Volume 87, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
Advertisements

MDM2 (murine double minute-2) links inflammation and tubular cell healing during acute kidney injury in mice  Shrikant R. Mulay, Dana Thomasova, Mi Ryu,
Inflammatory cytokines in acute renal failure
Cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity is mediated by tumor necrosis factor-α produced by renal parenchymal cells  B. Zhang, G. Ramesh, C.C. Norbury, W.B. Reeves 
Loss of Extracellular Superoxide Dismutase Induces Severe IL-23-Mediated Skin Inflammation in Mice  Yun Sang Lee, In-Su Cheon, Byung-Hak Kim, Myung-Ja.
Volume 76, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 81, Issue 2, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 85, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
The Th17 immune response in renal inflammation
Progranulin protects against renal ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice
Volume 91, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Laura Campbell, Elaine Emmerson, Helen Williams, Charis R
UVB-Induced Skin Inflammation and Cutaneous Tissue Injury Is Dependent on the MHC Class I–Like Protein, CD1d  Stephan Ryser, Marlène Schuppli, Beatrice.
Volume 77, Issue 9, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 82, Issue 8, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 2014)
Stromal Fibroblast–Specific Expression of ADAM-9 Modulates Proliferation and Apoptosis in Melanoma Cells In Vitro and In Vivo  Anna N. Abety, Jay W. Fox,
Yiping Wang, Yuet-Ching Tay, David C.H. Harris  Kidney International 
Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 91, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 82, Issue 10, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 83, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 73, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Protective Effect of MFG-E8 after Cutaneous Ischemia–Reperfusion Injury  Akihiko Uchiyama, Kazuya Yamada, Buddhini Perera, Sachiko Ogino, Yoko Yokoyama,
Paricalcitol attenuates cyclosporine-induced kidney injury in rats
Activation of hepatocyte growth factor receptor, c-met, in renal tubules is required for renoprotection after acute kidney injury  Dong Zhou, Roderick.
Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
MDM2 (murine double minute-2) links inflammation and tubular cell healing during acute kidney injury in mice  Shrikant R. Mulay, Dana Thomasova, Mi Ryu,
Volume 81, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 79, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
MAPKAPK-2 Signaling Is Critical for Cutaneous Wound Healing
Volume 75, Issue 8, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 80, Issue 12, Pages (December 2011)
The Loss of MCP-1 Attenuates Cutaneous Ischemia–Reperfusion Injury in a Mouse Model of Pressure Ulcer  Yuki Saito, Minoru Hasegawa, Manabu Fujimoto, Takashi.
Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 82, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Reciprocal functions of hepatocyte growth factor and transforming growth factor-β1 in the progression of renal diseases: A role for CD44?  Sandrine Florquin,
Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 90, Issue 3, Pages (September 2016)
Deletion of the epidermal growth factor receptor in renal proximal tubule epithelial cells delays recovery from acute kidney injury  Jianchun Chen, Jian-Kang.
Volume 85, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Adiponectin: an enlarging role in acute kidney injury
Volume 76, Issue 5, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Osteopontin in diabetic nephropathy: signpost or road?
Genetic deficiency of adiponectin protects against acute kidney injury
Volume 85, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 85, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 62, Pages S12-S22 (December 2002)
Volume 81, Issue 2, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 82, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 83, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 75, Issue 5, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 83, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 79, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 88, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Role of the T-cell receptor in kidney ischemia–reperfusion injury
Volume 75, Issue 5, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 67, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
Volume 76, Issue 8, Pages (October 2009)
David A. Ferenbach, David C. Kluth, Jeremy Hughes  Kidney International 
Sundararaman Swaminathan, Matthew D. Griffin  Kidney International 
Alternatively activated macrophages as therapeutic agents for kidney disease: in vivo stability is a key factor  Senthilkumar Alagesan, Matthew D. Griffin 
Volume 88, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 85, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Fig. 3. Neutrophil infiltration persisted in Bax KOBM → WT chimera throughout the recovery phase of IRI and was associated with delayed functional, histological.
Volume 75, Issue 8, Pages (April 2009)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 87, Issue 1, Pages 85-94 (January 2015) The calcium-binding protein complex S100A8/A9 has a crucial role in controlling macrophage-mediated renal repair following ischemia/reperfusion  Mark C. Dessing, Alessandra Tammaro, Wilco P. Pulskens, Gwendoline J. Teske, Loes M. Butter, Nike Claessen, Marco van Eijk, Tom van der Poll, Thomas Vogl, Johannes Roth, Sandrine Florquin, Jaklien C. Leemans  Kidney International  Volume 87, Issue 1, Pages 85-94 (January 2015) DOI: 10.1038/ki.2014.216 Copyright © 2015 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 S100A8 and S100A9 expression in renal tissue during renal ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. Protein complex S100A8/A9 (a) in kidney tissue from sham (Sh) wild-type (WT) mice or WT mice 1, 5, or 10 days following I/R. Quantification and representative photos from S100A8 (b) or S100A9 (c) single staining in corticomedular region (CM) in kidney tissue slides from WT mice (black bars) and S100A9 knockout (KO) mice (white bars). (d) Representative photos from kidney tissue sections with staining for S100A8 and/or S100A9 or Ly6/S100A8 (original magnification × 400). Protein complex S100A8/A9 expression (a) was corrected for total protein level in tissue. HPF, high-power field. Graph data are mean±s.e.m. *P<0.05, **P<0.005, ***P<0.0005 versus WT sham, #P<0.05, ##P<0.01 versus WT I/R 1. (a): N=8 individuals mice per group, (b, c): N=3 individuals mice per group. Kidney International 2015 87, 85-94DOI: (10.1038/ki.2014.216) Copyright © 2015 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Renal function and damage in wild-type (WT) and S100A9 knockout (KO) mice during renal ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. Renal function as displayed by serum creatinine (a) and urea (b), renal damage markers as displayed by tubular necrosis score (c, d), Kim1 mRNA (e) and Ngal mRNA (f), apoptotic TECs (g) and proliferating TECs (h) in kidneys from WT (black bars) and S100A9 KO mice (white bars) 1, 5, or 10 days after I/R and in sham (Sh) mice. (d) Representative photos of periodic acid-Schiff diastase (PASD) staining on renal tissue slides from WT and S100A9 KO mice 10 days after I/R. Arrow shows brush border; arrowhead shows cast formation (original magnification × 200). Necrosis score was graded according to a severity score of ‘0’ to ‘5’ as described in Materials and Methods section and displayed as arbitrary units (AU). Amounts of caspase-3- or Ki67-positive TECs were counted in 10 nonoverlapping high-power fields (HPFs). mRNA levels of Kim1 and Ngal (e, f) are expressed relative to housekeeping gene TATA box-binding protein (TBP). Graph data are mean±s.e.m. *P<0.01, **P<0.005, ***P<0.001 versus WT (a–c, e–h). TECs, tubular epithelial cells. Kidney International 2015 87, 85-94DOI: (10.1038/ki.2014.216) Copyright © 2015 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Renal fibrosis in wild-type (WT) and S100A9 knockout (KO) mice during renal ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. Markers of fibrosis transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) (a), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) (b), collagen type 1 (c, e, and f), and collagen type 3 (d, g, and h) in kidney tissue from WT mice (black bars) and S100A9 KO mice (white bars). TGF-β and HGF expression was corrected for total protein level in tissue. Collagen type 1 and type 3 mRNA levels are expressed relative to housekeeping gene TATA box-binding protein (TBP). Collagen type 1 (e) and type 3 (g) staining on renal tissue slides were digitally analyzed and presented as % positive staining per high-power field (HPF). Representative photos of collagen type 1 (f) and type 3 (h) staining on renal tissue slides from WT and S100A9 KO, 10 days after I/R (original magnification × 200). Graph data are mean±s.e.m. *P<0.05, **P<0.005, ***P<0.001 versus WT. Kidney International 2015 87, 85-94DOI: (10.1038/ki.2014.216) Copyright © 2015 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Cytokine and chemokine levels in wild-type (WT) and S100A9 knockout (KO) mice during renal ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. Inflammatory mediators keratinocyte-derived chemokine (KC) (a), monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 (b), interleukin (IL)-1β (c), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α (d) in kidney homogenate from WT mice (black bars) and S100A9 KO mice (white bars) 1, 5, or 10 days after I/R and in sham (Sh) mice. Protein expression was corrected for total protein level in tissue. Data are mean±s.e.m. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.005 versus WT. Kidney International 2015 87, 85-94DOI: (10.1038/ki.2014.216) Copyright © 2015 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Macrophage influx in kidneys from wild-type (WT) and S100A9 knockout (KO) mice during renal ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. F4/80 staining on kidney tissue from WT mice (black bars) and S100A9 KO mice (white bars) was digitally analyzed and presented as % positive staining per high-power field (HPF). Representative photos of kidney tissue slides from WT and S100A9 KO mice stained for F4/80, 10 days after I/R (original magnification × 200). Graph data are mean±s.e.m. *P<0.005 versus WT. Kidney International 2015 87, 85-94DOI: (10.1038/ki.2014.216) Copyright © 2015 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Classical and alternative macrophage markers in ischemia/reperfusion (I/R)-damaged kidney from wild-type (WT) and S100A9 knockout (KO) mice. mRNA levels of general macrophage marker Emr1 (a), classical macrophage marker nitric oxide synthase-2 (NOS-2) (b), interferon-regulating factor-5 (IRF5) (c), and alternative macrophage marker arginase-1 (Arg1) (d), macrophage galactose-type C-type lectin-1 (MGL1) (e), and interferon-regulating factor-4 (IRF4) (f) in kidneys from WT mice (black bars) and S100A9 KO mice (white bars) after I/R or in sham (Sh) mice. mRNA levels are expressed relative to housekeeping gene TATA box-binding protein (TBP). (g) Representative photos for Arg1 single staining on kidney tissue slides from WT and S100A9 KO mice, 5 days after I/R (original magnification × 200). (h) Representative photos for co-localization of Arg1 (red) and F4–80 (blue) on kidney tissue slides from WT and S100A9 KO mice, 5 days after I/R (original magnification × 200). Graph data are mean±s.e.m. *P<0.05, **P<0.005 versus WT. Kidney International 2015 87, 85-94DOI: (10.1038/ki.2014.216) Copyright © 2015 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 S100A8 and S100A9 mRNA levels during macrophage development and polarization. S100A8 and S100A9 mRNA levels in bone marrow cells (BMCs) and bone marrow–derived macrophages (BMDMs) from wild-type (WT) mice (a, b). S100A8 and S100A9 mRNA levels in BMDMs from WT mice, 48h after stimulation with medium (med), lipopolysaccharide+interferon (IFN)-γ (M1 polarization), or interleukin (IL)-4+IL-13 (M2 polarization) (c and d). mRNA levels are expressed relative to housekeeping gene TATA box-binding protein (TBP). Data are mean±s.e.m. (a, b): **P<0.005 versus BMCs, (c, d): *P<0.05, **P<0.005 versus medium (N=6 individuals mice per group). Kidney International 2015 87, 85-94DOI: (10.1038/ki.2014.216) Copyright © 2015 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Macrophage response to recombinant S100A8 and/or S100A9. Wild-type bone marrow–derived macrophages (WT BMDMs) were cultured in vitro and incubated with medium, 1 or 5μg/ml S100A8 (A8), S100A9 (A9), S100A8/A9 (A8/A9), lipopolysaccharide+interferon (IFN)-γ (M1 polarization), or interleukin (IL)-4+IL-13 (M2 polarization) for 48h. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α was measured in supernatant (a); arginase-1 (Arg1) (b) and interferon-regulating factor 4 (IRF4) (c) were measured on mRNA level. Data are mean±s.e.m. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 versus control (N=3 individuals mice per group). Kidney International 2015 87, 85-94DOI: (10.1038/ki.2014.216) Copyright © 2015 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 In vitro macrophage polarization in wild-type (WT) and S100A9 knockout (KO) mice. Classical macrophage marker nitric oxide synthase-2 (NOS-2) (a, c) and alternative macrophage marker arginase-1 (Arg1) (b, d) in bone marrow–derived macrophages (BMDM; (a, b)) and peritoneal macrophages (PM; (c, d)) from WT mice (black bars) and S100A9 KO mice (white bars) 48h after stimulation with medium (med), lipopolysaccharide+interferon (IFN)-γ (M1 polarization), or interleukin (IL)-4+IL-13 (M2 polarization). mRNA levels are expressed relative to housekeeping gene TATA box-binding protein (TBP). Data are mean±s.e.m. *P<0.05 versus WT (N=6 individuals mice per group). Kidney International 2015 87, 85-94DOI: (10.1038/ki.2014.216) Copyright © 2015 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions