Legal Employment Discrimination Business Law Mrs. A &
Discrimination in Employment Chapter 23. Employment Discrimination Treating individuals differently based on differences Treating individuals differently.
2 Equal Opportunity and the Law 2 Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 2-1.
Section 15.2 Employee Rights. Section 15.2 Employment Rights The government has passed laws to protect the rights of employees to: health and safety fair.
29.1 b a c kn e x t h o m e Chapter 29 Objectives List the bases in federal law upon which an employer may not discriminate against employees. Explain.
Laws Regulating Employment Discrimination Laws Regulating Employment Discrimination Section 21.2.
The Twelve Most Important Public Employment Law Developments Ever Bob Joyce PANC Asheville October 5, 2015.
The Legal Environment Chapter 3 Part 1 MGT 3513 Dr. Marler “The more laws and order are made prominent, The more thieves and robbers there will be.” Lao-tzu.
EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS AWARENESS SLO: I can understand the terms and conditions associated with fair workplace practices.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning BUSINESS LAW Twomey Jennings 1 st Ed. Twomey & Jennings BUSINESS LAW Chapter 38 Equal.
HUMAN RESOURCES Human Resource Video. Workforce Anyone 16 or older who are employed or looking for job  Service Industry  Include businesses that perform.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Canada Inc. The Changing Legal Emphasis: From Compliance to Valuing Diversity Dessler & Cole Human Resources Management in Canada.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
EMPLOYMENT LAW.  The American System: Employment “at will.”  Employee rights to privacy in “at will” system.  Term contracts and “just cause.”  Some.
OTHER FORMS OF DISCRIMINATION A. Employment Discrimination  The Civil rights Act of 1964-Title 7 prohibits discrimination in employment  Title.
Employment Discrimination Concepts Jody Blanke Distinguished Professor of Computer Information Systems and Law Mercer University.
Chapter 7 Employment Law Halsey/McLaughlin, Legal Environment You will be able to answer the following questions after reading this chapter: What is an.
C H A P T E R 6 Employment Law Chapter ??.
Business Law EMPLOYMENT LAW.
Protection from Discrimination
EMPLOYMENT LAW.
Employment Discrimination
EMPLOYMENT LAW April 7, 2011.
Section 21.2.
Chapter 3 Part 1 • MGT 3513 • Dr. Marler
Essentials of the legal environment today, 5e
Chapter 3 Part 1 • MGT 3513 • Dr. Barnett
EMPLOYMENT LAW.
Anti-Harassment, Sexual Harassment and Non-Discrimination
Complaint Process Alleged discriminatory act Internal investigation
Chapter 18: Employment Discrimination
Laws Relating to Employment Conditions & Benefits
Employment Discrimination
Presentation transcript:

April 7, 2011 EMPLOYMENT LAW

The American System: Employment at will. Employee rights to privacy in at will system. Term contracts and just cause. Some exceptions to at will employment. Controverting public policy Discrimination OVERVIEW OF TODAY

About 50 percent of people aged were employed for the month of July Who here has jobs? When you got your job, did you agree to work for a certain amount of time? In America, when you start working at a new job, there is typically no agreed upon length of time of the job. EMPLOYMENT AT WILL

In jobs where you dont have a specific amount of time for the job, the general rule is that your employer can fire you at any time, for any reason. EMPLOYMENT AT WILL

Layoffs, downsizing, and outsourcing are all based on this principle: you can be fired for any reason at any time under most employment contracts. EMPLOYMENT AT WILL

Two Employee Privacy topics: 1.What you do on your own time; 2.Drug testing. EMPLOYEE PRIVACY IN AT-WILL SYSTEM

1.Employer regulation of your free time. Case: Jim and Karen are dating. Karen leaves Dunder Mifflin to work for Staples. David Wallace tells Jim he needs to break up with Karen or be fired. Jim refuses to break up with Karen. David Wallace fires him. EMPLOYEE PRIVACY IN AT-WILL SYSTEM

1.Employer regulation of your free time. Can David fire Jim for dating Karen? Yes. EMPLOYEE PRIVACY IN AT-WILL SYSTEM

1.Employer regulation of your free time. What if David had told Jim not to date Pam, Jims coworker. Could David fire Jim for dating Pam? Yes. Patton v. J.C. Penney (Oregon 1986). EMPLOYEE PRIVACY IN AT-WILL SYSTEM

1.Employer regulation of your free time. What if, after Jim marries Pam, Jim has an affair with Leslie from Parks and Recreation. Can David fire him for that? Yes. Staats v. Ohio National Life Insurance (W.D. Pa. 1985). EMPLOYEE PRIVACY IN AT-WILL SYSTEM

1.Employer regulation of your free time. What if Jim walked into the office and found Michael having an affair with Erin, his secretary. Could David fire Jim for that? Yes. Hillenbrand v. Evansville (Ind. Ct. App. 1983). Could David fire Michael for that? Yes. Rogers v. IBM (1980). EMPLOYEE PRIVACY IN AT-WILL SYSTEM

Other things employers can fire you for doing away from work: Volunteering at the AIDS foundation. Brunner v. Al Attar (1990). Going to night school. Scroghan v. Kraftco (1977). Smoking. Grusendorf v. Oklahoma City (1987). Smokers 34% more absenteeism, 40% more occupational injuries, 55% more disciplinary incidents. EMPLOYEE PRIVACY IN AT-WILL SYSTEM

2. Drug Testing In 2004, over 61% of major U.S. firms use drug testing. Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988: Requires government employees and federal contractors to be drug- free. Is this a violation of your privacy? Mixed treatment in the courts. In public jobs, the court relies on the Fourth Amendment to protect you. In private jobs, courts give a bit less protection. EMPLOYEE PRIVACY IN AT-WILL SYSTEM

EMPLOYMENT AT WILL V. TERM CONTRACTS Most contracts are at-will. But a small percentage do have time terms.

In 2005, Tyrone Willingham signed a five-year contract to coach the Washington Husky Football Team. In 2009, Jim Mora, Jr. signed a five-year contract to coach the Seattle Seahawks. In 2008, Don Wakamatsu signed a four-year contract to manage the Seattle Mariners. TERM CONTRACTS

Mora signed 5-year contract in January But in January 2010, only one year later…

All three were fired before the end of their contracts. TERM CONTRACTS

Only two ways you can fire a coach (or anyone else with a term contract) before the end of the term: 1.For just cause. 2.By buying them out and paying them as if they were still coaching/working. TERM CONTRACTS

If you have a term contract, you can be fired only for just cause. Basically means the employee is doing very unreasonably unsatisfactory work quality and work behavior. TERM CONTRACTS: JUST CAUSE

What is satisfactory work? Four factors: Regular attendance; Obedience to reasonable work rules; Reasonable quantity and quality of work; Avoidance of conduct that hurts employers business. TERM CONTRACTS

Were these firings for just cause? Huskies were Seahawks were Mariners ended up losing 100 games. Still, none were for just cause. TERM CONTRACTS

Instead, all three coaches were bought out. TERM CONTRACTS

EMPLOYMENT AT WILL V. TERM CONTRACTS

Again, general rule: okay to fire you any time for any reason. There are a few ways your employer cannot fire you: If the reason for your firing contravenes public policy; or If the firing is discriminatory. EXCEPTIONS TO AT WILL

1.If the reason for your firing contravenes public policy. Case #1: Fulfilling a public obligation: jury duty EXCEPTIONS TO AT WILL

Case #1: Jury Duty Liz Lemon gets called for jury duty. Jack tells her she cant be gone for jury duty. He tells her to dress up like a crazy person and get out of it. Do whatever it takes to get out of jury duty. If you dont get out of that jury, youre fired. Liz tries, but gets selected for the jury. Can Jack fire her? No. Nees v. Hocks (Or. 1975). EXCEPTIONS TO AT WILL

1.If the reason for your firing contravenes public policy. Case #2: Committing an illegal act: EXCEPTIONS TO AT WILL

Jack tells Kenneth he needs to phone in a death threat to President Obama. Kenneth knows this is a federal crime with huge penalties. Jack tells Kenneth he has to do it anyway or Jack will fire him. Kenneth still refuses and Jack fires him. Can Jack do that? No. Johnson v. Del Mar Distributing. EXCEPTIONS TO AT WILL

2. If the reason for the firing is discriminatory. EXCEPTIONS TO AT WILL

Several federal statutes prohibit discrimination in employment. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of Civil War Reconstruction Statutes. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA). Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA). EXCEPTIONS TO AT WILL: DISCRIMINATION Ferdie

Statutes bar discrimination on the basis of: Race National origin Ethnicity Religion Gender Age Disability EXCEPTIONS TO AT WILL: DISCRIMINATION

1.Individual discriminatory treatment Case #1: Sven the Dane Sven, a mechanic for Boeing, gets laid off. He thinks he was laid off because he was Danish. He reapplies for the job. He thinks hell get it because he is qualified. He doesnt get it. The job remains open. Boeing hires Ole, a Norwegian. EXCEPTIONS TO AT WILL: DISCRIMINATION

1.Individual discriminatory treatment Case #1: Sven the Dane Sven sues Boeing. He claims he was passed over because of his ethnicity. Boeing claims it didnt hire Sven because of his criminal record of stealing from employers. Sven thinks this reason is a pretext. EXCEPTIONS TO AT WILL: DISCRIMINATION

1.Individual discriminatory treatment Case #1: Sven the Dane Must show he was passed over and was qualified. Employer can respond with other reason. Sven can then prove pretext. You dumb dirty Dane. McDonnell-Douglas v. Green. EXCEPTIONS TO AT WILL: DISCRIMINATION

2. Systemic Disparate Impact. When an employer has a policy in place that, while looking neutral on its face, has a disparate impact on races, genders, or religious persons. EXCEPTIONS TO AT WILL: DISCRIMINATION

2. Systemic Disparate Impact. Case #2: The Degree Requirement Seattle City Light has huge crews of people who dig ditches. The only real requirement for this job is to be good with a shovel. But Seattle City Light requires ditch-diggers to have a college degree, even though it is unrelated to ditch-digging. This results in only Norwegians working on these crews and no Danes. EXCEPTIONS TO AT WILL: DISCRIMINATION

Systemic Disparate Impact. The Danes sue. Seattle City Light says its always had this requirement and certainly doesnt have it in place to discriminate against Danes. What result? EXCEPTIONS TO AT WILL: DISCRIMINATION

2. Systemic Disparate Impact Griggs v. Duke Power (1971). Doesnt matter what companys intent was. If you have a test or other requirement that creates a disparate impact, you have to have a business necessity for doing so. The test must be related to the job. Degree requirement not related to ditch- digging. EXCEPTIONS TO AT WILL: DISCRIMINATION

3. Sexual harassment and sex discrimination Case #3: Quid Pro Quo Elle Woods works at a law firm. The partner who runs the firm makes unwelcome sexual advances to Elle. He tells her she will be promoted if she has sex with him, and hell fire her if she doesnt have sex with him. Can he do that? No. EXCEPTIONS TO AT WILL: DISCRIMINATION

3. Sexual Harassment. Later, Elle Woods is at work at the law firm, and many of the men are being gross. They arent coming onto her or demanding sexual favors. But they are making a lot of misogynistic remarks, telling terrible jokes about women, and being very graphic in talking about sex and women theyd like to score with. Is this sex discrimination that Elle can sue over? Yes. EXCEPTIONS TO AT WILL: DISCRIMINATION

EMPLOYMENT LAW REVIEW PROBLEM Tiger Woods and his ex-wife, Elin Woods, have separated and divorced after revelations of Tigers infidelity. Elin has moved to Seattle and gotten a job as a server at Top Pot donuts, the greatest restaurant in the history of the world. She did not agree upon any specified amount of time in accepting the job. Her manager, a deeply moral person who doesnt believe in divorce, learns that Elin is a divorcee. She immediately fires Elin. Can she do that? Yes. (cases we cited on Thursday).

EMPLOYMENT LAW REVIEW PROBLEM Tiger had an endorsement deal with Dicks hamburgers to serve as spokesperson. The deal was set for $1 million per year for four years. The contract allowed Dicks to end the agreement unilaterally for cause but did not explain what circumstances could count as cause. After Tigers many sexual affairs were revealed publicly, Dicks ended the agreement in the second year, claiming it ended the contract for cause. Dicks would have owed Tiger $2 million for the next two years. Does Tigers personal infidelity count as cause for firing? Should Dicks have to buyout Tigers contract?

EMPLOYMENT LAW REVIEW PROBLEM Tiger decides to take a year off from golf and work as an instructor at the Green Lake Pitch and Putt. He applies for the job. He is, quite obviously, very qualified to be a golf instructor. He is passed over the for the job, and the course hires Annika Sorenstam, a famous female golfer, instead. Tiger has a hunch that he was passed over because hes a man, but he has no proof. The golf course says it hired Annika because she has a better short game and is thus more qualified. If Tiger has no other proof, can he win his case for sex discrimination? What if he finds out that only women work at the course? What if he finds out that the female manager runs a sexist blog that includes crude epithets against men?

EMPLOYMENT LAW REVIEW PROBLEM After being fired from Top Pot, Elin decides to try her hand at being a bouncer. She applies to be a bouncer with the company that owns several bars in Seattle, including the Little Red Hen. Upon filling out the application, she finds a job requirement that all applicants be at least 6 3 tall. She does her research and finds that, because of this height requirement, all the companys bouncers are men. The company claims it has no bias against women, it just wants tall people as bouncers. Can she sue for disparate impact sex discrimination?