Discussion on Multi-AP Coordination Type

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1190r2 September 2014 Submission Kaiying Lv (ZTE) Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission Slide 1 Date:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1126r0 Submission September 2012 Krishna Sayana, SamsungSlide 1 Wi-Fi for Hotspot Deployments and Cellular Offload Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0068r0 Submission Discussions on the better resource utilization for the next generation WLANs January 2012 Yasuhiko Inoue (NTT),
BSS Load Information in ax
BSS Load Information in ax Follow up
BSS Load Information in ax
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
2111 NE 25th Ave, Hillsboro OR 97124, USA
Considerations on AP Coordination
Consideration on Interference Management in OBSS
January 2012 Discussions on the better resource utilization for the next generation WLANs Date: January 17th, 2012 Authors: Name Affiliations Address Phone.
Multi-AP Enhancement and Multi-Band Operations
Discussions on Multi-AP Coordination
2111 NE 25th Ave, Hillsboro OR 97124, USA
Considerations on AP Coordination
Discussion on EHT PAR Construction
View on EHT Candidate Features
Consideration on multi-AP coordination for EHT
Terminology for AP Coordination
Consideration on Interference Management in OBSS
Terminology for AP Coordination
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
Consideration on multi-AP coordination for EHT
Functional Requirements for EHT Specification Framework
Consideration on Interference Management in OBSS
Terminology for AP Coordination
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
Multi-AP Enhancement and Multi-Band Operations
Multi-AP Transmission Procedure
Discussion on Multi-AP Coordination Type
Consideration on 320MHz Bandwidth and 16 Spatial Streams
EHT Feature Discussion
Coordinated Null Steering for EHT
Multi-AP Transmission Procedure
Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
Enabling Persistent Allocation for EHT
Coordinated Null Steering for EHT
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Performance Investigation on Multi-AP Transmission
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
Discussion on Multi-band/Multi-channel Access Method
Discussion on 6 GHz Band Support
Consideration on Multi-AP Coordination
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
Performance Investigation on Multi-AP Transmission
Functional Requirements for EHT Specification Framework
Multi-AP Transmission Procedure
Enabling Persistent Allocation for EHT
Discussion on 6 GHz Band Support
Consideration on Multi-AP Sounding
Enabling Uplink Persistent Allocation for EHT
Virtual BSS For Multi AP Coordination
Discussion on Multi-band operation
Multi-Link Architecture and Requirement Discussion
EHT Multi-AP Feature Discussion
Consideration on Joint Transmission
Consideration on Multi-AP Sounding
Coordinated Spatial Reuse Performance Analysis
EHT Power saving considering multi-link
A unified transmission procedure for multi-AP coordination
Power Consideration for Multi-link Transmissions
Consideration on Multi-AP Coordination
Consideration on Multi-AP Ack Protocol
Multi-Link Architecture and Requirement Discussion
Discussion on Multi-link Acknowledgement
Discussion on Multi-band operation
Consideration on Multi-AP Coordination
Coordinated Spatial Reuse Performance Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Discussion on Multi-AP Coordination Type January 2019 Discussion on Multi-AP Coordination Type Date: 2019-1-14 Authors: Name Company Address Phone Email Yusuke Tanaka Sony Corporation Yusuke.YT.Tanaka@sony.com Kosuke Aio Kosuke.Aio@sony.com Ryuichi Hiarat Ryuichi.Hirata@sony.com Sho Furuichi Sho.Furuichi@sony.com Naotaka Sato naotaka.sato@ieee.org William Carney Sony Electronics William.Carney@sony.com Yusuke Tanaka(Sony Corporation), et al.

January 2019 Introduction Baseline PAR[1] and CSD[2] for EHT were created during the November IEEE 802.11 meeting. The baseline PAR includes a list of candidate features that have been discussed. The list includes Multi-AP Coordination that is one of well accepted technologies in EHT. Various types of Multi-AP coordination have been proposed and discussed in a lot of contributions. [3-16] Yusuke Tanaka(Sony Corporation), et al.

Multi-AP Coordination Types January 2019 Multi-AP Coordination Types Multi-AP coordination types have been categorized based on some aspects. E.g. Implementation complexity, MAC/PHY-level coordination. Contribution [15] clarifies Multi-AP coordination types with an appropriate terminology list. The list of terminologies would be a good baseline to discuss Multi-AP coordination technologies with avoiding confusion. The terminologies are as follows; Coordinated Beamforming Coordinated OFDMA Joint Processing Transmission Yusuke Tanaka(Sony Corporation), et al.

Purpose of this contribution January 2019 Purpose of this contribution As mentioned in [15], the list of terminologies is not exhaustive and here are some types that are not captured in the list yet. Enhancement of Handover and AP selection by Multi-AP coordination [13, 14] Transmission scheduling by Multi-AP coordination [6, 8, 11, 14, 16] Some of contributions use terminology “time/frequency coordination”, but the concept of frequency coordination is captured in OFDMA coordination. Therefore here time domain scheduling is focused. The purpose of this contribution is to clarify concepts of these types of Multi-AP coordination. This contribution can be complementary with other contributions [9, 15] which have discussed Multi-AP coordination types. Yusuke Tanaka(Sony Corporation), et al.

Enhancement of Handover and AP selection January 2019 Enhancement of Handover and AP selection This type of Multi-AP Coordination includes; Seamless Handover This technology improve re-connection speed where users move around. (e.g. office, hotspot, home scenario) APs exchange STA info (e.g. address, capability), AP info (e.g. BSSID, BSS color) and RSSI between APs and a STA. APs make decision on which AP re-establishes connection. The AP and STA exchange fewer frames to re-establish connection. Optimal AP selection for association. “AP selection” here means that unassociated STAs select an AP for association. This technology enables fast association with an optimal AP. APs exchange AP info (e.g. BSSID, BSS color, BSS load, capability) and RSSI between APs and the STA. APs announce it in a frame (e.g. beacon) to unassociated STAs. AP1 AP2 STA(moving) Exchange info and make decision Association Re-establishing connection AP1 AP2 STA(unassociated) AP3 Information exchange Information of multiple APs Yusuke Tanaka(Sony Corporation), et al.

Enhancement of Handover and AP selection January 2019 Enhancement of Handover and AP selection Aspects of this type are; Both technologies are related to Association and Re-association. These are realized by MAC enhancement. Phy-level synchronization is not required. Multiple APs exchange information, e.g. STA address, BSSID, BSS color, capability, BSS Load, RSSI between APs and a STA. These are not data transmission, therefore these should be separately treated from technologies related to data transmission. These are similar with coordinated technique[15] from the aspects of frame exchange. Frames are transmitted between one user and one AP. This type of Multi-AP coordination can be called; Coordinated association/handover Yusuke Tanaka(Sony Corporation), et al.

Transmission scheduling January 2019 Transmission scheduling This type of Multi-AP Coordination includes; Transmission timing scheduling This technology can mitigate mutual interference among multiple APs due to autonomous behavior of conventional WLANs. APs exchange traffic info (e.g. data rate, direction, latency requirement) and AP info (e.g. capability, schedule request). APs make decision on transmission timing. APs control downlink transmission by themselves and uplink transmission by trigger-based transmission. Transmission timing scheduling with spatial reuse This technology can mitigate mutual interference among multiple APs and improve spectrum utilization efficiency. Multiple APs exchange spatial reuse info (e.g. parameters for transmission power control) in addition to traffic info and AP info. APs make decision on transmission timing and transmission power. AP1 (BSS1) AP2 (BSS2) AP3 (BSS3) Tx/Rx time AP1 (BSS1) AP2 (BSS2) AP3 (BSS3) Tx/Rx w/ TPC time Yusuke Tanaka(Sony Corporation), et al.

Transmission scheduling January 2019 Transmission scheduling Aspects of this type are; These are expansion of 11ax trigger-based transmission and spatial reuse to Multi-AP Coordination. Multiple APs exchange information, e.g. data rate/direction/latency requirement of traffic, capability, schedule request, parameters for transmission power control. These are data transmission, therefore these should be a part of technologies related to data transmission. Data is transmitted between one user and one AP, so this is coordinated technique [15]. This type of Multi-AP coordination can be called; Coordinated timing scheduling Yusuke Tanaka(Sony Corporation), et al.

Summary of Multi-AP Coordination Type January 2019 Summary of Multi-AP Coordination Type Following Multi-AP coordination types were analyzed. Coordinated association/handover This is enhancement of Handover and AP selection for association. Coordinated timing scheduling This is transmission scheduling and enabling frequency reuse. This contribution can be complementary with other contributions [9, 15] which have discussed Multi-AP coordination types Note that this contribution has no intention to exclude any other types of Multi-AP coordination which is not captured or newly proposed in the future. Any feedbacks to brush up the analysis or naming are welcome. Yusuke Tanaka(Sony Corporation), et al.

Considerations on the baseline PAR January 2019 Considerations on the baseline PAR The current baseline PAR[1] includes Multi-AP Coordination. It reflects the situation that this technology have been actively discussed. There is description of an example of Multi-AP coordination types (e.g. coordinated and joint transmission). As discussed in this contribution, various types of Multi-AP coordination have been proposed and discussed (e.g. Coordinated OFDMA, coordinated association/handover, coordinated timing scheduling.) This contribution reconfirms that the description is just one example and any types of Multi-AP Coordination can be considered to achieve the primary objectives of EHT. Yusuke Tanaka(Sony Corporation), et al.

January 2019 Summary This contribution reviewed Multi-AP coordination types which have been proposed in EHT. This contribution clarified following types of Multi-AP coordination. Coordinated association/handover Coordinated timing scheduling Yusuke Tanaka(Sony Corporation), et al.

January 2019 Reference [1] 11-18-1231-01-0eht-eht-draft-proposed-par [2] 11-18-1233-01-0eht-eht-draft-proposed-csd [3] 11-18-1116-00-0eht-multi-ap-harq-for-eht [4] 11-18-1155-01-0eht-multi-ap-enhancement-and-multi-band-operations [5] 11-18-1161-00-0eht-eht-technology-candidate-discussions [6] 11-18-1215-01-0eht-discussion-on-par [7] 11-18-1439-00-0eht-distributed-mu-mimo [8] 11-18-1461-01-0eht-discussions-on-the-phy-features-for-eht [9] 11-18-1509-00-0eht-features-for-multi-ap-coordination [10] 11-18-1510-01-0eht-ap-coordinated-beamforming-for-eht [11] 11-18-1533-00-0eht-view-on-eht-candidate-features [12] 11-18-1547-00-0eht-technology-features-for-802-11-eht [13] 11-18-1575-00-0eht-further-study-on-potential-features [14] 11-18-1576-01-0eht-considerations-on-ap-coordination [15] 11-18-1926-02-0eht-terminology-for-ap-coordination [16] 11-19-0103-00-0eht-ap-coordination-in-eht Yusuke Tanaka(Sony Corporation), et al.